Skip to content

Meditation and Exercise to Treat Chronic Back Pain

Combined Meditation and Exercise as a Treatment for Patients With Chronic Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03324659
Acronym
MedExT
Enrollment
42
Registered
2017-10-30
Start date
2018-01-26
Completion date
2019-06-30
Last updated
2021-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Low Back Pain

Keywords

Mindfulness, Exercise, Meditation, Back pain

Brief summary

This study evaluates the analgesic effect of a combination treatment of exercise and mindfulness based meditation in patients with chronic back pain. Half of the participants will partake in a 4-week exercise and meditation intervention, while the other half will receive a placebo treatment. The investigators hypothesize that a combination treatment reduces disability and pain more than the control intervention.

Detailed description

Exercise and mindfulness based mediation can both produce analgesic effects in patients with chronic pain, but the mechanisms are not clear. Combining treatments could produce analgesic effects that are additive, synergistic, or counteractive to each other. Here, the investigators examine the effects of a 4-week intervention in patients with chronic low back pain. Patients are assigned to a meditation/exercise group or a control group. The investigators will measure pain and disability using a variety of tools including surveys (disability, anxiety, mindfulness, and pain), pain VAS scales, and quantitative sensory testing.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALExercise and Meditation

The Exercise and Meditation group will listen to recorded meditations (15 minutes) that are based on mindfulness. They will then walk on a treadmill for 30 minutes at a moderate intensity. The intervention is completed five days per week for four weeks.

BEHAVIORALControl

The Control group will listen to a recorded audio book for 15 minutes, They will then sit quietly for 30 minutes. The intervention is completed five days per week for four weeks.

Sponsors

University of Pittsburgh
CollaboratorOTHER
Duquesne University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Presence of clinically diagnosed nonspecific low back pain for at least 6 months 2. Body mass index within the normal to overweight range (18.5-29.9) 3. Resting heart rate 60 to 100 beats per minute 4. Resting blood pressure less than or equal to 140/90 5. Able to independently ambulate community distances without external support (e.g., walker, cane)

Exclusion criteria

6. Age less than 18 or greater than 60 years 7. BMI ≥ 30 or ≤ 18.4 8. Cardiovascular or respiratory disease 9. Neurological disease, unrelated to low back pain 10. Radicular low back pain 11. Back pain associated with neuropathy 12. Diabetes mellitus, Types 1 and 2 13. Diagnosed with a chronic pain condition, unrelated to low back pain 14. Acute pain 15. Regular participation in high intensity athletic/sporting activities 16. Sedentary lifestyle 17. Currently pregnant 18. Current cigarette smoker 19. On-going litigation associated with back pain 20. Inability to walk independently without external support (e.g. walker). 21. Regular participation in meditation techniques or training in Mindfulness-based stress reduction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Roland Morris Disability Questionnairebaseline and 4 weeksThe Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire is designed to assess self-rated physical disability caused by low back pain. The patient is asked to tick a statement when it applies to him that specific day, this makes it possible to follow changes in time. The end score is the sum of the ticked boxes. The score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 24 (max. disability).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnairebaseline and 4 weeksThe Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) is a questionnaire based on the Fear-Avoidance Model of Exaggerated Pain Perception, a model created in attempts to explain why some patients with acute painful conditions can recover while other patients develop chronic pain from such conditions. The FABQ measures patients' fear of pain and consequent avoidance of physical activity because of their fear. This questionnaire consists of 16 items, with each item scored from 0-6. Higher scores on the FABQ are indicative of greater fear and avoidance beliefs
Freiburg Mindfulness Inventorybaseline and 4 weeksThe FMI is a 14-item questionnaire for measuring mindfulness. It is most suitable in generalized contexts, where knowledge of the Buddhist background of mindfulness cannot be expected. The 14 items cover all aspects of mindfulness. The purpose is to characterize the experience of mindfulness. The subject is asked to answer every statement as honestly and spontaneously as possible. Each statement is scored on a 1 to 4 scale and a composite score is calculated from all statements.
VAS back pain (intensity & unpleasantness)baseline, daily (pre and post intervention), and 4 weeksParticipants will be asked to rate their current level of back pain intensity on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10
Change in Cutaneous Sensationbaseline and 4 weeksSubjects will be examined using cutaneous sensory filaments on the forearm with data recorded in grams.
Change in Pressure Sensationbaseline and 4 weeksSubjects will be examined using a pressure algometer to determine a pressure pain threshold, measured in Newtons
Change in Heat unpleasantnessbaseline and 4 weeksSubjects will be examined using a heat block with a determined temperature threshold. Subjects will report unpleasantness using a VAS scale.
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)baseline and 4 weeksThe STAI is an introspective psychological inventory consisting of 40 self-report items pertaining to anxiety affect. It distinguishes between a person's state and trait anxiety levels. The A-Trait and A-State scales comprise 20 items each, scored on a 4-point Likert-type response scale. Higher STAI scores suggest higher levels of anxiety.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026