Skip to content

Thoracic Spinal Versus Epidural Anesthesia for Nephrectomy in Obstructive/Restrictive Lung Disease Patients

Comparative Study of Mid-thoracic Spinal Versus Epidural Anesthesia for Open Nephrectomy in Patients With Obstructive/Restrictive Lung Disease: A Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03324490
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-10-27
Start date
2017-11-01
Completion date
2018-06-01
Last updated
2019-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Lung Diseases, Nephrectomy

Keywords

Mid-thoracic spinal anesthesia, Mid-thoracic epidural anesthesia, Nephrectomy, Lung disease

Brief summary

Patients with respiratory disease have an increased risk of developing complications perioperatively. The use of regional anesthesia decreases this risk with better postoperative outcome. The aim of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of thoracic spinal versus thoracic epidural anesthesia for open nephrectomy in patients with obstructive/restrictive lung disease.

Interventions

Spinal anesthesia will be performed for patients of the TSA group at the T7-T8 intervertebral space, using a 27 G pencil point needle with an introducer (Braun Melsungen, Melsungen, Germany). When correct placement is confirmed by the free flow of clear CSF, 1.5 ml of hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.5% (7.5 mg) in addition to 0.5 ml Fentanyl (25 μg) & 5 μg dexmedetomidine will be injected.

Epidural anesthesia will be performed for patients of the TEA group at the T7-T8 intervertebral space, using the Prefix Custom Epidural Anesthesia Tray with an 18 G Tuohy epidural needle & a 20 G epidural catheter. Patients will initially receive 5-10 ml of a mixed preparation of 0.5% isobaric Bupivacaine with 2 μg Fentanyl per ml volume as a bolus dose via the epidural catheter, this will be followed by a continuous infusion of 5-10 ml/hr started 1 hour after the bolus dose & continued throughout the procedure.

Neuro-axially injected

DRUGBupivacaine 0.5% (isobaric)

Neuro-axially injected

DRUGFentanyl

Neuro-axially injected

DRUGDexmedetomidine

Neuro-axially injected

Sponsors

Nazmy Edward Seif
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Using computer & sealed envelope randomization, patients are assigned to receive either thoracic spinal anesthesia \[TSA group: n=30\] or thoracic epidural anesthesia \[TEA group: n=30\].

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ASA class II or III * Mild to moderate obstructive or restrictive lung disease * Open nephrectomy candidate patients

Exclusion criteria

* Any condition contra-indicating regional anesthesia * Allergic to any of the drugs used during the procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Satisfaction Score24 hoursPatient Satisfaction Score defines the degree of patient satisfaction with the anesthetic experience and is assessed after recovery. It is graded as excellent E (best score), fair F & poor P (worst score).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VAS12 hoursVisual Analogue Score for pain graded from 0-10 \[0: no pain, 10: worst pain\].
Mean ABP12 hoursChange in Mean Arterial Blood Pressure measured in mmHg.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026