Skip to content

Disposable Stress Urinary Incontinence Pessary Device Study

Rinovum Subsidiary 2, LLC: Disposable Stress Urinary Incontinence Pessary Device Efficacy and Safety Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03323723
Enrollment
73
Registered
2017-10-27
Start date
2017-10-16
Completion date
2018-05-01
Last updated
2019-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stress Urinary Incontinence

Brief summary

This study is an interventional, single arm, multi-center study. It will be conducted at sites in the northeastern United States. The protocol will be approved by Chesapeake IRB or applicable local IRBs. The sample size will consist of approximately 50 participants. Participants will undergo an initial control period in which preweighed pads will be worn for 7 consecutive days for 12 hours. This will be followed by device usage for 14 consecutive days where participants will wear both device and preweighed pads simultaneously. for 12 hours.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an over-the-counter (OTC) disposable stress urinary incontinence (SUI) pessary device. Specifically, this study will evaluate the effectiveness of the pessary device by assessing reduction in urine leakage in approximately 50 women with Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI). Efficacy will be assessed by mean pad weight gain per hour, reduction of stress urinary incontinence events per day, and a quality of life questionnaire. The safety of the OTC SUI pessary device will be evaluated by assessing all adverse events, including the results of urinalysis, vaginal swab, and vaginal examination.

Interventions

DEVICESUI Device

Pessary SUI device

Sponsors

Rinovum Women's Health, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Efficacy and Safety Study, Single Group, Open Study, Open Label

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* • Provision of signed and dated informed consent form * Literacy must be in English (able to read and understand Informed Consent) * Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study * Female, aged \>18 * Be in generally good heath as determined by the Investigator * Have a physician diagnosis of SUI that occurred prior to or during the screening visit of this study * Have a \> 3-month history of experiencing \> 3 episodes of SUI per week * Be willing to use the investigational pessary device for the control of urinary incontinence * Have experience with wearing a tampon * The most recent Pap smear is normal within 36 months.

Exclusion criteria

* • Is pregnant, or planning to become pregnant during the study * Has been physician diagnosed with urge urinary incontinence or mixed urinary incontinence prior to or during the screening visit for this study * Is post-partum within 3 months * Has had an intrauterine device (IUD) placement of less than 6 months * Has self-reported difficulty emptying her bladder; * Has a history of Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS) or symptoms consistent with TSS; * Has experienced difficulty inserting or wearing an intra-vaginal device, including a tampon; * Has had vaginal surgery, perineal surgery, uterine surgery, or abortion (spontaneous or induced) within the past 3 months; * Has any Screening laboratory value outside the laboratory reference range considered clinically significant by the Investigator which could impact the safety of the participant or the outcome of the study * Has an active urinary tract infection or vaginal infection requiring treatment * If for any reason, the Investigator decides that the participant should not participate in the study. * Class III Obesity (BMI\> 40.0 kg/m2) * Advanced prolapse * Fit assessment is not successful during screening visit

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Reduction of Mean Pad Weight Gain (g/hr) During Treatment Phase as Compared to Baseline Phase.7 days of the baseline phase and 7 days of treatment phasePad weight gain (PWG) was measured by weighing used pads returned by participants and subtracting the pre-weight of that pad to obtain the total weight of leakage. The total weight of leakage was then divided by the number of hours the pad was worn by the participant to calculate the PWG/hr. The average PWG/hr for baseline was calculated by averaging the PWG/hr for the entire 7 days of the baseline phase. The average treatment PWG/hr for treatment phase was calculated by averaging the PWG/hr of the last 7 days of treatment phase. The percent change from baseline to treatment phase was then calculated. The objective was to show that PWG/hr is reduced by \>50% during treatment phase. Thus, the null hypothesis is that the mean weight gain reduction per hour is \<=50%, and the alternative is that it is \>50%, from the control period (no device) to the treatment period (women wearing the device).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Mean SUI Episodes During Treatment Phase as Compared to Baseline Phase7 days of baseline period and last 7 days of treatment phaseChange in mean number of SUI episodes per day from the 7-day baseline period to the last 7 days of the 14-day device treatment period. Participants will record SUI episodes in the Study Diary during the baseline (7 days) and treatment (14 days) periods. Negative values are indicative of efficacious outcome. Each subject will have a change in the number of episodes per day from the control period to the treatment period. Specifically, the number of episodes will be recorded each day in the diary. For the control phase, there will be (at most) 7 days of data. The mean number of SUI episodes per day will be computed for each subject. The same measures will occur in the treatment period for the analysis period, the last 7 days.
Change in Quality of Life From Before Treatment Phase to After Treatment PhaseBefore Treatment Phase and After Treatment Phase is completeChange in Quality of Life as measured by the ICIQ-LUTSqol - The Quality of Life Questionnaire to be performed at baseline, before, and after treatment phase of the study is based on 20 questions referring to areas which may have been influenced or changed by accidental urine loss and/or prolapse. These questions are assigned a value of, 1 = 'Not at all,' 2= 'Slightly,' 3 = 'Moderately,' or 4 'A lot.' Each area is then assessed on a scale of 1-10 to see how much it bothers them. The Questionnaire is scored by taking the average score of items and then multiplying that value by 25 to put scores on a scale from 0 to 100. A lower score is considered less impact to quality of life and a higher score reflects more impact to quality of life. In the same manner, a reduction in scores at the end of the Treatment Phase from post-baseline/before Treatment Phase, reflects improved quality of life. A reduction in score of \> 3.7 is considered the Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID).
Adverse Events and Labs Evaluation to Determine Safety of the Device21 daysEvaluation and analysis of AEs to determine safety as recommended in FDA SUI Clinical Trial Guidance - The safety of the OTC SUI pessary device will be evaluated by assessing all adverse events, including the results of urinalysis, vaginal swab, and vaginal examination.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
RS-2 SUI Device
Comparing use of device to non-treatment phase SUI Device: Pessary SUI device
73
Total73

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRS-2 SUI Device
Age, Customized
Average Age
53.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.04
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
43 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
73 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex, Female
73 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 73
other
Total, other adverse events
22 / 73
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 73

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage Reduction of Mean Pad Weight Gain (g/hr) During Treatment Phase as Compared to Baseline Phase.

Pad weight gain (PWG) was measured by weighing used pads returned by participants and subtracting the pre-weight of that pad to obtain the total weight of leakage. The total weight of leakage was then divided by the number of hours the pad was worn by the participant to calculate the PWG/hr. The average PWG/hr for baseline was calculated by averaging the PWG/hr for the entire 7 days of the baseline phase. The average treatment PWG/hr for treatment phase was calculated by averaging the PWG/hr of the last 7 days of treatment phase. The percent change from baseline to treatment phase was then calculated. The objective was to show that PWG/hr is reduced by \>50% during treatment phase. Thus, the null hypothesis is that the mean weight gain reduction per hour is \<=50%, and the alternative is that it is \>50%, from the control period (no device) to the treatment period (women wearing the device).

Time frame: 7 days of the baseline phase and 7 days of treatment phase

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
RS-2 SUI DevicePercentage Reduction of Mean Pad Weight Gain (g/hr) During Treatment Phase as Compared to Baseline Phase.-47.4 percent change
Secondary

Adverse Events and Labs Evaluation to Determine Safety of the Device

Evaluation and analysis of AEs to determine safety as recommended in FDA SUI Clinical Trial Guidance - The safety of the OTC SUI pessary device will be evaluated by assessing all adverse events, including the results of urinalysis, vaginal swab, and vaginal examination.

Time frame: 21 days

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RS-2 SUI DeviceAdverse Events and Labs Evaluation to Determine Safety of the DeviceAdverse Events40 events
RS-2 SUI DeviceAdverse Events and Labs Evaluation to Determine Safety of the DeviceAbnormal Laboratory Findings3 events
Secondary

Change in Mean SUI Episodes During Treatment Phase as Compared to Baseline Phase

Change in mean number of SUI episodes per day from the 7-day baseline period to the last 7 days of the 14-day device treatment period. Participants will record SUI episodes in the Study Diary during the baseline (7 days) and treatment (14 days) periods. Negative values are indicative of efficacious outcome. Each subject will have a change in the number of episodes per day from the control period to the treatment period. Specifically, the number of episodes will be recorded each day in the diary. For the control phase, there will be (at most) 7 days of data. The mean number of SUI episodes per day will be computed for each subject. The same measures will occur in the treatment period for the analysis period, the last 7 days.

Time frame: 7 days of baseline period and last 7 days of treatment phase

Population: mITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
RS-2 SUI DeviceChange in Mean SUI Episodes During Treatment Phase as Compared to Baseline Phase-1.00 number of episodes
Secondary

Change in Quality of Life From Before Treatment Phase to After Treatment Phase

Change in Quality of Life as measured by the ICIQ-LUTSqol - The Quality of Life Questionnaire to be performed at baseline, before, and after treatment phase of the study is based on 20 questions referring to areas which may have been influenced or changed by accidental urine loss and/or prolapse. These questions are assigned a value of, 1 = 'Not at all,' 2= 'Slightly,' 3 = 'Moderately,' or 4 'A lot.' Each area is then assessed on a scale of 1-10 to see how much it bothers them. The Questionnaire is scored by taking the average score of items and then multiplying that value by 25 to put scores on a scale from 0 to 100. A lower score is considered less impact to quality of life and a higher score reflects more impact to quality of life. In the same manner, a reduction in scores at the end of the Treatment Phase from post-baseline/before Treatment Phase, reflects improved quality of life. A reduction in score of \> 3.7 is considered the Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID).

Time frame: Before Treatment Phase and After Treatment Phase is complete

Population: mITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
RS-2 SUI DeviceChange in Quality of Life From Before Treatment Phase to After Treatment Phase-4.35 Change in QoL score

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026