Skip to content

Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine for Reversal of Rocuronium Neuromuscular

Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine for Reversal of Rocuronium Neuromuscular Block in Patients Having Catheter-based Neurointerventional Procedures

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03322657
Enrollment
69
Registered
2017-10-26
Start date
2017-11-14
Completion date
2021-02-01
Last updated
2021-11-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Neuromuscular Blockade

Keywords

Sugammadex, Neostigmine, Reversal of neuromuscular block

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the use of Sugammadex for reversing the neuromuscular blocking effects of rocuronium during neurointerventional procedures can speed recovery of neuromuscular function. Half of participates will receive Neostigmine with glycopyrrolate, while the other half will receive Sugammadex.

Detailed description

Incomplete recovery from neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) residual block after anesthesia and surgery continues to be a common problem in the postanesthesia care (PACU). Neostigmine remains the most common acetylcholinesterase inhibitor in the United States. However, administration of the drug significantly impairs genioglossus muscle activity when administered after full recovery from neuromuscular block. Moreover, doses of neostigmine exceeding 0.06 mg/kg increase the risk of respiratory complications independent of NMBAs effects. Sugammadex is a modified γ-cyclodextrin that rapidly reverses that effect of the steroidal nondepolarizing NMBAs rocuronium and vecuronium. Sugammadex forms a stable, inactive 1:1 complex with rocuronium or vecuronium, reducing the amount of free NMBA available to bind to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors at the neuromuscular junction. Unlike neostigmine, sugammadex completely reverses even dense neuromuscular blocks. Patients having catheter-based neurointerventional procedures are kept deeply anesthetized. It is common to find patients nearly completely paralyzed at the end of neurointerventional procedures and have a markedly delayed emergence while waiting for muscle function to recover sufficiently to safely antagonize with neostigmine.

Interventions

DRUGNeostigmine

Neostigmine injection

DRUGGlycopyrrolate

Glycopyrrolate injection

DRUGSugammadex

Sugammadex injection

Sponsors

The Cleveland Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years; * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1-3; * Scheduled for catheter-based neurointerventional procedures including coiling and stent insertion; * General anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

* Suspected difficult intubation; * Neuromuscular disorder; * Renal impairment creatinine ≥ 2 mg /dl; * Hepatic dysfunction; * History of malignant hyperthermia; * Allergy to neuromuscular blocking drugs, Sugammadex, neostigmine or glycopyrrolate; * Perioperative respiratory infections and/or pneumonia; * Intubated or unresponsive; * Pregnancy or breastfeeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time in Minutes to Reach Train of Four (TOF) Ratio ≥ 0.9 After the Administration of Reversal Agentwithin 90 minutes after endotracheal extubationThe primary outcome was a time-to-TOF ratio ≥ 0.9 after the administration of the reversal agent. The TOF ratio was measured in a continuous manner every 12 seconds from the administration of the reversal drug until TOF ratio ≥ 0.9 or until 90 minutes after administration of the reversal agent.
TOF Ratio at 90 Minat 90 minutes after the administration of the reversal agentTOF (train of four), also known as a peripheral nerve stimulator, is used to assess nerve function in patients receiving neuromuscular blocking agents (paralytic medications). Before giving the medications, the baseline must be measured because this tells how much electrical stimulation the patient needs for nerve stimulation without any paralytic on board. Our primary outcome TOF ratio between TOF at 90 minutes after the administration of the reversal agent versus the TOF at baseline tells us how well the treatment is working to reverse the rocuronium Neuromuscular. This is a sensitivity analysis of primary analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Time for Extubation After Administration of Reversal AgentsUp to 4 hours after administration of reversal agentsTime from administration of reversal agent to tracheal extubation
Change of Diaphragmatic Contractility Speed- Sniff (Breathing From the Nose), cm/sfrom baseline to 90 minutes after the administration of the reversal agentThe change of diaphragmatic contractility speed was defined as baseline minus postoperative diaphragmatic contraction.
Change of Diaphragmatic Contractility Speed, Deep Breathing From Mouth, cm/sfrom baseline to 90 minutes after the administration of reversal agentThe change of diaphragmatic contractility speed was defined as baseline minus postoperative diaphragmatic contraction.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Neostigmine With Glycopyrrolate
Neostigmine 0. 07 mg/kg with glycopyrrolate 0.01 mg/kg with ceiling dose of 5 mg neostigmine with 1 mg of glycopyrrolate at the end surgery Neostigmine: Neostigmine injection Glycopyrrolate: Glycopyrrolate injection
33
Sugammadex
Sugammadex 4 mg/kg at the end surgery Sugammadex: Sugammadex injection
35
Total68

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalSugammadexNeostigmine With Glycopyrrolate
Age, Continuous56 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Alcohol abuse1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Arterial hypertension43 Participants23 Participants20 Participants
ASA
II
6 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
ASA
III
64 Participants32 Participants32 Participants
Asthma6 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Cancer2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Chronic pain requiring opioids1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Chronic pulmonary disease8 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Current recreational drug user0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Current smoker13 Participants8 Participants5 Participants
Diabetes mellitus10 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Intraoperative Ephedrine16 Participants9 Participants7 Participants
Intraoperative fentanyl68 Participants35 Participants33 Participants
Intraoperative fentanyl, mg0.10 mg0.10 mg0.10 mg
Intraoperative midazolam, mg0 mg0 mg0 mg
Intraoperative Norepinephrine0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Intraoperative Phenylephrine50 Participants25 Participants25 Participants
Intraoperative propofol, mg200 mg200 mg200 mg
Intraoperative remifentanil22 Participants8 Participants14 Participants
Intraoperative remifentanil, μg0 μg0 μg0 μg
Ischemic heart disease2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Myocardial infarction2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Neurologic diseases16 Participants7 Participants9 Participants
No medical history6 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Obstructive sleep apnea10 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Afirican American
6 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Caucasian
61 Participants32 Participants29 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
46 Participants27 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
22 Participants8 Participants14 Participants
Time-weighted average minimum alveolar concentration0.78 percent at 1 atmosphere0.78 percent at 1 atmosphere0.79 percent at 1 atmosphere
Weight91 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 35
92 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38
90 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 330 / 35
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 330 / 35
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 330 / 35

Outcome results

Primary

Time in Minutes to Reach Train of Four (TOF) Ratio ≥ 0.9 After the Administration of Reversal Agent

The primary outcome was a time-to-TOF ratio ≥ 0.9 after the administration of the reversal agent. The TOF ratio was measured in a continuous manner every 12 seconds from the administration of the reversal drug until TOF ratio ≥ 0.9 or until 90 minutes after administration of the reversal agent.

Time frame: within 90 minutes after endotracheal extubation

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Neostigmine With GlycopyrrolateTime in Minutes to Reach Train of Four (TOF) Ratio ≥ 0.9 After the Administration of Reversal Agent8 minutes
SugammadexTime in Minutes to Reach Train of Four (TOF) Ratio ≥ 0.9 After the Administration of Reversal Agent3 minutes
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.2, 6.5]Cox proportional hazard model
Primary

TOF Ratio at 90 Min

TOF (train of four), also known as a peripheral nerve stimulator, is used to assess nerve function in patients receiving neuromuscular blocking agents (paralytic medications). Before giving the medications, the baseline must be measured because this tells how much electrical stimulation the patient needs for nerve stimulation without any paralytic on board. Our primary outcome TOF ratio between TOF at 90 minutes after the administration of the reversal agent versus the TOF at baseline tells us how well the treatment is working to reverse the rocuronium Neuromuscular. This is a sensitivity analysis of primary analysis.

Time frame: at 90 minutes after the administration of the reversal agent

Population: Eight patients were removed due to missing TOF at 90 min or TOF count not larger than 4.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Neostigmine With GlycopyrrolateTOF Ratio at 90 Min1.07 ratio
SugammadexTOF Ratio at 90 Min1.16 ratio
p-value: 0.1395% CI: [-2, 14]Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change of Diaphragmatic Contractility Speed, Deep Breathing From Mouth, cm/s

The change of diaphragmatic contractility speed was defined as baseline minus postoperative diaphragmatic contraction.

Time frame: from baseline to 90 minutes after the administration of reversal agent

Population: There were 6 (17%) missing in sugammadex group and 5 (15%) missing in neostigmine group on diaphragmatic function outcomes.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Neostigmine With GlycopyrrolateChange of Diaphragmatic Contractility Speed, Deep Breathing From Mouth, cm/s-0.02 cm/sStandard Deviation 1.43
SugammadexChange of Diaphragmatic Contractility Speed, Deep Breathing From Mouth, cm/s0.80 cm/sStandard Deviation 1.51
p-value: 0.0495% CI: [-0.18, 1.81]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Change of Diaphragmatic Contractility Speed- Sniff (Breathing From the Nose), cm/s

The change of diaphragmatic contractility speed was defined as baseline minus postoperative diaphragmatic contraction.

Time frame: from baseline to 90 minutes after the administration of the reversal agent

Population: There were 6 (17%) missing in sugammadex group and 5 (15%) missing in neostigmine group on diaphragmatic function outcomes.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Neostigmine With GlycopyrrolateChange of Diaphragmatic Contractility Speed- Sniff (Breathing From the Nose), cm/s-0.04 cm/sStandard Deviation 0.85
SugammadexChange of Diaphragmatic Contractility Speed- Sniff (Breathing From the Nose), cm/s0.29 cm/sStandard Deviation 1.13
p-value: 0.2195% CI: [-0.35, 1]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

The Time for Extubation After Administration of Reversal Agents

Time from administration of reversal agent to tracheal extubation

Time frame: Up to 4 hours after administration of reversal agents

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Neostigmine With GlycopyrrolateThe Time for Extubation After Administration of Reversal Agents8 minutes
SugammadexThe Time for Extubation After Administration of Reversal Agents8 minutes
p-value: 0.395% CI: [0.43, 1.34]Cox proportional hazard model

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026