Dental Implantation
Conditions
Keywords
surgical guide , double scan , triple scan protocol
Brief summary
16 implant placement by surgical guide using double scan protocol versus triple scan protocol to Evaluate angular and linear deviation of virtual implants and actual implant position in completely edentulous patients according to scanning protocol C1(double scan technique) and C2 (triple scan technique) .
Detailed description
In this study we discuss linear and angular deviation of actual implant position using planning protocol C1(double scan technique) or C2 (triple scan technique) in completely edentulous patient . Both protocols C1(double scan technique) and C2 (triple scan technique) indicated in completely edentulous patient and require C.T scan for patient wearing scan appliance . In C1(double scan technique) , after CT scan for patient wearing scan appliance , two optical scan for the model with and without scan appliance. In C2 (triple scan technique) , after CT scan for patient wearing scan appliance , CT scan for scan appliance alone . Teeth positions in both protocols were identified by radio-opaque scan appliance . 16 implant placement by surgical guide using double scan protocol versus triple scan protocol ( two groups - 8 implants in each group ) to Evaluate angular and linear deviation of virtual implants and actual implant position in completely edentulous patients according to scanning protocol C1(double scan technique) and C2 (triple scan technique) .
Interventions
DIAGNOSTIC_TESTscan protocol
Scanning strategy is based on multiple scans. Essentially one CT scan of the patient (usually with a scan appliance). Another CT scan of the model or scan appliance may be required (double scan technique). Such a second CT scan can be replaced by optical scanning of the model and scan appliance (triple scan technique).
Sponsors
Cairo University
Study design
Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
OTHER
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. patients totally edentulous arches. 2. patients with Bucco-lingual bone thickness \>6 mm allowing flapless implant placement 3. patients free from any systemic diseases that may affect bone quality e.g diabetes.
Exclusion criteria
1. patients with thin ridges. 2. patients with systemic disease that may affect bone quality. 3. Patients with poor oral hygiene and active periodontal diseases. 4. Anatomical situations requiring regenerative procedure.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of angular deviation between planned implants in surgical guide and actual implant position in completely edentulous patients . | immediate post operative | Evaluation of angular deviation between planned implants in surgical guide and actual implant position in completely edentulous patients according to scanning protocol C1(double scan technique) and C2 (triple scan technique) . |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of linear deviation between planned implants in surgical guide and actual implant position in completely edentulous patients | immediate post operative | Evaluation of linear deviation between planned implants in surgical guide and actual implant position in completely edentulous patients according to scanning protocol C1(double scan technique) and C2 (triple scan technique) . |
Contacts
Primary ContactMostafa M El- Maghraby
Backup ContactAmr H El khadem
Outcome results
None listed