Skip to content

Nitroglycerin Skin Patches for Facilitating Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Controlled Trial

NITROGLYCERINE SKIN PATCH VS PLACEBO PATCH FOR ENHANCING CERVICAL RIPENING IN LABOR INDUCTION: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03320187
Enrollment
100
Registered
2017-10-25
Start date
2016-12-31
Completion date
2017-09-21
Last updated
2017-10-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn

Brief summary

This study aims to establish the efficacy of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate as a nitric oxide donor in addition to dinoprostone for induction of cervical ripening in the third trimester through progression in the Bishop's score during 24 hour period.

Detailed description

Objectives: The primary outcome of the study is to compare the changes occurring to the cervix through the progression in the Bishop's score between NO donor (nitroglycerine patch) vs placebo; in combination with a well-established method of induction (Dinoprostone). The secondary objective of the study is to observe and report possible fetal and maternal side effects that may be associated. This will establish the safety and tolerability of NO donors. Research Question: Does the usage of Nitroglycerine skin patch enhance cervical ripening and facilitate induction of labor by Dinoprostone? Null hypothesis: Nitroglycerine skin patch does not cause advantage for ripening of the cervix nor facilitate the process of labor induction. Alternative hypothesis : Nitroglycerine skin patch has favorable effect in enhancing cervical ripening and the outcome of induction of labor.

Interventions

DRUGNitroderm TTS

Transdermal nitroglycerin 5mg skin patch

DRUGDinoprostone

Dinoprostone 3gm vaginal tablet will be used as the study method of labor induction

Sponsors

Dr. Ahmed S. Abd El-Hameed
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Prof. Abdel-Megeeed I. Abdel- Megeeed
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Ain Shams Maternity Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
17 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Singleton living full-term fetus. 2. Cephalic presentation, 3. Bishop score less than 5, 4. Assuring fetal monitoring, 5. The mother does not have PROM,

Exclusion criteria

1. Expected fetal anomaly (eg. by ultrasound), 2. Abnormal presentation, 3. Multiple pregnancy, 4. Non assuring fetal CTG, 5. Fetus more than 90th percentile of expected weight, 6. Previous maternal obstructed labor or previous cesarean section, 7. Maternal obstetric or medical complication, 8. Structural anomaly of the uterus

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in the cervical Bishop's score6,12,18 and 24 hours after administrationprogression of Bishop's score recorded twice during the induction of labor

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Development of any fetal or maternal side effectsFrom the time of administration of medication, cases will be assessed every 6 hours till 24 hours after delivery at time of dischargeassociated headache and nausea (for instance) are well-recognized side effects during the induction of labor
Need of Oxytocin to initiate uterine contractionsfrom time of patch administration up to 24 hoursWhether the case managed to initiate uterine contractions without the need to induce them with oxytocin

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026