Skip to content

Whey vs Casein to Combat Post-inflammatory Protein and Muscle Waste in Acute Disease

Whey vs Casein to Combat Post-inflammatory Protein and Muscle Waste - Combining Endotoxemia, Immobilisation and Fasting in Healthy Young Males in a New Model of Acute Febrile Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03319550
Enrollment
10
Registered
2017-10-24
Start date
2017-12-07
Completion date
2018-09-19
Last updated
2019-04-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Muscle Protein Synthesis, Endotoxemia, Nutrition, Milk Protein, Metabolism, Whey, Casein

Keywords

milk protein, endotoxemia, muscle protein synthesis, whey, casein

Brief summary

This study compares three different protein supplements (casein, whey and leucine-enriched whey) and their effect on post-inflammatory muscle waste in a model of acute disease. Each test person will undergo all three interventions. It is believed that leucine is the primary driver of muscle protein synthesis and therefore we hypothesize that leucine-enriched whey and whey are superior to casein in combating post-inflammatory muscle waste, because of its higher leucine content (16%, 11% and 9% leucine, respectively).

Detailed description

Background: Acute illness is accompanied by infection/inflammation, anorexia and immobilization all contributing to muscle loss, making nutritional supplement optimization an obvious target for investigation and eventually clinical intervention. In the clinical setting large heterogenicity among patients complicates investigations of muscle metabolism during acute illness. Therefore we introduce a disease model by combining Inflammation + 36 hour fast and bedrest. Inflammation/febrile illness will be initiated by using the well-established human endotoxemia model with a bolus injection of Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS), known to cause inflammation comparable with the initial phase of sepsis. The amino acid leucine has shown to be particularly anabolic in performance sports, but little is known about its potential beneficial effects during acute illness. Leucine is a powerful activator of muscle protein synthesis and it seems that protein supplements with the highest leucine content elicit a greater increase in protein synthesis than those with a smaller fraction of leucine. The protein supplements used most in hospitals contain casein derived protein, which has a much lower leucine content than the whey protein compounds typically used in performance sports. This study compares three different protein supplements.The study is an open, randomized crossover trial. Laboratory technicians, test subjects and investigators will be blinded. Interventions: I. LPS (1 ng/kg as bolus) + 36 h fasting + 36 h bedrest + Casein (9% leucine) II. LPS (1 ng/kg as bolus) + 36 h fasting + 36 h bedrest + Whey (11% leucine) III. LPS (1 ng/kg as bolus) + 36 h fasting + 36 h bedrest + Leucine-enriched whey (16% leucine) The test objects will be given 0,6 g protein/kg, 1/3 as a bolus and 2/3 as sipping over a period of 3,5 hour. Muscle metabolism will be investigated by phenylalanine tracer using the forearm model and total protein metabolism using a carbamide tracer. Through muscle biopsies intracellular signalling pathways will be investigated.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTCasein

see experimental description

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTWhey

see experimental description

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTLeucine-enriched whey

see experimental description

Sponsors

Arla Food for Health
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Aarhus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

The three different protein supplements will be fabricated with the same taste, colour and weight. They will be named A, B and C and the investigator will not know which protein is which until all data has been collected and analysed.

Intervention model description

Interventions\*: I. LPS (1 ng/kg as bolus) + 36 h fasting + 36 h bedrest + Casein II. LPS (1 ng/kg as bolus) + 36 h fasting + 36 h bedrest + Whey III. LPS (1 ng/kg as bolus) + 36 h fasting + 36 h bedrest + Leucine-enriched whey \* LPS will be administered on study day 1 and measurements of metabolism will be performed on study day 2 where we see the secondary effects of acute inflammation. The patient will stay at the hospital over night to ensure continues fast and bedrest. The beverages will be isocaloric and with the same total protein content. The basal period will be 2,5 hour with infusion of tracer. Hereafter a total amount of 0,6 g protein/kg bodyweight will be orally administered, 1/3 as a bolus and 2/3 as sipping over 3,5 hours. Muscle biopsies and blodsampels will be collected during both the basal and the sipping period.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
20 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy Male * Age between 20-40 * BMI between 20-30 * Normal health examination and blood samples * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Immobilisation of an extremity, unless a doctor has declared it fully rehabilitated. * Allergy against lidocain or latex. * The use of anabolic steroids * Disease like: Diabetes, epilepsia, infection, cardiovascular disease.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in muscle phenylalanine netbalance over the forearm muscleChange from baseline to 3.5 hours after interventionChanges of muscle phenylalanine net balance (= arterio(phe conc)-venous(phe conc) x flow) from baseline to 3.5 hours after intervention using the forearm model

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in whole body protein metabolism measured by a combination of phenylalanine- and tyrosine tracerChange from baseline to 3.5 hours after interventionChanges in whole body protein synthesis rates (umol/kg/h), breakdown rates (umol/kg/h), phenylalanine to tyrosine conversion rates (umol/kg/h) and net balance (umol/kg/h)
Blood enrichment of essential amino acidsAt baseline and every 30 minutes during the intervention period (3.5 hours)measures of essential amino acids in the blood
Changes in insulin concentrationsAt baseline and every 30 minutes during the intervention period (3.5 hours)Measures of insulin concentration in blood
Change in Intracellular signalling in muscle measured by western blotting.Change from baseline and after 2 hours of interventionInvestigating intracellular activity of muscle metabolism pathways by western blotting.
Energy expenditureAt baseline and after 2.5 hours of interventionUsing indirect calorimetry for 15 min
Changes in Glucose, fat and protein oxidation ratesAt baseline and after 2.5 hours of interventionUsing indirect calorimetry for 15 min for measuring glucose- (mg/kg/min), fat- (mg/kg/min) and protein oxidation (mg/kg/min)
Change in muscle breakdown and synthesis rates measured by phenylalanine tracerChange from baseline to 3.5 hours after interventionchanges from baseline to 3.5 hours after intervention in Ra(phe)=breakdown (umol/kg/h) and Rd(phe)=synthesis rate (umol/kg/h)
Changes in Glucagon concentrationsChange from baseline and to 1 hour and 3.5 hour after the interventionGlucagon concentrations in blood
Changes in GIP concentrationsChange from baseline and to 1 hour and 3.5 hour after the interventionGIP concentrations in blood
Changes in GLP-1 concentrationsChange from baseline and to 1 hour and 3.5 hour after the interventionGLP-1 concentrations in blood
Changes in Glucose concentrationsAt baseline and every 30 minutes during the intervention period (3.5 hours)Glucose concentrations in blood
Changes in heart rate profile upon repeated LPS exposureMeasured at baseline and 1,2,3,4,5,6 and 24 hours after LPS (6-8 weeks between visit 1,2 and 3)heart rate (beats/min)
Changes in temperature profile upon repeated LPS exposureMeasured at baseline and 1,2,3,4,5,6 and 24 hours after LPS (6-8 weeks between visit 1,2 and 3)Axillary temperature (celcius)
Changes in blood pressure profile upon repeated LPS exposureMeasured at baseline and 1,2,3,4,5,6 and 24 hours after LPS (6-8 weeks between visit 1,2 and 3)blood pressure (mmHg)
Changes in symptom score profile upon repeated LPS exposureMeasured at baseline and 1,2,3,4,5,6 and 24 hours after LPS (6-8 weeks between visit 1,2 and 3)symptom score (from 0-5) for nausea, back pain, muscle pain, headache and chills. 0=no symptoms, 5=severe symptoms.
Changes in TNfalfa profile upon repeated LPS exposureMeasured at baseline and 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours after LPS (6-8 weeks between visit 1,2 and 3)TNfalfa blood concentrations
Changes in IL-1 profile upon repeated LPS exposureMeasured at baseline and 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours after LPS (6-8 weeks between visit 1,2 and 3)IL-1 blood concentrations
Changes in IL-6 profile upon repeated LPS exposureMeasured at baseline and 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours after LPS (6-8 weeks between visit 1,2 and 3)IL-6 blood concentrations
Changes in IL-10 profile upon repeated LPS exposureMeasured at baseline and 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 hours after LPS (6-8 weeks between visit 1,2 and 3)IL-10 blood concentrations

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026