Clinical Characterization of Symptomatic Populations

Lid-parallel conjunctival folds (LIPCOF) will be evaluated in the area perpendicular to the temporal and nasal limbus on the bulbar conjunctiva above the lower lid (temporal and nasal LIPCOF, respectively), and classified using the LIPCOF grading scale: 0 = No conjunctival folds, 1 = One permanent and clear parallel fold, 2 = Two permanent and clear parallel folds (normally lower than 0.2mm), and 3 = More than two permanent and clear parallel folds (normally higher than 0.2mm).

Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up

Population: All subjects who have successfully completed all visits and did not substantially deviate from the protocol as determined by the trial cohort review committee prior to database hardlock.

Lid margin evaluation was conducted for upper and lower lids for both left and right eyes. The presence of the following biomicroscopy findings were recorded as No/normal or Yes/abnormal: * Irregularity: Notching of Margin * Vascularity of Lid Margin: Telangiectasia * Meibomian Gland Pouting, Plugging, or Capping * Lid/Lash Margin Debris Findings. The number of positive findings (yes) was reported for each group.

Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up

Population: All subjects who have successfully completed all visits and did not substantially deviate from the protocol as determined by the trial cohort review committee prior to database hardlock.

Horizontal length of staining and sagittal width of staining were graded for both upper and lower lids for each eye. Average grade was calculated separately for upper and lower lids, and the final grade was calculated as the average grade across upper and lower lids. Mean and standard deviation were reported for the final grade by stratum. Subjects were classified according to their final lid wiper epitheliopathy grade for each eye using the following scale: None = 0, Mild = 0.25 - 1.00, Moderate = 1.25 - 2.00, and Severe = 2.25 - 3.00. Final Grades range from 0 to 3, where higher final grades indicate worsening lid wiper epitheliopathy.

Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up

Population: All subjects who have successfully completed all visits and did not substantially deviate from the protocol as determined by the trial cohort review committee prior to database hardlock.

Meibomian glands were assessed in the three regions of each lower eyelid: temporal, central, and nasal. Approximately five glands are expressed per region with each use of the Meibomian Gland Evaluator. Secretions for each of the 5 glands selected within the three regions were graded using the following secretion grading scale: Grade 0 = No Secretion (Includes capped orifices), Grade 1 = Inspissated (semi-solid, toothpaste-like consistency), Grade 2 = Colored/Cloudy Liquid, Grade 3 = Clear Liquid Oil. The total grades for 5 glands per region was calculated for each subject. The total Meibomian Gland Secretion Score was calculated by adding the grades for the 15 glands assessed. Mean and standard deviation for total grade per region and total Meibomian Gland Secretion Score were reported for each stratum. Total scores range from 0 to 15 were lower score indicate worsening meibomian gland expressability.

Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up

Population: All subjects who have successfully completed all visits and did not substantially deviate from the protocol as determined by the trial cohort review committee prior to database hardlock.

Meibomian gland imaging was assessed in each each subject eye, at baseline, 4-Week Follow-up (during lens wear) and the the 5-Week Follow-up on subjects' bare eyes. Meibomian gland imaging is expressed interms of area of loss using the following grading scale: Degree 0 ≈ 0%; Degree 1 ≤ 25%; Degree 2 26% - 50%; Degree 3 51% - 75%; Degree 4 ≥ 75%.

Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up

Population: All subjects who have successfully completed all visits and did not substantially deviate from the protocol as determined by the trial cohort review committee prior to database hardlock.

Limbal and bulbar conjunctival redness were assessed or each quadrant (nasal, temporal, inferior, superior) using the following scale: 0 = Normal, 1 = Trace, 2 = Mild, 3 = Moderate, and 4 = Severe.

Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up

Population: All subjects dispensed a study lens.

Conjunctival staining was assessed for each eye by quadrant (Superior, Inferior, Nasal, Temporal) utilizing the following scale: Grade 0 = None (No conjunctival staining), Grade 1 = Trace (Scattered superficial punctate staining), Grade 2 = Mild (Regional or generalized punctate staining), Grade 3 = Moderate (Significant coalesced punctate staining), Grade 4 = Severe (Patch staining).

Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up

Population: All subjects dispensed a study lens.

Corneal staining was assessed for each eye by region (Central, Superior, Inferior, Nasal, Temporal). Corneal staining type was evaluated using the following the scale: Grade 0 = None, Grade 1 = Micropunctate, Grade 2 = Macropunctate, Grade 3 = Coalesced Macropunctate, and Grade 4 = Patch (\>1mm). Corneal staining area was evaluated using the following the scale: Grade 0 = 0% of region covered, Grade 1 = 10% of region covered, Grade 2 = 20% of region covered, Grade 3 = 30% of region covered, Grade 4 = 40% of region covered, Grade 5 = 50% of region covered, Grade 6 = 60% of region covered, Grade 7 = 70% of region covered, Grade 8 = 80% of region covered, Grade 9 = 90% of region covered, and Grade 10 = 100% of region covered. The following scale was used in the grading of corneal staining depth: Grade 0 = None, Grade 0 = Superficial epithelial, Grade 2 = Full epithelial, and Grade 3 = Stromal glow.

Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up

Population: All subjects dispensed a study lens.

Tear film lipid layer thickness was measured for each eye using LipiView II. The Review Lipid Images screen provided numerical analysis of the measured lipid layer thickness in nanometers (nm) from 10 (thinnest) to 240 (thickest), with a precision of 1 nm and an accuracy of 10 nm.

Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up

Population: All subjects who have successfully completed all visits and did not substantially deviate from the protocol as determined by the trial cohort review committee prior to database hardlock.

Tear film lipid pattern was recorded for each eye using the following categories: None, Open Meshwork, Closed (Tight Meshwork), Flow (Wave), Amorphous, Colors, and Other.

Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up

Population: All subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.

Non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) was measured for each eye to indicate the stability of the tear film. NIBUT is measured as the time interval in seconds after the final blink to the first appearance of distortion in the reflected rings; or to the time that the participant has to blink due to discomfort. Three measurements were taken on each eye. The average NIBUT was reported for each group.

Time frame: 4-Week Follow-up

Population: All subjects who have successfully completed all visits and did not substantially deviate from the protocol as determined by the trial cohort review committee prior to database hardlock.