Skip to content

The Evaluation of Effectiveness Between Empirical and Guided Therapy for Unexplained Non-Cardiac Chest Pain

The Evaluation of Effectiveness Between Empirical and Guided Therapy for Unexplained Non-Cardiac Chest Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03319121
Enrollment
68
Registered
2017-10-24
Start date
2015-03-31
Completion date
2017-12-31
Last updated
2019-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non Cardiac Chest Pain

Keywords

Non cardiac chest pain, Empirical therapy, Guided therapy

Brief summary

This is a prospective randomised clinical trial performed in a single center at Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM), Kelantan, Malaysia. Participants will be randomly allocated into either the empirical group or guided group for 8 weeks.The effectiveness in relieving chest pain (frequency and severity) will assessed after 2 weeks and 8 weeks of therapy with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GERDQ) and Quality of Life Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire, and visual analogue scale (VAS) (score 1-10).

Detailed description

Non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) is very common in the general population but symptom alone or patient's characteristics do not adequately differentiate cardiac and esophageal cause. Cardiologists are usually consulted first to exclude life-threatening acute coronary syndrome. Tests that are performed to exclude ischemic heart disease include exercise stress test and the more invasive coronary angiography. A negative stress test or angiogram or the presence of mild blockage of a single vessel disease will usually be adequate to exclude significant ischemia as a cause for chest pain. The next most important cause of unexplained chest pain would be gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). GERD and its complications of Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma have increased markedly in recent decades, not just in the developed countries but also in Asia. Although relatively less common among populations in Malaysia, there are data to suggest an increasing prevalence of reflux disease largely a result of obesity and increased intra-abdominal pressure. Dexlansoprazole (Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Japan) is a novel dual delayed release system recently approved by the FDA for treatment of heartburn associated with non-erosive and erosive reflux disease. It is unknown if dexlansoprazole is effective as an empirical therapy for NCCP. Another approach would be therapy guided by investigations including high resolution (HR) esophageal impedance manometry and 24-hour pH-impedance studies. Study of esophageal function has greatly evolved with the recent availability of high resolution multi-channel solid state manometer and impedance. Water swallows are commonly used in esophageal manometric studies to evaluate for peristaltic abnormalities. Esophageal pH monitoring does not detect all gastroesophageal reflux (GER) events but with the combination of impedance, this technique allows detection of GER of gas and acid or non-acid liquids. These tests would enable diagnosis of GERD and functional chest pain and thereby allow targeted therapy. For treatment of GERD, dexlansoprazole is effective and for functional chest pain, nonspecific adenosine antagonist, theophylline is proven to improve symptoms in patient with hypersensitive esophagus. A selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) is also effective for functional chest pain , however it is not known if theophylline is more effective than any other SSRIs.It is unknown about the response rates based on the guided therapy approach compared to the empirical PPI therapy. Therefore, the aim of the intervention is to evaluate the effectiveness of empirical therapy vs. guided therapy on symptoms unexplained non-cardiac chest pain.

Interventions

DRUGEmpirical therapy group

Receive extended release lansoprazole (Dexlansoprazole, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Japan) 60 mg daily for 2 weeks.

Receive Dexlansoprazole 30 mg daily for GERD, 60 mg daily for GERD with erosive esophagitis for 8 weeks and Theophylline SR 250 mg daily for functional chest pain for 4 weeks.

Sponsors

Universiti Sains Malaysia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

No masking

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomly allocated into either the empirical group or guided group for 8 weeks.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Months to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Participants with chest pain but normal angiogram or a negative stress test or normal electrocardiogram and cardiac enzyme.

Exclusion criteria

1. Participants with any medications that might affect the upper GI tract, previous surgeries of the upper GI tract and a negative endoscopic examination for peptic ulcer disease and upper GI tract malignancies 2. Participants with chronic, debilitating or life-threatening medical conditions and presence of overt psychiatric or psychological disturbances.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Non-cardiac chest pain symptoms assessed by visual analog scale (VAS)8 weeksVisual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess the non-cardiac chest pain symptoms. VAS is a psychometric response scale. The scale has scores from 0 to 10 with 1 cm interval between scores and with 0 denotes no pain, 5 denote moderate pain and 10 denote the worst possible pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Non-cardiac chest pain symptoms assessed by gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERDQ)8 weeksGastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERDQ) was used to assess the non-cardiac chest pain symptoms. GERDQ is a 6-item questionnaire developed for the diagnosis of GERD in a primary care setting. The total score of 0-8 is interpreted as less likely GERD and total score 9-18 is highly suggestive of GERD.
Non-cardiac chest pain symptoms assessed by quality of life in reflux and dyspepsia questionnaire (QOLRAD)8 weeksQuality of life in reflux and dyspepsia questionnaire (QOLRAD) was used to assess the non-cardiac chest pain symptoms. QOLRAD is a disease-specific questionnaire including 25 items combined into 5 dimensions: emotional distress, sleep disturbances, vitality, food/drinks problem and physical/social functioning. A seven-point graded Likert scale is used to rate the QOLRAD. Lower scores indicate a more severe impact on daily life and vice versa.

Countries

Malaysia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026