Skip to content

The Effect of Intensive Inpatient Attending Supervision on Medical Errors, Patient Safety and Resident Education

The Effect of Intensive Inpatient Attending Supervision on Medical Errors, Patient Safety and Resident Education

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03318198
Enrollment
134
Registered
2017-10-23
Start date
2015-09-30
Completion date
2017-04-30
Last updated
2017-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Focus of Study is on Graduate Medical Education Supervision

Keywords

Graduate Medical Education, Attending Supervision of Residents, Patient Safety

Brief summary

Randomized cross over trial investigating the effect of intensive attending supervision of residents caring for inpatients on the medical service on both patient safety and educational outcomes. Hypothesis: increased attending supervision would improve patient safety and resident education.

Detailed description

Background While the relationship between resident work hours and patient safety has been extensively studied, little research has evaluated the role of attending supervision on patient safety and education. Investigators conducted a 9-month randomized, cross-over trial on an inpatient medicine teaching service where 22 faculty provided either: 1) direct supervision where attendings joined work rounds on established (previously admitted) patients or 2) standard supervision where attendings were available, but did not join work rounds. Each faculty member participated in both arms in random order. The primary safety outcome was rate of medical errors. Secondary safety outcomes included deaths and transfers to the intensive care unit. Resident education was evaluated via a time motion study to assess resident participation on rounds and surveys to measure resident and attending educational ratings.

Interventions

OTHEREnhanged Attending Supervision

Attendings were randomized at the start of the study to begin in the enhanced supervision arm where they attended resident work rounds. They then crossed over to the control arm where they did not attend work rounds. The outcomes were assessed between the two periods during which the attending participated in the study; attending work rounds vs. not attending work rounds.

OTHERStandard of Care

Attendings participated directly in new patient rounds but did not see patients previously known to the team with the residents.

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

We conducted a 9-month randomized, cross-over trial on an inpatient medicine teaching service where 22 faculty provided either: 1) direct supervision where attendings joined work rounds on established (previously admitted) patients or 2) standard supervision where attendings were available, but did not join work rounds. Each faculty member participated in both arms in random order. The primary safety outcome was rate of medical errors. Resident education was evaluated via a time motion study to assess resident participation on rounds and surveys to measure resident and attending educational ratings.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Teaching attending on the medicine service at Massachusetts General Hospital * Resident physician on the medical service at Massachusetts General Hospital

Exclusion criteria

* Faculty unable to complete both control and intervention arms of the study. * Faculty unwilling to participate * Residents unwilling to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measurement of the rate of medical errors defined as preventable adverse events and near misses. Patient Safety Outcome9 monthsUsing a previously validated protocol (PMID:24871238) to assess these outcomes, five research nurses reviewed the medical records, formal incident reports from the hospital incident-reporting system, daily pharmacy reports, pharmacy paging logs and solicited reports from nurses working on the study units and noted any adverse events or near misses. Four physician investigators, blinded to attending and intervention, classified each suspected incident as an adverse event, near miss or exclusion (an incident determined to be neither a medical error or adverse event). Physician reviewers further classified all adverse events as preventable or non-preventable. Medical Error rates are reports as number of events per 1,000 patient days
Resident Engagement on Rounds: Educational Outcome9 monthsTime motion study of the amount of time residents and faculty speak during rounds. Time was measured by a research assistant using a Microsoft access program embedded on an IPAD that recorded length of time. Time measurement outcomes are reported in minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Resident and Faculty Perception of Education, Educational Outcome9 monthsA 20 question survey based on prior literature (PMID: 25340363) asking about resident and faculty experience with different levels of faculty supervision. The survey questions each were followed by a 5 point scale with a range from strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree to strongly disagree. Strongly agree represents a better outcome. There were no subscales.
Deaths, Patient Safety Outcome9 monthsHospital collected data on the number of medical patients who died during the study
Transfers to the Intensive Care Unit, Patient Safety Outcome9 monthsHospital collected data on the number of medical patients who were transferred to the intensive care unit

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026