Skip to content

Observational Biologic or Prosthetic Mesh

Prospective, Observational Trial of Biological or Prosthetic Mesh for Open Ventral Hernia Repair

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03317665
Enrollment
28
Registered
2017-10-23
Start date
2019-02-11
Completion date
2021-06-11
Last updated
2021-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ventral Incisional Hernia

Keywords

biologic, prosthetic, mesh

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence of hernia recurrence with the use of biologic and prosthetic mesh in ventral hernia repair.

Detailed description

Incisional hernias are very common, leading to over 380,000 operative repairs done annually. Despite the commonality of this problem, there has been no single operative repair that has become the standard. This is due to the high recurrence rates with all types of repairs, especially primary suture repair. Because of this, most repairs are done with some type of mesh, either made out of a prosthetic material or biologic material. Mesh repairs, however, have their own problems, namely surgical site infections and potential bowel erosion. Potential complications associated with prosthetic mesh for hernia repairs include: adverse reactions to the mesh, mesh erosion, stricture formation, adhesions resulting in bowel obstruction, enterocutaneous fistulas, injuries to nearby organs, nerves or blood vessels, infection, chronic pain and hernia recurrence. Potential complications associated with biological mesh include: adverse inflammatory response, laxity, eventration, and recurrent herniation. To address these mesh related complications, the separation of components technique was developed to reduce tension on the midline repair and the underlay technique was developed to place the mesh in the retrorectus space. Nevertheless, this technique still has a significant recurrence rate. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of biological or prosthetic mesh in incisional hernia repair, by assessing the associated rates of hernia recurrence and complications.

Interventions

DEVICEMesh for hernia repair

Permacol, Parietex, Progrip, Strattice Perforated, and Surgimend.

Sponsors

Integra LifeSciences Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of South Florida
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female patients \> 21 years old. * Able to provide informed consent in English or Spanish. * Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant, breastfeeding, or unwilling to practice birth control during participation in the study, if applicable. * Allergy or hypersensitivity to materials in porcine-based study products, prosthetic or biological meshes, or personal preference. * Male and female patients ≤ 21 years old * History of drug addiction (recreational drugs, prescription drugs or alcohol) that in the Investigator's opinion may interfere with protocol assessments and/or the subject's ability to complete the required follow up. * Serious or active medical or psychiatric condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may interfere with treatment, assessment, or compliance with the protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence of ventral hernia recurrence2 years from study ventral hernia repair

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of wound complications90 days from study ventral hernia repairComplications of interest: surgical site infections, seroma formation, and wound dehiscence or skin separation
Incidence of enterocutaneous fistula formation2 years from study ventral hernia repair
Mean Carolinas Comfort Scale score2 years from study ventral hernia repairPatient-centered outcome assessing hernia symptoms - minimum score 0 and maximum total score 115
Mean Visual Analog Scale score2 years from study ventral hernia repairPatient-centered outcome - pain score measured by a line in millimeters (0 for no pain and 10 for worst pain imaginable)
Mean mesh deployment timeduring surgeryDefined as the time mesh preparation starts to time mesh placement ends
Time to ventral hernia recurrence2 years from study ventral hernia repair
Mean total cost of hospitalization for primary admissionFrom date of surgery to date of hospital discharge (approximately 3 days)Defined as cost from surgery to hospital discharge
Mean total cost of surgery for primary admissionduring surgeryDefined as cost from preoperative preparation to anesthesia discharge
Mean total cost of narcotic usage for primary admissionFrom date of surgery to date of hospital discharge (approximately 3 days)Defined as cost from narcotic use from surgery to hospital discharge
Mean total cost of readmissions2 years from study ventral hernia repairany hospital readmissions related to ventral hernia complications or recurrence
Mean procedure timeduring surgeryDefined as time of incision to time of closure

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026