Skip to content

Evaluation of the Communities of Healing Mentorship/Support Group Program: Assessment of Preliminary Efficacy

Evaluation of the Communities of Healing Mentorship/Support Group Program: Assessment of Preliminary Efficacy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03317379
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-10-23
Start date
2017-10-01
Completion date
2021-06-30
Last updated
2021-08-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anorexia Nervosa, Binge-Eating Disorder, Bulimia Nervosa, Eating Disorder

Brief summary

The goal of the study is to evaluate two 6-month adjunct interventions (peer mentorship and social support mentorship) for individuals with eating disorders. Individuals will be randomized to peer-mentorship, social support mentorship, or a wait-list and eating disorder symptoms will be evaluated at baseline and post-treatment.

Detailed description

Eating disorders are serious mental illnesses associated with significant morbidity and high relapse rates. Patients are at especially high risk of relapse after leaving structured treatment (e.g., hospitalization). Adjunct interventions targeting patients' motivation and participation in treatment at these times may help patients recover from eating disorders. Project HEAL is a non-profit organization whose mission is to reduce suffering caused by eating disorders, and they have recently developed two adjunct, mentorship-based interventions for patients in recovery. In the peer mentorship condition, individuals meet weekly with a peer mentor who has previously recovered from an eating disorder in order to discuss symptoms and coping strategies. In the social support mentorship condition, individuals meet weekly with a social support mentor who has not personally struggled with an eating disorder in order to engage in activities unrelated to the eating disorder. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of this intervention. The design of the study is a three-arm randomized controlled trial comparing peer mentorship, social-support mentorship, and wait-list control conditions. Participants in the study will be randomized to one of the three conditions for six months. Wait-list participants will subsequently receive either type of mentorship. Participants will complete assessments of their eating disorder symptoms at baseline, monthly throughout the course of the study, and one year after beginning the study. Outcomes will be compared between groups.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPeer mentorship

Weekly meetings with a recovered peer mentor once per week. Dyads discuss eating disorder symptoms and how to overcome them.

BEHAVIORALSocial support mentorship

Weekly meetings with a social support mentor who has not personally struggled with an eating disorder, once per week. Dyads engage in activities unrelated to the eating disorder (e.g., a movie, a community event, volunteer work).

BEHAVIORALRecovery Record use with mentor

Recovery Record is a smart phone or web-based application designed to provide recovery support to eating disorder patients. Includes a number of features aimed to promote recovery, such as a meal tracking, prompts for completing meals/snacks, tracking for additional symptoms such as stress and mood, motivational messages, information about coping strategies, and capacity to share logged data with clinicians and mentors.

Sponsors

New York State Psychiatric Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Since this is a behavioral intervention, participants, care providers, and investigators are aware of each patient's randomization. Outcomes are assessed electronically.

Intervention model description

Randomization occurs at the beginning of each individual's participation in the study. Participants are randomized to one condition and not re-randomized during any portion of the study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Current or past 6 months AN, BN, or BED * Recent (within 6 months) discharge from structured treatment * Involved in outpatient treatment at an appropriate level of care * Medical stability * Access to smart phone or computer to complete study assessments

Exclusion criteria

* Evidence of needing specialized treatment for another medical or mental health condition

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Body Mass IndexBaseline (month 0, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 4, Month 5, Month 6kg/m2
Binge DaysBaseline through Week 28Units on a scale from 0 - 4 ( 0 = 0 days; 1 = A few (1-2) days; 2 = About half (3-4) days; 4 = Most (5-6) days; 4 = All (7) days Range was 0 - 4
Body Dissatisfaction Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Baseline, Month 3, Month 6The Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI) is a self-report questionnaire that includes 8 subscales and we used the Body Dissatisfaction subscale. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-style scale (0 = Never; 4= Often) to describe how well each item describes the participant's experiences. Scores are derived by summing responses across the questions included in each subscale. The range for Body dissatisfaction is 0 - 28. Higher scores are reflective of greater eating pathology.
Cognitive Restraint Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Baseline, Month 3, Month 6The Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI) is a self-report questionnaire that includes 8 subscales and we used the Cognitive Restraint subscale. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-style scale (0 = Never; 4= Often) to describe how well each item describes the participant's experiences. Scores are derived by summing responses across the questions included in each subscale. The range for Cognitive Restraint is 0 - 12. Higher scores are reflective of greater eating pathology.
Restricting Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Baseline, Month 3, Month 6The Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI) is a self-report questionnaire that includes 8 subscales and we used the Restricting subscale. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-style scale (0 = Never; 4= Often) to describe how well each item describes the participant's experiences. Scores are derived by summing responses across the questions included in each subscale. The range for Restricting is 0 - 24. Higher scores are reflective of greater eating pathology.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Peer Mentorship
Participants meet weekly with an adult peer mentor who has recovered from an eating disorder. The focus of meetings is on eating disorder symptoms and how to overcome them. The goal of this program is to reduce eating disorder symptoms directly by receiving support and guidance from someone who has been through it. Peer mentorship: Weekly meetings with a recovered peer mentor once per week. Dyads discuss eating disorder symptoms and how to overcome them. Recovery Record use with mentor: Recovery Record is a smart phone or web-based application designed to provide recovery support to eating disorder patients. Includes a number of features aimed to promote recovery, such as a meal tracking, prompts for completing meals/snacks, tracking for additional symptoms such as stress and mood, motivational messages, information about coping strategies, and capacity to share logged data with clinicians and mentors.
20
Social Support Mentorship
Participants meet weekly with an adult mentor who has not personally struggled with an eating disorder but who is dedicated to offering support. During weekly meetings, participants and mentors (and possibly 1-2 other mentees) engage in activities unrelated to the eating disorder. The goal of this program is to reduce eating disorder symptoms indirectly by exploring aspects of self outside the eating disorder. Social support mentorship: Weekly meetings with a social support mentor who has not personally struggled with an eating disorder, once per week. Dyads engage in activities unrelated to the eating disorder (e.g., a movie, a community event, volunteer work).
18
Wait List
Participants are on a wait list and then get matched with either type of mentor (of their choice) 6 months later
22
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up032

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalPeer MentorshipSocial Support MentorshipWait List
Age, Continuous28.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
27.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
31.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5
27.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
58 Participants18 Participants18 Participants22 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
53 Participants16 Participants17 Participants20 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
59 Participants20 Participants17 Participants22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 180 / 22
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 203 / 1810 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 200 / 185 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Binge Days

Units on a scale from 0 - 4 ( 0 = 0 days; 1 = A few (1-2) days; 2 = About half (3-4) days; 4 = Most (5-6) days; 4 = All (7) days Range was 0 - 4

Time frame: Baseline through Week 28

Population: Number of participants with BN or BED

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 70 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 251 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 17.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 80.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 21.25 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 16.43 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.79
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 91 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysBaseline1.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 150 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 101 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 230 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 141 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 110 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 30.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.58
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 131 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 120.50 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.71
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 241 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 211 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 41 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 26.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 201 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 5 Week 51.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 1
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 10.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.58
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 190 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 6.67 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.58
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 221 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Peer MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 181 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 210 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 223 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 260 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysBaseline1 units on a scaleStandard Error 2
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 140 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 11.33 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.3
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 2.33 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.57
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 31 units on a scaleStandard Error 2
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 40 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 5 Week 51.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.3
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 60.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 71.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.7
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 81.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.5
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 92 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 101 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 111 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 120 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 131 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 151 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 162 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 172 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 181 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 190 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 200 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 230 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Social Support MentorshipBinge DaysWeek 253 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 81.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.3
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 231.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 1
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 160.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 7.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 241.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 171.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 1
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 61.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 11.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 1
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 181.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.2
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 5 Week 51.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 261.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.3
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 191.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 4.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 250 units on a scaleStandard Error 0
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 201.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.3
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 3.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 211.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 1
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 220.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 121.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 1
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 11.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 1
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 21.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 13.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 101.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 141.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.4
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 9.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
Wait ListBinge DaysBaseline1.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 1
Wait ListBinge DaysWeek 151.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
p-value: 0.0195% CI: [0.03, 0.24]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.2895% CI: [-0.07, 0.23]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Body Dissatisfaction Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)

The Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI) is a self-report questionnaire that includes 8 subscales and we used the Body Dissatisfaction subscale. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-style scale (0 = Never; 4= Often) to describe how well each item describes the participant's experiences. Scores are derived by summing responses across the questions included in each subscale. The range for Body dissatisfaction is 0 - 28. Higher scores are reflective of greater eating pathology.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: Not every person completed this measure at every time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Peer MentorshipBody Dissatisfaction Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Month 618.2 units on scaleStandard Deviation 7.5
Peer MentorshipBody Dissatisfaction Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Month 319.6 units on scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Peer MentorshipBody Dissatisfaction Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Baseline23.5 units on scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Social Support MentorshipBody Dissatisfaction Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Baseline19.9 units on scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
Social Support MentorshipBody Dissatisfaction Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Month 319.4 units on scaleStandard Deviation 6
Social Support MentorshipBody Dissatisfaction Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Month 621.2 units on scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
Wait ListBody Dissatisfaction Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Month 620.9 units on scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
Wait ListBody Dissatisfaction Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Month 320.7 units on scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
Wait ListBody Dissatisfaction Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Baseline21.2 units on scaleStandard Deviation 8
p-value: 0.0395% CI: [0.06, 1.16]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.0295% CI: [0.09, 1.27]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Body Mass Index

kg/m2

Time frame: Baseline (month 0, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 4, Month 5, Month 6

Population: Number of subjects with Anorexia Nervosa or Atypical Anorexia Nervosa (n =45). The number of participants with AN or Atypical AN is less than the total sample.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Peer MentorshipBody Mass IndexMonth 521.8 kg/m2Standard Deviation 4.2
Peer MentorshipBody Mass IndexMonth 622.8 kg/m2Standard Deviation 4.3
Peer MentorshipBody Mass IndexMonth 421.3 kg/m2Standard Deviation 3.5
Peer MentorshipBody Mass IndexBaseline (month 0)21.9 kg/m2Standard Deviation 3.6
Peer MentorshipBody Mass IndexMonth 121.9 kg/m2Standard Deviation 4
Peer MentorshipBody Mass IndexMonth 222.6 kg/m2Standard Deviation 3.8
Peer MentorshipBody Mass IndexMonth 321.6 kg/m2Standard Deviation 4.1
Social Support MentorshipBody Mass IndexMonth 321.6 kg/m2Standard Deviation 4.1
Social Support MentorshipBody Mass IndexMonth 421.3 kg/m2Standard Deviation 3.5
Social Support MentorshipBody Mass IndexMonth 221.4 kg/m2Standard Deviation 3.3
Social Support MentorshipBody Mass IndexBaseline (month 0)20.7 kg/m2Standard Deviation 2.7
Social Support MentorshipBody Mass IndexMonth 121.1 kg/m2Standard Deviation 2.8
Social Support MentorshipBody Mass IndexMonth 521.8 kg/m2Standard Deviation 4.2
Social Support MentorshipBody Mass IndexMonth 622.8 kg/m2Standard Deviation 4.3
Wait ListBody Mass IndexMonth 321.7 kg/m2Standard Deviation 3.7
Wait ListBody Mass IndexMonth 623.4 kg/m2Standard Deviation 4.1
Wait ListBody Mass IndexMonth 424.4 kg/m2Standard Deviation 3.4
Wait ListBody Mass IndexMonth 523.5 kg/m2Standard Deviation 3.4
Wait ListBody Mass IndexMonth 121.5 kg/m2Standard Deviation 4.5
Wait ListBody Mass IndexBaseline (month 0)21.5 kg/m2Standard Deviation 4
Wait ListBody Mass IndexMonth 221.6 kg/m2Standard Deviation 4.9
p-value: 0.895% CI: [-0.17, 0.22]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.3295% CI: [-0.1, 0.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Cognitive Restraint Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)

The Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI) is a self-report questionnaire that includes 8 subscales and we used the Cognitive Restraint subscale. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-style scale (0 = Never; 4= Often) to describe how well each item describes the participant's experiences. Scores are derived by summing responses across the questions included in each subscale. The range for Cognitive Restraint is 0 - 12. Higher scores are reflective of greater eating pathology.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: Not every participant filled out this measure at every time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Peer MentorshipCognitive Restraint Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Month 36.2 units on scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Peer MentorshipCognitive Restraint Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Baseline7.1 units on scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Peer MentorshipCognitive Restraint Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Month 65.6 units on scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Social Support MentorshipCognitive Restraint Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Month 36.8 units on scaleStandard Deviation 3
Social Support MentorshipCognitive Restraint Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Baseline7.3 units on scaleStandard Deviation 3
Social Support MentorshipCognitive Restraint Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Month 67.0 units on scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Wait ListCognitive Restraint Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Baseline7.1 units on scaleStandard Deviation 2.4
Wait ListCognitive Restraint Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Month 67.4 units on scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Wait ListCognitive Restraint Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Month 37.3 units on scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
p-value: 0.0895% CI: [-0.02, 0.42]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.1295% CI: [-0.04, 0.41]Mixed Models Analysis
Primary

Restricting Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)

The Eating Pathology Symptoms Inventory (EPSI) is a self-report questionnaire that includes 8 subscales and we used the Restricting subscale. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert-style scale (0 = Never; 4= Often) to describe how well each item describes the participant's experiences. Scores are derived by summing responses across the questions included in each subscale. The range for Restricting is 0 - 24. Higher scores are reflective of greater eating pathology.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: Not every participant completed this measure at every timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Peer MentorshipRestricting Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Month 311.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.6
Peer MentorshipRestricting Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Baseline11.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2
Peer MentorshipRestricting Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Month 69.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
Social Support MentorshipRestricting Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Month 310.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.9
Social Support MentorshipRestricting Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Baseline10.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.4
Social Support MentorshipRestricting Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Month 610.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
Wait ListRestricting Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Baseline8.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.6
Wait ListRestricting Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Month 69.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
Wait ListRestricting Subscale of the Eating Disorder Symptom Inventory (EPSI)Month 39.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
p-value: 0.1895% CI: [-0.14, 0.74]Mixed Models Analysis
p-value: 0.595% CI: [-0.3, 0.62]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026