Skip to content

Ultrasound-assisted Versus Conventional Landmark-guided Paramedian Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients

Ultrasound-assisted Versus Conventional Landmark-guided Paramedian Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03316352
Enrollment
80
Registered
2017-10-20
Start date
2017-10-24
Completion date
2018-01-11
Last updated
2018-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Spinal, Ultrasonography

Brief summary

Multiple passes and attempts during spinal anesthesia might be associated with a greater incidence of paraesthesia, postdural puncture headache, and spinal hematoma. We hypothesized that the use of a preprocedural ultrasound-assisted paramedian technique for spinal anesthesia in patients with old age would reduce the number of passes required to entry into the subarachnoid space when compared with the landmark-guided paramedian approach. The study participants will be randomized into group L (landmark-guided) and group U (ultrasound-assisted). In group L, spinal anesthesia will be performed via paramedian approach using conventional landmark palpation technique. In group U, a preprocedural ultrasound scan will be used to mark the needle insertion site, and spinal anesthetic will be done via the paramedian approach.

Interventions

PROCEDUREUltrasound-assisted paramedian technique spinal anesthesia

Ultrasound-assisted paramedian technique will be used. A preprocedural ultrasound scan will be performed, and skin marking for spinal entry site will be done using ultrasound scan. Spinal anesthesia will be done according to skin marking using ultrasound, via paramedian approach.

PROCEDURELandmark-guided paramedian technique spinal anesthesia

Landmark-guided paramedian technique will be used. Spinal anesthesia will be done using conventional landmark-guided paramedian technique.

DEVICEUltrasound

A preprocedural ultrasound scan will be done using Portable Echocardiography system (Vivid-i, GE healthcare) with 4C-RS convex probe (2.0-5.5 MHz Frequency range).

During spinal anesthesia, 0.5% heavy bupivacaine will be administered into intrathecal space. The dose of local anesthetic injected for spinal anesthesia will be at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist. The dose range of intrathecal bupivacaine will be between 12 and 16 mg.

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Elderly patients (age≥60 years) scheduled to undergoing elective orthopedic surgery under spinal anesthesia * Patients with ASA physical status classification I, II, III

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with contraindication to spinal anesthesia (coagulopathy, local infection, allergy to local anesthetic) * Patients with morbid cardiac diseases * Pregnancy * Patients with previous history of lumbar spine surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the number of needle passesfrom the initiation of spinal anesthesia procedure, until the completion of spinal anesthetic injectionthe number of forward advancements of the spinal needle in a given interspinous space, i.e., withdrawal and redirection of spinal needle without exiting the skin

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time for identifying landmarksfrom the initiation of spinal anesthesia procedure, until the completion of spinal anesthetic injectionIn group L, time from start of palpation to completion of the process, as declared by the anesthesiologist. In group U, time from placement of the ultrasound probe on the skin to the completion of markings.
Time taken for performing spinal anestheticfrom the initiation of spinal anesthesia procedure, until the completion of spinal anesthetic injectiontime from needle insertion to the completion of injection
Level of block5, 10, 15 minutes after the completion of spinal anesthetic injectionloss of cold sensation tested with 2% chlorhexidine swab
Number of spinal needle insertion attemptsfrom the initiation of spinal anesthesia procedure, until the completion of spinal anesthetic injectionthe number of times the spinal needle was withdrawn from the skin and reinserted
Periprocedural painfrom the initiation of spinal anesthesia procedure, until the completion of spinal anesthetic injection11-point verbal rating scale (0=no pain, 10=most pain imaginable)
Periprocedural discomfort scorefrom the initiation of spinal anesthesia procedure, until the completion of spinal anesthetic injection11-point verbal rating scale (0=no discomfort, 10=most discomfort imaginable)
Incidence of radicular pain, paraesthesia, and blood tapping in the spinal needlefrom the initiation of spinal anesthesia procedure, until the completion of spinal anesthetic injectionIncidence of radicular pain, paraesthesia, and blood tapping in the spinal needle during the spinal anesthesia procedure

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026