Skip to content

The Effect of Visual Feedback on Function, Stability and Quality of Life in Transtibial Amputation

Investigation of the Effect of Visual Feedback on Function, Stability and Quality of Life in Individuals With Transtibial Amputation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03316248
Enrollment
24
Registered
2017-10-20
Start date
2017-01-25
Completion date
2017-06-18
Last updated
2017-10-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amputation, Traumatic Amputation

Keywords

Transtibial amputation, visual feedback, rehabilitation

Brief summary

This study was conducted to examine the effect of visual feedback on function, stability and quality of life in transtibial amputees. A total of 24 subjects who had unilateral transtibial amputations, used prosthesis with total surface bearing socket (TSB) for at least 1 year and volunteered to participate in the study were included. Before and after Treatment subjects were evaluated with LASAR Posture for prosthetic weight bearing (PWB), Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and Timed Up& Go Test (TUG) for balance and functional mobility, 2-Minute-Walk-Test (2MWT) for physical performance, Satisfaction with the Prosthesis Questionnaire (SATPRO) for prosthetic pleasure and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) for health- related quality of life. Participants were randomly divided into two equal groups as study and control groups. After the evaluations the same exercises; PWB exercises, balance exercises, anteroposterior and lateral weight shifting, obstacle course, walking on different grounds were applied to the the study group with visual feedback methods and control group.

Detailed description

Inclusion criteria: 1. had transtibial amputation 2. \>18 years old 3. had total surface bearing socket at least one year Outcome measures: * Prosthetic weight bearing * Berg Balance Scale * Timed up &go Test * 2 Minute Walk Test * Satisfaction of prosthesis questionnare * Nottingham health profile

Interventions

in the study group, subjects were applied for example prosthetic weight bearing exercises in front of the mirror. They watched their reflected image while doing exercises.

OTHERusual prosthetic rehabilitation

prosthetic weight bearing and balance exercises were applied to the control group for 9 sessions.

Sponsors

Hacettepe University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* had unilateral transtibial amputations, * used prosthesis with total surface bearing socket (TSB) for at least 1 year * volunteered to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

* had any neurological disorders * had any cognitive problems

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prosthetic Weight bearing3 minutesminimal (Min WB) and maximal (Max WB) values were visually recorded on the amputated side for three consecutive minutes. The average weight bearing on the amputated side (Ml) was calculated by dividing the sum of maximal and minimal weight bearing values by two. The percentage of total body weight (TBW) borne through the amputated limb was then determined using the formula: (Ml/TBW) x 100

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026