Skip to content

Efficacity and Safety of Mechanical Insufflation-exsufflation on ICU

Efficacity and Safety of Mechanical Insufflation-exsufflation on Intubated and Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03316079
Enrollment
26
Registered
2017-10-20
Start date
2015-03-06
Completion date
2017-12-01
Last updated
2017-10-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mechanical Ventilation Complication, Mucus; Plug, Tracheobronchial, Mucus Retention

Keywords

intensive care, invasive mechanical ventilation, mechanical insufflation-exsufflation, airway mucus clearance, chest physiotherapy, peak expiratory flow, pulmonary mechanics

Brief summary

Critically ill and intubated patients on mechanical ventilation (IMV) often present retention of respiratory secretions, increasing the risk of respiratory infections and associated morbidity. Endotracheal suctioning (ETS) is the main strategy to prevent mucus retention, but its effects are limited to the first bronchial bifurcation. Mechanical in-exsufflation devices (MI-E) are a non-invasive chest physiotherapy (CPT) technique that aims to improve mucus clearance in proximal airways by generating high expiratory flows and simulating cough. Currently there are no studies that have specifically assessed the effects of MI-E in critically ill and intubated patients. Thus, the aims of this study are to evaluate efficacy and safety of MI-E to improve mucus clearance in critically ill and intubated patients.

Detailed description

Controlled randomized, cross-over, single blind trial conducted at University Hospital of Bordeaux (France). Inclusion criteria: Patients (\>18 yo) intubated \[internal diameter (ID) 7 to 8\], sedated \[Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) -3 to -5\], connected to IMV at least 48 h and expected IMV of at least 24h. Exclusion criteria: Lung disease or pulmonary parenchyma damage, respiratory inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO2) \>60% and/or positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) \> 10 centimetres of water (cmH2O) and/or hemodynamic instability (mean arterial pressure (MAP) \< 65 millimetres of mercury (mmHg) although use of vasopressors\] , hemofiltered patients through a central jugular catheter, patients on strict dorsal decubitus by medical prescription, and high respiratory infectious risk. Design: All patients will receive CPT followed by ETS twice daily. However, patients will randomly receive in one of the sessions an additional treatment of MI-E before ETS. MI-E treatment consists in 4 series of 5 in-expiratory cycles at +/- 40 cmH2O, 3 and 2 sec of inspiratory-expiratory time and 1 sec pause between cycles. Variables: Mucus clearance will be assessed through wet volume of suctioned sputum through a suction catheter connected to a sterile collector container. Pulmonary mechanics will be measured before, after and 1 h post-intervention through a pneumotachograph (PNT). Peak expiratory flow (PEF) generated by MI-E will be continuously measured through a PNT. Hemodynamic measurements will be recorded before, after and 1 h post-intervention.

Interventions

OTHERChest physiotherapy techniques

Respiratory manual CPT

CPT + MI-E (4 series of 5 inspiratory-expiratory cycles at +/- 40 cmH2O, 3 seconds of inspiratory time, 2 seconds of expiratory time and 1 second pause between cycles).

Sponsors

Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: * Patients over 18 years old. * Patents endotracheally intubated (tubes between 7mm and 8mm of internal diameter). * Invasive mechanical ventilation \> 48h * Invasive mechanical ventilation expected \> 24h * RASS between -3 and -5

Exclusion criteria

: * Lung disease with pulmonary parenchyma injury or diseases where mechanical insufflation-exsufflation use is not recommended (eg: emphysema, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, hemoptyses, airway instability, acute barotrauma). * Hemofiltered patients through a central jugular catheter. * Respiratory instability (FiO2) \>60% and/or (PEEP) \> 10cmH2O, and/or hemodynamic instability (MAP) \< 65mmHg although use of vasopressors)\] instability * Patients on strict dorsal decubitus by medical prescription. * High risk infection patients (eg: tuberculosis, H1N1) that cannot be disconnected from IMV.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mucus volume retrievedImmediately after treatmentrespiratory secretions (ml) will be suctioned by a suctioning catheter connected to a sterile collector container

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pulmonary mechanicsImmediately before treatmentPulmonary mechanics will be measured with a pulmonary mechanics monitor connected to endotracheal tube. We will obtain positive inspiratory pressure (PIP; cmH20), plateau pressure (Ppl; cmH20), tidal volume (Vt; ml). We will combine PIP, Ppl and Vt to obtain static compliance (Cst) (ml/cmH2O).
Hemodynamic measurementsImmediately before treatmentHeart Beat per minute (HB) with continous monitoring
Arterial blood gasesImmediately before treatmentpH (in units) will be obtained from radial artery and blood gases analyzed.
ComplicationsThrough study completionWe will asess the following adverse events that could happen while we will applying protocol: * Mean arterial pressure lower than 15% from baseline * Systolic blood pressure higher or lower than 15% from baseline * Diastolic blood pressure higher or lower than 15% from baseline * Heart rate higher or lower than 20% from baseline * Oxygen saturation \< 85%

Countries

France

Contacts

Primary ContactRoberto Martinez Alejos, Msc
rober.martinez.alejos@gmail.com0033 677952556
Backup ContactJoan Daniel Martí Romeu, PhD
jd.martibcn@gmail.com0034 627 95 48 27

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026