Skip to content

Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Before and After Vaginal Prolapse Repair

Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Following Vaginal Reconstructive Surgery; a Prospective Study to Describe Anatomy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03315715
Enrollment
17
Registered
2017-10-20
Start date
2018-03-01
Completion date
2020-05-24
Last updated
2020-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Brief summary

This study is to describe the impact of vaginal reconstruction, including an intraperitoneal vaginal vault suspension for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) on pelvic anatomy using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis.

Detailed description

Approximately 1 in 11 women will undergo surgery for POP by age 80 years. POP occurs due to a defect or weakness of the pelvic floor, resulting in the herniation of pelvic organs through the vagina. The goal of surgical interventions has historically been thought to restore normal pelvic anatomy. Restoration of pelvic anatomy has been demonstrated following pelvic reconstructive surgery by way of significantly improved postoperative Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ) scale measurements. Furthermore, improved POPQ measurements have also been shown to be positively correlated with improved patient satisfaction. More recently, attention has turned toward using imaging studies to describe the postoperative anatomical changes seen in pelvic reconstructive surgery. The purpose of this study is to describe the impact of vaginal reconstruction, including an intraperitoneal vaginal vault suspension for POP on pelvic anatomy using dynamic MRI of the pelvis. The primary aim is to compare postoperative dynamic pelvic MRI measurements to preoperative measurements in patients who undergo prolapse repair vaginally including anterior, posterior and intraperitoneal vaginal vault suspension repairs for POP.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

TriHealth Inc.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults 18 years of age or older * English-speaking * Undergoing anterior, posterior and intraperitoneal vaginal vault suspension by a physician at Cincinnati Urogynecology Associates, TriHealth for the treatment of symptomatic POP * Concomitant procedures such as hysterectomy, suburethral sling, bilateral salpingectomy or salpingooophorectomy * Willingness to participate in study

Exclusion criteria

* Unwillingness to participate in the study * Pregnancy * Contraindication to pelvic MRI, such as a metal implanted device (excluding titanium) or claustrophobia * Previous surgery for apical prolapse such as sacrocolpopexy or vaginal vault suspension, or transvaginal mesh for prolapse * Physical or mental impairment that would affect the subject's ability to complete the dynamic MRI, including patient's with dementia or those who have impaired mobility * Known findings that may distort pelvic anatomy, such as a pelvic mass, congenital anomaly, or history of pelvic radiation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in H-line, Dynamic MRI measurement between pre- and postBefore surgery and 12 weeks after surgeryThe distance from pubic symphysis to the posterior anal canal
Change in M-line, Dynamic MRI measurementBefore surgery and 12 weeks after surgeryThe descent of the levator plate from the pubococyygeal line (PCL)
Change in O classificationBefore surgery and 12 weeks after surgeryThe type of visceral prolapse (cystocele, rectocele, enterocele and the degree beyond the H-line

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026