Skip to content

Validation of SHADE a Mobile Technology for Monitoring of Ultraviolet Exposure

Validation of SHADE a Mobile Technology for Monitoring of Ultraviolet Exposure

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03315286
Enrollment
111
Registered
2017-10-20
Start date
2017-10-11
Completion date
2019-03-31
Last updated
2019-12-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Actinic Keratoses, Behavior, Health, Behavior, Risk Reduction, Skin Cancer, Ultraviolet-Induced Change in Normal Skin

Keywords

ultraviolet light, dosimetry, actinic keratosis, skin cancer, sun counseling, wearable device

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Shade for the management of UV-induced skin complications and data collected from this study will be used to support the proposed indications for use.

Detailed description

The incidence of non-melanoma skin cancers, due to increased ultraviolet (UV) exposure, has increased by 300% over the past 2 decades. The innovative UV sensor, Shade, is designed to help people manage their UV exposure by quantifying their UV exposure levels through a linked smartphone application. In order to validate the effectiveness of Shade, we propose conducting a study communicating the level of UV exposure and correlating it with the development of actinic keratosis (AK), a precancerous lesion of the skin. We will recruit patients with multiple repeat AK's, as this population continues to develop AKs every year. We will include renal transplant patients. The risk of developing squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in renal transplant patients is 65 times higher than normal patients. They are an ideal patient population for this study. We will evaluate the UV monitor's effectiveness in decreasing the number of AKs over a summer. This randomized partially blinded study will recruit 120 patients with a recent history of AK lesions and evaluate the incidence of new AKs after one summer. We will perform a control versus study group analysis. Half of the subjects (study group) will be randomly assigned to use the sensor along with its smartphone application, while the other half (control group) will receive standard of care treatment involving counseling to avoid sun exposure. Subjects will have regular standard of care visits with the dermatologist who will follow the number of actinic keratosis via clinical exam and photography. The primary outcome will be a statistically significant reduction by at least 25% of the cumulative number of newly occurred AK lesions between the control and the study group over one summer, counted at enrollment and follow-up. In subjects at one study site, skin DNA damage will also be assessed using cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPD) levels measured by ELISA in both sun exposed (cheek) and sun protected skin (buccal mucosa) in both the study and control groups. Secondary outcomes will look at clinical decreases by 25% in CPD levels after using the sensor.

Interventions

DEVICESHADE Ultraviolet Sensor

Patients will wear device for 6 months in addition to their own method of photo-protection.

Patients will use their own method of photo-protection

Sponsors

YouV Labs Inc.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* between 18-80 years of age * given a diagnosis of actinic keratosis in the past year and/or has had a history of \>5 actinic keratosis over the past 5 years * has a compatible smartphone ((Apple version \>= 7, Android version \>= 4.4.2; no Jitterbug or Samsung Galaxy J3) * willing to commit to dermatology visits (including standard of care visits) every 3 months for 6 months

Exclusion criteria

* received UV therapy within the past 6 months * work/lifestyle incompatible with wearing a UV sensor over the course of 1 year * has difficulty controlling UV exposure * has a medical condition judged incompatible with the study by the enrolling physician including the presence of an ICD or an existing plan for extended inpatient treatment * has received field therapy (i.e., entire face or scalp) for the treatment of actinic keratosis (i.e., topical imiquimod, 5-fluorouracil, photodynamic therapy) in the past 3 months * is an employee or direct relative of an employee of the investigational site or study sponsor

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quantification of Actinic Keratosis Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group6 monthsClinical counting of new actinic keratosis at 3 month intervals for a total duration of 6 months. Patient's actinic keratosis were counted at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 months. The average number of actinic keratosis at 6 months is only reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quantification of Non Melanoma Skin Cancers After Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group6 monthsClinical counting of new non melanoma skin cancers at 3 month intervals for a total duration of 6 months. Patient's non melanoma skin cancers were counted at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 months. The average number of non melanoma skin cancers at 6 months is only reported.
Impact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - DepressionBaseline, 3 months and 6 months. data at baseline and 6 months will be reportedPROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) surveys will be given to patients at at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 month . Specifically we will include questions about anxiety, depression, and ability to participate in social roles and activities. The surveys will be scored on a scale of 1 to 5. 1 indicates never, 5 indicates always. An example of a question would be I felt fearful and the patient would score this question on a scale of 1-5 as indicated above. The results are scored using item-level calibrations via HealthMeasures.net Scoring Service. The total raw score (aggregate of the scores) is rescaled into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.
Impact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - AnxietyBaseline, 3 months and 6 months. data at baseline and 6 months will be reportedPROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) surveys will be given to patients at at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 month . Specifically we will include questions about anxiety, depression, and ability to participate in social roles and activities. The surveys will be scored on a scale of 1 to 5. 1 indicates never, 5 indicates always. An example of a question would be I felt fearful and the patient would score this question on a scale of 1-5 as indicated above. The results are scored using item-level calibrations via HealthMeasures.net Scoring Service. The total raw score (aggregate of the scores) is rescaled into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.
Impact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and ActivitiesBaseline, 3 months and 6 months. data at baseline and 6 months will be reportedPROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) surveys will be given to patients at at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 month . Specifically we will include questions about anxiety, depression, and ability to participate in social roles and activities. The surveys will be scored on a scale of 1 to 5. 1 indicates never, 5 indicates always. An example of a question would be I felt fearful and the patient would score this question on a scale of 1-5 as indicated above. The results are scored using item-level calibrations via HealthMeasures.net Scoring Service. The total raw score (aggregate of the scores) is rescaled into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.
Quantification of Melanoma Skin Cancers After Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group6 monthsClinical counting of new non melanoma skin cancers at 3 month intervals for a total duration of 6 months. Patient's melanoma skin cancers were counted at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 months. The number of melanoma skin cancers at each time point is reported.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

We recruited 14 patients with kidney transplantation & actinic keratosis from 10/2018 to 4/2018. We recruited another 97 patients with only a history of actinic keratosis without a history of kidney transplantation between 4/2018 and 7/2018. Patient were all recruited at one academic institution. We are presenting the data of the 97 patients.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Device: SHADE Ultraviolet Sensor
Patients will receive an Ultraviolet (UV) sensor that will quantify their UV exposure through a linked smartphone application. Patients will also receive clinical counseling by their dermatologist regarding sun protection and avoidance SHADE Ultraviolet Sensor: Patients will wear device for 6 months in addition to their own method of photo-protection. Standard of care counseling: Patients will use their own method of photo-protection
50
Standard of Care Counseling
Patients will receive clinical counseling by their dermatologist regarding sun protection and avoidance Standard of care counseling: Patients will use their own method of photo-protection
47
Total97

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up03
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandard of Care CounselingTotalDevice: SHADE Ultraviolet Sensor
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
35 Participants60 Participants25 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants37 Participants25 Participants
Baseline measurement of Actinic keratosis6.212 lesions6.319 lesions6.42 lesions
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
47 Participants92 Participants45 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
47 Participants96 Participants49 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
47 participants97 participants50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants34 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants63 Participants36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 500 / 47
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 500 / 47
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 500 / 47

Outcome results

Primary

Quantification of Actinic Keratosis Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group

Clinical counting of new actinic keratosis at 3 month intervals for a total duration of 6 months. Patient's actinic keratosis were counted at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 months. The average number of actinic keratosis at 6 months is only reported.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: We are posting the results of patients without a transplant (97). Out of the 97 subjects, in the device group, 49 subjects completed the study. 1 subject was removed for protocol violation. In the control group, 43 subjects completed the study, 3 subjects were lost to follow up and 1 subject was removed for protocol violation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Device: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorQuantification of Actinic Keratosis Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group4.53 lesions
Standard of Care CounselingQuantification of Actinic Keratosis Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group4.74 lesions
p-value: 0.8t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Impact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities

PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) surveys will be given to patients at at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 month . Specifically we will include questions about anxiety, depression, and ability to participate in social roles and activities. The surveys will be scored on a scale of 1 to 5. 1 indicates never, 5 indicates always. An example of a question would be I felt fearful and the patient would score this question on a scale of 1-5 as indicated above. The results are scored using item-level calibrations via HealthMeasures.net Scoring Service. The total raw score (aggregate of the scores) is rescaled into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months and 6 months. data at baseline and 6 months will be reported

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Device: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorImpact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activitiesbaseline57 units on a scale
Device: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorImpact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities6 months55.8 units on a scale
Standard of Care CounselingImpact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activitiesbaseline60 units on a scale
Standard of Care CounselingImpact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities6 months62.1 units on a scale
Comparison: baseline data is reported herep-value: 0.07t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: 6 month data is reported herep-value: 0.0002t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Impact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Anxiety

PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) surveys will be given to patients at at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 month . Specifically we will include questions about anxiety, depression, and ability to participate in social roles and activities. The surveys will be scored on a scale of 1 to 5. 1 indicates never, 5 indicates always. An example of a question would be I felt fearful and the patient would score this question on a scale of 1-5 as indicated above. The results are scored using item-level calibrations via HealthMeasures.net Scoring Service. The total raw score (aggregate of the scores) is rescaled into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months and 6 months. data at baseline and 6 months will be reported

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Device: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorImpact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Anxietybaseline46.2 units on a scale
Device: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorImpact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Anxiety6 months46.3 units on a scale
Standard of Care CounselingImpact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Anxietybaseline44.1 units on a scale
Standard of Care CounselingImpact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Anxiety6 months44.7 units on a scale
Comparison: Baseline data is reported here.p-value: 0.2t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: 6 month data is reported herep-value: 0.4t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Impact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Depression

PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) surveys will be given to patients at at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 month . Specifically we will include questions about anxiety, depression, and ability to participate in social roles and activities. The surveys will be scored on a scale of 1 to 5. 1 indicates never, 5 indicates always. An example of a question would be I felt fearful and the patient would score this question on a scale of 1-5 as indicated above. The results are scored using item-level calibrations via HealthMeasures.net Scoring Service. The total raw score (aggregate of the scores) is rescaled into a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months and 6 months. data at baseline and 6 months will be reported

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Device: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorImpact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Depressionbaseline44.2 units on a scale
Device: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorImpact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Depression6 months45.3 units on a scale
Standard of Care CounselingImpact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Depressionbaseline43.6 units on a scale
Standard of Care CounselingImpact of UV Sensor (SHADE) on Patient's Quality of Life as Measured by PROMIS - Depression6 months43.7 units on a scale
Comparison: Baseline results are reported here.p-value: 0.6t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: 6 month data is reported herep-value: 0.3t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Quantification of Melanoma Skin Cancers After Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group

Clinical counting of new non melanoma skin cancers at 3 month intervals for a total duration of 6 months. Patient's melanoma skin cancers were counted at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 months. The number of melanoma skin cancers at each time point is reported.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: We are posting the results of patients without a transplant (97). Out of the 97 subjects, in the device group, 49 subjects completed the study. 1 subject was removed for protocol violation. In the control group, 43 subjects completed the study, 3 subjects were lost to follow up and 1 subject was removed for protocol violation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Device: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorQuantification of Melanoma Skin Cancers After Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Groupbaseline0 lesions
Device: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorQuantification of Melanoma Skin Cancers After Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group3 months0 lesions
Device: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorQuantification of Melanoma Skin Cancers After Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group6 months0 lesions
Standard of Care CounselingQuantification of Melanoma Skin Cancers After Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Groupbaseline1 lesions
Standard of Care CounselingQuantification of Melanoma Skin Cancers After Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group3 months1 lesions
Standard of Care CounselingQuantification of Melanoma Skin Cancers After Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group6 months1 lesions
Secondary

Quantification of Non Melanoma Skin Cancers After Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group

Clinical counting of new non melanoma skin cancers at 3 month intervals for a total duration of 6 months. Patient's non melanoma skin cancers were counted at baseline (0 months), 3 months and 6 months. The average number of non melanoma skin cancers at 6 months is only reported.

Time frame: 6 months

Population: We are posting the results of patients without a transplant (97). Out of the 97 subjects, in the device group, 49 subjects completed the study. 1 subject was removed for protocol violation. In the control group, 43 subjects completed the study, 3 subjects were lost to follow up and 1 subject was removed for protocol violation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Device: SHADE Ultraviolet SensorQuantification of Non Melanoma Skin Cancers After Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group0.04 lesions
Standard of Care CounselingQuantification of Non Melanoma Skin Cancers After Using the UV Sensor vs. Control Group0.232 lesions
p-value: 0.03t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026