Skip to content

Best Approach in Recurrent-Ovarian-Cancer-with Cediranib-Olaparib

Italian Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Weekly Paclitaxel vs. Cediranib-Olaparib (Continuous vs. Intermittent) in Patients With Platinum Resistant High Grade Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03314740
Acronym
BAROCCO
Enrollment
123
Registered
2017-10-19
Start date
2017-06-12
Completion date
2021-04-01
Last updated
2025-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ovarian Neoplasms

Brief summary

This is a Phase II, randomized, multi-centre study aiming at comparing the efficacy of Olaparib and Cediranib vs. weekly Paclitaxel in terms of progression free survival (PFS) in platinum refractory or resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. Patients will be randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to three treatment arms: * Arm A: Paclitaxel 80 mg/mq every week * Arm B: Cediranib 20 mg/day + Olaparib 600 mg / day (i.e. 300 mg BD) given every day * Arm C: Cediranib 20 mg/day given 5 days per weeks + Olaparib 600 mg / day (i.e. 300 mg BD) given 7 days per weeks

Detailed description

Both the experimental arms (Arm B and C) will be compared with Arm A in terms of PFS. If both superior to the control (Arm A), they will be compared in terms of gastrointestinal safety.

Interventions

DRUGPaclitaxel

Comparator active compound

DRUGCediranib

Experimental compound

DRUGOlaparib

Experimental compound

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients affected by pathologically confirmed high-grade epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. 2. Relapsed/progressive disease within 6 months from last platinum-based chemotherapy (platinum resistant/refractory disease). 3. Any line of treatment (after the first). 4. Any last chemotherapy line, including Paclitaxel, that should have been administered at least 6 months before the study beginning. 5. Patients must be women \> 18 years of age. 6. Patients must have normal organ and bone marrow function measured within 28 days prior to administration of study treatment as defined below: * Haemoglobin ≥ 10.0 g/dL and no blood transfusions in the 28 days prior to entry/randomization - Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 x 109/L * White blood cells (WBC) \> 3x109/L * Platelet count ≥ 100 x 109/L * Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x institutional Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) * AST (SGOT)/ALT (SGPT) ≤ 2.5 x institutional Upper Limit of Normal, unless liver metastases are present in which case it must be ≤ 5x ULN * Creatinine clearance estimated using the Cockcroft-Gault equation ≥51 mL/min,. 7. ECOG performance status 0-1. 8. Patients must have a life expectancy ≥ 16 weeks. 9. Evidence of non-childbearing status for women of childbearing potential (negative urine or serum pregnancy test within 28 days of study treatment, confirmed prior to treatment on day 1 or postmenopausal women. Postmenopausal status is defined as: * Amenorrheic for 1 year or more following cessation of exogenous hormonal treatments * LH and FSH levels in the post-menopausal range for women under 50 * Radiation-induced oophorectomy with last menses \>1 year ago, * Chemotherapy-induced menopause with \>1 year interval since last menses * Surgical sterilization (bilateral oophorectomy or hysterectomy) 10. Patient is willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study including undergoing treatment, scheduled visits and examinations including follow up. 11. At least one lesion (measurable as defined by RECIST 1.1) that can be accurately assessed by CT scan or MRI with Chest X-ray at baseline and follow up visits. 12. BRCA1-2 mutation status known. In case of BRCA status unknown, the BRCA test must be performed before the randomization or, if not feasible, within the end-of the study treatment. 13. Provision of informed consent prior to any study specific procedures. In case of patients unable to give written informed consent, is necessary to have the subject or legal representative sign, but in any case a witness must be present and sign and date with the person providing informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Any previous treatment with a PARP inhibitor, including Olaparib. 2. Prior treatment with Cediranib (previous bevacizumab or other antiangiogenic drugs are allowed) 3. Previous progression to weekly Paclitaxel 4. Patients with second primary cancer, except: adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer, curatively treated in-situ cancer of the cervix, or other solid tumours curatively treated with no evidence of disease for ≥ 5 years 5. Patients receiving any systemic chemotherapy, radiotherapy (except for palliative reasons), within 2 weeks from the last dose prior to study treatment (or a longer period depending on the defined characteristics of the agents used). The patient can receive bisphosphonates for bone metastases, before and during the study as long as these were started at least 4 weeks prior to treatment with study drug. 6. Concomitant use of known strong CYP3A inhibitors (eg. itraconazole, telithromycin, clarithromycin, protease inhibitors boosted with ritonavir or cobicistat, indinavir, saquinavir, nelfinavir, boceprevir, telaprevir) or moderate CYP3A inhibitors (eg. ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, diltiazem, fluconazole, verapamil). The required washout period prior to starting Olaparib is 2 weeks. 7. Concomitant use of known strong (eg. phenobarbital, enzalutamide, phenytoin, rifampicin, rifabutin, rifapentine, carbamazepine, nevirapine and St John's Wort ) or moderate CYP3A inducers (eg. bosentan, efavirenz, modafinil). The required washout period prior to starting Olaparib is 5 weeks for enzalutamide or phenobarbital and 3 weeks for other agents. 8. Persistent toxicities (\>=CTCAE grade 2) with the exception of alopecia, caused by previous cancer therapy. 9. Resting ECG with QTc \> 470msec on 2 or more time points within a 24 hour period or family history of long QT syndrome. 10. Greater than +1 proteinuria on two consecutive dipsticks taken no less than 1 week apart unless urinary protein \< 1.5g in a 24 hr period or urine protein/creatinine ratio \< 1.5. 11. A history of poorly controlled hypertension or resting blood pressure \>150/100 mmHg in the presence or absence of a stable regimen of anti-hypertensive therapy (measurements will be made after the patient has been resting supine for a minimum of 5 minutes. Two or more readings should be taken at 2-minute intervals and averaged. If the first two diastolic readings differ by more than 5 mmHg, then an additional reading should be obtained and averaged). 12. Blood transfusions within 28 days prior to study start. 13. Features suggestive of Myelodysplastic syndrome or Acute myeloid leukemia (MDS/AML) on peripheral blood smear. 14. Patients with symptomatic uncontrolled brain metastases. A scan to confirm the absence of brain metastases is not required. The patient can receive a stable dose of corticosteroids before and during the study as long as these were started at least 28 days prior to treatment. 15. Major surgery within 4 weeks of starting study treatment and patients must have recovered from any effects of any major surgery. 16. Patients considered at poor medical risk due to a serious, uncontrolled medical disorder, non-malignant systemic disease or active, uncontrolled infection. Examples include, but are not limited to, uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmia, recent (within 3 months) myocardial infarction, unstable spinal cord compression (untreated and unstable for at least 28 days prior to study entry), superior vena cava syndrome, extensive bilateral lung disease on HRCT scan or any psychiatric disorder that prohibits obtaining informed consent. 17. Patients unable to swallow medications and patients with gastrointestinal disorders likely to interfere with absorption of the study medication. 18. Breast feeding women. 19. Immunocompromised patients, e.g., patients who are known to be serologically positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and are receiving antiviral therapy. 20. Patients with known active hepatic disease (i.e., Hepatitis B or C). 21. Patients with a known hypersensitivity to Olaparib, Cediranib or any of the excipients of the products. 22. Patients with a known hypersensitivity to Paclitaxel. 23. Patients with uncontrolled seizures. 24. History of abdominal fistula or gastrointestinal perforation. 25. Prior gastrectomy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy: Progression Free Survival (PFS)An average of 30 months for each participantPFS is defined as time from randomization to the date of first progression or death for any cause, whichever comes first. Progression was established as the radiological disease progression according to RECIST 1.1 (as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions) or to clinical assessment in case radiological evaluation is not feasible due to clinical condition.
Safety: Number of Evacuations Per DayEvacuation were collected daily for the first four weeks of treatment of experimental drugsNumber of evacuations per day used as an index of gastro-intestinal toxicity profile of experimental drugs

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy: Overall Survival (OS)Up to one year after the last patient enrolledOS is defined as time from randomization to the date of death for any cause
Efficacy: Quality of LifeUp to sixth month of study treatmentQuality of Life evaluated by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian (FACT-O) questionnaire
Safety: Maximum Toxicity GradeUp to 30 days after the end of treatmentMaximum toxicity grade experienced by each patient, for each toxicity, according to NCI-CTCAE v. 4.03
Safety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityAdverse events were collected at the end of each cycle for the duration of treatment for each participant (an average of 3.5 months) and following 30 days after the end of treatment.Number of patients experiencing grade 3-4 toxicity for each toxicity according to NCI-CTCAE v. 4.03
Safety: Type, Frequency and Nature of SAEsUp to 30 days after the end of treatmentType, frequency and nature of SAEs, according to NCI-CTCAE v. 4.03
Efficacy: Objective Response Rate (ORR)Disease assessments were scheduled every 8 weeks (+/- 1 week) from randomization for all treatment duration (an average of 3.5 months).Percentage of patients with an objective response as determined by RECIST 1.1
Safety: Number of Patients With at Least a SUSARUp to 30 days after the end of treatmentNumber of patients with at least a SUSAR, according to NCI-CTCAE v. 4.03
Compliance: Number of Administered CyclesUp to one year after the last patient enrolledThe endpoint for compliance is the number of administered cycles.
Compliance: Reasons for Discontinuation and Treatment ModificationUp to one year after the last patient enrolledThe endpoints for compliance are the reasons for discontinuation and treatment modification.
Compliance: Dose IntensityUp to one year after the last patient enrolledEntire dose administered during treatment
Safety: Number of Patients With at Least a SAE; Patients With at Least a SADRUp to 30 days after the end of treatmentNumber of patients with at least a SAE; patients with at least a SADR, according to NCI-CTCAE v. 4.03
Efficacy: PFS2Up to one year after the last patient enrolledPFS2 is defined as time from first progression to the date of second progression or death for any cause, whichever comes first.

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was approved and activated in 7 experimental sites. The enrolment was closed on 18th October 2018 with the inclusion of 123 patients.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm A
Intravenous administration of weekly Paclitaxel (dosage: 80 mg/mq) for a maximum of 6 cycles. Cycle is defined as 4 weeks. Paclitaxel: Comparator active compound
41
Arm B
Oral administration of two experimental drugs: * Cediranib 20 mg/day given 7 days per week * Olaparib 600 mg / day (i.e. 300 mg twice a day) 7 days per week until progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient or physician decision to discontinue or death. Cediranib: Experimental compound Olaparib: Experimental compound
41
Arm C
Oral administration of two experimental drugs: * Cediranib 20 mg/day given 5 days per week * Olaparib 600 mg / day (i.e. 300 mg twice a day) 7 days per week until progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient or physician decision to discontinue or death. Cediranib: Experimental compound Olaparib: Experimental compound
41
Total123

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm ATotalArm CArm B
Age, Continuous62.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
61.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
61.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
61.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
BRCA mutated4 Participants15 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Last Platinum Free interval3.0 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3
2.6 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2
2.3 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
2.5 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
Previous Chemotherapy lines2.6 lines
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
2.9 lines
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
2.9 lines
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
3.1 lines
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants6 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
36 Participants114 Participants40 Participants38 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
41 Participants123 Participants41 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
24 / 2831 / 4134 / 41
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 2836 / 4134 / 41
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 2811 / 419 / 41

Outcome results

Primary

Efficacy: Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as time from randomization to the date of first progression or death for any cause, whichever comes first. Progression was established as the radiological disease progression according to RECIST 1.1 (as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions) or to clinical assessment in case radiological evaluation is not feasible due to clinical condition.

Time frame: An average of 30 months for each participant

Population: Intention to treat population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm AEfficacy: Progression Free Survival (PFS)3.1 months
Arm BEfficacy: Progression Free Survival (PFS)5.6 months
Arm CEfficacy: Progression Free Survival (PFS)3.8 months
p-value: 0.26590% CI: [0.5, 1.14]cox model
p-value: 0.90490% CI: [0.68, 1.55]cox- model
Primary

Safety: Number of Evacuations Per Day

Number of evacuations per day used as an index of gastro-intestinal toxicity profile of experimental drugs

Time frame: Evacuation were collected daily for the first four weeks of treatment of experimental drugs

Population: No primary safety analysis in terms of gastrointestinal events between continuous and intermittent arm was done because neither experimental arm showed any superiority in PFS over the control arm.

Secondary

Compliance: Dose Intensity

Entire dose administered during treatment

Time frame: Up to one year after the last patient enrolled

Secondary

Compliance: Number of Administered Cycles

The endpoint for compliance is the number of administered cycles.

Time frame: Up to one year after the last patient enrolled

Secondary

Compliance: Reasons for Discontinuation and Treatment Modification

The endpoints for compliance are the reasons for discontinuation and treatment modification.

Time frame: Up to one year after the last patient enrolled

Secondary

Efficacy: Objective Response Rate (ORR)

Percentage of patients with an objective response as determined by RECIST 1.1

Time frame: Disease assessments were scheduled every 8 weeks (+/- 1 week) from randomization for all treatment duration (an average of 3.5 months).

Population: ORR population: patients in the ITT population who received at least one dose of study treatment and had at least one radiological assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm AEfficacy: Objective Response Rate (ORR)9 participants
Arm BEfficacy: Objective Response Rate (ORR)6 participants
Arm CEfficacy: Objective Response Rate (ORR)4 participants
Secondary

Efficacy: Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as time from randomization to the date of death for any cause

Time frame: Up to one year after the last patient enrolled

Secondary

Efficacy: PFS2

PFS2 is defined as time from first progression to the date of second progression or death for any cause, whichever comes first.

Time frame: Up to one year after the last patient enrolled

Secondary

Efficacy: Quality of Life

Quality of Life evaluated by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian (FACT-O) questionnaire

Time frame: Up to sixth month of study treatment

Secondary

Safety: Maximum Toxicity Grade

Maximum toxicity grade experienced by each patient, for each toxicity, according to NCI-CTCAE v. 4.03

Time frame: Up to 30 days after the end of treatment

Secondary

Safety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each Toxicity

Number of patients experiencing grade 3-4 toxicity for each toxicity according to NCI-CTCAE v. 4.03

Time frame: Adverse events were collected at the end of each cycle for the duration of treatment for each participant (an average of 3.5 months) and following 30 days after the end of treatment.

Population: safety population: randomized patients receiving at least one dose of study drugs

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm ASafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityBone marrow hypocellular grade≥30 Participants
Arm ASafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityMyelodysplastic syndrome grade 50 Participants
Arm ASafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityFatigue grade≥30 Participants
Arm ASafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityAnemia grade≥30 Participants
Arm ASafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityAnorexia grade≥30 Participants
Arm ASafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicitySepsis grade 51 Participants
Arm ASafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityDiarrhea grade≥30 Participants
Arm ASafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityWhite blood cells decreased grade≥31 Participants
Arm ASafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityNeutrophil count decreased grade≥32 Participants
Arm ASafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityThromboembolic event grade≥30 Participants
Arm ASafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityPlatelet count decreased grade≥30 Participants
Arm ASafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityPalmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome grade≥30 Participants
Arm ASafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityMucositis oral grade≥30 Participants
Arm ASafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityHypertension grade≥30 Participants
Arm ASafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityPneumonitis grade≥30 Participants
Arm ASafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityNausea grade≥30 Participants
Arm ASafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityFebrile neutropenia grade≥30 Participants
Arm ASafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityPeripheral motor neuropathy grade≥31 Participants
Arm ASafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityVomiting grade≥30 Participants
Arm BSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityPalmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome grade≥31 Participants
Arm BSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityAnemia grade≥34 Participants
Arm BSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityBone marrow hypocellular grade≥31 Participants
Arm BSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityFebrile neutropenia grade≥30 Participants
Arm BSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityDiarrhea grade≥32 Participants
Arm BSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityMucositis oral grade≥31 Participants
Arm BSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityNausea grade≥31 Participants
Arm BSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityVomiting grade≥30 Participants
Arm BSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityFatigue grade≥34 Participants
Arm BSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicitySepsis grade 50 Participants
Arm BSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityNeutrophil count decreased grade≥31 Participants
Arm BSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityPlatelet count decreased grade≥31 Participants
Arm BSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityWhite blood cells decreased grade≥30 Participants
Arm BSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityAnorexia grade≥31 Participants
Arm BSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityMyelodysplastic syndrome grade 51 Participants
Arm BSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityPeripheral motor neuropathy grade≥30 Participants
Arm BSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityPneumonitis grade≥31 Participants
Arm BSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityHypertension grade≥35 Participants
Arm BSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityThromboembolic event grade≥30 Participants
Arm CSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityAnorexia grade≥30 Participants
Arm CSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityVomiting grade≥32 Participants
Arm CSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityThromboembolic event grade≥31 Participants
Arm CSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityMyelodysplastic syndrome grade 50 Participants
Arm CSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityNausea grade≥33 Participants
Arm CSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityHypertension grade≥36 Participants
Arm CSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityPeripheral motor neuropathy grade≥30 Participants
Arm CSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityMucositis oral grade≥30 Participants
Arm CSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityAnemia grade≥36 Participants
Arm CSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityPneumonitis grade≥30 Participants
Arm CSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityDiarrhea grade≥31 Participants
Arm CSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityNeutrophil count decreased grade≥31 Participants
Arm CSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityFebrile neutropenia grade≥31 Participants
Arm CSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityPlatelet count decreased grade≥30 Participants
Arm CSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicitySepsis grade 50 Participants
Arm CSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityPalmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome grade≥30 Participants
Arm CSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityWhite blood cells decreased grade≥30 Participants
Arm CSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityFatigue grade≥35 Participants
Arm CSafety: Number of Patients Experiencing Grade 3-4 Toxicity for Each ToxicityBone marrow hypocellular grade≥30 Participants
Secondary

Safety: Number of Patients With at Least a SAE; Patients With at Least a SADR

Number of patients with at least a SAE; patients with at least a SADR, according to NCI-CTCAE v. 4.03

Time frame: Up to 30 days after the end of treatment

Secondary

Safety: Number of Patients With at Least a SUSAR

Number of patients with at least a SUSAR, according to NCI-CTCAE v. 4.03

Time frame: Up to 30 days after the end of treatment

Secondary

Safety: Type, Frequency and Nature of SAEs

Type, frequency and nature of SAEs, according to NCI-CTCAE v. 4.03

Time frame: Up to 30 days after the end of treatment

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026