Skip to content

A Study of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Versus RFA in the Treatment of Recurrent HCC

A RCT Study of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Versus RFA in the Treatment of Recurrent HCC

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03313648
Enrollment
180
Registered
2017-10-18
Start date
2016-09-01
Completion date
2021-09-01
Last updated
2017-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrent

Keywords

Recurrent HCC, Laparoscopic Hepatectomy, RFA, RCT

Brief summary

To observe and compare the short-term and long-term oncological outcome of laparoscopic hepatectomy and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma .

Detailed description

Background & Aims: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. The 5-year recurrent rate of HCC after first curative resection is 77%\ 100%. Laparoscopic repeat liver resection (LRLR) has been shown in small retrospective studies to be a safe and effective treatment for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) in selected patients, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been increasingly performed for treating recurrent tumors involving the liver after hepatectomy. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term and long-term outcome of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of rHCC.

Interventions

PROCEDURELaparoscopic Hepatectomy

180 patients with recurrent HCC with recurrent nodular diameters of less than 5 cm and up to three nodules were randomly divided into LH (n=90) and RFA groups (n=90). Outcomes were monitored and evaluated during the 5-year follow-up period.

PROCEDURERadiofrequency Ablation

180 patients with recurrent HCC with recurrent nodular diameters of less than 5 cm and up to three nodules were randomly divided into LH (n=90) and RFA groups (n=90). Outcomes were monitored and evaluated during the 5-year follow-up period.

Sponsors

Southwest Hospital, China
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Two different treatments are conducted on the participant base on the randomized choices

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Any gender,18 to 70 years old; * Preoperative diagnosis of recurrent HCC clear,liver resection was done previously; * No active hepatitis and decompensated cirrhosis; * Patient with previous liver resection, maximum diameter ≤5cm single recurrent nodules or 3 nodules in diameter and no more than 3cm,did not infringe the portal vein,hepatic vein and inferior vena cava invasion,lymph node or extrahepatic turn; * No tumor rupture or bleeding; * Child-Pugh class A or B grade,ICG-R15 \<20%; * No coagulation disorders,platelet count \> 50 × 109 / L and prolonged prothrombin time \< 5 seconds; * After diagnosis of recurrent HCC,not be including related surgery,radiofrequency ablation (RFA),TACE treatment,no certainty anticancer chemotherapy treatment;supreme absolute contraindications abdominal surgery; * Recurrent nodules are not close to intestines,stomach,cholecyst or diaphragm muscle, not close to the first porta hepatis,main vessel and biliary ducts; * Patients generally available,heart and lung function can tolerate surgery, abdominal surgery supreme absolute contraindications; * Voluntarily participate in the study, voluntarily accept any therapy of two,informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Opposite of the above inclusion criteria; * Severe upper abdominal adhesions; * Postoperative pathological examination of the bile duct cell or mixed cell carcinoma and pathologically confirmed positive margin; * Foreign,Hong Kong,Macao,Taiwan and other regions,estimated postoperative difficult to track,followed up; * Nodules proved to be not recurrent HCC during intraoperative exploration, such as:liver metastases of colorectal cancer.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survival rate5 yearsfollow-up after the surgery every 3 months, to understand statistics 5-year survival.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
intraoperative parametersduring the operationoperation time and hepatic inflow occlusion time will be combined to report intraoperative parameters in hour(h).

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative complicationsDuration hospitalization(an expected average of 7 days)hepatic failure,hemorrhage,biliary leakage,ascites,intra-abdominal infection,pleural effusion,pulmonary infection,cardiac insufficiency.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactShuguo Zheng
shuguozh@yahoo.com.cn0086-13508308676

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026