Skip to content

Stand-Alone Cage Verus Anterior Plating for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Stand-Alone Cage Versus Anterior Plating for 1-2 Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. A Clinical and Radiographic Analysis

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03312192
Enrollment
0
Registered
2017-10-17
Start date
2017-07-17
Completion date
2020-12-31
Last updated
2021-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Spine Degeneration, Degenerative Disc Disease

Keywords

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion, Stand-Alone Cage, Anterior Plating

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical results between two different techniques for ACDF: 1. Stand-alone ACDF, which means the placement of an interbody device (cage) without anterior fixation or plating; 2. ACDF with and interbody cage and anterior plating for fixation. Both of these procedures are commonly performed at Rush with unclear advantage of one procedure over the other. Both have been associated with good to excellent clinical outcomes. The devices used in this study are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Detailed description

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one the most common procedures performed by spine surgeons. Although ACDF with autologous bone graft and anterior plating is commonly performed, this procedure may be associated with postoperative dysphagia, significant costs and adjacent segment pathology. To address these concerns, a number of surgeons have opted to utilize an interbody cage in a stand-alone fashion with good to excellent results. However, the published data is limited and currently there in no consensus among spine surgeons regarding the best technique to achieve fusion and improve clinical outcomes in patients with degenerative disc disease in the cervical spine.

Interventions

DEVICEInterbody Cage

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with interbody cage placement

DEVICEInterbody Cage and Anterior Plating

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with interbody cage placement and anterior plating

Sponsors

Rush University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

1\. Stand-alone ACDF, which means the placement of an interbody device (cage) without anterior fixation or plating; 2. ACDF with and interbody cage and anterior plating for fixation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing a primary 1- to 2-level ACDF (a) Diagnosis: myelopathy, radiculopathy, myeloradiculopathy, stenosis, herniated nucleus pulposus, degenerative disc disease, spondylosis, osteophytic complexes, and foraminal stenosis * Patients able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Cervical spine trauma

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Improvement - Change in Baseline Visual analogue Score (VAS) for Pain6 monthsPatients will be asked to complete the VAS to measure their pain prior to surgery and at their preoperative office visit(s) or just prior to surgery in the preoperative waiting area. Scores at the 6 month follow up office visit will be compared to baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dysphagia6 months6 month postoperative followup SWAL-QOL score will be compared to baseline
Fusion Rates6 monthsPostoperative radiographic studies will be performed at 6 month follow up visit to assess for arthrodesis (fusion) and pseudarthrosis (non-fusion).
Clinical Improvement - Change in baseline 12-item Short Form (SF-12) Health Survey at 6 months6 monthsSF-12 survey scores at 6 month follow up will be compared to baseline
Clinical Improvement - Change in baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 6 months6 monthsODI survey scores at 6 month follow up will be compared to baseline

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse Events1 year(a) Intra-operative - Information will be obtained from the operative note. (i) Blood loss, length of surgery, procedural details, complications (b) Post-operative - Information will be obtained from the clinic notes
Narcotics Consumption3 daysThe total amount of narcotic use for each subject will be recorded. Dosages of narcotics will be converted to morphine equivalents. This information will be measured during the hospitalization.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026