Skip to content

High Frequency PNS Stimulation Study for Back and Leg Pain

A European, Prospective, Multi-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial Investigating the Effects of High Frequency Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) in the Treatment of Chronic Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03312010
Enrollment
38
Registered
2017-10-17
Start date
2018-03-01
Completion date
2022-12-01
Last updated
2025-11-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Back and Leg Pain, Chronic Back Pain

Brief summary

Prospective, double blinded, randomized, clinical study investigating the effects of high frequency PNS for the treatment of chronic back or back and leg pain.

Detailed description

All subjects will have two permanent stimulators placed over the proximal peripheral nerves at T9 at the implant visit. The stimulators can easily be removed for non-responders. High frequency stimulation is typically programmed below sensory threshold. This type of stimulation lends itself to a placebo-controlled trial. For this study subjects will be randomized 1:1 at enrollment into a high frequency or sham group. Neither the subjects nor experimenters will be made aware of their randomization assignment for at least the first month of the trial. Subjects belonging to both groups will be unblinded to their assignment at the 1-month or a later visit (including unscheduled visit) if they have a VAS \> 30 mms. Subjects belonging to the sham group will be reprogrammed with HF stimulation at this point. Subjects belonging to the HF stimulation group will keep stimulating with HF. Subjects reporting a VAS \< 30 mms will continue to be blinded.

Interventions

DEVICEPNS HF

A needle and catheter is carefully inserted near your spinal column. The stimulator is then placed through the catheter and directed towards the T9 proximal peripheral nerves. The proximal end of the stimulator is then sutured underneath the skin of your back to the fascia to prevent migration.

DEVICEPNS Sham

A needle and catheter is carefully inserted near your spinal column. The stimulator is then placed through the catheter and directed towards the T9 proximal peripheral nerves. The proximal end of the stimulator is then sutured underneath the skin of your back to the fascia to prevent migration.

Sponsors

AZ Delta
CollaboratorOTHER
GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus
CollaboratorOTHER
Curonix LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Subjects and assessors randomized to HF blinded Subjects and assessors randomized to sham blinded

Intervention model description

Prospective, partially double-blinded, randomized

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject is ≥ 18 years of age at time of informed consent; * Subjects have been diagnosed with predominant, chronic, intractable back pain with a VAS \> 50 mm (on a 100-mm scale); * Subjects have been diagnosed with predominant, chronic, intractable back pain for at least 6 months before study participation; * Based on the medical opinion of the Principal Investigator, subject has a stable pain medication regiment; * Based on the medical opinion of the Principal Investigator, there is no evidence of anatomic abnormalities that could jeopardize the placement of the device or pose a hazard to the subject; * Subject is willing to undergo surgical implant procedure, attend visits as scheduled, and comply with the study requirements; * Subject is willing and able to operate the patient programmer, recharging equipment and has the ability to undergo study assessments and provide accurate responses; * Based on the opinion of the implanter, subject is a good surgical candidate for the implant procedure; * Subject is male or non-pregnant female; * Subject is deemed to be neuro-psycho-socially appropriate for implantation therapies based of the assessment of a clinical psychologist and principal investigator, using face-to-face encounters and the psychological testing described in the measures; * Patient is capable of giving informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Obvious mechanical instability related to pain (diagnosed by imaging taken within the past 6 months); * Unresolved malignancies in the last six months; * Subject has post-herpetic neuralgia (shingles); * Subject has an active systemic infection or is immune-compromised; * Based on the medical opinion of the Principal Investigator the subject has other psychological conditions (e.g., psychosis, suicidal ideation, borderline personality disorder, somatization, narcissism), other health conditions (e.g., substance abuse, another chronic condition requiring the regular use of opioid medication), or other legal concerns that would preclude his/her enrollment in the study or potentially confound the results of the study; * Subject is currently enrolled in or plans to enroll in any concurrent drug and/or device study while participating in this study; * Insulin-dependent diabetic who is not controlled through diet and/or medication (determined by the physician) or non-insulin dependent diabetic who is not well controlled through diet and/or medication; * Bleeding complications or coagulopathy issues; * Pregnant/lactating or not using adequate birth control; * A life expectancy of less than one year; * Any active implanted device whether turned off or on; * A previous PNS experience for the treatment of back pain; * Conditions requiring Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) evaluation or diathermy procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Responder rate1 month post-implanta \> 50% reduction in back pain as measured by VAS with the Freedom PNS system in the HF (test) group as opposed to sham and conventional medical management

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
VAS back pain1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 36 monthsPercentage change from baseline in VAS for back pain
VAS leg pain1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 36 monthsPercentage change from baseline in VAS for leg pain
ODI1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 36 monthsChange from baseline in functionality using the ODI score

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
PGIC1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 36 monthsSubject satisfaction with the therapy as measured by the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Non-opioid Pain Medication1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 36 monthsPrescribed non-opioid pain medication
EQ-5D-5L1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 36 monthsChanges from baseline in quality of life
AE's1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 36 monthsIncidence of device related adverse events
Opioid Pain Medication1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 36 monthsPrescribed opioid pain medications

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026