Skip to content

Health Coaching & Technology in a Weight Loss Center

A Pilot Study of an eHealth-delivered Health Coaching Intervention

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03309787
Enrollment
37
Registered
2017-10-16
Start date
2017-11-29
Completion date
2019-12-01
Last updated
2020-07-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Behavior, Health, mHealth, Obesity, Technology, Videoconferencing

Brief summary

The national epidemic of obesity is associated with considerable morbidity, disability and early mortality. Conventional weight loss programs beyond a primary care setting have the potential to reduce weight, but are difficult to access for adults with obesity in rural areas due to lack of transportation and access to specialty care. Routine intensive behavioral therapy, while effective, is often not supplemented with adjuncts that could be helpful in engaging participants in behavioral change. The overarching goal of this SYNERGY pilot project is to overcome barriers rural adults face by using video-conferencing to deliver specialty obesity care that otherwise is inaccessible to most adults faced with this disease. It also intends to use emerging mobile health (mHealth) technology which has shown considerable promise in providing motivational feedback. This proposal highlights T3/T4 translation bridging technologists, allied health staff, and clinicians in the development and implementation of new therapeutic modalities. The study aims to evaluate a telehealth-based health coaching program that is embedded in the Dartmouth-Hitchcock Weight and Wellness Center that integrates novel remote monitoring technology in effecting behavioral change using Amulet, a Dartmouth Computer Science developed mHealth device over a 16-week period. First, the feasibility and accessibility of an eHealth-delivered health coaching obesity intervention using remote monitoring and video-conferencing (Aim 1) will be evaluated. The potential effectiveness of achieving the primary outcome of 5% weight loss, with secondary outcomes of improved physical function and self reported health (Aim 2) will be ascertained. The intervention's impact on implementation outcomes of workflow, adoption, and organizational change that could affect further scalability and generalizability in other high-risk population groups (Aim 3) will be assessed. These preliminary findings will be used in a future competitive application for an extramural R01 designed to assess the effectiveness of our intervention in achieving weight loss in rural obese adults. If successful, this application has the potential to redesign care using applied methods of telehealth translated to community-based, rural populations to facilitate behavioral change. The project also meets criteria of the NIH Strategic Plan for Obesity and the Institute of Medicine's need for Telehealth research.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALeHealth

Intervention Description: The pilot comprises of five components listed below which provide access to specialty obesity care to rural obese adults, and enhance it with technology (telehealth and remote monitoring): Team-based care; medical plan, nurses, psychologists, dietician, Health coaching, Weekly coaching sessions , Messaging and Remote Monitoring

Sponsors

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* English speaking; * Community-dwelling; * Age 18-65 years; * Obesity based on: BMI ≥30kg/m2 54; * Participating in the DH-WWC health coach program; * Access to home, high-speed internet with Wi-Fi; * Medical clearance from their primary care provider; * Provide voluntary, written consent; * Require an EHR patient portal account and credentials ; -----If subjects do not have an account, one will be created for the purposes of this study

Exclusion criteria

* Unwilling to participate in the 16 week pilot or complete study measures; * Individuals unwilling/unable to provide consent; * A medical record diagnosis of dementia as intensive behavioral therapy and health coaching require the ability to complete questionnaires and change behavior, all of which may be challenging in individuals with cognitive impairment; * Cognitive impairment measured by the 6-item Callahan screen, a brief and reliable six-item screening questionnaire with acceptable sensitivity (88.7%) and specificity (88.0%) in identifying individuals with cognitive impairment. Its diagnostic properties are comparable to the full Folstein Mini-Mental Status Examination in those scoring ≥3. This questionnaire can be administered by telephone or face-to-face interview and is being as an adjunct to medical record documentation of cognitive impairment; * Life-threatening illness including those receiving palliative care or hospice services; * Nursing facility or hospital admission in the past six months; * Psychiatric diagnosis that would interfere with study participation and require significant modification to meet their needs such as major depressive disorder, substance abuse, suicidal ideation or severe mental illness (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder); * History of bariatric surgery; * American College of Sports Medicine contraindications to exercise57 including: a resting heart rate of \>120bpm; Blood pressure \>180/100mmHg; unstable angina;

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acceptability16 WeeksAcceptability: Qualitative interviews will ensure the appropriateness of the pilot and its strengths/weaknesses. Participants will answer questions on a scale from 0-5, where 5 = high acceptability of the program.
Completion Rate: Number of Participants Completing the Intervention16 weeksCompletion/ Feasibility: The following rates will be computed: screened for inclusion; eligibility; enrollment; completion; assessment. We will assess entry criteria (reasons for dropout/non-adherence) and time to collect data. Enrollment success will be defined as 30 patients. Adequate retention is defined as a dropout rate of \<20%. Completion of \>80% of post-study measures will be defined as adequate. Attending \>80% of sessions will be considered acceptable. Staff will track equipment, software or technical issues (malfunctions, data loss, hardware) in a journal.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in 6 Minute WalkBaseline/16 weeks - pre/post change - increase = longer distance6-Minute Walk (6MWT) is a cardiovascular fitness surrogate measuring distance (normal 400-700m) related to function. A clinically important difference or change is 50-55m
Diet ChangeBaseline/16 weeksThe Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants (REAPS) is a 16 item survey (score 13-39) of diet habits. Higher scores = higher diet quality. Positive score = better diet quality
Readiness to Change16 weeksThe University of Rhode Island Change Assessment is a 12 item questionnaire assessing one's stages of change based on contemplation, action, maintenance and pre-contemplation.. The range of scores from -2 to +14. Higher scores indicate higher readiness to change
Willingness to Pay16 weeksPatient Perception of Value: Two questions will assess Willingness to Pay (WTP) - whether they would pay for telemedicine delivery of the intervention in lieu of in-person travel time or cost.
Subjective HealthBaseline/16 weeks - ChangeThe 10-question, non-proprietary Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems General Health-10 (PROMIS) captures physical, mental and social aspects of quality of life. Positive change scores = improved health. The score ranges from 0-100, 50 is the population mean, 10 consists of 1SD, and higher scores equate better health.
Change in WeightBaseline/16 weeksWeight will be measured using a Seca 770 analyzer (in clinic) and by the Omron HBF-514 (at home remotely). Weight Loss (change in weight)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Staff Adoption16 weeksStaff Adoption: Haug's 12-item Measure of Evidence-Based Practice Adoption assesses stage of change, experience, attitudes, organization barriers and strategies to support evidence-based practices (1-5 point scale - strongly disagree to agree).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Combined Amulet/Fitbit
As per usual care participants will receive an eHealth (Amulet/Fitbit + videoconferencing) intervention over a 16 week period of time. eHealth: Intervention Description: The pilot comprises of five components listed below which provide access to specialty obesity care to rural obese adults, and enhance it with technology (telehealth and remote monitoring): Team-based care; medical plan, nurses, psychologists, dietician, Health coaching, Weekly coaching sessions , Messaging and Remote Monitoring
8
Amulet Only
As per usual care participants will receive an eHealth (Amulet + videoconferencing) intervention over a 16 week period of time. eHealth: Intervention Description: The pilot comprises of five components listed below which provide access to specialty obesity care to rural obese adults, and enhance it with technology (telehealth and remote monitoring): Team-based care; medical plan, nurses, psychologists, dietician, Health coaching, Weekly coaching sessions , Messaging and Remote Monitoring
9
Fitbit Only
As per usual care participants will receive an eHealth (Fitbit + videoconferencing) intervention over a 16 week period of time. eHealth: Intervention Description: The pilot comprises of five components listed below which provide access to specialty obesity care to rural obese adults, and enhance it with technology (telehealth and remote monitoring): Team-based care; medical plan, nurses, psychologists, dietician, Health coaching, Weekly coaching sessions , Messaging and Remote Monitoring
20
Total37

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAmulet OnlyFitbit OnlyTotalCombined Amulet/Fitbit
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants20 Participants37 Participants8 Participants
Age, Continuous49.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
45.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1
46.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
48.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
9 Participants20 Participants37 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
9 participants20 participants37 participants8 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants16 Participants32 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants4 Participants5 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 80 / 90 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 80 / 90 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 80 / 90 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Acceptability

Acceptability: Qualitative interviews will ensure the appropriateness of the pilot and its strengths/weaknesses. Participants will answer questions on a scale from 0-5, where 5 = high acceptability of the program.

Time frame: 16 Weeks

Population: On a scale of 0 (very disatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied) regarding the acceptability of the intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Combined Amulet/FitbitAcceptability4 score on a scale
Fitbit OnlyAcceptability4 score on a scale
Amulet OnlyAcceptability5 score on a scale
Primary

Completion Rate: Number of Participants Completing the Intervention

Completion/ Feasibility: The following rates will be computed: screened for inclusion; eligibility; enrollment; completion; assessment. We will assess entry criteria (reasons for dropout/non-adherence) and time to collect data. Enrollment success will be defined as 30 patients. Adequate retention is defined as a dropout rate of \<20%. Completion of \>80% of post-study measures will be defined as adequate. Attending \>80% of sessions will be considered acceptable. Staff will track equipment, software or technical issues (malfunctions, data loss, hardware) in a journal.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Total completers

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Combined Amulet/FitbitCompletion Rate: Number of Participants Completing the Intervention6 Participants
Fitbit OnlyCompletion Rate: Number of Participants Completing the Intervention14 Participants
Amulet OnlyCompletion Rate: Number of Participants Completing the Intervention7 Participants
Secondary

Change in 6 Minute Walk

6-Minute Walk (6MWT) is a cardiovascular fitness surrogate measuring distance (normal 400-700m) related to function. A clinically important difference or change is 50-55m

Time frame: Baseline/16 weeks - pre/post change - increase = longer distance

Population: 2 participants in combined amulet/fitbit group were unable to perform assessment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Combined Amulet/FitbitChange in 6 Minute Walk111.25 metersStandard Deviation 27.8
Fitbit OnlyChange in 6 Minute Walk227.14 metersStandard Deviation 140.14
Amulet OnlyChange in 6 Minute Walk-45.67 metersStandard Deviation 180.5
Secondary

Change in Weight

Weight will be measured using a Seca 770 analyzer (in clinic) and by the Omron HBF-514 (at home remotely). Weight Loss (change in weight)

Time frame: Baseline/16 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Combined Amulet/FitbitChange in Weight-0.47 weight change (kg)Standard Deviation 2.77
Fitbit OnlyChange in Weight-3.06 weight change (kg)Standard Deviation 3.63
Amulet OnlyChange in Weight-2.51 weight change (kg)Standard Deviation 2.16
Secondary

Diet Change

The Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants (REAPS) is a 16 item survey (score 13-39) of diet habits. Higher scores = higher diet quality. Positive score = better diet quality

Time frame: Baseline/16 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Combined Amulet/FitbitDiet Change3.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.71
Fitbit OnlyDiet Change2.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.11
Amulet OnlyDiet Change2.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.91
Secondary

Readiness to Change

The University of Rhode Island Change Assessment is a 12 item questionnaire assessing one's stages of change based on contemplation, action, maintenance and pre-contemplation.. The range of scores from -2 to +14. Higher scores indicate higher readiness to change

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: higher score indicates higher readiness to change. The range of scores from -2 to +14. Higher scores indicate higher readiness to change

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Combined Amulet/FitbitReadiness to Change10.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.31
Fitbit OnlyReadiness to Change9.64 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.33
Amulet OnlyReadiness to Change10.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Secondary

Subjective Health

The 10-question, non-proprietary Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems General Health-10 (PROMIS) captures physical, mental and social aspects of quality of life. Positive change scores = improved health. The score ranges from 0-100, 50 is the population mean, 10 consists of 1SD, and higher scores equate better health.

Time frame: Baseline/16 weeks - Change

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Combined Amulet/FitbitSubjective Health2.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.11
Fitbit OnlySubjective Health4.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.38
Amulet OnlySubjective Health5.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
Secondary

Willingness to Pay

Patient Perception of Value: Two questions will assess Willingness to Pay (WTP) - whether they would pay for telemedicine delivery of the intervention in lieu of in-person travel time or cost.

Time frame: 16 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Combined Amulet/FitbitWillingness to PayCost <$30>60min5 Participants
Combined Amulet/FitbitWillingness to PayTime<60min6 Participants
Combined Amulet/FitbitWillingness to PayTime>60min0 Participants
Combined Amulet/FitbitWillingness to PayCost <$30<60min1 Participants
Fitbit OnlyWillingness to PayTime<60min6 Participants
Fitbit OnlyWillingness to PayTime>60min1 Participants
Fitbit OnlyWillingness to PayCost <$30<60min0 Participants
Fitbit OnlyWillingness to PayCost <$30>60min7 Participants
Amulet OnlyWillingness to PayTime>60min3 Participants
Amulet OnlyWillingness to PayCost <$30<60min3 Participants
Amulet OnlyWillingness to PayCost <$30>60min11 Participants
Amulet OnlyWillingness to PayTime<60min11 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Staff Adoption

Staff Adoption: Haug's 12-item Measure of Evidence-Based Practice Adoption assesses stage of change, experience, attitudes, organization barriers and strategies to support evidence-based practices (1-5 point scale - strongly disagree to agree).

Time frame: 16 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Combined Amulet/FitbitStaff Adoption2.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026