Skip to content

Agreement Between Clinician and Instrumented Laxity Assessment

Agreement Between Clinician and Instrumented Laxity Assessment

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03309098
Enrollment
0
Registered
2017-10-13
Start date
2017-11-28
Completion date
2017-11-28
Last updated
2024-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ankle Injuries and Disorders, Ankle Sprains

Brief summary

Ankle injuries are the most common acute injury to the active population. It is important to ensure best practices and techniques used in clinics for evaluation are validated and consistent. This study will compare diagnostic outcomes of a clinician and of a diagnostic arthrometer when testing acute ankle injuries.

Detailed description

Ankle injuries, specifically lateral ankle sprains, are the most common acute injury to the active population (Hootman, Dick, & Agel, 2007). It is important to insure the use of best practice and ensure that the techniques being utilized in clinics for evaluation are validated and consistent within the techniques. Manual testing and instrumented testing have not yet been tested within the same cohort. The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic outcomes of a clinician and of a diagnostic arthrometer when testing acute ankle injuries. Participants will be recruited at University of Nebraska at Omahas (UNO) Injury Prevention and Care Clinic and Athletic Training Room in Sapp Fieldhouse. Participants with be members of the UNO Wellness Center or UNO athlete, aged 19-80 years old. During a standard evaluation the participant will have a clinician test manual ligamentous laxity and a blinded clinician testing laxity using an arthrometer. Participation will not alter the normal treatment or care for participants. The author hypothesizes that the diagnostic accuracy for all performed test will be good to excellent when assessed for laxity and moderate to good when assessed for pain.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTLigmaster Arthrometer Assessment

Perform an anterior drawer, inversion stress test and eversion stress test on the participant with an ankle arthrometer (LigMaster Version 1.26, Sport Tech, Inc, Charlottesville, Virginia).

Sponsors

University of Nebraska
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 50 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Membership to University of Nebraska at Omahas Wellness Center: a student taking on campus classes or a paying community member. Acute injury occurred within one week of evaluation.

Exclusion criteria

* Any condition that is contraindicated for manual test (i.e. fracture).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic accuracy of inversion stress test, eversion stress test and anterior drawerwithin 48 hours post-injuryAssess the diagnostic accuracy of the inversion stress test, eversion stress test and anterior drawer using an arthrometer.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026