Evaluate a Saw Bone Training Protocol in Using Tactile Sensation to Classify Bone Quality During Implant Surgery

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT03307798

Acronym

SBTP

Enrollment

Registered

2017-10-12

Start date

2017-09-20

Completion date

2018-08-31

Last updated

2017-10-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diagnosis of Bone Quality, Surgery, Training Tactile Sensation

Keywords

dental implant,bone quality,tactile sensation

Brief summary

Bone quality is one of the major factors influencing the dental implant survival rate. Bone quality is believed to have effects on initial implant stability and success of osseointegration. Different implant designs and surgical protocols were developed for improving the survival rate in different bone quality. Although bone quality can be partly diagnosed by radiographic images, lots of experienced surgeons also evaluate bone quality with tactile sensation when they drill the bone. However, variations in evaluation of bone density maybe exist among different surgeons. For less experienced dentists, it is difficult to diagnose bone quality with tactile sensation in the beginning. This purpose of this study is to evaluate a training protocol in using tactile sensation to classify bone quality during implant surgery. Saw bones of variant densities are used as training materials. The outcomes before and after training will be compared. The effect of training frequency before surgery will also be evaluated.

Detailed description

Twenty-five dentists will be enrolled into the study. Tests will be performed using visual analog scale to score bone quality of test blocks.

Interventions

None listed

Study design

Observational model

OTHER

Time perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

26 Years to 40 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Certified dentist with implant surgery experience less than 10 implants.

Exclusion criteria

* Age exceed the limits * Implant surgery experience more or equal to 10 implants

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Change on visual analog scale (VAS) score of each test block	1st time point: test before training & test immediately after training; 2nd time point: 1 week after 1st time point (test after 1 wk); 3rd time point: 1 month after 2nd time point (test after 1month)	Each VAS score performed on the specific test block will be compared between different time point.

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactTong-Mei Wang, DDS, MS, PhD

tongmeiwang@ntu.edu.tw886223123456

Backup ContactLi-Deh Lin, DDS, PhD

lidehlin@ntu.edu.tw886223123456

Outcome results