Skip to content

LAParoscopic Entry Technique in REnal Surgery

Laparoscopic Entry Technique in Renal Surgery: a Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Open (Hasson) Versus Closed (Veress) Techniques.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03306238
Acronym
LAPRES
Enrollment
300
Registered
2017-10-11
Start date
2017-11-01
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2017-12-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Kidney Diseases

Keywords

laparoscopy/ key-hole, renal surgery, open/hasson, closed/veress

Brief summary

This is a randomised controlled trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of two different port site entry techniques in laparoscopic renal surgery: open method (Hasson) and closed method (Veress). It will involve 300 adult patients undergoing elective laparoscopic renal surgery in Tallaght hospital under two Consultant urologists.

Detailed description

Surgical specialties commonly using laparoscopic techniques like gynecology and general surgery have extensively compared the various available techniques of port insertion (1). There is very little known regarding the safest entry technique for the initial port in laparoscopic renal surgery. Results from other surgical specialties cannot simply be extrapolated to this type of laparoscopic surgery due to difference in entry site and patient position with renal surgery. Hence, this randomised controlled trial will be performed in a urological unit with two laparoscopic renal surgeons to compare two commonly used techniques of initial trocar insertion: the closed method and the open method. Background Since its introduction in 1991 by Clayman, laparoscopic renal surgery has become very popular and is widely used for both benign and malignant renal operations such as radical, simple and partial nephrectomies, pyeloplasties, nephro-ureterectomies (2). The overall reported major and minor complication rate of laparoscopic renal surgery is 9.5% and 1.9% respectively (2). Initial entry by trocar insertion is the most hazardous part of the laparoscopic procedure. Opinion regarding the safest entry technique is divided. The two most commonly used techniques of port entry include open and closed (3). An open technique, as first described by Hasson, involves the peritoneum being cut down, followed by the insertion of a blunt trocar under direct visualisation, gas insufflation, and insertion of the laparoscope. One of the closed technique involves the insertion of a Veress needle (a needle equipped with a spring-loaded obturator) into the peritoneal cavity, followed by gas insufflation (act of blowing) and insertion of a trocar (a sharp, pointed instrument with a cannula used to enter the body cavity). Finally the laparoscope is passed through the trocar once the obturator is removed. Previous meta-analyses in laparoscopic surgery from gynaecological and general surgical operations have not been able to support one technique over the other due to insufficient evidence.to our knowledge (3), there are no randomised controlled trials comparing these two techniques in laparoscopic renal surgery. During laparoscopic renal surgery, the patient is placed in a lateral flank position with the table flexed. The initial port of entry can be either at the umbilicus or lateral to it. This position is unique to urological surgery and hence can have different implications to the initial trocar insertion technique. The objective is to compare the open method (Hasson) and closed method (Veress) of laparoscopic port site entry in renal surgery

Interventions

PROCEDUREOpen approach to port insertion

This involves the peritoneum being cut down, followed by the insertion of a blunt trocar under direct visualisation, gas insufflation, and insertion of the laparoscope

PROCEDUREClosed approach to port insertion

This involves the insertion of a Veress needle (a needle equipped with a spring-loaded obturator) into the peritoneal cavity, followed by gas insufflation (act of blowing) and insertion of a trocar (a sharp, pointed instrument with a cannula used to enter the body cavity).

Sponsors

The Adelaide and Meath Hospital, incorporating The National Children's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The patient and the investigator will not be informed of the type of approach they had. These will be marked as A and B with only the care povide/surgeon being aware of the actual approach. The investigator of complications and assessor of the case outcomes will collect data without the knowledge of the group the patient belongs to. The surgeon or car eprovider cannot be masked in this case due to technical limitations but they will not contribute towards analysing the results.

Intervention model description

This is a randomised single blinded prospective trial comparing two similar groups directly to check for differnces in time to approach and complication rate

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* • Able to undergo a general anaesthetic * At least 18 years old * Willing and able to give AN INFORMED CONSENT

Exclusion criteria

* patient refusal obese patients BMI \>40mg/m2 previous laparotomy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complications48 hoursMinor and major complications assessed

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to insertion30 minutesRecord time taken to perform both approaches

Countries

Ireland

Contacts

Primary ContactArun Z Thomas, MCh, FRCS
arun.z.thomas@gmail.com0353879804873

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026