Skip to content

Pulmonary Nodule Detection: Comparison of an Ultra Low Dose vs Standard Scan.

Detection of Pulmonary Nodules: Comparison of Ultra-low-dose Chest CT (Approaching a Two Views Chest X-ray Radiation) and Standard Low Dose CT. A Monocentric, Prospective, Non-randomized, Comparative, Open-label Study With Blind Reading of the Judgment Criteria.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03305978
Acronym
npUBD
Enrollment
150
Registered
2017-10-10
Start date
2017-09-26
Completion date
2019-07-10
Last updated
2019-08-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Cancer, Radiation Exposure, Smoking

Keywords

Ultra low dose chest CT, lung cancer screening

Brief summary

Lung cancer screening programs are still discussed in Europe today, and one of the concern is radiation due to iterative CT. The aim of this monocentric, prospective, non randomized study is to compare an ultra low dose chest CT (approaching a two views X ray) versus a standard low dose chest CT for ≥4mm lung nodules detection, and secondary for lung nodule characterization and smoking associated findings (emphysema, bronchial abnormalities and coronary calcifications).

Detailed description

An additional Ultra Low Dose CT, approaching 0.2mSv, will be performed in consenting patients referred for non enhanced chest CT in our Revolution CT scanner (GE Healthcare®).The dose delivered with the two acquisitions is still lower than the french diagnostic reference level. Standard CT is interpreted and a report is sent to the referent physician as usual. Then the two acquisitions are read over time by two independent radiologists, blinded over judgment criterias. In case of discordance, an other radiologist will arbitrate. We hope to validate our Ultra low dose chest CT protocol, which is more than 10 times less radiating than a standard low dose CT, as a sensitive tool to detect lung nodules.

Interventions

An additional ultra low dose CT row is performed for every subject besides standard diagnostic low dose chest CT.

standard diagnostic low dose chest CT

Sponsors

University Hospital, Grenoble
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

blinding evaluation of criteria

Intervention model description

Major Patient Addressed for Thoracic CT without Injection of Contrast

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: 1. Patients referred for non enhanced chest CT for following indications : * lung nodule search or control * nodular abnormality on chest X ray * statement of COPD or emphysema * asbestos exposure * nodule localization before radio frequency ablation * assessment of disease extent of an extra thoracic cancer (in case of iodinated intravenous contrast agent contraindication) * statement before extrathoracic transplantation (in case of iodinated intravenous contrast agent contraindication) 2. Affiliated with the french social security 3. Who signed consent

Exclusion criteria

: 1. Inability to lie down and still during the examination 2. Inability to hold breath more than 5 seconds 3. Pneumonia in the last 3 months 4. Body mass index more than 35kg/m² 5. exclusion period of another interventionnal study 6. referred for articles L1121-5 to L1121-8 of french public health code 7. Pregnant or breastfeeding women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ultra low dose CT lung nodule detection sensibility22 monthsDetection rate (%) of ≥4mm lung nodules in ultra low dose chest CT versus standard low dose chest CT

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Concordance of coronary calcification detection and quantification between ultra low dose and standard low dose chest CT22 monthsComparison of Weston scores between ultra low dose and standard low dose chest CT
Concordance of bronchial abnormalities evaluation between ultra low dose and standard low dose chest CT22 monthscomparison of detection of bronchial thickening or dilatation between ultra low dose and standard low dose chest CT
Ultra low dose CT diagnostic performances of lung nodule detection22 monthstrue positives, false positives, true negatives, false negatives, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, specificity, of ≥4mm lung nodules detection within ultra low dose chest CT versus standard low dose chest CT
Concordance of emphysema characteristics between ultra low dose and standard low dose chest CT22 monthscomparison of emphysema detection, type (centrilobular, paraseptal, panlobular, bullous) and distribution between ultra low dose and standard low dose chest CT
Ultra low dose CT inter-observer reproducibility22 monthsinter observer reproducibility for size, density and type of ≥4mm lung nodule detected in ultra low dose CT
Influence of subjects characteristics, nodule location, and nodule size on detection between ultra low dose and standard low dose chest CT22 monthsanalysis of subjects characteristics (age, gender, body mass index), ≥4mm nodule location, and ≥4 mm nodule size on detection between ultra low dose and standard low dose chest CT
Concordance of ≥4mm lung nodules characteristics between ultra low dose and standard low dose chest CT22 monthscomparison of size, density, type (true nodule or intrapulmonary ganglion) of ≥4mm lung nodule between ultra low dose and standard low dose chest CT

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026