Skip to content

Trial of Injected Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Bupivacaine Infusion After Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Single Dose Liposomal Bupivacaine Delivered Via VATS Intercostal Nerve Block vs. Continuous Bupivacaine Infusion Delivered Via Indwelling Subscapular Catheter After Surgical Stabilization of Rib Fractures

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03305666
Enrollment
36
Registered
2017-10-10
Start date
2017-10-05
Completion date
2021-01-31
Last updated
2021-09-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia, Local, Chest Injury Trauma, Drug Effect, Intercostal Rib, Local Infiltration, Nerve Pain, Opioid Dependence, Pain; Catheter (Other), Pneumonia, Rib Fractures, Rib Trauma, Surgical Procedure, Unspecified

Brief summary

Rib fractures represent a common injury pattern this is highly associated with patient morbidity and mortality, as pain control remains a challenge. Even after surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF), unsuccessful pain control can lead to morbid outcomes such as pneumonia and opioid dependence. Multi-modal anesthesia, with the use of thoracic epidurals and para-vertebral injections/catheters, has shown to lessen these occurrences but are subject to a wide array of limitations. A more directed therapy with liposomal bupivacaine has shown to provide sustained analgesia for up to 72 hours in patients who have undergone other types of thoracic surgery, but not SSRF. The hypothesis of the current clinical trial is that, among patients undergoing SSRF, liposomal bupivacaine delivered via video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is an intercostal nerve block that provides comparable analgesia to the pain catheter, as measured by pulmonary function, numeric pain scoring, and postoperative narcotic use.

Detailed description

Rib fractures represent a common injury pattern with high associated morbidity and mortality. Effective pain control in both the acute and long term periods remains a challenge. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) is now a recommended treatment for patients with severe chest wall injuries. In addition to stabilization of the chest wall, SSRF offers a unique opportunity to deliver directed, loco-regional anesthesia. Loco-regional anesthesia is a recognized, essential component of multi-modal anesthesia for patients with rib fractures in order to both decrease pain and minimize the use of opioids and their associated side effects. Delivery options for loco-regional anesthesia to patients with rib fractures share in common the intention of anesthetizing the intercostal nerves. Moving from the spinal cord laterally, modalities include thoracic epidural catheters, paravertebral blocks or catheters, and rib/intercostal blocks. Although rib blocks may be accomplished via a variety of techniques, the two most common intra-operative techniques are video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) intercostal nerve blocks and indwelling, subscapular catheters In general, neuraxial modalities such as thoracic epidural and para-vertebral injections/catheters are subject to a wide array of limitations, including patient coagulopathy (International Normalized Ratio \> 1.5), co-existing spine fractures, peri-insertion, peri-removal withholding of venous thromboembolism pharmacoprophylaxis, and provider availability. For these reasons, our current practice is to insert a subscapular pain catheter at the conclusion of the SSRF operation; this catheter is able to deliver a continuous infusion of 0.25% bupivacaine and may be left in place for several days. Although favorable results using the pain catheter have been published in patients with rib fractures who have not undergone SSRF, we have noticed several limitations to this treatment modality. First, position is highly variable; and, because the catheter is not truly in the space of the intercostal nerves, drug delivery is likely irregular. This variability may be particularly relevant in obese patients; and the median body mass index of patient who underwent SSRF at Denver Health is 29 kg/m\^2. Beyond catheter placement, we have also experienced issues with leakage of drug from the skin entry site of the catheter. Moreover, catheters frequently become dislodged or inadvertently removed during patient transport. Further, the indwelling foreign body likely introduces some risk of infection. Finally, the presence of the catheter is distressing to many patients. Liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel, Pacira Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Parsippany, NJ, www.pacira.com) has been shown to provide sustained analgesia for up to 72 hours following a single injection of the drug delivery system. The safety and efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine has been evaluated in over 1,300 subjects and 21 clinical trials. Although many of these trials have included thoracic surgery patients, no trial has evaluated the efficacy and safety of liposomal bupivacaine administered to patients with rib fractures undergoing SSRF. Potential benefits as compared to current practice include directed injection immediately adjacent to the intercostal nerve using a VATS approach, as well as obviation of the need for an indwelling catheter. The hypothesis of the current clinical trial is that, among patients undergoing SSRF, liposomal bupivacaine delivered via video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) is an intercostal nerve block that provides comparable analgesia to the pain catheter, as measured by pulmonary function, numeric pain scoring, and postoperative narcotic use.

Interventions

DRUGLiposomal bupivacaine injection

A single injection of liposomal bupivacaine is administered at the time of SSRF, directly to the fracture site via VATS

DRUGBupivacaine indwelling catheter

Bupivacaine indwelling OnQ pain pump catheter is placed in the subscapular space at the time of SSRF for continuous bupivacaine infusion post op

Sponsors

Denver Health and Hospital Authority
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Non-inferiority, randomized, clinical trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing SSRF at Denver Health Medical Center

Exclusion criteria

* Allergy or hypersensitivity to bupivacaine * Pregnancy * Incarceration * Age \< 18 years * Indwelling continuous thoracic epidural analgesia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Daily Sequential Clinical Assessment of Respiratory Function (SCARF) ScoreMedian SCARF scores were recorded for the first 5 postoperative days.The SCARF score is a validated, dynamic tool that ranges from 0-4, with 0 being the best score and 4 being the worst. One point is given for each of the following four parameters: (1) respiratory rate ≥ 20 breaths per minute; (2) numeric pain score ≥ 5; (3) incentive spirometry \< 50% of predicted based upon a nomogram including sex, height, and age; (4) cough deemed inadequate to clear respiratory secretions by respiratory therapists. The parameters used to calculate the SCARF score are summed to create the total 0-4 score and these results were recorded by clinical personnel not involved in the trial. SCARF scores were taken at 10 am daily for all postoperative inpatient hospital days, however due to variance in length of stay, only scores from the first 5 postoperative days were recorded for the purpose of this results analysis. Scores were then aggregated across the patients and timeframe to result in one median score per group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Daily Narcotic Requirements Using Equi-analgesic DosesMean narcotic requirement scores were recorded for the first 5 postoperative hospital inpatient days.Narcotic pain medication requirements were recorded daily over the duration of inpatient hospital stay, however due to variance in length of stay, only the first 5 postoperative days were recorded for this analysis. Scores were averaged across patients providing one daily postoperative mean score per treatment group. The narcotics provided to patients varied based on standard of care, so an Equi-Analgesic Scale was used to standardize dosages across narcotic type. A 1:1 ratio for narcotic dosages is calculated with the following measured as equivalent: 1.5 milligrams (mg) of intravenous (IV) Hydromorphone; 7.5 mg of per oral (PO) Hydromorphone; 100 micrograms (mcg) of IV Fentanyl; 10 mg of IV Morphine; 30 mg of PO Morphine; 20 mg of PO Oxycodone (Percocet); and 30 mg of PO Hydrocodone (Vicodin). In the context of this scale, lower scores are best, indicating fewer narcotics required and higher scores are worse indicating the need for more narcotics based on subjective patient pain.
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Failure of Primary Loco-Regional Analgesia (LRA)72 hoursThe failure of LRA for this study was defined as the percentage number of instances a patient required a secondary LRA modality within 72 hours of placement of the primary modality for either treatment arm. Requirement of this secondary LRA was determined by the patients' medical team with criteria based on subjective patient experience of pain.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited based on physician referral for surgical stabilization of rib fracture (SSRF) at Denver Health from November 2017 through July 2020.

Pre-assignment details

All 36 patients were enrolled in the study and assigned to groups via a Microsoft Excel randomization.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Bupivacaine Indwelling Catheter
Bupivacaine indwelling OnQ pain pump catheter will be placed in the subscapular space at the time of surgery, at infusion of 12 ml/hr of 0.25% bupivacaine, and left in place for a maximum of 120 hours Bupivacaine indwelling catheter: Bupivacaine indwelling OnQ pain pump catheter is placed in the subscapular space at the time of SSRF for continuous bupivacaine infusion post op
16
Liposomal Bupivacaine Injection
A single injection of liposomal bupivacaine: mixture of 20 mL liposomal bupivacaine, 20 mL 0.25% bupivacaine, and 10 mL sterile saline (50 mL total), will be delivered in the intercostal space during VATS (with a 178 mm, 22 gauge needle, at ribs 3-8). Liposomal bupivacaine injection: A single injection of liposomal bupivacaine is administered at the time of SSRF, directly to the fracture site via VATS
18
Total34

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyORIF cancelled due to patient's cognitive decline, withdrawn from study at this time20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBupivacaine Indwelling CatheterLiposomal Bupivacaine InjectionTotal
Admit Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)13.3 units on a scale13.3 units on a scale13.3 units on a scale
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
5 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
11 Participants15 Participants26 Participants
Age, Continuous53.3 years52.3 years52.8 years
Body Mass Index (BMI)26 kg/m^227.2 kg/m^226.6 kg/m^2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants13 Participants23 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Injury Severity Score (ISS)19.5 units on a scale22.1 units on a scale20.8 units on a scale
Number of Participants who Use Tobacco5 Participants3 Participants8 Participants
Number of Participants with Asthma2 Participants3 Participants5 Participants
Number of Participants with COPD0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
16 Participants16 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants8 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants10 Participants21 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 160 / 18
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 161 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 160 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Daily Sequential Clinical Assessment of Respiratory Function (SCARF) Score

The SCARF score is a validated, dynamic tool that ranges from 0-4, with 0 being the best score and 4 being the worst. One point is given for each of the following four parameters: (1) respiratory rate ≥ 20 breaths per minute; (2) numeric pain score ≥ 5; (3) incentive spirometry \< 50% of predicted based upon a nomogram including sex, height, and age; (4) cough deemed inadequate to clear respiratory secretions by respiratory therapists. The parameters used to calculate the SCARF score are summed to create the total 0-4 score and these results were recorded by clinical personnel not involved in the trial. SCARF scores were taken at 10 am daily for all postoperative inpatient hospital days, however due to variance in length of stay, only scores from the first 5 postoperative days were recorded for the purpose of this results analysis. Scores were then aggregated across the patients and timeframe to result in one median score per group.

Time frame: Median SCARF scores were recorded for the first 5 postoperative days.

Population: All 34 participants were analyzed on this data point and aggregate data is provided below for each treatment arm. Patients who were intubated at 10 am (the time of data reporting) could not be measured on a few factors of this outcome measure and this discrepancy was accounted for in the statistical analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Bupivacaine Indwelling CatheterDaily Sequential Clinical Assessment of Respiratory Function (SCARF) Score2 score on a scale
Liposomal Bupivacaine InjectionDaily Sequential Clinical Assessment of Respiratory Function (SCARF) Score2 score on a scale
p-value: 0.12ANOVA
Secondary

Daily Narcotic Requirements Using Equi-analgesic Doses

Narcotic pain medication requirements were recorded daily over the duration of inpatient hospital stay, however due to variance in length of stay, only the first 5 postoperative days were recorded for this analysis. Scores were averaged across patients providing one daily postoperative mean score per treatment group. The narcotics provided to patients varied based on standard of care, so an Equi-Analgesic Scale was used to standardize dosages across narcotic type. A 1:1 ratio for narcotic dosages is calculated with the following measured as equivalent: 1.5 milligrams (mg) of intravenous (IV) Hydromorphone; 7.5 mg of per oral (PO) Hydromorphone; 100 micrograms (mcg) of IV Fentanyl; 10 mg of IV Morphine; 30 mg of PO Morphine; 20 mg of PO Oxycodone (Percocet); and 30 mg of PO Hydrocodone (Vicodin). In the context of this scale, lower scores are best, indicating fewer narcotics required and higher scores are worse indicating the need for more narcotics based on subjective patient pain.

Time frame: Mean narcotic requirement scores were recorded for the first 5 postoperative hospital inpatient days.

Population: All 34 participants were analyzed on this data point and aggregate data is provided below for each treatment arm. The data below is the mean result provided for each of the first 5 postoperative days following surgical intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bupivacaine Indwelling CatheterDaily Narcotic Requirements Using Equi-analgesic DosesPostoperative Day #26.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Bupivacaine Indwelling CatheterDaily Narcotic Requirements Using Equi-analgesic DosesPostoperative Day #44.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
Bupivacaine Indwelling CatheterDaily Narcotic Requirements Using Equi-analgesic DosesPostoperative Day #34.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
Bupivacaine Indwelling CatheterDaily Narcotic Requirements Using Equi-analgesic DosesPostoperative Day #54.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
Bupivacaine Indwelling CatheterDaily Narcotic Requirements Using Equi-analgesic DosesPostoperative Day #18.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13
Liposomal Bupivacaine InjectionDaily Narcotic Requirements Using Equi-analgesic DosesPostoperative Day #52.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Liposomal Bupivacaine InjectionDaily Narcotic Requirements Using Equi-analgesic DosesPostoperative Day #16.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
Liposomal Bupivacaine InjectionDaily Narcotic Requirements Using Equi-analgesic DosesPostoperative Day #24.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
Liposomal Bupivacaine InjectionDaily Narcotic Requirements Using Equi-analgesic DosesPostoperative Day #32.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Liposomal Bupivacaine InjectionDaily Narcotic Requirements Using Equi-analgesic DosesPostoperative Day #41.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
Comparison: This is the P-Value for between groups comparison of Postoperative Day #1.p-value: 0.41ANOVA
Comparison: This is the P-Value for between groups comparison of Postoperative Day #2.p-value: 0.25ANOVA
Comparison: This is the P-Value for between groups comparison of Postoperative Day #3.p-value: 0.12ANOVA
Comparison: This is the P-Value for between groups comparison of Postoperative Day #4.p-value: 0.04ANOVA
Comparison: This is the P-Value for between groups comparison of Postoperative Day #5.p-value: 0.32ANOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Experiencing Failure of Primary Loco-Regional Analgesia (LRA)

The failure of LRA for this study was defined as the percentage number of instances a patient required a secondary LRA modality within 72 hours of placement of the primary modality for either treatment arm. Requirement of this secondary LRA was determined by the patients' medical team with criteria based on subjective patient experience of pain.

Time frame: 72 hours

Population: All 34 participants were analyzed on this data point and aggregate data is provided below for each treatment arm. Percentages entered below are based on number of failure occurrences, in this case defined as requiring a secondary LRA.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Bupivacaine Indwelling CatheterPercentage of Participants Experiencing Failure of Primary Loco-Regional Analgesia (LRA)18.8 percentage of participants
Liposomal Bupivacaine InjectionPercentage of Participants Experiencing Failure of Primary Loco-Regional Analgesia (LRA)5.6 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.23ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026