Skip to content

Comparative Study Between Conventional and Telematic Patients Follow-up

Comparative Study Between Conventional and Telematic Follow-up of Patient Treated in a General Ang GI Surgery Department (TLM-CGD)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03304509
Acronym
TLM-CGD
Enrollment
200
Registered
2017-10-09
Start date
2017-03-19
Completion date
2018-08-23
Last updated
2018-08-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

General Surgery, Outpatients, Telemedicine

Brief summary

This is a parallel group clinical trial comparing two types of follow-up in patients operated and treated in a General and GI surgery department. Face-to-face vs telematic follow-up by using a platform that offers videoconferencing will be compared. Patients will be included and assigned randomly to each group using an informatics program until 100 patients are reached in each arm of the study (n total = 200 patients) The main and secondary outcomes will be evaluated 30 days after the date of the follow-up.

Detailed description

This is a parallel group clinical trial comparing two types of follow-up in patients operated and treated in a General and GI surgery department. Face-to-face vs telematic follow-up by using a platform that offers videoconferencing will be compared. The hypothesis is that a follow-up based on a telematic visit will no add extra comorbidities while could reduce costs and increase patients satisfaction. Patients will be included and assigned randomly to each group using an informatics program until 100 patients are reached in each arm of the study (n total = 200 patients) Information regarding the type of follow-up and the instructions to perform the telematic visit will be provided to patients before discharge. The follow-up date will be set according to the established protocol for each type of pathology. In case of clinical complications patients will be referred to the emergency department or will be visited in face-to-face basis. The main and secondary outcomes will be evaluated 30 days after the date of the follow-up.

Interventions

OTHERTelematic follow-up

Telematic follow-up by using a platform with videoconference

Sponsors

Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Patients will be included and assigned randomly, using an informatic program, to one of the study arms before hospital discharge.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients treated or operated in the General and GI Surgery department in Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol

Exclusion criteria

* Proctological Surgery * Personal conditions that not allow a correct comprehension or developement of the study * Patients with postoperative complications greater than Clavien-Dindo grade II * Not being in possession of the necessary informatic devices in case of telematic follow-up * Not having a basic informatic knowledge in case of telematic follow-up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Follow-up accomplishmentFrom date of discharge until the date of follow-up, 30 days after dischargePercentage of patients that can finish the follow-up in the assigned group

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Emergency department consultationFrom discharge until 30 days after the follow-up dateComparison between number of emergency department consultations in each group if related to the surgical procedure
Patient satisfaction30 days after the follow-up dateAssessment of the patient satisfaction related to the follow-up using the NHS Outpatients Questionnaire. The results will be the comparision of percentage of each answer in each group.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026