Skip to content

Metaplasticity Experimental Design and Comparison of Motor Outcome Measure Sensitivity to Change

Metaplasticity in the Human Motor Cortex: Validation of an Experimental Design and Comparison of Motor Outcome Measure Sensitivity to Change

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03304262
Enrollment
13
Registered
2017-10-06
Start date
2017-07-18
Completion date
2018-03-31
Last updated
2023-08-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Keywords

Metaplasticity, Motor excitability, rTMS, tDCS

Brief summary

The overall objective is to validate the methodology of a metaplasticity experimental design by assessing change in motor excitability after administration of priming transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) followed by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in healthy human participants.

Detailed description

The overall objective is to validate the methodology of a metaplasticity experimental design by assessing change in motor excitability after administration of priming transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) followed by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in healthy human participants. Our primary objective is to compare pre- and post-measures of cortical excitability before priming tDCS (anodal, cathodal or sham) \[M1\], directly after priming tDCS \[M2\], directly after inhibitory rTMS \[M3\], and 10 minutes after inhibitory rTMS \[M4\]. Our secondary objective is to evaluate the sensitivity of motor excitability outcome measures response to the noninvasive neurostimulation (e.g. rTMS and tDCS). We also aim to compare pre- and post- measures of cortical excitability after inhibitory and excitatory priming of the motor cortex, and to evaluate the sensitivity of motor outcome measures to changes in cortical plasticity.

Interventions

DEVICErTMS

Between time point M2 and M3, participant will receive 900 pulses of rTMS at 1Hz at 0.85 of M2 resting motor threshold.

Sponsors

University of New Mexico
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Participants will be blinded to treatment group, investigator administering tDCS will be blinded to which treatment arm subject is assigned to, and the data analyst will be conducting analysis off site and is different than investigator applying stimulation.

Intervention model description

This is a randomized, sham-controlled, double blinded crossover trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Must be at least 18 years of age (all genders, races, ethnicity) * Must have no current psychiatric or neurologic issues * Must not have any conditions listed in

Exclusion criteria

* Must be fluent in English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in MEP Amplitudeassessed and reported throughout study completion pre- and post- intervention approximately 30 minutesPercent Change in MEP amplitude over the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle of the right hand

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cortical Silent PeriodtDCS + rTMS assessed and reported pre and post (approximately 10 minutes)Change in length of CSP
Simple Reaction TimeThe final outcome will be percent change in the reaction time from pre- to post- intervention.Participants will perform a simple reaction time task. This will be measured in seconds of response after a stimulus. The final outcome will be percent change in the reaction time from pre- to post- intervention.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

This was a crossover design, in which each participant came in three times and was randomly assigned to each intervention with a wash-out period in between.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cathodal tDCS + rTMS Then Anodal tDCS + rTMS Then Sham tDCS + rTMS
Participant will receive 10 minutes of cathodal tDCS between M1 and M2 timepoints, and rTMS for 900 1Hz pulses at 0.85 of Resting Motor Threshold at M2. After 1 week washout, participant will receive 10 minutes of anodal tDCS between M1 and M2 timepoints, and rTMS for 900 1 Hz pulses at 0.85 Resting Motor Threshold at M2. After 1 week washout, participant will receive 10 minutes of sham tDCS between M1 and M2 timepoints, and rTMS for 900 1 Hz pulses at 0.85 Resting Motor Threshold at M2. rTMS: Between time point M2 and M3, participant will receive 900 pulses of rTMS at 1Hz at 0.85 of M2 resting motor threshold.
4
Anodal tDCS + rTMS Then Sham tDCS + rTMS Then Cathodal tDCS + rTMS
Participant will receive 10 minutes of anodal tDCS between M1 and M2 timepoints, and rTMS for 900 1Hz pulses at 0.85 of Resting Motor Threshold at M2. After 1 week washout, participant will receive 10 minutes of sham tDCS between M1 and M2 timepoints, and rTMS for 900 1 Hz pulses at 0.85 Resting Motor Threshold at M2. After 1 week washout, participant will receive 10 minutes of cathodal tDCS between M1 and M2 timepoints, and rTMS for 900 1 Hz pulses at 0.85 Resting Motor Threshold at M2. rTMS: Between time point M2 and M3, participant will receive 900 pulses of rTMS at 1Hz at 0.85 of M2 resting motor threshold.
5
Sham tDCS + rTMS Then Cathodal tDCS + rTMS Then Anodal tDCS + rTMS
Participant will receive 10 minutes of sham tDCS between M1 and M2 timepoints, and rTMS for 900 1Hz pulses at 0.85 of Resting Motor Threshold at M2. After 1 week washout, participant will receive 10 minutes of cathodal tDCS between M1 and M2 timepoints, and rTMS for 900 1 Hz pulses at 0.85 Resting Motor Threshold at M2. After 1 week washout, participant will receive 10 minutes of anodal tDCS between M1 and M2 timepoints, and rTMS for 900 1 Hz pulses at 0.85 Resting Motor Threshold at M2. rTMS: Between time point M2 and M3, participant will receive 900 pulses of rTMS at 1Hz at 0.85 of M2 resting motor threshold.
4
Total13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCathodal tDCS + rTMS Then Anodal tDCS + rTMS Then Sham tDCS + rTMSTotalSham tDCS + rTMS Then Cathodal tDCS + rTMS Then Anodal tDCS + rTMSAnodal tDCS + rTMS Then Sham tDCS + rTMS Then Cathodal tDCS + rTMS
Age, Continuous35.54 years35.54 years35.54 years35.54 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants8 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants5 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants9 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
4 participants13 participants4 participants5 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants8 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants5 Participants2 Participants1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 130 / 130 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 130 / 130 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 130 / 130 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change in MEP Amplitude

Percent Change in MEP amplitude over the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle of the right hand

Time frame: assessed and reported throughout study completion pre- and post- intervention approximately 30 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Cathodal tDCS + rTMSPercent Change in MEP Amplitude1.19 Percent Change
Anodal tDCS + rTMSPercent Change in MEP Amplitude1.06 Percent Change
Sham tDCS + rTMSPercent Change in MEP Amplitude1.38 Percent Change
Secondary

Cortical Silent Period

Change in length of CSP

Time frame: tDCS + rTMS assessed and reported pre and post (approximately 10 minutes)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Cathodal tDCS + rTMSCortical Silent Period1.02 Percent change
Anodal tDCS + rTMSCortical Silent Period1.01 Percent change
Sham tDCS + rTMSCortical Silent Period0.99 Percent change
Secondary

Simple Reaction Time

Participants will perform a simple reaction time task. This will be measured in seconds of response after a stimulus. The final outcome will be percent change in the reaction time from pre- to post- intervention.

Time frame: The final outcome will be percent change in the reaction time from pre- to post- intervention.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Cathodal tDCS + rTMSSimple Reaction Time1.01 Percent change
Anodal tDCS + rTMSSimple Reaction Time1.02 Percent change
Sham tDCS + rTMSSimple Reaction Time1.02 Percent change

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026