Skip to content

London Investigation Into diElectric Scanning of Lesions

Performance Evaluation of the MARIA (Multi Static Array Processing of Radiowave Image Acquisition) Radar Breast Imaging System in Patients With Breast Cancer and in Patients Assessed in the Symptomatic Breast Clinic.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03302819
Acronym
LIESL
Enrollment
994
Registered
2017-10-05
Start date
2017-11-01
Completion date
2018-12-01
Last updated
2017-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Brief summary

The MARIA breast imaging system is a novel CE-marked radio-frequency (RF) medical imaging device. The system employs an electromagnetic imaging technique that exploits the dielectric contrast between normal and cancerous tissues. The performance and imaging characteristics of MARIA are not yet well demonstrated. The investigators aim to evaluate some aspects of this potentially important new technology.

Detailed description

The early diagnosis of breast cancer is of paramount importance, with a 5-year survival rate of 97% if the cancer is caught locally, deteriorating to 79% if it has progressed to the axillary lymph nodes, and 23% if it has spread to the rest of the body, known as metastasised. Diagnosis is currently achieved through clinical examination, imaging with mammography (MMG) and/or ultrasound (US) and needle biopsy. Mammography is dependent upon adequate breast compression to allow greater contrast differentiation between tissue structures, this is not only uncomfortable, but in younger women with 'dense' breast tissue the contrast difference between normal tissue and tumour is minimal despite compression. Furthermore mammography uses ionising radiation, which means that a risk/benefit calculation is weighted against repeated or frequent use. Frequently it is necessary to use additional imaging such as ultrasound or MRI for diagnostic support. Breast tumours have an additional property that can distinguish them from normal and this is defined by the dielectric value. This has two components - the dielectric constant, which affects the velocity of propagation of radio waves and therefore their wavelength, and the conductivity, which affects the rate of attenuation. Typically a tumour has a dielectric constant of 45-50 and a conductivity of 2S/m, whereas breast fat is 5-15 and 0.2-1S/m respectively but with considerable range. Normal glandular tissue is intermediate. These differences in dielectric constant enable a consideration of the value of this data in breast cancer diagnosis. Several attempts to exploit this property for imaging have been made. The outcomes have been similar in that the presence of a tumour is detectable, however limitations in depth for detection and mode of the technology were identified. Due to updated technology in the MARIA device, previous limitations from similar studies are not reported to be a problem. This study aims to determine the proportion of patients with breast cancer who are correctly diagnosed by MARIA, and to stratify this by breast density and histological type. In addition a pilot study will be performed to investigate the imaging characteristics and performance of MARIA in the assessment of benign and malignant lesions in patients attending the symptomatic breast clinic. The MARIA scan will be in addition to any standard diagnostic procedures, including imaging, that comprise the standard of care. The scan will require them to lie prone for less than 10 minutes with their breast pendant in an ergonomically-fitted bowl with a thin layer of a coupling fluid (similar to hand moisture in consistency) applied to the surface of the breast. While there is no direct benefit nor detrimental effect from this study to the patients participating, the study has large implications for many women. This study will allow the investigators to test the feasibility of this highly innovating approach to breast cancer, with minimal negative effects or possible complications. This diagnostic modality could prove to be a major step forwards in cancer detection, initially as a complementary source of information that can increase confidence in results obtained from established technologies that are routinely deployed in the clinic.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTMARIA scan

The patient will have an additional MARIA scan along with conventional imaging, pathology and surgical procedures.

Sponsors

Micrima, Ltd.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Attending a symptomatic breast care clinic OR Patients who have a diagnosed or suspected breast cancer (P5/M5/U5/B5). * Female sex * 18 years or older. * Able to provide informed consent. * Not in any identified, vulnerable group.

Exclusion criteria

* Unable to mount MARIA™ patient bed using provided 2-step * Unable to lie in the prone position * Patients who have undergone biopsy less than 5 days before the MARIA™ scan * Patients with implanted electronics. * Patients with breast implants. * Patients with nipple piercings (unless they are removed prior to the MARIA™ scan) * Breast sizes smaller than 197ml or greater than 1L in volume

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients with breast cancer in whom breast cancer is correctly identified by MARIA1 week (after histopathology result)Comparison to histopathology result
Sensitivity and specificity of MARIA for a range of findings to include, simple cysts, fibroadenomata, and malignant lesions. As judged against the final diagnosis at discharge, which may be based on clinical findings, imaging and pathology data.Through study completion, an average of 1 yearComparison with clinical, radiology and pathology findings
Proportion of post-operative patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy, correctly identified by MARIA with complete response or residual disease, as compared to surgical histology.Through study completion, an average of 1 yearComparison of response to surgical histology

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assessment of data repeatability (test re-test) of MARIA assessment results on patients with diagnostic follow-up imaging.After attendance for further imaging, at 1-2 weeks.Comparison with prior MARIA scan when returning for further imaging
Compare the detection of breast cancer from MARIA with the detection from mammography by the sub-group of histology type.Through study completion, an average of 1 yearComparison to Mammography and Pathology result
Patient tolerance of MARIA (a non-compressing, non-ionising modality)Through study completion, an average of 1 yearQuestionnaire measurement, Quantitative answers.
Investigate the performance of MARIA in the estimation of residual tumour size compared to the final surgical histology results in the case of patients receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy.Through study completion, an average of 1 yearThe correlation between the pathological features of the lesion and the imaging features as determined from MARIA including presence of features, shape and size.
Compare the detection of breast cancer from MARIA with the detection from mammography by sub-group of mammographic density.Through study completion, an average of 1 yearComparison to Mammography and Pathology result
Compare the detection of breast cancer from MARIA with the detection from mammography in the overall patient group.Through study completion, an average of 1 yearComparison to Mammography and Pathology result

Contacts

Primary ContactRichard Sidebottom
richardsidebottom@nhs.net02073528171

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026