Skip to content

CAP'Onco : Psychological and Social Consultation of Professional Accompaniment in Oncology

CAP'Onco : Psychological and Social Consultation of Professional Accompaniment in Oncology

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03302767
Acronym
CAP'ONCO
Enrollment
29
Registered
2017-10-05
Start date
2017-08-07
Completion date
2018-06-27
Last updated
2021-05-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer

Keywords

Oncology, Work Keeping, Social difficulties, Cognitive Disorders

Brief summary

This patient support system is designed to help patients regain their professional activity after their treatment. It's a 3-Axis neuropsycho-social synergy on 3 axes: * A weekly pluridisciplinary consultation in tandem (Social worker + Psychologist / Neuropsychologist) * Monthly information meetings and workshops (TIC'Onco reunions: collective information times and Cogit'Onco workshops: cognitive workshops * An information booklet Prepare the work return The aim of this research is to evaluate efficiency in term of quality of life improvement linked to work status, utility, feasibility and patients' satisfaction. The aim of this research is to evaluate efficiency in term of quality of life improvement linked to work status, utility, feasibility and patients' satisfaction.

Detailed description

Unmet need characterize in 4 points: * Cancer and survival: challenges for cancer patients who want to work while being treated * Cancer and career: Job instability for cancer patients * Difficulties and isolation of patients due to a lack of coordination between healthcare professionals and colleagues/management * Post-treatment cognitive troubles stress and hindered patient return to employment: chemo brain This research-action will propose and evaluate a concrete device: To maintain a professional activity with the support of CAP'Onco during treatment, to balance between quality of life, managing the cancer event and the psychosocial consequences for professional experience, to provide an early, durable and multimodal support to improve work keeping and anticipate return to employment

Interventions

OTHERPsychological and Social Consultation

Psychological and Social Consultation at Baseline, during the study and at the end of follow-up

Sponsors

Institut Bergonié
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients attending the Institut Bergonié * Informed Consent signed. * Patients affiliated to a French social * living in Gironde * Professional activity at the time of diagnosis * Treated for - breast cancer, Hodgkin's or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (non-cerebral), testicular cancer * CURATIVE support * At any time during treatment (chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or immunotherapy)

Exclusion criteria

* Patient deprived of liberty or subject to a legal protection measure * History of cancers * Cerebral pathology and / or brain metastasis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresAt baseline and 5 monthsStandardised QLQ-C30 scoring according to EORTC scoring manual (Fayers et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. 2001). 15 dimensions are presented below. Each dimension is a standardised score ranges from 0 to 100. A low score corresponds to a low functional level, an absence of symptoms or a low level of QoL/ overall health and, conversely, so that a high score corresponds to a high functional level, a high presence of symptoms or a high level of QoL/overall health.
Cognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale ScoresAt baseline and 5 monthsCognitive complaints were evaluated by using the french Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) scale version 3 Assessed using median total score (range 0-132) and median scores of these 4 dimensions : * Perceived Cognitive Impairment (range 0-72) * Impact on quality of life (range 0-16) * Comments from others (range 0-16) * Perceived Cognitive Skills (range 0-28) Higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning.
Professional Recovery Scale ScoresAt baseline and 5 monthsProfessional recovery was evaluated by using the Scale of motivation to Professional recovery. This scale was constructed for the needs of this exploratory research and has for vocation a later validation. It includes 62 questions and was assessed using median scores of these 7 dimensions : * Work and administrative process (0-100) * Positioning in relation to the job-post-mission (0-100) * Emotion and work (0-100) * Labour relations (0-100) * Work and physical/intellectual conditions (0-100) * Privacy and work (0-100) * Return to work (0-20) Higher scores represent better outcomes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale ScoresAt baseline and 5 monthsTiredness was evaluated by using the Piper Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) revised scale Assessed using median total score (range 0-10) and median scores of these 4 tiredness dimensions : * Behavioural * Emotional * Sensory * Cognitive-mood Each dimension has range 0-10 with following interpretation: higher scores indicate greater severity of fatigue
Anxio-depressive Troubles : HAD Scale ScoresAt baseline and 5 monthsAnxio-depressive troubles were evaluated by using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale. Assessed using median scores of these 2 dimensions : * Anxiety * Depression Each dimension has range 0-21 with following interpretation: higher scores represent worse outcomes (0-7 normal; 8-10 mild; 11-14 moderate; 15-21 severe)

Countries

France

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Psychological and Social Consultation
Psychological and Social Consultation at Baseline, during the study and at the end of follow-up
29
Total29

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPsychological and Social Consultation
Age, Continuous44.9 years
Marital Status
As a couple
7 Participants
Marital Status
Married
11 Participants
Marital Status
Single
10 Participants
Marital Status
Widower
1 Participants
PROFESSIONAL STATUS
Other
1 Participants
PROFESSIONAL STATUS
Private Sector
12 Participants
PROFESSIONAL STATUS
Public Sector
13 Participants
PROFESSIONAL STATUS
Self-employed worker
3 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected— Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
29 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants
SOCIO-PROFESSIONAL CATEGORY
craftsman, shopkeeper, business owner
3 Participants
SOCIO-PROFESSIONAL CATEGORY
employee
14 Participants
SOCIO-PROFESSIONAL CATEGORY
executive, intellectual profession
6 Participants
SOCIO-PROFESSIONAL CATEGORY
intermediate profession
5 Participants
SOCIO-PROFESSIONAL CATEGORY
person without professional activity
1 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Cognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale Scores

Cognitive complaints were evaluated by using the french Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog) scale version 3 Assessed using median total score (range 0-132) and median scores of these 4 dimensions : * Perceived Cognitive Impairment (range 0-72) * Impact on quality of life (range 0-16) * Comments from others (range 0-16) * Perceived Cognitive Skills (range 0-28) Higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning.

Time frame: At baseline and 5 months

Population: * At baseline, 2 patients did not complete the Cognitive complaints questionnaire~* At 5 months, 1 patient did not complete the Cognitive complaints questionnaire

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Psychological and Social ConsultationCognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale ScoresPerceived Cognitive Impairment - 5 months50.5 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationCognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale ScoresImpact on quality of life - Baseline8 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationCognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale ScoresPerceived Cognitive Impairment - Baseline39 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationCognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale ScoresImpact on quality of life - 5 months14.0 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationCognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale ScoresComments from others - Baseline15 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationCognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale ScoresComments from others - 5 months16 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationCognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale ScoresPerceived Cognitive Skills - Baseline13 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationCognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale ScoresPerceived Cognitive Skills - 5 months17.5 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationCognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale ScoresTotal score - Baseline75 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationCognitive Complaints : FACT Cog Scale ScoresTotal score - 5 months96 scores on a scale
Primary

Professional Recovery Scale Scores

Professional recovery was evaluated by using the Scale of motivation to Professional recovery. This scale was constructed for the needs of this exploratory research and has for vocation a later validation. It includes 62 questions and was assessed using median scores of these 7 dimensions : * Work and administrative process (0-100) * Positioning in relation to the job-post-mission (0-100) * Emotion and work (0-100) * Labour relations (0-100) * Work and physical/intellectual conditions (0-100) * Privacy and work (0-100) * Return to work (0-20) Higher scores represent better outcomes

Time frame: At baseline and 5 months

Population: * At baseline, 1 patient did not complete the Professional recovery questionnaire~* At 5 months :~ * 3 patients have missing data for the scores 'Work and administrative process', 'Work and physical/intellectual conditions' and 'Privacy and work'~ * 4 patients have missing data for the scores 'Positioning in relation to the job-post-mission', 'Emotion and work' and 'Labour relations'~ * 1 patient has missing data for the score 'Return to work'

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Psychological and Social ConsultationProfessional Recovery Scale ScoresWork and administrative process - Baseline58 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationProfessional Recovery Scale ScoresWork and administrative process - 5 months61 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationProfessional Recovery Scale ScoresEmotion and work - 5 months60 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationProfessional Recovery Scale ScoresLabour relations - Baseline55 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationProfessional Recovery Scale ScoresPrivacy and work - 5 months60.5 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationProfessional Recovery Scale ScoresPositioning in relation to the job-post-mission - Baseline40.5 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationProfessional Recovery Scale ScoresPositioning in relation to the job-post-mission - 5 months50 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationProfessional Recovery Scale ScoresEmotion and work - Baseline58.5 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationProfessional Recovery Scale ScoresLabour relations - 5 months59 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationProfessional Recovery Scale ScoresWork and physical/intellectual conditions - Baseline42 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationProfessional Recovery Scale ScoresWork and physical/intellectual conditions - 5 months52.5 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationProfessional Recovery Scale ScoresPrivacy and work - Baseline50.5 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationProfessional Recovery Scale ScoresReturn to work - Baseline10 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationProfessional Recovery Scale ScoresReturn to work - 5 months14 scores on a scale
Primary

Quality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores

Standardised QLQ-C30 scoring according to EORTC scoring manual (Fayers et al. EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. 2001). 15 dimensions are presented below. Each dimension is a standardised score ranges from 0 to 100. A low score corresponds to a low functional level, an absence of symptoms or a low level of QoL/ overall health and, conversely, so that a high score corresponds to a high functional level, a high presence of symptoms or a high level of QoL/overall health.

Time frame: At baseline and 5 months

Population: * At baseline, 1 patient did not complete the QLQ-C30 questionnaire. And of the remaining 28 patients, 1 patient has missing data for the score 'Dyspnoea'.~* At 5 months, 1 patient did not complete the QLQ-C30 questionnaire. And of the remaining 28 patients :~ * 1 patient has missing data for the scores 'Constipation' and 'Diarrhoea'~ * 1 another patient has missing data for the score 'Fatigue'

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresPhysical functioning - Baseline82.9 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresGlobal health status/ quality of life - Baseline61.0 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresGlobal health status/ quality of life - 5 months70.8 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresPhysical functioning - 5 months83.2 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresRole functioning - Baseline72.6 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresRole functioning - 5 months78.6 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresEmotional functioning - Baseline61.0 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresEmotional functioning - 5 months67.0 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresCognitive functioning - Baseline61.3 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresSocial functioning - Baseline73.2 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresSocial functioning - 5 months82.1 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresFatigue - Baseline47.6 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresNausea/ vomiting - 5 months3.0 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresPain - Baseline38.7 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresPain - 5 months33.3 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresDyspnoea - Baseline24.7 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresDyspnoea - 5 months16.7 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresDiarrhoea - Baseline8.3 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresDiarrhoea - 5 months3.7 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresCognitive functioning - 5 months73.2 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresFatigue - 5 months43.6 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresNausea/ vomiting - Baseline3.6 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresInsomnia - Baseline52.4 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresInsomnia - 5 months41.7 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresAppetite loss - Baseline9.5 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresAppetite loss - 5 months6.0 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresConstipation - Baseline21.4 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresConstipation - 5 months16.0 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresFinancial difficulties - Baseline21.4 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationQuality of Life : EORTC QLQ-C30 ScoresFinancial difficulties - 5 months15.5 scores on a scale
Secondary

Anxio-depressive Troubles : HAD Scale Scores

Anxio-depressive troubles were evaluated by using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale. Assessed using median scores of these 2 dimensions : * Anxiety * Depression Each dimension has range 0-21 with following interpretation: higher scores represent worse outcomes (0-7 normal; 8-10 mild; 11-14 moderate; 15-21 severe)

Time frame: At baseline and 5 months

Population: * At baseline, 2 patients did not complete the Anxio-depressive troubles questionnaire~* At 5 months ,1 patient did not complete the Anxio-depressive troubles questionnaire

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Psychological and Social ConsultationAnxio-depressive Troubles : HAD Scale ScoresAnxiety score - 5 months8 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationAnxio-depressive Troubles : HAD Scale ScoresDepression score - Baseline7.0 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationAnxio-depressive Troubles : HAD Scale ScoresDepression score - 5 months6.5 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationAnxio-depressive Troubles : HAD Scale ScoresAnxiety score - Baseline10.0 scores on a scale
Secondary

Tiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale Scores

Tiredness was evaluated by using the Piper Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) revised scale Assessed using median total score (range 0-10) and median scores of these 4 tiredness dimensions : * Behavioural * Emotional * Sensory * Cognitive-mood Each dimension has range 0-10 with following interpretation: higher scores indicate greater severity of fatigue

Time frame: At baseline and 5 months

Population: * At baseline:~ * 2 patients have missing data for the scores 'Emotional dimension', Behavioural dimension' and 'Sensory dimension'~ * 3 patients have missing data for the score 'Cognitive-mood dimension'~ * 3 patients finally have missing data for 'Total Score Fatigue Scale'~* At 5 months, 1 patient did not complete the Tiredness questionnaire

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Psychological and Social ConsultationTiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale ScoresEmotional dimension - Baseline5.4 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationTiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale ScoresEmotional dimension - 5 months5.7 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationTiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale ScoresSensory dimension - Baseline4.2 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationTiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale ScoresBehavioural dimension - 5 months4.7 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationTiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale ScoresBehavioural dimension - Baseline5.3 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationTiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale ScoresSensory dimension - 5 months4.0 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationTiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale ScoresCognitive-mood dimension - Baseline4.8 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationTiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale ScoresCognitive-mood dimension - 5 months3.9 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationTiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale ScoresTotal Score Fatigue Scale - Baseline5.2 scores on a scale
Psychological and Social ConsultationTiredness : Piper MFI-20 Scale ScoresTotal Score Fatigue Scale - 5 months4.7 scores on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026