Skip to content

The Use of Chewing Gum for Xerostomia and Hyposalivation After Radiotherapy for Oral and Oropharyngeal Tumors

The Use of Chewing Gum for Xerostomia and Hyposalivation After Radiotherapy for Oral and Oropharyngeal Tumors

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03302676
Enrollment
109
Registered
2017-10-05
Start date
2016-09-30
Completion date
2019-01-31
Last updated
2019-03-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Head and Neck Cancer, Hyposalivation, Radiation Therapy Complication, Xerostomia

Keywords

Saliva substitute

Brief summary

This study evaluates the possible benefits of a tasteless and sugar free chewing gum as a salivary stimulant for head and neck cancer patients treated with curative intended radiotherapy.

Detailed description

Radiation-induced xerostomia and hyposalivation are frequent side effects after completed treatment for oral and oropharyngeal cancers. This may induce eating and swallowing difficulties, compromised oral hygiene, pain in the mouth, or speech deficiencies. As a consequence, quality of life is often impaired for this group of patients even after completing treatment. This study hypothesize that chewing gum can stimulate salivary flow from the residual functional salivary glands and thereby improving the patient's oral well-being. Primary endpoint: \- To assess whether the difference between the unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow after a one-month period of using chewing gum will result in improved oral well-being. Secondary endpoint: * To assess if unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow differs between the two groups of patients * To evaluate changes in quality of life with EORTC QLQ H&N-35 for patients using chewing gum * To evaluate differences in quality of life with EORTC QLQ H&N-35 between the two groups of patients. All patients who have received curative intended treatment for oral or oropharyngeal carcinomas at the Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, will be invited to participate in the study. If the eligibility criteria are met the patient will be randomized 2:1 to either the intervention arm with chewing gum or the control arm with standard oral care. The study intends to include 210 patients in total. Of these, 140 patients in the intervention arm and 70 in the control arm. Recruitment to the study was initiated in September 2016 and is expected to be completed in July 2018. The duration of the study is one month from inclusion and randomization to final follow up. For all included patients, saliva samples are collected (unstimulated and stimulated sialometry) and the EORTC QLQ H&N-35 questionnaire and a xerostomia specific questionnaire are completed. The patients in the control arm are only introduced to chewing gum at the last follow up visit. In the intervention arm, all patients are instructed to use the chewing gum on a daily basis (preferably 5 times a day) and to make notes in a patient diary to document compliance.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTChewing gum

Sponsors

Danish Cancer Society
CollaboratorOTHER
Odense Patient Data Explorative Network
CollaboratorOTHER
Odense University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

2:1 randomization in favor of chewing gum (intervention)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Over 18 years of age * Diagnosed with oral or oropharyngeal carcinoma * Received curative intended radiation therapy (primary or postoperative), 60-66Gy including concurrent chemotherapy * Within 6 to 60 months after radiation therapy * Complains of xerostomia level 1 (according to Danish Head and Neck Cancer group) * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Poor teeth condition or full set of dentures * Recurrence of cancer or palliative treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Salivary flow (intervention arm)1 monthPatients in the intervention arm will experience increase in stimulated salivary flow at follow up as compared to unstimulated salivary flow at baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Salivary flow (both groups of patients)1 monthThe difference between unstimulated and stimulated salivary flow will be higher for patients in the intervention arm as compared to the difference in salivary flow for patients in the control arm.

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026