Skip to content

WAveCrest Vs. Watchman TranssEptal LAA Closure to REduce AF-Mediated STroke 2

WAveCrest Vs. Watchman TranssEptal LAA Closure to REduce AF-Mediated STroke 2. A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Active Controlled, Clinical Trial of the Coherex WaveCrest® Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion System Compared to the Watchman® LAA Closure Device for the Reduction in Risk of Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism in Subjects With Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation That Have an Appropriate Rationale to Seek a Non-pharmacologic Alternative to Chronic Oral Anticoagulation.

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03302494
Acronym
WAVECREST2
Enrollment
248
Registered
2017-10-05
Start date
2017-12-27
Completion date
2023-12-21
Last updated
2025-03-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation, Left Atrial Appendage

Brief summary

The WAVECREST 2 trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, active controlled, clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Coherex WaveCrest Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Occlusion System.

Detailed description

The WAVECREST 2 trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, active controlled, clinical trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Coherex WaveCrest Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Occlusion System. Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the Treatment Arm (Coherex WaveCrest LAA occlusion system) or the Control Arm (Boston Scientific's Watchman LAA occlusion system). The trial is designed to demonstrate that safety and effectiveness of the WaveCrest device are non-inferior to the Watchman device.

Interventions

DEVICECoherex WaveCrest® Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion System

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure

DEVICEWatchman® LAA Closure Device

Percutaeous left atrial appendage closure

Sponsors

Biosense Webster, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Coherex Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

If the subject is suspected of having a stroke since their most recent follow-up, a Neurologist blinded to subject's randomization and implanted device must evaluate the subject or otherwise provide rationale for why an in-person neurology visit and exam are unnecessary. Neurology or blinded trial personnel should also administer mRS & NIHSS if there is suspicion of stroke A Clinical Events Committee, also blinded to subject's randomization, will adjudicate primary safety and effectiveness.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Documented evidence of paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent non-valvular atrial fibrillation 2. At least 18 years of age 3. Calculated CHADS2 score ≥ 2 or CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 3 4. Indication for warfarin therapy with an appropriate rationale to seek a non-pharmacologic alternative to chronic oral anticoagulation 5. Willing and able to comply with post-implant anticoagulation and antiplatelet regimen 6. Willing to participate in the required follow-up visits and tests 7. Subject has been informed of the nature of the trial, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the IRB/EC at the site

Exclusion criteria

1. Atrial fibrillation (AF) due to a reversible cause (e.g. thyrotoxicosis or postoperative) 2. Known contraindication and/or allergy to warfarin, nickel, aspirin, intravenous contrast or P2Y12 inhibitors (clopidogrel, ticagrelor, and prasugrel), which cannot be adequately pre-medicated or desensitized 3. Conditions other than AF requiring long-term anticoagulation therapy 4. Contraindications for percutaneous catheterization procedures 5. Prior surgical LAA occlusion/exclusion or implanted with LAA occlusion device, or any prior attempt of such procedures 6. Prior percutaneous or surgical closure of a patent foramen ovale or atrial septal defect 7. Inability or unwillingness to take oral anticoagulation for 45 days post-procedure 8. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV heart failure 9. Prior cardiac transplant, history of mitral valve replacement or transcatheter mitral valve intervention, or any mechanical valve implant 10. History of symptomatic carotid, intervertebral, or intracranial artery occlusion or stenosis without revascularization with the exception of known occlusion without symptoms \> 6 months 11. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥ 4 12. Chronic resting heart rate ≥ 110 bpm 13. Congenital cardiac anomalies requiring cardiac surgery or interventional repair 14. Stroke or transient ischemic attack (confirmed by Neurologist) within 60 days prior to enrollment 15. Myocardial infarction within 60 days prior to enrollment 16. Sepsis or any infection requiring oral antibiotic therapy within 14 days or intravenous antibiotic therapy within 30 days prior to enrollment 17. Surgical or interventional cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular procedure including cardioversion within 30 days prior to enrollment or AF ablation within 60 days prior to enrollment or any planned general surgery or interventional procedure within 90 days after enrollment or any planned cardiac surgery. 18. On renal replacement therapy, serum creatinine \> 3.0 mg/dl (265 μmol/L) or calculated creatinine clearance \< 25 ml/minute 19. Thrombocytopenia (\<60,000 platelets/mm3), leucopenia (white blood cell count \< 3,000 cells/mm³), or anemia (hemoglobin concentration \< 10 grams/deciliter) based on blood work done within 30 days prior to enrollment 20. Any medical disorder or psychiatric illness that would interfere with successful completion of the trial 21. Currently participating in an investigational drug trial or another device trial that has not completed the primary endpoint (trials requiring extended follow-up for products that are commercially available are not considered investigational trials). Concurrent enrollment in the ACC LAAO Registry is permitted. 22. Subject belongs to a vulnerable population (see definition in Appendix I: Acronyms and Definitions) 23. Any condition that would reduce life expectancy to less than 2 years 24. Women of childbearing potential who are, or plan to become pregnant during the time of the trial (method of assessment per physician discretion) Echocardiographic

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Composite of All Cause Death, Procedure or Device Related Complications Requiring Percutaneous or Surgical Intervention or Major BleedingAll death, procedure- or device-related complications requiring percutaneous or surgical intervention: From baseline up to 45 days; major bleeding: From baseline up to 5 years 11 monthsThe primary safety outcome was the composite of death from any cause (all-cause mortality), procedure or device related complications requiring percutaneous or surgical intervention through 45 days post procedure or major bleeding throughout the duration of the trial. The analysis was based on sponsor assessment of adverse events data. Baseline was defined as 90 day prior to treatment or 90 days prior to randomization; baseline assessments could occur on the day of implant.
Percentage of Participants With Composite of Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism at 24 MonthsAt 24 monthsPercentage of participants with composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism at 24 months was reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism With the WAVECREST Device in Comparison to the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc Imputed Risk of Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism in the Absence of Anticoagulant TherapyAt 45 daysCHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age \>=75 years (yrs), prior Stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA)/Thromboembolism) and CHA2DS2-VASc scores (Vascular disease, Age 65- 74 yrs, female Sex) were developed to identify non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) participants at an elevated risk for ischemic stroke. CHADS2 score assign 1 point: congestive heart failure, hypertension, age \>= 75 yrs, diabetes mellitus; 2 points: prior stroke/TIA/thromboembolism. CHADS2 score ranges from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicated higher risk for ischemic strokes. CHA2DS2-VASc Score assign 1 point for each following risk factors: congestive heart failure, hypertension (blood pressure consistently above 140/90), diabetes mellitus, vascular disease, age 65 to74 yrs, female and assigned 2 points for age \>=75 yrs and prior stroke or TIA or thromboembolism each. Overall score ranged from 0 to a 9, with lower scores indicated lower risk and higher scores indicated higher risk for ischemic strokes.
Percentage of Participants With Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) ClosureAt 45 daysPercentage of participants with LAA closure, defined as a gap of \<= 5 millimetre (mm) at the 45-day visit as assessed by transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) was reported.

Countries

Australia, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Analysis population included participants greater than or equal to (\>=) 18 years old diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and a CHADS2 score \>= 2 or a CHA2DS2-VASc score \>= 3 who had an appropriate rationale to seek a non-pharmacologic alternative to chronic oral anticoagulation.

Pre-assignment details

As pre-specified in the protocol, participants who signed the informed consent form (ICF) were considered enrolled in the study. Out of the 248 enrolled participants (who signed the ICF), 183 were randomized to respective treatment arms, 26 were screen failures and 39 discontinued due to study hold during the screening period. Hence, data for 183 randomized participants is reported below.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1 (WaveCrest Roll-In)
Roll in participants who were enrolled prior to a site's randomization phase and who had vascular access attempted, underwent Coherex WaveCrest left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion system (WaveCrest device) implant procedure. Coherex Wave Crest LAA occlusion system delivery sheath was used to deliver the implant percutaneously via the femoral vein through a transseptal puncture into the LAA.
71
Group 2 (WaveCrest Randomized)
Randomized participants underwent Coherex WaveCrest LAA occlusion system (WaveCrest device) implant procedure. Coherex Wave Crest LAA occlusion system delivery sheath was used to deliver the implant percutaneously via the femoral vein through a trans septal puncture into the LAA.
52
Group 3 (Watchman Randomized)
Randomized participants underwent Watchman left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) System (Watchman Device) implant procedure. Watchman device was intended for percutaneous, transcatheter closure of the left atrial appendage and consisted of the watchman access system (access sheath and dilator) and watchman delivery system (delivery catheter and watchman device). The access sheath and delivery catheter permitted device placement in the LAA via femoral venous access and inter-atrial septum crossing into the left atrium.
56
Total179

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event120
Overall StudyDeath13114
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up133
Overall StudyOther746
Overall StudyPhysician Decision101
Overall StudyRandomized but not treated and discontinued during study hold022
Overall StudyStudy Terminated by Sponsor322930
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1029

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup 1 (WaveCrest Roll-In)Group 2 (WaveCrest Randomized)Group 3 (Watchman Randomized)Total
Age, Continuous72.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.64
75.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.43
76.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.69
74.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.88
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
69 Participants51 Participants53 Participants173 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants21 Participants20 Participants73 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
39 Participants31 Participants36 Participants106 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
15 / 7113 / 524 / 56
other
Total, other adverse events
63 / 7151 / 5248 / 56
serious
Total, serious adverse events
50 / 7142 / 5239 / 56

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Composite of All Cause Death, Procedure or Device Related Complications Requiring Percutaneous or Surgical Intervention or Major Bleeding

The primary safety outcome was the composite of death from any cause (all-cause mortality), procedure or device related complications requiring percutaneous or surgical intervention through 45 days post procedure or major bleeding throughout the duration of the trial. The analysis was based on sponsor assessment of adverse events data. Baseline was defined as 90 day prior to treatment or 90 days prior to randomization; baseline assessments could occur on the day of implant.

Time frame: All death, procedure- or device-related complications requiring percutaneous or surgical intervention: From baseline up to 45 days; major bleeding: From baseline up to 5 years 11 months

Population: The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis set consisted of all randomized participants regardless of treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 (WaveCrest Roll-In)Percentage of Participants With Composite of All Cause Death, Procedure or Device Related Complications Requiring Percutaneous or Surgical Intervention or Major Bleeding47.89 Percentage of participants
Group 2 (WaveCrest Randomized)Percentage of Participants With Composite of All Cause Death, Procedure or Device Related Complications Requiring Percutaneous or Surgical Intervention or Major Bleeding32.69 Percentage of participants
Group 3 (Watchman Randomized)Percentage of Participants With Composite of All Cause Death, Procedure or Device Related Complications Requiring Percutaneous or Surgical Intervention or Major Bleeding17.86 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Composite of Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism at 24 Months

Percentage of participants with composite of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism at 24 months was reported.

Time frame: At 24 months

Population: The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized participants regardless of treatment received.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 (WaveCrest Roll-In)Percentage of Participants With Composite of Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism at 24 Months4.23 Percentage of participants
Group 2 (WaveCrest Randomized)Percentage of Participants With Composite of Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism at 24 Months3.85 Percentage of participants
Group 3 (Watchman Randomized)Percentage of Participants With Composite of Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism at 24 Months5.36 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism With the WAVECREST Device in Comparison to the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc Imputed Risk of Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism in the Absence of Anticoagulant Therapy

CHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age \>=75 years (yrs), prior Stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA)/Thromboembolism) and CHA2DS2-VASc scores (Vascular disease, Age 65- 74 yrs, female Sex) were developed to identify non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) participants at an elevated risk for ischemic stroke. CHADS2 score assign 1 point: congestive heart failure, hypertension, age \>= 75 yrs, diabetes mellitus; 2 points: prior stroke/TIA/thromboembolism. CHADS2 score ranges from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicated higher risk for ischemic strokes. CHA2DS2-VASc Score assign 1 point for each following risk factors: congestive heart failure, hypertension (blood pressure consistently above 140/90), diabetes mellitus, vascular disease, age 65 to74 yrs, female and assigned 2 points for age \>=75 yrs and prior stroke or TIA or thromboembolism each. Overall score ranged from 0 to a 9, with lower scores indicated lower risk and higher scores indicated higher risk for ischemic strokes.

Time frame: At 45 days

Population: The ITT analysis set consisted of all randomized participants regardless of treatment received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 (WaveCrest Roll-In)Percentage of Participants With Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism With the WAVECREST Device in Comparison to the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc Imputed Risk of Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism in the Absence of Anticoagulant Therapyischemic strokes4.23 Percentage of participants
Group 1 (WaveCrest Roll-In)Percentage of Participants With Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism With the WAVECREST Device in Comparison to the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc Imputed Risk of Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism in the Absence of Anticoagulant Therapysystemic embolisms0 Percentage of participants
Group 2 (WaveCrest Randomized)Percentage of Participants With Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism With the WAVECREST Device in Comparison to the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc Imputed Risk of Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism in the Absence of Anticoagulant Therapyischemic strokes3.85 Percentage of participants
Group 2 (WaveCrest Randomized)Percentage of Participants With Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism With the WAVECREST Device in Comparison to the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc Imputed Risk of Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism in the Absence of Anticoagulant Therapysystemic embolisms0 Percentage of participants
Group 3 (Watchman Randomized)Percentage of Participants With Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism With the WAVECREST Device in Comparison to the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc Imputed Risk of Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism in the Absence of Anticoagulant Therapyischemic strokes5.36 Percentage of participants
Group 3 (Watchman Randomized)Percentage of Participants With Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism With the WAVECREST Device in Comparison to the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc Imputed Risk of Ischemic Stroke or Systemic Embolism in the Absence of Anticoagulant Therapysystemic embolisms0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Closure

Percentage of participants with LAA closure, defined as a gap of \<= 5 millimetre (mm) at the 45-day visit as assessed by transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) was reported.

Time frame: At 45 days

Population: Analysis population included all roll-in and randomized and treated participants. Here 'N' (number of participants analysed) signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this outcome measures.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group 1 (WaveCrest Roll-In)Percentage of Participants With Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Closure100.0 Percentage of participants
Group 2 (WaveCrest Randomized)Percentage of Participants With Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Closure100.0 Percentage of participants
Group 3 (Watchman Randomized)Percentage of Participants With Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Closure100.0 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026