Skip to content

Bovine Carotid Artery Biologic Graft and Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene for Permanent Hemodialysis Access

A Prospective Randomized Study of Bovine Carotid Artery Biologic Graft and Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene for Permanent Hemodialysis Access

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03300024
Enrollment
10
Registered
2017-10-03
Start date
2015-02-01
Completion date
2018-02-12
Last updated
2019-05-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arteriovenous Graft, End Stage Renal Disease, Hemolysis

Keywords

Hemodialysis, Arteriovenous, Graft, polytetrafluoroethylene, Bovine

Brief summary

The investigators propose a randomized study to compare bovine carotid artery (BCA) biologic grafts and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts (ePTFE) for permanent hemodialysis access.

Detailed description

Arteriovenous grafts (AVG) remain reliable substitutes for permanent hemodialysis access in scenarios that preclude the placement of arteriovenous fistulae. There is scarcity of evidence to support the current preference of synthetic conduits over biologic grafts in clinical practice. Advances in the design of AVG's warrant contemporary comparisons between synthetic and biologic AVG options. This is especially important as biologic conduits may confer an advantage by virtue of their inherent similarity to the native human vasculature. The overall goal of this project is to compare one and two year patency (functional, primary, primary assisted and secondary), complication rates and re-intervention rates between BCA and standard ePTFE grafts. The investigators hypothesize that vascular patient who will receive the BCA graft will have improved patency as well as lower complication and re-intervention rates compared to the standard ePTFE graft.

Interventions

DEVICEExpanded polytetrafluoroethylene Graft

Group will receive any standard ePTFE graft (control) based on the surgeons' discretion. The graft will be placed either in the arm (brachial artery to axillary vein) or forearm (brachial artery to cephalic or suitably sized vein) depending on which location works best in your particular case.

DEVICEBovine Carotid Artery Graft

Group will receive the BCA graft (experimental).The graft will be placed either in the arm (brachial artery to axillary vein) or forearm (brachial artery to cephalic or suitably sized vein) depending on which location works best in your particular case.

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The study will not be blinded because patient side blinding is expected to have minimal to no effect, while physician side blinding is impractical; and difficult to achieve due to the primary surgeon being the one usually who follows up on any intervention or treatment.

Intervention model description

Patients will undergo surgery as per standard of care and receive the randomized graft in compliance to National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) guidelines for Arteriovenous graft creation. Surgeries will be elective in nature. The grafts will be placed either in the arm (brachial artery-axillary vein) or forearm (brachial artery to cephalic or suitably sized vein) based on anatomic suitability

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients at least 18 years of age * Have End Stage Renal Disease and are undergoing Arterio-Venous-Graft surgery * Not Eligible to receive an Arterio-Venous-Fistula * Provided written informed consent * Agreed to return for all required clinical follow up for the study

Exclusion criteria

* Eligible to receive an Arterio-Venous-Fistula * Known allergic reaction or history of intolerance to any ePTFE or BCA components * Local infection at AVG placement site at the time of surgery * Patients with a bleeding disorder or who refuse blood transfusion * Patients with an active malignancy * Life expectancy less than 1 year * Pregnant women or those planning on becoming pregnant for the duration of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients With Functional PatencyOne year after Graft PlacementFunctional patency represents the interval from the first time the graft is used for hemodialysis to any qualifying event (stenosis, thrombosis, graft failure)
Percentage of Patients With Primary Graft PatencyOne year after Graft PlacementPrimary patency is defined as the interval from graft placement to any intervention for stenosis with or without complete occlusion (thrombosis).
Percentage of Patients With Primary-Assisted Graft PatencyOne year after Graft PlacementAssisted primary patency is defined as the interval from graft placement to the first episode of complete occlusion.
Percentage of Patients With Secondary Graft PatencyOne year after Graft PlacementSecondary patency is defined as the interval from graft placement to graft failure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Pseudoaneurysms Formation at the Access SiteAt 6 months after Graft Placement
Percentage of Patients With Surgical Site InfectionAt 6 months after Graft PlacementThe presence of erythema or purulent drainage at the surgical incision and need for intravenous antibiotics or surgical intervention.
Steal SyndromeAt 6 months after Graft PlacementSteal syndrome will be staged per standard as follows: Stage I: pale/blue and/or cold hand without pain; Stage II: Pain during exercise and/or hemodialysis; Stage III: Rest pain; Stage IV: Ulcers/necrosis/gangrene. Accordingly, surgical intervention will be carried out for patients with stage III or IV steal.
Percentage of Patients Requiring Revisional Procedures of the Arteriovenous GraftAt 6 months after Graft PlacementAt hemodialysis, the grafts will be accessed with 15 or 17 gauge needles inserted at any angle between 25-30 degrees (the same method used for a native arterio-venous fistula). If by physical examination the graft is thrombosed, then the patient will immediately be referred for endovascular thrombectomy and revision. If the graft is patent, but problematic, the patient will be referred for an urgent fistulogram and endovascular reintervention

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)
The ePTFE grafts used are the Flixene (Maquet-Atrium Medical, Hudson, NH), Advanta VXT (Maquet-Atrium), GORE-TEXStretch Vascular Graft For Vascular Access (W. L. Gore and Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz), or Venaflo (Bard Peripheral Vascular, Tempe, Ariz). The choice of graft used is at the surgeons' discretion. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene Graft: Group will receive any standard ePTFE graft (control) based on the surgeons' discretion. The graft will be placed either in the arm (brachial artery to axillary vein) or forearm (brachial artery t
4
Bovine Carotid Artery Graft
The bovine carotid artery biological grafts (Artegraft®; Artegraft, Inc., North Brunswick, NJ) consist of a biological fibrous matrix processed to enhance long-term patency and provide a tightly woven, cross-linked conduit that is flexible and compliant. Bovine Carotid Artery Graft: Group will receive the BCA graft (experimental).The graft will be placed either in the arm (brachial artery to axillary vein) or forearm (brachial artery to cephalic or suitably sized vein) depending on which location works best in your particular case.
6
Total10

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyPhysician Decision46

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBovine Carotid Artery GraftTotalExpanded Polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Age, Continuous67.2 years65.7 years63.5 years
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 Participants10 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants7 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants3 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 00 / 0
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Patients With Functional Patency

Functional patency represents the interval from the first time the graft is used for hemodialysis to any qualifying event (stenosis, thrombosis, graft failure)

Time frame: One year after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Primary

Percentage of Patients With Functional Patency

Functional patency represents the interval from the first time the graft is used for hemodialysis to any qualifying event (stenosis, thrombosis, graft failure)

Time frame: Two years after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Primary

Percentage of Patients With Primary-Assisted Graft Patency

Assisted primary patency is defined as the interval from graft placement to the first episode of complete occlusion.

Time frame: One year after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Primary

Percentage of Patients With Primary-Assisted Graft Patency

Assisted primary patency is defined as the interval from graft placement to the first episode of complete occlusion.

Time frame: Two years after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Primary

Percentage of Patients With Primary Graft Patency

Primary patency is defined as the interval from graft placement to any intervention for stenosis with or without complete occlusion (thrombosis).

Time frame: Two years after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Primary

Percentage of Patients With Primary Graft Patency

Primary patency is defined as the interval from graft placement to any intervention for stenosis with or without complete occlusion (thrombosis).

Time frame: One year after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Primary

Percentage of Patients With Secondary Graft Patency

Secondary patency is defined as the interval from graft placement to graft failure.

Time frame: Two years after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Primary

Percentage of Patients With Secondary Graft Patency

Secondary patency is defined as the interval from graft placement to graft failure.

Time frame: One year after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Secondary

Incidence of Pseudoaneurysms Formation at the Access Site

Time frame: At 18 months after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Secondary

Incidence of Pseudoaneurysms Formation at the Access Site

Time frame: At 24 months after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Secondary

Incidence of Pseudoaneurysms Formation at the Access Site

Time frame: At 6 months after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Secondary

Incidence of Pseudoaneurysms Formation at the Access Site

Time frame: At 12 months after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Secondary

Percentage of Patients Requiring Revisional Procedures of the Arteriovenous Graft

At hemodialysis, the grafts will be accessed with 15 or 17 gauge needles inserted at any angle between 25-30 degrees (the same method used for a native arterio-venous fistula). If by physical examination the graft is thrombosed, then the patient will immediately be referred for endovascular thrombectomy and revision. If the graft is patent, but problematic, the patient will be referred for an urgent fistulogram and endovascular reintervention

Time frame: At 24 months after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Secondary

Percentage of Patients Requiring Revisional Procedures of the Arteriovenous Graft

At hemodialysis, the grafts will be accessed with 15 or 17 gauge needles inserted at any angle between 25-30 degrees (the same method used for a native arterio-venous fistula). If by physical examination the graft is thrombosed, then the patient will immediately be referred for endovascular thrombectomy and revision. If the graft is patent, but problematic, the patient will be referred for an urgent fistulogram and endovascular reintervention

Time frame: At 18 months after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Secondary

Percentage of Patients Requiring Revisional Procedures of the Arteriovenous Graft

At hemodialysis, the grafts will be accessed with 15 or 17 gauge needles inserted at any angle between 25-30 degrees (the same method used for a native arterio-venous fistula). If by physical examination the graft is thrombosed, then the patient will immediately be referred for endovascular thrombectomy and revision. If the graft is patent, but problematic, the patient will be referred for an urgent fistulogram and endovascular reintervention

Time frame: At 12 months after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Secondary

Percentage of Patients Requiring Revisional Procedures of the Arteriovenous Graft

At hemodialysis, the grafts will be accessed with 15 or 17 gauge needles inserted at any angle between 25-30 degrees (the same method used for a native arterio-venous fistula). If by physical examination the graft is thrombosed, then the patient will immediately be referred for endovascular thrombectomy and revision. If the graft is patent, but problematic, the patient will be referred for an urgent fistulogram and endovascular reintervention

Time frame: At 6 months after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Surgical Site Infection

The presence of erythema or purulent drainage at the surgical incision and need for intravenous antibiotics or surgical intervention.

Time frame: At 12 months after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Surgical Site Infection

The presence of erythema or purulent drainage at the surgical incision and need for intravenous antibiotics or surgical intervention.

Time frame: At 6 months after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Surgical Site Infection

The presence of erythema or purulent drainage at the surgical incision and need for intravenous antibiotics or surgical intervention.

Time frame: At 18 months after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Surgical Site Infection

The presence of erythema or purulent drainage at the surgical incision and need for intravenous antibiotics or surgical intervention.

Time frame: At 24 months after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Secondary

Steal Syndrome

Steal syndrome will be staged per standard as follows: Stage I: pale/blue and/or cold hand without pain; Stage II: Pain during exercise and/or hemodialysis; Stage III: Rest pain; Stage IV: Ulcers/necrosis/gangrene. Accordingly, surgical intervention will be carried out for patients with stage III or IV steal.

Time frame: At 24 months after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Secondary

Steal Syndrome

Steal syndrome will be staged per standard as follows: Stage I: pale/blue and/or cold hand without pain; Stage II: Pain during exercise and/or hemodialysis; Stage III: Rest pain; Stage IV: Ulcers/necrosis/gangrene. Accordingly, surgical intervention will be carried out for patients with stage III or IV steal.

Time frame: At 18 months after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Secondary

Steal Syndrome

Steal syndrome will be staged per standard as follows: Stage I: pale/blue and/or cold hand without pain; Stage II: Pain during exercise and/or hemodialysis; Stage III: Rest pain; Stage IV: Ulcers/necrosis/gangrene. Accordingly, surgical intervention will be carried out for patients with stage III or IV steal.

Time frame: At 12 months after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Secondary

Steal Syndrome

Steal syndrome will be staged per standard as follows: Stage I: pale/blue and/or cold hand without pain; Stage II: Pain during exercise and/or hemodialysis; Stage III: Rest pain; Stage IV: Ulcers/necrosis/gangrene. Accordingly, surgical intervention will be carried out for patients with stage III or IV steal.

Time frame: At 6 months after Graft Placement

Population: Data was not collected for this outcome measure

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026