Skip to content

Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of CJM112 in Patients With Inadequately Controlled Severe Asthma

A Randomized, Subject- and Investigator-blinded, Placebo Controlled, Multi-center, Multiple Dose Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of CJM112 in Patients With Inadequately Controlled Moderate to Severe Asthma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03299686
Enrollment
118
Registered
2017-10-03
Start date
2017-11-06
Completion date
2019-07-08
Last updated
2021-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

Asthma, allergic, eosinophilic, non-T2 high, allergy triggered asthma, reactive asthma, asthma attack, difficulty breathing

Brief summary

An unmet medical need exists for patients with moderate and severe asthma who continue to demonstrate symptoms despite being on standard of care medications, and are not eligible for other biologic therapies developed or in development for T2-high(allergic/eosinophilic) asthma. The purpose of this study was to determine if CJM112, an anti-IL-17A antibody, displayed the clinical efficacy and safety profile to support further development in patients with inadequately controlled moderate to severe asthma with low IgE and low circulating eosinophil levels.

Detailed description

After an initial screening visit, run-in period and baseline assessments, the eligible subjects entered the treatment period and were randomized in a 3:2 ratio to one of the two treatment groups: * 300 mg CJM112 s.c. injection received once per week for the first 4 weeks, followed by once every two weeks up to Week 12 (Day 85) + standard of care treatment. * Matching placebo + standard of care treatment. After completion of the last dose on Day 85 of treatment period, subjects returned for the final efficacy assessment on Day 92. Following the treatment period, all subjects entered a 13-week safety follow-up period, including the End of Study (EoS) visit on Day 176.

Interventions

DRUGCJM112

300 mg CJM112 (Study treatment) s.c. injection received per week for the first 4 weeks, followed by once every two weeks up to Week 12 (Day 85) + standard of care treatment.

OTHERPlacebo to CJM112

Placebo to match CJM112 + standard of care treatment

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with a physician-diagnosed history of moderate to severe asthma for a period of at least one year prior to screening. 2. Patients on a stable therapy regimen of asthma for at least 3 months prior to screening with at least medium dose inhaled glucocorticoid and at least one additional asthma controller medication (such as inhaled long-acting bronchodilator, leukotriene antagonist, theophylline, stable low dose glucocorticoid, etc). 3. Acceptable and reproducible spirometry with FEV1 ≥ 40 and ≤ 90% of predicted at screening and baseline (re-testing is allowed once). 4. ACQ score ≥ 1.5 at screening and baseline (re-testing is allowed once). 5. Total serum IgE \< 150 IU/mL 6. Peripheral blood eosinophils \<300/μL

Exclusion criteria

1. Previous use of biologics or other concomitant medications within the time periods specified in the SOM/protocol. 2. History of ongoing, chronic, or recurrent moderate or severe infectious disease. 3. Patients who have smoked or inhaled nicotine or tobacco products within the 6 month period prior to Visit 1 or who have a smoking history of greater than 10 pack years. 4. Patients who have had an asthma attack/exacerbation requiring systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 continuous days within 4 weeks prior to screening. 5. Patients who have had a respiratory tract infection or asthma worsening within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1 or during the screening period. 6. Women of child-bearing potential unless they use highly effective methods of contraception during dosing and for 13 weeks after stopping of investigational drug.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)Baseline, Day 92The primary efficacy analysis assessed the effect of CJM112 on the absolute change from baseline in trough FEV1 in Liters compared to placebo on Day 92. Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) is calculated as the volume of air forcibly exhaled in one second as measured by a spirometer. Baseline measurement was defined as the baseline visit pre-bronchodilator spirometry assessment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume 1 (FEV1) % of PredictedBaseline, Day 92The secondary efficacy analyses assessed the effect of CJM112 on the absolute change from baseline in trough FEV1 in % of predicted compared to placebo on Day 92. Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) was calculated as the volume of air forcibly exhaled in one second as measured by a spirometer. FEV1% of predicted is defined as FEV1% of the patient divided by the average FEV1% in the population for any person of similar age, sex and body composition. Pre-bronchodilator FEV1% of predicted was directly provided as part of the spirometry assessment.
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 (ACQ6) ScoreBaseline, Day 92The ACQ-6 is a validated asthma assessment tool that consists of 6 self-assessment questions. Each item on the ACQ-6 has a possible score ranging from 0 to 6 and the total score is the mean of all responses. The seven-point response scale goes from 0 = 'totally controlled' to 6 = 'severely uncontrolled. Negative change from baseline values indicate improved asthma control.
Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7 (ACQ7) ScoreBaseline, Day 92The ACQ-7 measured asthma symptom control and consists of 7 items: 5 on symptom assessment, 1 on rescue medication use and 1 on airway calibre (FEV1 % predicted). All seven items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating total control and 6 indicating poor control. The questions are equally weighted and the total score is the mean of the seven items. The first 6 questions of the ACQ-7 were completed by the participant while the last question was completed by the study investigator using data from the Master Scope spirometer. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in lung function.
Percentage of Patients With at Least 0.5 Decrease in ACQ7 ScoreBaseline, Day 92The ACQ-7 measured asthma symptom control and consists of 7 items: 5 on symptom assessment, 1 on rescue medication use and 1 on airway calibre (FEV1 % predicted). All seven items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating total control and 6 indicating poor control. The questions are equally weighted and the total score is the mean of the seven items. The first 6 questions of the ACQ-7 were completed by the participant while the last question was completed by the study investigator using data from the Master Scope spirometer. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in lung function. An ACQ7 responder is defined as a patient with a decrease in score of greater or equal to 0.5 when compared to baseline.
Percentage of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment85 daysNumber of patients with at least one adverse event leading to discontinuation of study treatment

Countries

Argentina, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Israel, Slovakia, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were from Argentina (2), Belgium (3), Germany (5), Denmark (4), France (2), Israel (3), Slovakia (2), The United States (7)

Pre-assignment details

After an initial screening visit, run-in period and baseline assessments, the eligible subjects entered the treatment period and were randomized in a 3:2 ratio to one of the two treatment groups.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CJM112 300 mg
Study treatment: 300 mg CJM112 s.c. injection received once per week for the first 4 weeks, followed by once every two weeks up to Week 12
70
Placebo
Placebo to CJM112: Placebo s.c. injection received once per week for the first 4 weeks, followed by once every two weeks up to Week 12
48
Total118

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Follow-up EpochSubject/Guardian Decision01
Treatment EpochAdverse Event84
Treatment EpochPhysician Decision10
Treatment EpochSubject/Guardian Decision20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCJM112 300 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous57.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.79
55.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.62
56.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.29
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
6 Participants1 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
61 Participants47 Participants108 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
39 Participants32 Participants71 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants16 Participants47 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 700 / 48
other
Total, other adverse events
55 / 7038 / 48
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 702 / 48

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)

The primary efficacy analysis assessed the effect of CJM112 on the absolute change from baseline in trough FEV1 in Liters compared to placebo on Day 92. Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) is calculated as the volume of air forcibly exhaled in one second as measured by a spirometer. Baseline measurement was defined as the baseline visit pre-bronchodilator spirometry assessment.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 92

Population: The analysis population included the Pharmacodynamics (PD) analysis set with evaluable FEV1 data at both timepoints.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CJM112 300 mgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)0.043 LitersStandard Deviation 0.031
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1)0.016 LitersStandard Deviation 0.03
p-value: 0.737480% CI: [-0.029, 0.082]Bayesian linear repeated measures model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 (ACQ6) Score

The ACQ-6 is a validated asthma assessment tool that consists of 6 self-assessment questions. Each item on the ACQ-6 has a possible score ranging from 0 to 6 and the total score is the mean of all responses. The seven-point response scale goes from 0 = 'totally controlled' to 6 = 'severely uncontrolled. Negative change from baseline values indicate improved asthma control.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 92

Population: The analysis population included the Pharmacodynamics (PD) analysis set with evaluable ACQ6 data at both timepoints

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CJM112 300 mgChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 (ACQ6) Score-0.93 units on scaleStandard Error 0.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 (ACQ6) Score-0.71 units on scaleStandard Error 0.11
p-value: 0.06180% CI: [-0.41, -0.04]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7 (ACQ7) Score

The ACQ-7 measured asthma symptom control and consists of 7 items: 5 on symptom assessment, 1 on rescue medication use and 1 on airway calibre (FEV1 % predicted). All seven items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating total control and 6 indicating poor control. The questions are equally weighted and the total score is the mean of the seven items. The first 6 questions of the ACQ-7 were completed by the participant while the last question was completed by the study investigator using data from the Master Scope spirometer. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in lung function.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 92

Population: The analysis population included the Pharmacodynamics (PD) analysis set with evaluable ACQ7 data at both timepoints

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CJM112 300 mgChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7 (ACQ7) Score-0.83 units on scaleStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire 7 (ACQ7) Score-0.60 units on scaleStandard Error 0.1
p-value: 0.0480% CI: [-0.4, -0.06]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume 1 (FEV1) % of Predicted

The secondary efficacy analyses assessed the effect of CJM112 on the absolute change from baseline in trough FEV1 in % of predicted compared to placebo on Day 92. Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) was calculated as the volume of air forcibly exhaled in one second as measured by a spirometer. FEV1% of predicted is defined as FEV1% of the patient divided by the average FEV1% in the population for any person of similar age, sex and body composition. Pre-bronchodilator FEV1% of predicted was directly provided as part of the spirometry assessment.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 92

Population: The analysis population included the Pharmacodynamics (PD) analysis set with evaluable FEV1 data at both timepoints

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
CJM112 300 mgChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume 1 (FEV1) % of Predicted1.064 Percent predictedStandard Error 0.914
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume 1 (FEV1) % of Predicted0.151 Percent predictedStandard Error 1.105
p-value: 0.26380% CI: [-0.939, 2.766]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment

Number of patients with at least one adverse event leading to discontinuation of study treatment

Time frame: 85 days

Population: Safety analysis set: Subjects who received any study drug

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CJM112 300 mgPercentage of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment8 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs) Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment4 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With at Least 0.5 Decrease in ACQ7 Score

The ACQ-7 measured asthma symptom control and consists of 7 items: 5 on symptom assessment, 1 on rescue medication use and 1 on airway calibre (FEV1 % predicted). All seven items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale, with 0 indicating total control and 6 indicating poor control. The questions are equally weighted and the total score is the mean of the seven items. The first 6 questions of the ACQ-7 were completed by the participant while the last question was completed by the study investigator using data from the Master Scope spirometer. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement in lung function. An ACQ7 responder is defined as a patient with a decrease in score of greater or equal to 0.5 when compared to baseline.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 92

Population: The analysis population included the Pharmacodynamics (PD) analysis set with evaluable ACQ7 data at both timepoints

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CJM112 300 mgPercentage of Patients With at Least 0.5 Decrease in ACQ7 Score38 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Patients With at Least 0.5 Decrease in ACQ7 Score19 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026