Skip to content

PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN AMIODARONE Versus LIDOCAINE IN SVT

PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN AMIODARONE Versus LIDOCAINE IN PATIENTS WITH STABLE VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA IN THE EMERGENCY ROOM

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03299517
Acronym
AMIOLIDO-VT
Enrollment
80
Registered
2017-10-03
Start date
2017-08-02
Completion date
2022-08-02
Last updated
2018-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arrhythmias Ventricular

Keywords

lidocaine, amiodarone

Brief summary

Introduction: Recent studies have suggested that other medications may be superior to amiodarone in controlling ventricular arrhythmias. However, a prospective and randomized comparison with lidocaine has not yet been described. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the use of amiodarone versus lidocaine in patients with stable ventricular tachycardias. Methodology: For this, a unicentric, randomized and prospective study will be carried out, in which the two drugs will be administered in a comparative manner. Hospital data (test results, medical outcomes, arrhythmia reversal, complications) of patients will be analyzed for safety and effectiveness. Expected results: The use of lidocaine is not inferior to amiodarone in the tolerability and reversion of stable ventricular tachycardias.

Interventions

DRUGAntiarrythmic Drugs

Patient will be randomly randomized 1: 1 for the antiarrythmic drugs. If there is no reversal and there is no adverse event, a further dose of the same pre-administered medicinal product will be performed in another 30 minutes.

Patient will be randomly randomized 1: 1 for the the antiarrythmic drugs. If there is no reversal and there is no adverse event, a further dose of the same pre-administered medicinal product will be performed in another 30 minutes.

Sponsors

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult men and women\> 18 years old * Presence of sustained ventricular tachycardia with HR\> 120 bpm * Systolic blood pressure\> 90 mmHg * No signs of poor peripheral perfusion * Absence of dyspnea * Absence of severe angina * Signed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnancy * Hemodynamic instability * Body mass index greater than 40 kg / m2 * Use of intravenous amiodarone or lidocaine in the last 24 hours * Acute coronary syndrome * Presence of tachycardia with irregular or supraventricular RR * Contraindications to study drugs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Lowering the level of consciousness.1 hourglasgow \< 15
HR increase1 hourHR increase\> 20 bpm.
The appearance of polymorphic TV.1 hourpolymorphic TV.
Signs of pulmonary congestion1 hourdyspnea, orthopnea, onset of pulmonary rales or drop in oximetry.
Signs of peripheral hypoperfusion and shock1 hourhypoperfusion and shock
Severe hypotension1 hoursystolic blood pressure \<70 mmHg if the previous one is \<100 mmHg or systolic blood pressure \<80 mmHg if the previous one is \> 100 mmHg).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
time required for reversal1 hoursinusal rhythm
effectiveness of reversal1 hoursinusal rhythm

Countries

Brazil

Contacts

Primary ContactAlexandre Soeiro, MD
alexandre.soeiro@bol.com.br1126615299

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026