Skip to content

Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure Devices and Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Oscillating Positive Expiratory Pressure Device for Mucous Clearing in Severe Exacerbation of COPD Requiring Hospitalization Targeting Outcome: A Randomized, Double Blind, Sham Controlled Trial (SIMPLE)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03299231
Acronym
SIMPLE
Enrollment
160
Registered
2017-10-03
Start date
2018-01-22
Completion date
2024-10-31
Last updated
2024-05-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Keywords

COPD, acute exacerbation, OPEP

Brief summary

Sputum production increases in acute exacerbation of COPD, both in amount and consistency. It increases airways obstruction and hence delays improvement and prolongs hospital stay. oscillating positive expiratory pressure (OPEP) devices were extensively studied in cystic fibrosis and bronchiectasis. Only seldom studied in chronic bronchitis. This study aims to measure the effects of mucous clearing device in hospitalized patients with acute exacerbation of COPD.

Detailed description

In this study, investigators will investigate the change of objective measurements of lung functions and exercise capacity in addition to subjective measures of quality of life.

Interventions

DEVICEOPEP Aerobika

Previous studies of OPEP device shows preliminary benefit in subjects with COPD. No serious adverse events were recorded in previous studies. The device is FDA registered.

DEVICEOPEP Aerobika Sham device

The same OPEP device which is devoid of the nebulizer port valve to render it inactive. Used for control sham arm.

Sponsors

Trudell Medical International
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Ain Shams University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

Randomization carried by a third party not involved in the study.

Intervention model description

Prospective, Parallel group (1:1), Randomized, double blind, sham controlled, single center.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* COPD patients, stages 3-4 according to GOLD guidelines 2016, with post bronchodilator FEV1/FVC \< 70% of predicted and FEV1 \< 50% with exacerbations necessitates hospital admission. * Smokers or Ex-smokers. * Able and willing to provide informed signed consent. Able and understanding the correct use of the bronchial clearing device. * Able to perform effectively spirometry. * Able and willing to receive the management plane as indicated including systemic steroids if seemed necessary.

Exclusion criteria

* Other obstructive pulmonary diseases or those do not fulfill the criteria of COPD diagnosis. * Nonsmokers. * Presence of major comorbidity causing organ dysfunction as cardiac (including severe pulmonary hypertension), renal, or liver impairment (not including diabetes, arterial hypertension, or obesity). * Presence of lobar pneumonia. * Suspicion of bronchogenic malignancy. * Any other complication either at admission or during hospital stay as pneumothorax, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, cerebrovascular accidents, ... * Patients unable or not willing to provide informed signed consent. * Patients unable to use the bronchial clearing device. * Patients unable to perform spirometry. * Patients unable or not willing to comply to the management plan or the study protocol. * Patients receiving regular oral steroids or non-selective beta blockers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
percent change of Forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1)at 12 weeks after hospital dischargechange in volume of air expired forcefully in first second of expiration
percent change of Forced vital capacity (FVC)at 12 weeks after hospital dischargechange in total volume of air expired forcefully
percent change of six minutes walking distance (6MWD)at 12 weeks after hospital dischargedistance in meters a subject walk within 6 minutes

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
hospital readmission4 weeks after dischargeadmission to hospital after 30 days of discharge due to COPD exacerbation
change in health related quality of life12 weeks after hospital dischargemeasured by Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire
Moderate COPD exacerbation12 weeks after dischargeexacerbation of COPD need additional treatment as antibiotics and/or steroids
severe COPD exacerbation12 weeks after dischargeexacerbation of COPD need hospitalization
change in score of shortness of breath12 weeks after hospital dischargemeasure by baseline and transitional dyspnea index
hospital stayfirst day of hospital admission to day of hospital discharge up to 12 weeksmeasured in days of hospital stay

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary ContactHesham H Raafat, M.D.
hesham.raafat@med.asu.edu.eg+966592542751
Backup ContactGihan Elassal, M.D.
gelassal2006@gmail.com+201001130465

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026