HIV Infections
Conditions
Keywords
Long acting Cabotegravir, Safety, HIV-1, Efficacy, Tolerability, ATLAS-2M, Long acting Rilpivirine
Brief summary
This Antiretroviral Therapy as Long Acting Suppression every 2 Months (ATLAS-2M) study is designed to demonstrate the non-inferior antiviral activity and safety of CAB LA + RPV LA administered every 8 weeks (Q8W) compared to CAB LA + RPV LA administered every 4 weeks (Q4W) over a 48-week treatment period in approximately 1020 adult HIV-1 infected subjects. Subjects will be divided in 2 groups; Group 1 will include subjects receiving current anti-retroviral (ART) standard of care (SOC) therapy whereas group 2 will include subjects currently receiving CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W in ATLAS study. Subjects in both groups will be randomized to receive CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W or Q8W. The study will be carried out in 3 phases including screening phase, maintenance phase and extension phase. Subjects choosing not to enter the Extension phase can complete their study participation at the Week 100 visit and enter into the 52-week Long-Term Follow-Up (LTFU) Phase as required. A sub-study in the ATLAS-2M study will evaluate the pharmacokinetics, tolerability and efficacy of CAB and RPV long acting injections following intramuscular administration in the Vastus Lateralis Muscle (thigh) in HIV-infected Adult Participants who have received at least three years of Gluteal Injections in this ATLAS-2M Study.
Interventions
CAB tablets are white to almost white oval shaped film coated 30 mg tablets for oral administration. CAB tablets are to be stored up to 30 degree Celsius and protected from moisture.
RPV tablets are 25 mg tablets that are off-white, round, biconvex, film-coated and debossed on one side with TMC and the other side with 25. RPV tablets should be stored at 25 degree Celsius (excursions permitted to 15 degree-30 degree Celsius) and protected from light.
CAB LA injectable suspension is a sterile white to slightly pink suspension containing 200 mg/mL of GSK1265744 as free acid for administration by IM injection. CAB LA injectable suspension is to be stored at up to 30 degree Celsius and should not be frozen.
RPV LA injectable suspension is a sterile white suspension containing 300 mg/mL of RPV as the free base for administration by IM injection. RPV LA injectable suspension should be kept in the outer package and stored at 2-8 degree Celsius and should not be frozen. RPV LA should also be protected from light.
Sponsors
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
ViiV Healthcare
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Masking description
This will be an open-label study and therefore no blinding is required
Intervention model description
Two groups of subjects will be randomized to receive CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W, or CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W regimen
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Subjects who will be able to understand and comply with protocol requirements, instructions, and restrictions. * Understand the long term commitment to the study and be likely to complete the study as planned * Be considered as an appropriate candidate for participation in an investigative clinical trial with oral and intramuscularly injectable medications (e.g., no active substance use disorder, acute major organ disease, or planned long-term work assignments out of the country, etc.). * Aged 18 years or older (or \>=19 where required by local regulatory agencies), at the time of signing the informed consent. * A female is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant (as confirmed by a negative serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) test at screen and a negative urine hCG test at Randomization), not lactating, and at least one of the following conditions applies: Non-reproductive potential defined as: pre-menopausal females with one of the following: documented tubal ligation; documented hysteroscopic tubal occlusion procedure with follow-up confirmation of bilateral tubal occlusion; hysterectomy; Documented Bilateral Oophorectomy. Postmenopausal defined as 12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea \[in questionable cases a blood sample with simultaneous follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol levels consistent with menopause (refer to laboratory reference ranges for confirmatory levels)\]. Females on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and whose menopausal status is in doubt will be required to use one of the highly effective contraception methods if they wish to continue their HRT during the study. Otherwise, they must discontinue HRT to allow confirmation of post-menopausal status prior to study enrollment. Reproductive potential and agrees to follow one of the options listed in the Modified List of Highly Effective Methods for Avoiding Pregnancy in Females of Reproductive Potential (FRP) from 30 days prior to the first dose of study medication, throughout the study, for at least 30 days after discontinuation of all oral study medications, and for at least 52 weeks after discontinuation of CAB LA and RPV LA. The investigator is responsible for ensuring that participants understand how to properly use these methods of contraception. * Capable of giving signed informed consent. Eligible subjects or their legal guardians (and next of kin when locally required), must sign a written Informed Consent Form before any protocol-specified assessments are conducted. Enrollment of subjects who are unable to provide direct informed consent is optional and will be based on local legal/regulatory requirements and site feasibility to conduct protocol procedures. * Subjects enrolled in France must be affiliated to, or a beneficiary of, a social security category. * Subjects receiving oral SOC treatment for HIV-1 (not participating in ATLAS Trial) must be on uninterrupted current regimen \[either the initial or second anti-retroviral (ARV) regimen\] for at least 6 months prior to Screening. Any prior switch, defined as a change of a single drug or multiple drugs simultaneously, must have occurred due to tolerability/safety, access to medications, or convenience/simplification, and must NOT have been done for treatment failure (HIV-1 RNA \>=400 copies/mL). * For subjects receiving oral SOC treatment for HIV-1 (not participating in ATLAS Trial) Documented evidence of at least two plasma HIV-1 RNA measurements \<50 copies/mL in the 12 months prior to Screening: one within the 6 to 12-month window, and one within 6 months prior to Screening. * For subjects receiving oral SOC treatment for HIV-1 (not participating in ATLAS Trial): Plasma HIV-1 RNA \<50 copies/mL at Screening * Subjects transitioning from 201585 (ATLAS) must have been on CAB LA 400 milligram (mg) + RPV LA 600 mg Q4W or Current ART regimen through at minimum Week 52 of the ATLAS study as per ATLAS protocol dosing requirements and until Day 1 of the ATLAS-2M study. Any disruptions in dosing during ATLAS must be discussed with the Medical Monitor for a final determination of eligibility. * For Participants transitioning from 201585 (ATLAS): plasma HIV-1 RNA \<50 copies/mL at Screening Sub-study inclusion criteria * Eligible participants must have been on CAB LA + RPV LA regimen for a minimum of 152 weeks while on the ATLAS-2M study. * Plasma HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/mL at Sub-Study Screening
Exclusion criteria
For subjects not transitioning from 201585 (ATLAS): * Within 6 months prior to Screening, any plasma HIV-1 RNA measurement \>=50 copies/mL * Within the 6 to 12-month window prior to Screening, any plasma HIV-1 RNA measurement \>200 copies/mL, or 2 or more plasma HIV-1 RNA measurements \>=50 copies/mL * Any drug holiday during the window between initiating first HIV ART and 6 months prior to Screening, except for brief periods (less than 1 month) where all ART was stopped due to tolerability and/or safety concerns. * Any switch to a second line regimen, defined as change of a single drug or multiple drugs simultaneously, due to virologic failure to therapy (defined as a confirmed plasma HIV 1 RNA measurement \>=200 copies/mL after initial suppression to \<50 copies/mL while on first line HIV therapy regimen) * A history of use of any regimen consisting of only mono or dual HIV-1 therapy (even if only for peri-partum treatment). Subjects who are currently participating in or anticipate to be selected for any other interventional study with the exception of the 201585 (ATLAS) study. For Subjects transitioning from 201585 (ATLAS): * During participation in ATLAS, consecutive (2 or more sequential) plasma HIV-1 RNA measurements \>=50 copies/mL * During participation in ATLAS, any HIV-1 RNA measurement \>=200 copies/mL * More than two total measurements of plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=50 c/mL during participation in the ATLAS trial will require direct approval by the ATLAS-2M Medical Monitor and Study virologist for study participation. For all subjects: * Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or plan to become pregnant or breastfeed during the study. * Any evidence of a current Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Stage 3 disease except cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma not requiring systemic therapy and CD4+ counts \<200 cells/µL are not exclusionary. * Subjects with moderate to severe hepatic impairment. * Any pre-existing physical or mental condition (including substance use disorder) which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may interfere with the subject's ability to comply with the dosing schedule and/or protocol evaluations or which may compromise the safety of the subject. * Subjects determined by the Investigator to have a high risk of seizures, including participants with an unstable or poorly controlled seizure disorder. A subject with a prior history of seizure may be considered for enrollment if the Investigator believes the risk of seizure recurrence is low. All cases of prior seizure history should be discussed with the Medical Monitor prior to enrollment. * All subjects will be screened for syphilis (rapid plasma reagin \[RPR\]). Subjects with untreated secondary (late latent) or tertiary syphilis infection, defined as a positive RPR and a positive treponemal test without clear documentation of treatment, are excluded. Subjects with a false positive RPR (with negative treponemal test) or serofast RPR result (persistence of a reactive nontreponemal syphilis test despite history of adequate therapy and no evidence of re-exposure) may enroll after consultation with the Medical Monitor. Participants with primary syphilis or early latent secondary syphilis (acquired within the preceding year) who have a positive RPR test and have not been treated may be treated during the screening period and if completion of antibiotic treatment occurs during the screening period, may be allowed entry after consultation with the Medical Monitor. If antibiotic treatment cannot be completed before the screening window ends, subjects may be rescreened once following completion of antibiotic therapy for primary or early latent secondary syphilis. * Subjects who, in the investigator's judgment, pose a significant suicide risk. Subject's recent history of suicidal behavior and/or suicidal ideation should be considered when evaluating for suicide risk. * The subject has a tattoo or other dermatological condition overlying the gluteus region which may interfere with interpretation of injection site reactions. * Evidence of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection based on the results of testing at Screening for Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), Hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), Hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) and HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) as follows: Subjects positive for HBsAg are excluded; Subjects negative for anti-HBs but positive for anti-HBc (negative HBsAg status) and positive for HBV DNA are excluded. Note: Participants positive for anti-HBc (negative HBsAg status) and positive for anti-HBs (past and/or current evidence) are immune to HBV and are not excluded. * Asymptomatic individuals with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection will not be excluded, however Investigators must carefully assess if therapy specific for HCV infection is required; participants who are anticipated to require HCV treatment within 12 months must be excluded. (HCV treatment on study may be permitted post Week 52, following consultation with the medical monitor). * Subjects with HCV co-infection will be allowed entry into this study if: liver enzymes meet entry criteria; HCV Disease has undergone appropriate work-up, and is not advanced, and will not require treatment prior to the Week 52 visit. Additional information (where available) on participants with HCV co-infection at screening should include results from any liver biopsy, Fibroscan, ultrasound, or other fibrosis evaluation, history of cirrhosis or other decompensated liver disease, prior treatment, and timing/plan for HCV treatment; In the event that recent biopsy or imaging data is not available or inconclusive, the Fib-4 score will be used to verify eligibility: Fib-4 score \>3.25 is exclusionary; Fib-4 scores 1.45 - 3.25 requires Medical Monitor consultation; Fibrosis 4 Score Formula: (Age x AST ) / ( Platelets x ( square \[ ALT \]) * Unstable liver disease (as defined by any of the following: presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminemia, esophageal or gastric varices, or persistent jaundice or cirrhosis), known biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones or otherwise stable chronic liver disease per investigator assessment). * History of liver cirrhosis with or without hepatitis viral co-infection. * Ongoing or clinically relevant pancreatitis. * Clinically significant cardiovascular disease, as defined by history/evidence of congestive heart failure, symptomatic arrhythmia, angina/ischemia, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or any clinically significant cardiac disease. * Ongoing malignancy other than cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma, basal cell carcinoma, or resected, non-invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; other localized malignancies require agreement between the investigator and the Study medical monitor for inclusion of the participant prior to randomization. * Any condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion of the study drugs or render the participant unable to receive study medication. * History or presence of allergy or intolerance to the study drugs or their components or drugs of their class. In addition, if heparin is used during pharmacokinetic sampling, participants with a history of sensitivity to heparin or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia must not be enrolled. * Current or anticipated need for chronic anti-coagulation with the exception of the use of low dose acetylsalicylic acid (\<=325 mg) or hereditary coagulation and platelet disorders such as hemophilia or Von Willebrand Disease. * Any evidence of primary resistance based on the presence of any major known Integrase inhibitor (INI) or Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance-associated mutation, except for K103N by any historical resistance test result. * Any verified Grade 4 laboratory abnormality. A single repeat test is allowed during the Screening phase to verify a result. * Any acute laboratory abnormality at Screening, which, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude the subject's participation in the study of an investigational compound. * Subjects has estimated creatine clearance \<50mL/minute per 1.73 meter square (m\^2) via Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Method * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>=3 × Upper limit of normal (ULN) * Exposure to an experimental drug (with the exception of those in the ATLAS study including CAB, CAB LA, and RPV LA) or experimental vaccine within either 30 days, 5 half-lives of the test agent, or twice the duration of the biological effect of the test agent, whichever is longer, prior to Day 1 of this study. * Treatment with any of the following agents within 28 days of Screening: radiation therapy; cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents; tuberculosis therapy with the exception of isoniazid (isonicotinylhydrazid, INH); anti--coagulation agents; Immunomodulators that alter immune responses such as chronic systemic corticosteroids, interleukins, or interferons. Note: Subjects using short-term (e.g. \<=21 days) systemic corticosteroid treatment; topical, inhaled and intranasal corticosteroids are eligible for enrollment. * Treatment with an HIV-1 immunotherapeutic vaccine within 90 days of Screening * Treatment with any agent, except recognized ART as allowed above, with documented activity against HIV-1 within 28 days of study Day 1. Treatment with acyclovir/valacyclovir is permitted. * Use of medications which are associated with Torsade de Pointes. * Current or prior history of etravirine (ETR) use. * Current use of tipranavir/ritonavir or fosamprenavir/ritonavir. * Subjects receiving any prohibited medication and who are unwilling or unable to switch to an alternate medication. * Participation in other interventional studies or non-interventional studies that require any type of assessment outside the local standard of care practices is generally not permitted, however for eligible subjects in South Africa only, co-enrolment in the AIDS Clinical Trial Group ACTG interventional study (A5392) could be exceptionally permitted after review and approval by the Medical Monitor. Sub-study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus-ribonucleic Acid (HIV-RNA) >=50 Copies Per Milliliter (c/mL) as Per Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot Algorithm at Week 48 | Week 48 | Percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA \>=50 c/mL as per FDA snapshot algorithm at Week 48 was assessed to demonstrate the non-inferior antiviral activity of CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W compared to CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W regimen over 48 weeks in HIV-1 infected ART experienced participants. The HIV-1 RNA \>=50 c/mL per Snapshot algorithm was determined by the last on-treatment HIV-1 RNA measurement within the Week 48 analysis visit window. Intent-to-treat-Exposed (ITT-E) Population comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Participants were assessed according to their randomized treatment, regardless of the treatment they received. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL Using FDA Snapshot Algorithm at Week 48 | Week 48 | Percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/mL at Week 48 using FDA Snapshot algorithm was assessed to demonstrate antiviral activity of CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W compared to CAB LA+ RPV LA Q4W. The HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/mL per Snapshot algorithm was determined by last on-treatment HIV-1 RNA measurement within the analysis visit window. The 95% CIs were derived using normal approximation (Wald CI) |
| Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL Using FDA Snapshot Algorithm at Week 24 | Week 24 | Percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/mL at Week 48 using FDA Snapshot algorithm was assessed to demonstrate antiviral activity of CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W compared to CAB LA+ RPV LA Q4W. The HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/mL per Snapshot algorithm was determined by last on-treatment HIV-1 RNA measurement within the analysis visit window. The 95% CIs were derived using normal approximation (Wald CI) |
| Percentage of Participants With Protocol Defined Confirmed Virologic Failure (CVF) Through Weeks 24 and 48 | Weeks 24 and 48 | CVF was defined as rebound as indicated by two consecutive plasma HIV-1-RNA levels \>=200 c/mL after prior suppression to \<200 c/mL. Cumulative percentage of participants with protocol defined CVF up to Weeks 24 and 48 has been presented. |
| Percentage of Participants With HIV-RNA >=50 c/mL as Per FDA Snapshot Algorithm at Week 24 | Weeks 24 | Percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=50 c/mL at Week 24 using FDA Snapshot algorithm was assessed to demonstrate antiviral activity of CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W compared to CAB LA+ RPV LA Q4W. The HIV-1 RNA \>=50 c/mL per Snapshot algorithm was determined by the last on-treatment HIV-1 RNA measurement within the analysis visit window. The 95% CIs were derived using normal approximation (Wald CI). |
| Absolute Values for HIV-1 RNA at Week 48 | Weeks 48 | Plasma samples were collected for quantitative analysis of HIV-1 RNA. Logarithm to base 10 (log10) values for plasma HIV-1 RNA has been presented. |
| Change From Baseline Values for HIV-1 RNA at Week 48 | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 48 | Plasma samples were collected for quantitative analysis of HIV-1 RNA. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Logarithm to base 10 values for plasma HIV-1 RNA has been presented. |
| Absolute Values for Cluster of Differentiation 4 Plus (CD4+) at Week 48 | Week 48 | Blood samples were collected and CD4+ cell count assessment by flow cytometry was carried out to evaluate the immunologic activity of CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W compared to CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W. |
| Change From Baseline Values for CD4+ at Week 48 | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 48 | Blood samples were collected and CD4+ cell count assessment by flow cytometry was carried out to evaluate the immunologic activity of CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W compared to CAB LA+RPV LA Q4W. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. |
| Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs >=5% Incidence) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)-Maintenance Phase | Up to Week 48 | An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, associated with liver injury and impaired liver function or any other situations as per medical or scientific judgement. Safety Population comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Participants were assessed according to actual treatment received. |
| Number of Participants With Severity of Adverse Events-Maintenance Phase | Up to Week 48 | Severity of adverse events were defined as per The Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS adverse events Grading Table). Severity grades for adverse events were as Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe), Grade 4 (Potentially life-threatening) and Grade 5 (all deaths related to an AE). |
| Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Up to Week 48 | Clinical chemistry toxicities were graded as per the DAIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table)Blood samples were collected for the analysis of following clinical chemistry parameters: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin, alkaline phosphate (ALP), aspartate aminotranferase (AST), bilirubin, carbon dioxide (CO2), cholesterol, creatinine kinase, creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from creatinine adjusted for bovine serum albumin (BSA), glucose, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypernatremia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, low density lipoprotein (LDL) calculation, lipase, phosphate, potassium, sodium and triglycerides. Severity grades were: Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (Potentially life-threatening). |
| Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Up to Week 48 | The hematology toxicities were graded as per the DAIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table). Blood samples were collected for the analysis of following hematology parameters: hemoglobin, leukocytes, neutrophils and platelets. Severity grades were as Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (Potentially life-threatening). |
| Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Adverse Events-Maintenance Phase | Up to Week 48 | An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. Percentage of participants with adverse events leading to withdrawal has been presented. |
| Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 | Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemical parameters including ALT, ALP, AST and creatinine kinase. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Albumin Over Time | Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 | Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameter: albumin. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 | Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters: bilirubin and creatinine. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 | Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters: CO2, chloride, phosphate, potassium, sodium and urea. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Cholesterol, Glucose, Direct High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol Calculation and Triglycerides at Week 48 | Baseline (Day 1) and Week 48 | Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters: cholesterol, glucose, direct HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol calculation and triglycerides. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Over Time | Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 | Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameter: GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD-EPI. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Lipase Over Time | Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 | Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameter: Lipase. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 | Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameters: basophils, eosinophils, leukocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils and platelets. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) Over Time | Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 | Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter: erythrocyte MCV. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Over Time | Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 | Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter: erythrocytes. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit Over Time | Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 | Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter: hematocrit. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin Over Time | Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 | Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter: hemoglobin. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. |
| Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | Up to Week 48 analysis | Phenotypic resistance (PR) was analyzed in participants who met CVF criteria. PR for following Baseline third agent drugs: Integrase inhibitors(INI): bictegravir (BIC), CAB, dolutegravir (DTG), elvitegravir (EVG), raltegravir(RAL); non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors(NNRTI): delavirdine(DLV), efavirenz(EFV), etravirine(ETR), nevirapine(NVP), RPV; nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI): lamivudine(3TC), abacavir(ABC), emtricitabine(FTC), tenofovir(TDF), zidovudine(ZDV), stavudine(d4T), didanosine(ddI) and protease inhibitors(PI): atazanavir(ATV), darunavir(DRV), fosamprenavir(FPV), indinavir(IDV), lopinavir(LPV), nelfinavir(NFV), ritonavir(RTV), saquinavir(SQV) and tipranavir (TPV) is presented. Phenotypic susceptibility was defined based on the fold change (FC) value: resistant (FC\>clinical higher cutoff or biological cutoff), partially sensitive (FC\<=clinical higher cutoff and \> clinical lower cutoff), sensitive(FC\<=clinical lower cutoff or biological cutoff) |
| Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | Up to Week 48 analysis | Genotypic resistance was analyzed in participants who met confirmed virologic withdrawal criteria. Genotypic Resistance data for the following Baseline third agent drugs, INI: BIC, DTG, EVG, RAL; NNRTI: DLV, EFV, ETR, NVP, RPV; NRTI: 3TC, ABC, FTC, TDF, ZDV, d4T, ddI and PI: ATV, ATV/ritonavir (r), DRV/r, FPV/r, IDV/r, LPV/r, NFV, RTV, SQV/r and TPV/r in participants meeting CVF criteria has been presented. |
| Number of Participants With Their Treatment Preference as Assessed Using Preference Questionnaire at Week 48 Without (w/o) Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV-CAB 600 mg LA +RPV 900 mg LA Q8W Arm Only | Week 48 | Participants were administered the preference questionnaire which had 3 questions. For treatment preference, participants were required to provide their response to Question 1, which stated Based on your experience which HIV treatment do you prefer. The responses included 1) Injectable LA HIV treatment Q4W, 2) Injectable LA HIV Treatment Q8W (only select this answer if you received the 8-week injectable regimen of CAB LA + RPV LA during study), 3) Oral daily HIV treatment and 4) No preference. Oral daily HIV Treatment refers to the oral medication of CAB + RPV subjects received during the oral lead-in period. Number of participants without prior exposure to CAB+RPV who selected each of the responses based on their treatment preference is presented. |
| Number of Participants With Their Treatment Preference as Assessed Using Preference Questionnaire at Week 48 With >=1 Weeks of Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV-CAB 600 mg LA +RPV 900 mg LA Q8W Arm Only | Week 48 | Participants were administered the preference questionnaire which had 3 questions. For treatment preference, participants were required to provide their response to Question 1, which stated Based on your experience which HIV treatment do you prefer. The responses included 1) Injectable LA HIV treatment Q4W, 2) Injectable LA HIV Treatment Q8W (only select this answer if you received the 8-week injectable regimen of CAB LA + RPV LA during study), 3) Oral daily HIV treatment and 4) No preference. Oral daily HIV Treatment refers to the oral medication of CAB + RPV subjects received during the oral lead-in period. Number of participants with \>=1 weeks of prior exposure to CAB+RPV who selected each of the responses based on their treatment preference is presented. |
| Number of Participants With Their Treatment Preference as Assessed Using Preference Questionnaire at Week 48-CAB 400 mg LA +RPV 600 mg LA Q4W Arm Only | Week 48 | Participants were administered the preference questionnaire which had 3 questions. For treatment preference, participants were required to provide their response to Question 1, which stated Based on your experience which HIV treatment do you prefer. The responses included 1) Injectable LA HIV treatment Q4W, 2) Injectable LA HIV Treatment Q8W (only select this answer if you received the 8-week injectable regimen of CAB LA + RPV LA during study), 3) Oral daily HIV treatment and 4) No preference. Oral daily HIV Treatment refers to the oral medication of CAB + RPV participants received during the oral lead-in period. Number of participants who selected each of the responses based on their treatment preference is presented. |
| Change From Baseline in Life Satisfaction (LISAT) Using HIV/AIDs-targeted Quality of Life (HATQoL) Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48 | The HATQoL questionnaire was used to assess the health related QoL (HRQoL). It comprises of three dimensions:LISAT, medication worries (MEDWO) and disclosure worries (DISWO). Total imputed value score for LISAT is calculated on a 0-100 scale using the formula: LISAT 100=\[100 divided by (20 minus 4)\]\*(LISAT minus 4). A response of 5 in LISAT score shows satisfaction all of the time and 1 as none of the time. The higher the score, the greater satisfaction to life and the less worry. The transformed dimension score for each domain was summarized and analyzed. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) was used as primary method of analysis. Data for participants without/with prior exposure to CAB+RPV (0 Weeks \[without exposure\] and \>=1 Weeks \[with exposure\]) has been presented. Baseline value is defined as last available recorded value up to and including the Maintenance treatment start. Change from Baseline value is calculated as the value at the post-dose visit minus the Baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in HIV Medication, MEDWO Using HATQoL Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48 | The HATQoL questionnaire was used to assess the HRQoL. It comprises of three dimensions:LISAT, MEDWO and DISWO. The total imputed value score for MEDWO is calculated on a 0-100 scale using the formula: MEDWO 100=\[100 divided by (25 minus 5)\]\*(MEDWO minus 5). A response of 1 in MEDWO score shows medication worries all of the time and 5 as none of the time. The higher the score, the greater satisfaction to life and the less worry. The transformed dimension score for each domain was summarized and analyzed. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis. Participants without/with prior exposure to CAB+RPV (0 Weeks \[without exposure\] and \>=1 Weeks \[with exposure\]) has been presented. Baseline value is defined as last available recorded value up to and including the Maintenance treatment start. Change from Baseline value is calculated as the value at the post-dose visit minus the Baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in DISWO Using HATQoL Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48 | The HATQoL questionnaire was used to assess the HRQoL. It comprises of three dimensions:LISAT, MEDWO and DISWO. The total imputed value score for DISWO is calculated on a 0-100 scale using the formula: DISWO 100=\[100 divided by (25 minus 5)\]\*(DISWO minus 5). A response of 1 in DISWO score shows disclosure worries all of the time and 5 as none of the time. The higher the score, the greater satisfaction to life and the less worry. The transformed dimension score for each domain was summarized and analyzed. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis. Participants without/with prior exposure to CAB+RPV (0 Weeks \[without exposure\] and \>=1 Weeks \[with exposure\]) has been presented. Baseline value is defined as last available recorded value up to and including the Maintenance treatment start. Change from Baseline value is calculated as the value at the post-dose visit minus the Baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in Total Treatment Satisfaction Score Using HIV Treatment Satisfaction Status Questionnaire (HIVTSQs) at Weeks 24 and 48 | Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48 | The HIVTSQs treatment satisfaction questionnaire comprises of 1-12 questions and the total treatment satisfaction score is computed with items 1-11 and summed to produce a score with a possible range of 0 to 66. Higher scores represent greater treatment satisfaction as compared to the past few weeks. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis. Participants without/with prior exposure to CAB+RPV (0 Weeks \[without exposure\] and \>=1 Weeks \[with exposure\]) has been presented. Baseline value is defined as last available recorded value up to and including the Maintenance treatment start. Change from Baseline value is calculated as the value at the post-dose visit minus the Baseline value. |
| Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48 | HIVTSQs is a 12 item questionnaire. The individual item scores on HIVTSQs scale are rated as 6 (very satisfied, convenient, flexible, etc.) to 0 (very dissatisfied, inconvenient, inflexible, etc.). Higher scores represent greater satisfaction with each aspect of treatment. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis. Participants without/with prior exposure to CAB+RPV (0 Weeks \[without exposure\] and \>=1 Weeks \[with exposure\]) has been presented. Baseline value is defined as last available recorded value up to and including the Maintenance treatment start. Change from Baseline value is calculated as the value at the post-dose visit minus the Baseline value. |
| Total Treatment Satisfaction Change Score Using HIV Treatment Satisfaction Change Questionnaire (HIVTSQc) at Week 48 | Week 48 | The HIVTSQc is a 1-12 items questionnaire. Each item is scored -3 to 3. Total treatment satisfaction change score is computed using items 1 to 11 and are summed to produce a score with a possible range of -33 to 33. Higher the score, greater the improvement in satisfaction with treatment; the lower the score, the greater the deterioration in satisfaction with treatment. A score of 0 represented no change. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis. Total treatment satisfaction change score for participants who entered the current study from Q4W arm of ATLAS (NCT number: NCT02951052) and from either standard of care (SOC) arms of ATLAS or the new SOC participants) has been presented. |
| Change From Week 8 in Dimension Scores Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Week 8 and Weeks 24 and 48 | The PIN questionnaire explores bother of pain at injection site and injection site reactions (ISR), anxiety before and after injection, willingness to receive an HIV injectable treatment the following visit and satisfaction with mode of treatment administration of individuals receiving injection and perceptions of individuals associated with receiving injections. This measure contains 21 items that measure pain at injection site, local site reactions, impact on functioning and willingness to pursue injectable treatment outside of a clinical trial. Scores range from 1 to 5, and questions are phrased in such a way as to ensure that 1 always equated with the most favourable perception of vaccination, and 5 most unfavourable. Dimension scores include bother from ISR, leg movement, sleep and acceptability. Score of a domain is calculated as mean of all items within the domain. Higher scores represent worse perception of injection. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis. |
| Change From Week 8 in Individual Item Scores (Anxiety Before, Pain, Satisfaction, Anxiety After and Willingness) Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Week 8 and Weeks 24 and 48 | The PIN questionnaire explores the bother of pain at the injection site and ISRs, anxiety before and after injection, willingness to receive an HIV injectable treatment the following visit and satisfaction with the mode of treatment administration of individuals receiving injection and perceptions of individuals associated with receiving injections. This measure contains 21 items that measure pain at injection site, local site reactions, impact on functioning and willingness to pursue injectable treatment outside of a clinical trial. The items in the scale are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1(very dissatisfied, extremely, etc.) to 5 (very satisfied, not at all, etc.). Lower scores represent worse perception of injection. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis. |
| Change From Baseline in Treatment Acceptance a Using General Acceptance Dimension of the Chronic Treatment Acceptance (ACCEPT) Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48 | The ACCEPT questionnaire is a generic medication acceptance measure assessing how participants weigh advantages and disadvantages of long-term medication.The questionnaire consists of 25 items that capture six dimensions.3 questions that focus on general acceptance of study medication were analyzed.Items on the scale are rated as 1-5 scores:1:not at all acceptable,2:not very acceptable,3:somewhat acceptable, 4:totally acceptable and 5:I don't know.Total score of the dimension is calculated as the mean of recoded items of the dimension and then linearly transformed to be on a scale from 0 to 100:Total Score=(mean of the recoded items in the dimension minus1)divided by2\*100. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis. Data for participants without or with prior exposure has been presented. Baseline value is defined as last available value up to and including the Maintenance treatment. Change from Baseline value is calculated as the value at the post-dose visit minus the Baseline value. |
| Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for CAB LA Evaluable | Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 | Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of CAB LA. PK Population comprises of all participants who received CAB and / or RPV and underwent PK sampling during the study and provide at least 1 non-missing CAB and / or RPV plasma concentration value (Non-quantifiable \[NQ\] values will be considered as non-missing values). |
| Maximum Concentration (Cmax) in Plasma for CAB LA Evaluable | Predose at Weeks 4, 8, 13, 24, 32, 40, 48; 1 Week post-dose at Week 9 and 41 | Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to analyze Cmax in plasma for CAB LA. Participants who transitioned from ATLAS (201585 - NCT02951052) into this ATLAS-2M (207966) study had been treated with CAB + RPV for at least one year, were approaching steady state exposures, and were therefore excluded in order to focus the population analysis on those without prior exposure. |
| Cmax in Plasma for RPV LA Evaluable | Predose at Weeks 4, 8, 13, 24, 32, 40, 48; 1 Week post-dose at Week 9 and 41 | Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to analyze Cmax in plasma for RPV LA. Participants who transitioned from ATLAS (201585 - NCT02951052) into this ATLAS-2M (207966) study had been treated with CAB + RPV for at least one year, were approaching steady state exposures, and were therefore excluded in order to focus the population analysis on those without prior exposure. |
| Plasma Ctrough for RPV LA Evaluable | Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48 | Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of RPV LA. |
| Area Under the Curve (AUC) for CAB LA | Predose at Weeks 4, 8, 13, 24, 32, 40, 48; 1 Week post-dose at Week 9 and 41 | Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to analyze concentration in plasma for CAB LA. Participants who transitioned from ATLAS (201585 - NCT02951052) into this ATLAS-2M (207966) study had been treated with CAB + RPV for at least one year, were approaching steady state exposures, and were therefore excluded in order to focus the population analysis on those without prior exposure. |
| AUC for RPV LA | Predose at Weeks 4, 8, 13, 24, 32, 40, 48; 1 Week post-dose at Week 9 and 41 | Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to analyze concentration in plasma for RPV LA. Participants who transitioned from ATLAS (201585 - NCT02951052) into this ATLAS-2M (207966) study had been treated with CAB + RPV for at least one year, were approaching steady state exposures, and were therefore excluded in order to focus the population analysis on those without prior exposure. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Different Demographic Parameters for Inter-participant Variability | Up to Week 48 | Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of CAB LA and RPV LA. Demographic parameters including, but not limited to, age, sex, race, body weight, body mass index, and relevant laboratory parameters were planned to be evaluated as potential predictors of inter participant variability for pharmacokinetic parameters. |
| Number of Participants With Different Demographic Parameters for Intra-participant Variability | Up to Week 48 | Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of CAB LA and RPV LA. Demographic parameters including, but not limited to, age, sex, race, body weight, body mass index, and relevant laboratory parameters were planned to be evaluated as potential predictors of intra participant variability for pharmacokinetic parameters. |
Countries
Argentina, Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
This non-inferiority study evaluated antiviral activity of cabotegravir(CAB) long acting(LA) 600 milligrams(mg) + rilpivirine(RPV) LA 900 mg administered every 8 weeks(Q8W) compared with CAB LA 400 mg+RPV LA 600 mg administered every 4 weeks(Q4W) over a 48-week period in virologically suppressed human immunodeficiency type 1 infection participants.
Pre-assignment details
A total of 1049 eligible participants were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to 1 of the 2 treatment arms in Maintenance Phase, of which 4 participants did not receive study treatment and 1045 participants were included in Intent to treat-Exposed Population. Results presented are based on Week 48 primary analysis.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W Eligible participants transitioning from antiretroviral (ART) standard of care (SOC) therapy arm and CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W arm in the ATLAS (NCT02951052) study and randomized to receive CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W in the current study were administered oral therapy with CAB 30 mg + RPV 25 mg once daily at Day 1 for 4 weeks. Participants then received intramuscular (IM) injections of CAB LA 600 mg and RPV LA 900 mg at Week 4b and Week 8 followed by injections Q8W thereafter. Participants transitioned from the CAB LA+RPV LA Q4W arm of ATLAS study received CAB LA 600 mg+RPV LA 900 mg intramuscular injections on Day 1, Week 8 and Q8W thereafter. | 522 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W Eligible participants transitioning from ART SOC arm and CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W arm in the ATLAS (NCT02951052) study and randomized to receive CAB LA+RPV LA Q4W in the current study were administered oral therapy with CAB 30 mg + RPV 25 mg once daily at Day 1 for 4 weeks. Participants then received a loading dose of CAB LA 600 mg and RPV LA 900 mg IM injections at Week 4b followed maintenance injections of CAB LA 400 mg +RPV LA 600 mg Q4W thereafter. Participants transitioned from the Q4W arm of ATLAS study continued to receive CAB LA 400 mg+RPV LA 600 mg intramuscular injections administered Q4W from Day 1. | 523 |
| Total | 1,045 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 12 | 13 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 9 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | On-going | 486 | 481 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 5 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Pregnancy | 1 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 6 | 21 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 42.7 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.16 | 42.3 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.58 | 42.5 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.87 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian (AI) or Alaska Native (AN) | 17 Participants | 11 Participants | 28 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian-Central/South Asian Heritage (H) | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian-East Asian H | 20 Participants | 12 Participants | 32 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian-Japanese H | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian-South East Asian (SEA) H | 8 Participants | 7 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American (AA) | 101 Participants | 90 Participants | 191 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Multiple-AI/AN and Black/AA/White/Caucasian/EU H | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Multiple-AI/AN and NH/Other Pacific Islander | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Multiple-Black/AA and White-Arabic/North African H | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Multiple-Black/AA and White/Caucasian/EU H | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Multiple-SEA H and White/Caucasian/ EU H | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Native Hawaiian (NH) or other Pacific Islander | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White-Arabic/North African H | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White-Mixed White Race | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White-White/Caucasian/European (EU) H | 368 Participants | 388 Participants | 756 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Sex at birth=Female | 137 Participants | 143 Participants | 280 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Sex at birth=Male | 385 Participants | 380 Participants | 765 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Reported gender=Female | 142 Participants | 146 Participants | 288 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Reported gender=Male | 380 Participants | 377 Participants | 757 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 522 | 0 / 523 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 429 / 522 | 427 / 523 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 27 / 522 | 19 / 523 |
Outcome results
Primary
Percentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus-ribonucleic Acid (HIV-RNA) >=50 Copies Per Milliliter (c/mL) as Per Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot Algorithm at Week 48
Percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA \>=50 c/mL as per FDA snapshot algorithm at Week 48 was assessed to demonstrate the non-inferior antiviral activity of CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W compared to CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W regimen over 48 weeks in HIV-1 infected ART experienced participants. The HIV-1 RNA \>=50 c/mL per Snapshot algorithm was determined by the last on-treatment HIV-1 RNA measurement within the Week 48 analysis visit window. Intent-to-treat-Exposed (ITT-E) Population comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Participants were assessed according to their randomized treatment, regardless of the treatment they received.
Time frame: Week 48
Population: ITT-E Population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Percentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus-ribonucleic Acid (HIV-RNA) >=50 Copies Per Milliliter (c/mL) as Per Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot Algorithm at Week 48 | 1.7 Percentage of participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Percentage of Participants With Plasma Human Immunodeficiency Virus-ribonucleic Acid (HIV-RNA) >=50 Copies Per Milliliter (c/mL) as Per Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot Algorithm at Week 48 | 1.0 Percentage of participants |
95% CI: [-0.6, 2.2]
Secondary
Absolute Values for Cluster of Differentiation 4 Plus (CD4+) at Week 48
Blood samples were collected and CD4+ cell count assessment by flow cytometry was carried out to evaluate the immunologic activity of CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W compared to CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W.
Time frame: Week 48
Population: ITT-E Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Absolute Values for Cluster of Differentiation 4 Plus (CD4+) at Week 48 | 685.9 Cells per cubic millimeter | Standard Deviation 261.7 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Absolute Values for Cluster of Differentiation 4 Plus (CD4+) at Week 48 | 700.0 Cells per cubic millimeter | Standard Deviation 278.18 |
Secondary
Absolute Values for HIV-1 RNA at Week 48
Plasma samples were collected for quantitative analysis of HIV-1 RNA. Logarithm to base 10 (log10) values for plasma HIV-1 RNA has been presented.
Time frame: Weeks 48
Population: ITT-E Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Absolute Values for HIV-1 RNA at Week 48 | 1.599 Log 10 c/mL | Standard Deviation 0.087 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Absolute Values for HIV-1 RNA at Week 48 | 1.593 Log 10 c/mL | Standard Deviation 0.0302 |
Secondary
Area Under the Curve (AUC) for CAB LA
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to analyze concentration in plasma for CAB LA. Participants who transitioned from ATLAS (201585 - NCT02951052) into this ATLAS-2M (207966) study had been treated with CAB + RPV for at least one year, were approaching steady state exposures, and were therefore excluded in order to focus the population analysis on those without prior exposure.
Time frame: Predose at Weeks 4, 8, 13, 24, 32, 40, 48; 1 Week post-dose at Week 9 and 41
Population: PK Population. Only those participants with data available at specified time points has been analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Area Under the Curve (AUC) for CAB LA | 3756.03 Micrograms*hours per milliliter |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Area Under the Curve (AUC) for CAB LA | 2449.75 Micrograms*hours per milliliter |
Secondary
AUC for RPV LA
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to analyze concentration in plasma for RPV LA. Participants who transitioned from ATLAS (201585 - NCT02951052) into this ATLAS-2M (207966) study had been treated with CAB + RPV for at least one year, were approaching steady state exposures, and were therefore excluded in order to focus the population analysis on those without prior exposure.
Time frame: Predose at Weeks 4, 8, 13, 24, 32, 40, 48; 1 Week post-dose at Week 9 and 41
Population: PK Population. Only those participants with data available at specified time points has been analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | AUC for RPV LA | 126467.59 Nanograms*hours per milliliter |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | AUC for RPV LA | 70306.62 Nanograms*hours per milliliter |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Albumin Over Time
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameter: albumin. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Albumin Over Time | Week 16, n=515, 513 | -0.3 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 2.56 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Albumin Over Time | Week 32, n=499, 498 | -0.2 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 2.63 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Albumin Over Time | Week 8, n=510, 515 | -0.3 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 2.48 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Albumin Over Time | Week 40, n=495, 490 | 0.1 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 2.68 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Albumin Over Time | Week 24, n=505, 503 | -0.0 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 2.49 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Albumin Over Time | Week 48, n=493, 486 | -0.2 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 2.59 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Albumin Over Time | Week 4, n=326, 520 | -0.5 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 2.32 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Albumin Over Time | Week 48, n=493, 486 | -0.2 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 2.6 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Albumin Over Time | Week 4, n=326, 520 | -0.2 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 2.45 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Albumin Over Time | Week 8, n=510, 515 | -0.1 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 2.48 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Albumin Over Time | Week 16, n=515, 513 | -0.4 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 2.51 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Albumin Over Time | Week 24, n=505, 503 | -0.2 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 2.59 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Albumin Over Time | Week 32, n=499, 498 | -0.3 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 2.68 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Albumin Over Time | Week 40, n=495, 490 | -0.3 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 2.54 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Over Time
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameter: GFR from creatinine adjusted using CKD-EPI. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Over Time | Week 16, n=515, 513 | -0.2 milliliters/minute/1.73 square meter | Standard Deviation 9.08 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Over Time | Week 32, n=499, 498 | -1.7 milliliters/minute/1.73 square meter | Standard Deviation 10.12 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Over Time | Week 8, n=508, 514 | 1.0 milliliters/minute/1.73 square meter | Standard Deviation 9.07 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Over Time | Week 40, n=494, 489 | -1.7 milliliters/minute/1.73 square meter | Standard Deviation 9.92 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Over Time | Week 24, n=503, 503 | -0.7 milliliters/minute/1.73 square meter | Standard Deviation 9.67 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Over Time | Week 48, n=493, 486 | -1.9 milliliters/minute/1.73 square meter | Standard Deviation 9.96 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Over Time | Week 4, n=326, 521 | -0.8 milliliters/minute/1.73 square meter | Standard Deviation 9.05 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Over Time | Week 48, n=493, 486 | -3.3 milliliters/minute/1.73 square meter | Standard Deviation 9.79 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Over Time | Week 4, n=326, 521 | 0.4 milliliters/minute/1.73 square meter | Standard Deviation 7.91 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Over Time | Week 8, n=508, 514 | 0.4 milliliters/minute/1.73 square meter | Standard Deviation 8.62 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Over Time | Week 16, n=515, 513 | -0.4 milliliters/minute/1.73 square meter | Standard Deviation 9.01 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Over Time | Week 24, n=503, 503 | -1.7 milliliters/minute/1.73 square meter | Standard Deviation 10.65 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Over Time | Week 32, n=499, 498 | -3.0 milliliters/minute/1.73 square meter | Standard Deviation 10.19 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) Over Time | Week 40, n=494, 489 | -2.9 milliliters/minute/1.73 square meter | Standard Deviation 9.95 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Lipase Over Time
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameter: Lipase. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Lipase Over Time | Week 16, n=515, 513 | 2.7 Units per liter | Standard Deviation 33.41 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Lipase Over Time | Week 32, n=499, 498 | 3.1 Units per liter | Standard Deviation 35.2 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Lipase Over Time | Week 8, n=510, 514 | 1.5 Units per liter | Standard Deviation 23.82 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Lipase Over Time | Week 40, n=494, 486 | 1.3 Units per liter | Standard Deviation 23.35 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Lipase Over Time | Week 24, n=503, 503 | 0.7 Units per liter | Standard Deviation 19.71 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Lipase Over Time | Week 48, n=493, 486 | 3.2 Units per liter | Standard Deviation 53.46 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Lipase Over Time | Week 4, n=326, 521 | 1.7 Units per liter | Standard Deviation 28.76 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Lipase Over Time | Week 48, n=493, 486 | 2.9 Units per liter | Standard Deviation 42.61 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Lipase Over Time | Week 4, n=326, 521 | 1.1 Units per liter | Standard Deviation 22.67 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Lipase Over Time | Week 8, n=510, 514 | 1.4 Units per liter | Standard Deviation 24.74 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Lipase Over Time | Week 16, n=515, 513 | 0.7 Units per liter | Standard Deviation 18.82 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Lipase Over Time | Week 24, n=503, 503 | 2.6 Units per liter | Standard Deviation 34.49 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Lipase Over Time | Week 32, n=499, 498 | -0.5 Units per liter | Standard Deviation 21.91 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameter: Lipase Over Time | Week 40, n=494, 486 | 2.7 Units per liter | Standard Deviation 30.95 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemical parameters including ALT, ALP, AST and creatinine kinase. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | AST, Week 4, n=326, 520 | -0.6 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 13.25 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALT, Week 32, n=499, 498 | -0.4 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 12.6 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | AST, Week 8, n=510, 515 | 0.6 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 11.71 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALP, Week 8, n=510, 515 | -4.1 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 13.07 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | AST, Week 16, n=515, 513 | 1.2 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 24.79 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALT, Week 8, n=510, 515 | 0.8 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 21.28 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | AST, Week 24, n=505, 503 | 1.6 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 53.81 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALP, Week 16, n=515, 513 | -4.8 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 14.65 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | AST, Week 32, n=499, 498 | -1.6 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 8.84 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALT, Week 40, n=495, 490 | 0.4 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 13.5 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | AST, Week 40, n=495, 490 | -1.0 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 10.14 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALP, Week 24, n=505, 503 | -5.2 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 16.04 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | AST, Week 48, n=493, 486 | -0.2 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 12.48 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALT, Week 24, n=505, 503 | 1.9 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 63.03 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | Creatinine kinase, Week 4, n=326, 520 | 30.2 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 689.41 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALP, Week 32, n=499, 498 | -5.7 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 17.14 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | Creatinine kinase, Week 8, n=510, 515 | 24.1 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 479.84 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALT, Week 48, n=493, 486 | 1.1 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 16.39 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | Creatinine kinase, Week 16, n=515, 513 | 30.6 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 692.65 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALP, Week 40, n=495, 490 | -5.9 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 17.61 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | Creatinine kinase, Week 24, n=505, 503 | -13.6 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 265.16 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALT, Week 16, n=515, 513 | 1.5 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 47.6 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | Creatinine kinase, Week 32, n=499, 498 | -23.3 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 314.46 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALP, Week 48, n=493, 486 | -6.6 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 17.18 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | Creatinine kinase, Week 40, n=495, 490 | -12.5 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 336.08 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALP, Week 4, n=326, 520 | -5.5 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 12.09 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | Creatinine kinase, Week 48, n=493, 486 | 17.9 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 411.7 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALT, Week 4, n=326, 520 | -1.3 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 11.11 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | Creatinine kinase, Week 48, n=493, 486 | -2.9 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 810.46 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALT, Week 4, n=326, 520 | 0.1 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 14.01 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALT, Week 8, n=510, 515 | 0.3 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 15.65 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALT, Week 16, n=515, 513 | -0.7 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 12.29 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALT, Week 24, n=505, 503 | -0.3 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 13.39 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALT, Week 32, n=499, 498 | 2.4 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 33.72 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALT, Week 40, n=495, 490 | 6.6 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 112.13 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALT, Week 48, n=493, 486 | 1.6 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 18.61 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALP, Week 4, n=326, 520 | -2.1 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 10.25 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALP, Week 8, n=510, 515 | -3.3 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 11.31 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALP, Week 16, n=515, 513 | -4.2 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 13.07 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALP, Week 24, n=505, 503 | -4.0 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 13.42 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALP, Week 32, n=499, 498 | -4.1 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 14.95 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALP, Week 40, n=495, 490 | -3.9 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 16.09 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | ALP, Week 48, n=493, 486 | -4.5 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 15.02 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | AST, Week 4, n=326, 520 | -0.3 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 18.47 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | AST, Week 8, n=510, 515 | 0.0 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 14.46 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | AST, Week 16, n=515, 513 | -0.3 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 16.58 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | AST, Week 24, n=505, 503 | -0.2 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 21.65 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | AST, Week 32, n=499, 498 | 0.8 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 34.81 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | AST, Week 40, n=495, 490 | 2.5 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 66.54 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | AST, Week 48, n=493, 486 | -0.7 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 16.12 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | Creatinine kinase, Week 4, n=326, 520 | -29.3 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 717.51 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | Creatinine kinase, Week 8, n=510, 515 | -23.7 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 682.9 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | Creatinine kinase, Week 16, n=515, 513 | -4.7 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 856.65 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | Creatinine kinase, Week 24, n=505, 503 | 31.1 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 1198.22 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | Creatinine kinase, Week 32, n=499, 498 | -5.8 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 787.02 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: ALT, ALP, AST and Creatinine Kinase Over Time | Creatinine kinase, Week 40, n=495, 490 | 34.2 International units per liter | Standard Deviation 1288.66 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters: bilirubin and creatinine. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Bilirubin, Week 24, n=505, 503 | 0.8 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 9.42 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Creatinine, Week 4, n=326, 521 | 0.89 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 8.768 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Bilirubin, Week 4, n=326, 520 | 0.4 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 6.44 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Creatinine, Week 8, n=510, 515 | -0.94 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 8.638 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Bilirubin, Week 32, n=499, 498 | 0.5 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 5.54 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Bilirubin, Week 16, n=515, 513 | 0.5 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 5.78 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Creatinine, Week 24, n=505, 503 | 0.22 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 9.085 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Bilirubin, Week 40, n=495, 490 | 0.7 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 6 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Creatinine, Week 32, n=499, 498 | 1.01 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 9.49 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Bilirubin, Week 8, n=510, 515 | 0.4 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 5.68 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Creatinine, Week 40, n=495, 490 | 1.02 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 9.604 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Bilirubin, Week 48, n=493, 486 | 0.4 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 5.77 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Creatinine, Week 48, n=493, 486 | 1.30 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 9.813 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Creatinine, Week 16, n=515, 513 | -0.24 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 8.973 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Creatinine, Week 48, n=493, 486 | 2.30 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 8.678 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Bilirubin, Week 4, n=326, 520 | 0.1 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 5.7 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Bilirubin, Week 8, n=510, 515 | 0.1 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 5.39 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Bilirubin, Week 16, n=515, 513 | 0.2 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 5.69 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Bilirubin, Week 24, n=505, 503 | 0.5 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 5.23 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Bilirubin, Week 32, n=499, 498 | 0.4 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 5.46 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Bilirubin, Week 40, n=495, 490 | 0.4 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 5.77 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Bilirubin, Week 48, n=493, 486 | 0.7 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 4.93 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Creatinine, Week 4, n=326, 521 | -0.36 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 7.215 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Creatinine, Week 8, n=510, 515 | -0.39 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 8.191 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Creatinine, Week 16, n=515, 513 | -0.03 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 8.516 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Creatinine, Week 24, n=505, 503 | 0.94 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 9.591 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Creatinine, Week 32, n=499, 498 | 2.09 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 9.313 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Bilirubin and Creatinine Over Time | Creatinine, Week 40, n=495, 490 | 2.05 Micromoles per liter | Standard Deviation 9.414 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Cholesterol, Glucose, Direct High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol Calculation and Triglycerides at Week 48
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters: cholesterol, glucose, direct HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol calculation and triglycerides. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 48
Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Cholesterol, Glucose, Direct High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol Calculation and Triglycerides at Week 48 | Glucose, Week 48, n=478, 470 | 0.16 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.907 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Cholesterol, Glucose, Direct High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol Calculation and Triglycerides at Week 48 | LDL cholesterol calculation, Week 48, n=415, 398 | 0.026 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.629 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Cholesterol, Glucose, Direct High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol Calculation and Triglycerides at Week 48 | Direct HDL cholesterol, Week 48, n=423, 408 | 0.011 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.292 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Cholesterol, Glucose, Direct High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol Calculation and Triglycerides at Week 48 | Triglycerides, Week 48, n=423, 408 | -0.039 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.79 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Cholesterol, Glucose, Direct High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol Calculation and Triglycerides at Week 48 | Cholesterol, Week 48, n=423, 408 | 0.023 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.742 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Cholesterol, Glucose, Direct High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol Calculation and Triglycerides at Week 48 | Triglycerides, Week 48, n=423, 408 | -0.017 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.88 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Cholesterol, Glucose, Direct High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol Calculation and Triglycerides at Week 48 | Cholesterol, Week 48, n=423, 408 | 0.075 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.748 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Cholesterol, Glucose, Direct High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol Calculation and Triglycerides at Week 48 | Glucose, Week 48, n=478, 470 | 0.12 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 1.208 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Cholesterol, Glucose, Direct High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol Calculation and Triglycerides at Week 48 | Direct HDL cholesterol, Week 48, n=423, 408 | -0.000 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.288 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: Cholesterol, Glucose, Direct High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol Calculation and Triglycerides at Week 48 | LDL cholesterol calculation, Week 48, n=415, 398 | 0.098 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.585 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of clinical chemistry parameters: CO2, chloride, phosphate, potassium, sodium and urea. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Chloride, Week 24, n=505, 503 | 0.1 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.36 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | CO2, Week 8, n=510, 515 | -0.8 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.12 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | CO2, Week 16, n=515, 513 | -1.0 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.31 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | CO2, Week 24, n=505, 503 | -0.7 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.38 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | CO2, Week 32, n=499, 498 | -0.9 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.31 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | CO2, Week 40, n=495, 490 | -0.6 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.33 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | CO2, Week 48, n=493, 485 | -0.4 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.32 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Chloride, Week 4, n=326, 520 | 0.6 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.19 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Chloride, Week 8, n=510, 515 | 0.3 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.24 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Chloride, Week 16, n=515, 513 | 0.4 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | CO2, Week 4, n=326, 520 | -0.5 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.29 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Chloride, Week 32, n=499, 498 | 0.2 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.34 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Chloride, Week 40, n=495, 490 | -0.1 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.46 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Chloride, Week 48, n=493, 486 | -0.0 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.25 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Phosphate, Week 4, n=326, 520 | 0.054 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.182 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Phosphate, Week 8, n=510, 515 | 0.025 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.177 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Phosphate, Week 16, n=515, 513 | 0.017 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.181 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Phosphate, Week 24, n=505, 502 | 0.016 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.17 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Phosphate, Week 32, n=499, 498 | -0.001 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.183 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Phosphate, Week 40, n=495, 490 | 0.014 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.18 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Phosphate, Week 48, n=493, 486 | 0.007 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.169 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Potassium, Week 4, n=326, 520 | 0.03 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.337 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Potassium, Week 8, n=510, 515 | 0.04 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.317 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Potassium, Week 16, n=515, 513 | 0.03 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.328 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Potassium, Week 24, n=505, 503 | 0.04 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.338 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Potassium, Week 32, n=499, 498 | 0.04 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.364 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Potassium, Week 40, n=495, 490 | 0.04 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.351 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Potassium, Week 48, n=493, 486 | 0.04 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.315 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Sodium, Week 4, n=326, 520 | 0.4 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.02 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Sodium, Week 8, n=510, 515 | 0.1 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.14 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Sodium, Week 16, n=515, 513 | 0.0 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Sodium, Week 24, n=505, 503 | -0.2 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.07 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Sodium, Week 32, n=499, 498 | -0.1 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Sodium, Week 40, n=495, 490 | -0.3 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.09 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Sodium, Week 48, n=493, 486 | -0.4 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.02 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Urea, Week 4, n=326, 520 | 0.24 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 1.251 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Urea, Week 8, n=510, 515 | 0.07 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 1.306 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Urea, Week 16, n=515, 513 | 0.07 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 1.372 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Urea, Week 24, n=505, 503 | 0.06 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 1.298 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Urea, Week 32, n=499, 498 | 0.11 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 1.297 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Urea, Week 40, n=495, 490 | 0.18 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 1.345 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Urea, Week 48, n=493, 486 | 0.13 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 1.35 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Sodium, Week 24, n=505, 503 | -0.3 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.2 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | CO2, Week 4, n=326, 520 | -0.7 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.32 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Potassium, Week 4, n=326, 520 | 0.03 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.303 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | CO2, Week 8, n=510, 515 | -0.8 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.23 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Urea, Week 32, n=499, 498 | 0.16 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 1.356 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | CO2, Week 16, n=515, 513 | -0.9 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.33 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Potassium, Week 8, n=510, 515 | 0.04 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.331 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | CO2, Week 24, n=505, 503 | -0.7 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.28 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Sodium, Week 32, n=499, 498 | -0.1 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.21 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | CO2, Week 32, n=499, 498 | -0.8 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.43 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Potassium, Week 16, n=515, 513 | 0.03 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.341 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | CO2, Week 40, n=495, 490 | -0.7 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.44 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Urea, Week 16, n=515, 513 | 0.15 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 1.32 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | CO2, Week 48, n=493, 485 | -0.4 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.41 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Potassium, Week 24, n=505, 503 | 0.03 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.321 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Chloride, Week 4, n=326, 520 | 0.2 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.35 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Sodium, Week 40, n=495, 490 | -0.2 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.13 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Chloride, Week 8, n=510, 515 | 0.2 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.34 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Potassium, Week 32, n=499, 498 | 0.00 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.34 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Chloride, Week 16, n=515, 513 | 0.2 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.4 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Urea, Week 48, n=493, 486 | 0.14 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 1.457 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Chloride, Week 24, n=505, 503 | -0.1 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.59 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Potassium, Week 40, n=495, 490 | 0.02 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.334 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Chloride, Week 32, n=499, 498 | 0.1 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.64 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Sodium, Week 48, n=493, 486 | -0.3 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.21 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Chloride, Week 40, n=495, 490 | 0.0 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.36 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Potassium, Week 48, n=493, 486 | 0.03 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.327 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Chloride, Week 48, n=493, 486 | -0.1 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.46 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Urea, Week 24, n=505, 503 | 0.15 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 1.27 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Phosphate, Week 4, n=326, 520 | 0.018 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.167 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Sodium, Week 4, n=326, 520 | 0.1 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.11 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Phosphate, Week 8, n=510, 515 | 0.029 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.16 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Urea, Week 4, n=326, 520 | 0.19 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 1.227 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Phosphate, Week 16, n=515, 513 | 0.007 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.172 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Sodium, Week 8, n=510, 515 | 0.2 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.02 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Phosphate, Week 24, n=505, 502 | -0.004 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.168 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Urea, Week 40, n=495, 490 | 0.21 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 1.412 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Phosphate, Week 32, n=499, 498 | 0.001 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.172 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Sodium, Week 16, n=515, 513 | -0.1 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 2.01 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Phosphate, Week 40, n=495, 490 | 0.001 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.17 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Urea, Week 8, n=510, 515 | 0.19 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 1.336 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Clinical Chemistry Parameters: CO2, Chloride, Phosphate, Potassium, Sodium and Urea Over Time | Phosphate, Week 48, n=493, 486 | 0.010 Millimoles per liter | Standard Deviation 0.157 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in DISWO Using HATQoL Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV
The HATQoL questionnaire was used to assess the HRQoL. It comprises of three dimensions:LISAT, MEDWO and DISWO. The total imputed value score for DISWO is calculated on a 0-100 scale using the formula: DISWO 100=\[100 divided by (25 minus 5)\]\*(DISWO minus 5). A response of 1 in DISWO score shows disclosure worries all of the time and 5 as none of the time. The higher the score, the greater satisfaction to life and the less worry. The transformed dimension score for each domain was summarized and analyzed. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis. Participants without/with prior exposure to CAB+RPV (0 Weeks \[without exposure\] and \>=1 Weeks \[with exposure\]) has been presented. Baseline value is defined as last available recorded value up to and including the Maintenance treatment start. Change from Baseline value is calculated as the value at the post-dose visit minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48
Population: ITT-E Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in DISWO Using HATQoL Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | Without exposure, Week 24, n=317, 324 | 1.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.58 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in DISWO Using HATQoL Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | Without exposure, Week 48, n=318, 324 | -0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.14 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in DISWO Using HATQoL Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | With exposure, Week 24, n=192, 194 | 0.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.13 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in DISWO Using HATQoL Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | With exposure, Week 48, n=192, 194 | -0.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.11 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in DISWO Using HATQoL Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | With exposure, Week 48, n=192, 194 | 1.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.84 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in DISWO Using HATQoL Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | Without exposure, Week 24, n=317, 324 | 1.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.18 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in DISWO Using HATQoL Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | With exposure, Week 24, n=192, 194 | 1.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.2 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in DISWO Using HATQoL Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | Without exposure, Week 48, n=318, 324 | -0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.86 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) Over Time
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter: erythrocyte MCV. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) Over Time | Week 16, n=509, 507 | -1.99 Femtoliters | Standard Deviation 4.583 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) Over Time | Week 32, n=491, 491 | -3.17 Femtoliters | Standard Deviation 5.005 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) Over Time | Week 8, n=509, 510 | -1.16 Femtoliters | Standard Deviation 3.27 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) Over Time | Week 40, n=481, 476 | -3.35 Femtoliters | Standard Deviation 4.74 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) Over Time | Week 24, n=500, 498 | -2.46 Femtoliters | Standard Deviation 5.085 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) Over Time | Week 48, n=489, 478 | -3.28 Femtoliters | Standard Deviation 5 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) Over Time | Week 4, n=331, 520 | -0.32 Femtoliters | Standard Deviation 2.136 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) Over Time | Week 48, n=489, 478 | -3.08 Femtoliters | Standard Deviation 4.797 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) Over Time | Week 4, n=331, 520 | -0.13 Femtoliters | Standard Deviation 2.322 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) Over Time | Week 8, n=509, 510 | -0.84 Femtoliters | Standard Deviation 3.132 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) Over Time | Week 16, n=509, 507 | -1.84 Femtoliters | Standard Deviation 4.37 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) Over Time | Week 24, n=500, 498 | -2.41 Femtoliters | Standard Deviation 4.777 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) Over Time | Week 32, n=491, 491 | -2.75 Femtoliters | Standard Deviation 4.682 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) Over Time | Week 40, n=481, 476 | -3.15 Femtoliters | Standard Deviation 4.578 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Over Time
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter: erythrocytes. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Over Time | Week 16, n=509, 507 | 0.182 10^12 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.305 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Over Time | Week 32, n=491, 491 | 0.189 10^12 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.3145 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Over Time | Week 8, n=509, 510 | 0.092 10^12 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.2669 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Over Time | Week 40, n=481, 476 | 0.229 10^12 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.3217 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Over Time | Week 24, n=500, 498 | 0.209 10^12 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.3071 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Over Time | Week 48, n=489, 478 | 0.188 10^12 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.3288 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Over Time | Week 4, n=331, 520 | 0.033 10^12 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.2206 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Over Time | Week 48, n=489, 478 | 0.170 10^12 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.3329 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Over Time | Week 4, n=331, 520 | 0.024 10^12 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.2211 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Over Time | Week 8, n=509, 510 | 0.083 10^12 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.2651 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Over Time | Week 16, n=509, 507 | 0.162 10^12 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.3222 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Over Time | Week 24, n=500, 498 | 0.170 10^12 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.3225 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Over Time | Week 32, n=491, 491 | 0.150 10^12 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.3337 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Erythrocytes Over Time | Week 40, n=481, 476 | 0.157 10^12 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.3184 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit Over Time
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter: hematocrit. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit Over Time | Week 16, n=509, 507 | 0.008 Proportion of red blood cells in blood | Standard Deviation 0.0229 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit Over Time | Week 32, n=491, 491 | 0.003 Proportion of red blood cells in blood | Standard Deviation 0.02352 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit Over Time | Week 8, n=509, 510 | 0.004 Proportion of red blood cells in blood | Standard Deviation 0.02274 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit Over Time | Week 40, n=481, 476 | 0.006 Proportion of red blood cells in blood | Standard Deviation 0.02323 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit Over Time | Week 24, n=500, 498 | 0.008 Proportion of red blood cells in blood | Standard Deviation 0.02219 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit Over Time | Week 48, n=489, 478 | 0.003 Proportion of red blood cells in blood | Standard Deviation 0.02414 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit Over Time | Week 4, n=331, 520 | 0.002 Proportion of red blood cells in blood | Standard Deviation 0.02088 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit Over Time | Week 48, n=489, 478 | 0.001 Proportion of red blood cells in blood | Standard Deviation 0.02565 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit Over Time | Week 4, n=331, 520 | 0.002 Proportion of red blood cells in blood | Standard Deviation 0.02202 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit Over Time | Week 8, n=509, 510 | 0.004 Proportion of red blood cells in blood | Standard Deviation 0.02362 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit Over Time | Week 16, n=509, 507 | 0.007 Proportion of red blood cells in blood | Standard Deviation 0.02485 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit Over Time | Week 24, n=500, 498 | 0.004 Proportion of red blood cells in blood | Standard Deviation 0.02413 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit Over Time | Week 32, n=491, 491 | 0.001 Proportion of red blood cells in blood | Standard Deviation 0.02469 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hematocrit Over Time | Week 40, n=481, 476 | 0.000 Proportion of red blood cells in blood | Standard Deviation 0.02378 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin Over Time
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameter: hemoglobin. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin Over Time | Week 16, n=509, 507 | 0.44 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 6.979 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin Over Time | Week 32, n=491, 491 | 1.11 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 7.633 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin Over Time | Week 8, n=509, 510 | 0.28 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 7.028 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin Over Time | Week 40, n=481, 476 | 1.36 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 7.503 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin Over Time | Week 24, n=501, 498 | 1.48 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 7.013 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin Over Time | Week 48, n=489, 478 | -0.13 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 7.631 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin Over Time | Week 4, n=331, 520 | 0.08 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 6.425 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin Over Time | Week 48, n=489, 478 | -0.80 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 8.462 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin Over Time | Week 4, n=331, 520 | -0.16 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 6.797 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin Over Time | Week 8, n=509, 510 | -0.05 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 7.419 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin Over Time | Week 16, n=509, 507 | 0.05 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 7.531 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin Over Time | Week 24, n=501, 498 | 0.45 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 7.488 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin Over Time | Week 32, n=491, 491 | 0.05 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 8.041 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameter: Hemoglobin Over Time | Week 40, n=481, 476 | -0.47 Grams per liter | Standard Deviation 7.788 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time
Blood samples were collected for the analysis of hematology parameters: basophils, eosinophils, leukocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils and platelets. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Population: Safety Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Basophils, Week 16, n=508, 507 | -0.000 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.02651 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Lymphocytes, Week 32, n=489, 486 | 0.119 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.46387 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Eosinophils, Week 48, n=486, 478 | 0.001 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.12444 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Lymphocytes, Week 40, n=479, 472 | 0.126 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.44614 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Eosinophils, Week 4, n=330, 516 | 0.031 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.13775 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Lymphocytes, Week 48, n=486, 478 | 0.063 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.43255 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Leukocytes, Week 4, n=331, 520 | 0.437 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.5653 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Monocytes, Week 4, n=330, 516 | 0.051 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.14208 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Basophils, Week 32, n=489, 486 | 0.005 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.02708 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Monocytes, Week 8, n=506, 505 | 0.003 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.1208 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Leukocytes, Week 8, n=508, 507 | 0.110 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.5863 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Monocytes, Week 16, n=508, 507 | -0.002 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.12804 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Eosinophils, Week 8, n=506, 505 | 0.015 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.14391 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Monocytes, Week 24, n=497, 495 | 0.019 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.1346 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Leukocytes, Week 16, n=509, 507 | 0.050 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.4281 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Monocytes, Week 32, n=489, 486 | 0.048 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.13969 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Basophils, Week 8, n=506, 505 | 0.000 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.02682 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Monocytes, Week 40, n=479, 472 | 0.060 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.1357 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Leukocytes, Week 24, n=499, 497 | 0.148 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.5229 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Monocytes, Week 48, n=486, 478 | 0.030 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.13329 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Eosinophils, Week 16, n=508, 507 | 0.001 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.13474 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Neutrophils, Week 4, n=330, 516 | 0.152 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.44916 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Leukocytes, Week 32, n=491, 489 | 0.185 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.5455 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Neutrophils, Week 8, n=506, 505 | 0.035 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.49397 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Basophils, Week 40, n=479, 472 | 0.004 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.02716 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Neutrophils, Week 16, n=508, 507 | -0.018 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.34384 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Leukocytes, Week 40, n=480, 476 | 0.177 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.6601 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Neutrophils, Week 24, n=497, 495 | 0.047 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.36697 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Eosinophils, Week 24, n=497, 495 | 0.001 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.13607 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Neutrophils, Week 32, n=489, 486 | 0.001 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.43051 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Leukocytes, Week 48, n=488, 478 | -0.007 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.5561 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Neutrophils, Week 40, n=479, 472 | -0.021 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.53092 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Basophils, Week 24, n=497, 495 | 0.002 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.02809 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Neutrophils, Week 48, n=486, 478 | -0.108 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.39875 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Lymphocytes, Week 4, n=330, 516 | 0.187 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.44013 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Platelets, Week 4, n=329, 518 | 2.09 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 32.33 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Eosinophils, Week 32, n=489, 486 | 0.005 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.12762 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Platelets, Week 8, n=506, 507 | -0.62 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 35.873 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Lymphocytes, Week 8, n=506, 505 | 0.040 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.39452 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Platelets, Week 16, n=498, 505 | 0.01 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 35.207 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Basophils, Week 48, n=486, 478 | 0.005 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.0273 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Platelets, Week 24, n=496, 496 | 0.26 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 36.085 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Lymphocytes, Week 16, n=508, 507 | 0.060 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.4347 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Platelets, Week 32, n=487, 486 | 1.67 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 40.601 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Eosinophils, Week 40, n=479, 472 | 0.006 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.13578 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Platelets, Week 40, n=478, 472 | 0.38 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 38.636 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Lymphocytes, Week 24, n=497, 495 | 0.081 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.41863 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Platelets, Week 48, n=489, 474 | 0.06 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 39.549 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Basophils, Week 4, n=330, 516 | 0.006 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.02751 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Platelets, Week 48, n=489, 474 | -1.51 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 35.44 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Basophils, Week 4, n=330, 516 | 0.003 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.02811 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Basophils, Week 8, n=506, 505 | 0.002 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.02699 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Basophils, Week 16, n=508, 507 | 0.001 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.02929 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Basophils, Week 24, n=497, 495 | 0.002 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.02803 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Basophils, Week 32, n=489, 486 | 0.003 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.02988 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Basophils, Week 40, n=479, 472 | 0.004 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.02772 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Basophils, Week 48, n=486, 478 | 0.003 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.02926 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Eosinophils, Week 4, n=330, 516 | 0.015 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.15112 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Eosinophils, Week 8, n=506, 505 | 0.012 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.13314 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Eosinophils, Week 16, n=508, 507 | 0.010 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.13012 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Eosinophils, Week 24, n=497, 495 | 0.009 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.12836 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Eosinophils, Week 32, n=489, 486 | 0.011 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.1381 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Eosinophils, Week 40, n=479, 472 | 0.009 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.12297 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Eosinophils, Week 48, n=486, 478 | 0.002 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.12646 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Leukocytes, Week 4, n=331, 520 | 0.335 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.6343 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Leukocytes, Week 8, n=508, 507 | 0.214 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.6109 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Leukocytes, Week 16, n=509, 507 | 0.139 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.6384 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Leukocytes, Week 24, n=499, 497 | 0.139 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.6301 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Leukocytes, Week 32, n=491, 489 | 0.111 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.6454 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Leukocytes, Week 40, n=480, 476 | 0.100 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.8042 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Leukocytes, Week 48, n=488, 478 | -0.012 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.6035 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Lymphocytes, Week 4, n=330, 516 | 0.063 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.42683 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Lymphocytes, Week 8, n=506, 505 | 0.039 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.44987 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Lymphocytes, Week 16, n=508, 507 | 0.033 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.4403 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Lymphocytes, Week 24, n=497, 495 | 0.061 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.4624 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Lymphocytes, Week 32, n=489, 486 | 0.096 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.45178 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Lymphocytes, Week 40, n=479, 472 | 0.107 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.5059 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Lymphocytes, Week 48, n=486, 478 | 0.049 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.48991 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Monocytes, Week 4, n=330, 516 | 0.021 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.13359 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Monocytes, Week 8, n=506, 505 | 0.003 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.1427 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Monocytes, Week 16, n=508, 507 | -0.007 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.14361 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Monocytes, Week 24, n=497, 495 | 0.020 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.14458 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Monocytes, Week 32, n=489, 486 | 0.039 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.14531 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Monocytes, Week 40, n=479, 472 | 0.060 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.15692 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Monocytes, Week 48, n=486, 478 | 0.033 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 0.13116 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Neutrophils, Week 4, n=330, 516 | 0.228 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.48979 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Neutrophils, Week 8, n=506, 505 | 0.141 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.48054 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Neutrophils, Week 16, n=508, 507 | 0.082 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.52187 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Neutrophils, Week 24, n=497, 495 | 0.027 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.46192 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Neutrophils, Week 32, n=489, 486 | -0.054 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.53192 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Neutrophils, Week 40, n=479, 472 | -0.090 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.5885 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Neutrophils, Week 48, n=486, 478 | -0.118 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 1.37189 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Platelets, Week 4, n=329, 518 | 5.91 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 39.613 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Platelets, Week 8, n=506, 507 | 0.27 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 34.345 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Platelets, Week 16, n=498, 505 | -1.70 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 34.072 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Platelets, Week 24, n=496, 496 | -2.53 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 35.214 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Platelets, Week 32, n=487, 486 | -1.76 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 37.49 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Hematology Parameters: Basophils, Eosinophils, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils and Platelets Over Time | Platelets, Week 40, n=478, 472 | 0.32 10^9 cells per liter | Standard Deviation 38.028 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in HIV Medication, MEDWO Using HATQoL Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV
The HATQoL questionnaire was used to assess the HRQoL. It comprises of three dimensions:LISAT, MEDWO and DISWO. The total imputed value score for MEDWO is calculated on a 0-100 scale using the formula: MEDWO 100=\[100 divided by (25 minus 5)\]\*(MEDWO minus 5). A response of 1 in MEDWO score shows medication worries all of the time and 5 as none of the time. The higher the score, the greater satisfaction to life and the less worry. The transformed dimension score for each domain was summarized and analyzed. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis. Participants without/with prior exposure to CAB+RPV (0 Weeks \[without exposure\] and \>=1 Weeks \[with exposure\]) has been presented. Baseline value is defined as last available recorded value up to and including the Maintenance treatment start. Change from Baseline value is calculated as the value at the post-dose visit minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48
Population: ITT-E Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in HIV Medication, MEDWO Using HATQoL Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | Without exposure, Week 24, n=318, 324 | 2.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.53 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in HIV Medication, MEDWO Using HATQoL Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 324 | 3.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.87 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in HIV Medication, MEDWO Using HATQoL Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | With exposure, Week 24, n=192, 194 | 0.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.57 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in HIV Medication, MEDWO Using HATQoL Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | With exposure, Week 48, n=192, 194 | 1.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.82 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in HIV Medication, MEDWO Using HATQoL Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | With exposure, Week 48, n=192, 194 | 1.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.95 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in HIV Medication, MEDWO Using HATQoL Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | Without exposure, Week 24, n=318, 324 | 2.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.61 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in HIV Medication, MEDWO Using HATQoL Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | With exposure, Week 24, n=192, 194 | 1.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.86 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in HIV Medication, MEDWO Using HATQoL Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 324 | 1.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.97 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48
HIVTSQs is a 12 item questionnaire. The individual item scores on HIVTSQs scale are rated as 6 (very satisfied, convenient, flexible, etc.) to 0 (very dissatisfied, inconvenient, inflexible, etc.). Higher scores represent greater satisfaction with each aspect of treatment. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis. Participants without/with prior exposure to CAB+RPV (0 Weeks \[without exposure\] and \>=1 Weeks \[with exposure\]) has been presented. Baseline value is defined as last available recorded value up to and including the Maintenance treatment start. Change from Baseline value is calculated as the value at the post-dose visit minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48
Population: ITT-E Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 4, Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 323 | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.05 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 1, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.23 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 1, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 193 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.77 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 1, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.81 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 2, Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 323 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 2, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.78 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 2, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 193 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 2, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.49 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 3, Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 323 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.42 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 3, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.45 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 3, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 193 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.82 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 3, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.05 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 1, Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 323 | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.19 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 4, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 4, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 193 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 4, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 5, Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 323 | 0.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.41 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 5, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 0.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.36 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 5, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 193 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 5, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.69 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 6, Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 323 | 0.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.72 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 6, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 0.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.71 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 6, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 193 | 0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.96 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 6, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.13 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 7, Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 323 | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.78 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 7, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.94 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 7, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 193 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 7, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 8, Without exposure, Week 24, n=318, 322 | 0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.31 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 8, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.31 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 8, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 194 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.61 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 8, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.64 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 9, Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 322 | 0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.16 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 9, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.23 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 9, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 194 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.52 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 9, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 10, Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 322 | 0.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.44 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 10, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 0.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.52 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 10, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 194 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.78 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 10, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.79 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 11, Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 322 | 0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.22 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 11, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.26 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 11, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 194 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 11, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.62 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 12, Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 322 | -0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.46 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 12, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | -0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.46 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 12, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 194 | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.92 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 12, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.08 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 12, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 194 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.92 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 1, Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 323 | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.18 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 7, Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 323 | 0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.98 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 1, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.27 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 10, Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 322 | 0.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.5 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 1, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 193 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.78 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 7, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.92 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 1, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 11, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 194 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.65 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 2, Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 323 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.67 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 7, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 193 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 2, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.65 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 10, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 0.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.63 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 2, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 193 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.61 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 7, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.69 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 2, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.63 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 12, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | -0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.57 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 3, Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 323 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.49 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 8, Without exposure, Week 24, n=318, 322 | 0.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 3, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.48 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 10, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 194 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.67 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 3, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 193 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.03 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 8, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.41 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 3, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 11, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 4, Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 323 | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.28 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 8, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 194 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.58 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 4, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.28 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 10, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.77 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 4, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 193 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 8, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 4, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.98 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 12, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.02 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 5, Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 323 | 0.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.37 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 9, Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 322 | 0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 5, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.42 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 11, Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 322 | 0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.25 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 5, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 193 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.72 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 9, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.36 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 5, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.88 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 12, Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 322 | -0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.48 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 6, Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 323 | 0.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.71 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 9, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 194 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.72 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 6, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 0.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 11, Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.31 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 6, With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 193 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 9, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.85 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Individual Item Scores Using HIVTSQs at Weeks 24 and 48 | Item 6, With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.12 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Life Satisfaction (LISAT) Using HIV/AIDs-targeted Quality of Life (HATQoL) Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV
The HATQoL questionnaire was used to assess the health related QoL (HRQoL). It comprises of three dimensions:LISAT, medication worries (MEDWO) and disclosure worries (DISWO). Total imputed value score for LISAT is calculated on a 0-100 scale using the formula: LISAT 100=\[100 divided by (20 minus 4)\]\*(LISAT minus 4). A response of 5 in LISAT score shows satisfaction all of the time and 1 as none of the time. The higher the score, the greater satisfaction to life and the less worry. The transformed dimension score for each domain was summarized and analyzed. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) was used as primary method of analysis. Data for participants without/with prior exposure to CAB+RPV (0 Weeks \[without exposure\] and \>=1 Weeks \[with exposure\]) has been presented. Baseline value is defined as last available recorded value up to and including the Maintenance treatment start. Change from Baseline value is calculated as the value at the post-dose visit minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48
Population: ITT-E Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Life Satisfaction (LISAT) Using HIV/AIDs-targeted Quality of Life (HATQoL) Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | Without exposure, Week 24, n=318, 324 | 1.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.87 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Life Satisfaction (LISAT) Using HIV/AIDs-targeted Quality of Life (HATQoL) Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 324 | -0.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.24 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Life Satisfaction (LISAT) Using HIV/AIDs-targeted Quality of Life (HATQoL) Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | With exposure, Week 24, n=192, 194 | -0.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.31 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Life Satisfaction (LISAT) Using HIV/AIDs-targeted Quality of Life (HATQoL) Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | With exposure, Week 48, n=192, 194 | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.03 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Life Satisfaction (LISAT) Using HIV/AIDs-targeted Quality of Life (HATQoL) Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | With exposure, Week 48, n=192, 194 | -1.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.5 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Life Satisfaction (LISAT) Using HIV/AIDs-targeted Quality of Life (HATQoL) Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | Without exposure, Week 24, n=318, 324 | -0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Life Satisfaction (LISAT) Using HIV/AIDs-targeted Quality of Life (HATQoL) Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | With exposure, Week 24, n=192, 194 | 0.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.73 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Life Satisfaction (LISAT) Using HIV/AIDs-targeted Quality of Life (HATQoL) Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 324 | 0.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.51 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Total Treatment Satisfaction Score Using HIV Treatment Satisfaction Status Questionnaire (HIVTSQs) at Weeks 24 and 48
The HIVTSQs treatment satisfaction questionnaire comprises of 1-12 questions and the total treatment satisfaction score is computed with items 1-11 and summed to produce a score with a possible range of 0 to 66. Higher scores represent greater treatment satisfaction as compared to the past few weeks. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis. Participants without/with prior exposure to CAB+RPV (0 Weeks \[without exposure\] and \>=1 Weeks \[with exposure\]) has been presented. Baseline value is defined as last available recorded value up to and including the Maintenance treatment start. Change from Baseline value is calculated as the value at the post-dose visit minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48
Population: ITT-E Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Total Treatment Satisfaction Score Using HIV Treatment Satisfaction Status Questionnaire (HIVTSQs) at Weeks 24 and 48 | Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 323 | 4.63 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.818 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Total Treatment Satisfaction Score Using HIV Treatment Satisfaction Status Questionnaire (HIVTSQs) at Weeks 24 and 48 | Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 4.42 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.351 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Total Treatment Satisfaction Score Using HIV Treatment Satisfaction Status Questionnaire (HIVTSQs) at Weeks 24 and 48 | With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 193 | 0.55 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.05 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Total Treatment Satisfaction Score Using HIV Treatment Satisfaction Status Questionnaire (HIVTSQs) at Weeks 24 and 48 | With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | 0.40 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.242 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Total Treatment Satisfaction Score Using HIV Treatment Satisfaction Status Questionnaire (HIVTSQs) at Weeks 24 and 48 | With exposure, Week 48, n=191, 194 | -0.01 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.521 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Total Treatment Satisfaction Score Using HIV Treatment Satisfaction Status Questionnaire (HIVTSQs) at Weeks 24 and 48 | Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 323 | 4.44 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.709 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Total Treatment Satisfaction Score Using HIV Treatment Satisfaction Status Questionnaire (HIVTSQs) at Weeks 24 and 48 | With exposure, Week 24, n=191, 193 | 0.55 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.347 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Total Treatment Satisfaction Score Using HIV Treatment Satisfaction Status Questionnaire (HIVTSQs) at Weeks 24 and 48 | Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 323 | 3.55 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.224 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline in Treatment Acceptance a Using General Acceptance Dimension of the Chronic Treatment Acceptance (ACCEPT) Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV
The ACCEPT questionnaire is a generic medication acceptance measure assessing how participants weigh advantages and disadvantages of long-term medication.The questionnaire consists of 25 items that capture six dimensions.3 questions that focus on general acceptance of study medication were analyzed.Items on the scale are rated as 1-5 scores:1:not at all acceptable,2:not very acceptable,3:somewhat acceptable, 4:totally acceptable and 5:I don't know.Total score of the dimension is calculated as the mean of recoded items of the dimension and then linearly transformed to be on a scale from 0 to 100:Total Score=(mean of the recoded items in the dimension minus1)divided by2\*100. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis. Data for participants without or with prior exposure has been presented. Baseline value is defined as last available value up to and including the Maintenance treatment. Change from Baseline value is calculated as the value at the post-dose visit minus the Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 24 and 48
Population: ITT-E Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Treatment Acceptance a Using General Acceptance Dimension of the Chronic Treatment Acceptance (ACCEPT) Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 323 | 6.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.96 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Treatment Acceptance a Using General Acceptance Dimension of the Chronic Treatment Acceptance (ACCEPT) Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 324 | 6.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.96 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Treatment Acceptance a Using General Acceptance Dimension of the Chronic Treatment Acceptance (ACCEPT) Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | With exposure, Week 24, n=192, 194 | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.37 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline in Treatment Acceptance a Using General Acceptance Dimension of the Chronic Treatment Acceptance (ACCEPT) Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | With exposure, Week 48, n=192, 194 | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.92 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Treatment Acceptance a Using General Acceptance Dimension of the Chronic Treatment Acceptance (ACCEPT) Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | With exposure, Week 48, n=192, 194 | -2.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.25 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Treatment Acceptance a Using General Acceptance Dimension of the Chronic Treatment Acceptance (ACCEPT) Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | Without exposure, Week 24, n=319, 323 | 4.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 33.53 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Treatment Acceptance a Using General Acceptance Dimension of the Chronic Treatment Acceptance (ACCEPT) Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | With exposure, Week 24, n=192, 194 | -1.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.79 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline in Treatment Acceptance a Using General Acceptance Dimension of the Chronic Treatment Acceptance (ACCEPT) Questionnaire in Participants With or Without Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV | Without exposure, Week 48, n=319, 324 | 5.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.77 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline Values for CD4+ at Week 48
Blood samples were collected and CD4+ cell count assessment by flow cytometry was carried out to evaluate the immunologic activity of CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W compared to CAB LA+RPV LA Q4W. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 48
Population: ITT-E Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline Values for CD4+ at Week 48 | 5.3 Cells per cubic millimeter | Standard Deviation 168.62 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline Values for CD4+ at Week 48 | -24.6 Cells per cubic millimeter | Standard Deviation 199.02 |
Secondary
Change From Baseline Values for HIV-1 RNA at Week 48
Plasma samples were collected for quantitative analysis of HIV-1 RNA. Baseline value is defined as latest pre-treatment assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline is defined as post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Logarithm to base 10 values for plasma HIV-1 RNA has been presented.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 48
Population: ITT-E Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Baseline Values for HIV-1 RNA at Week 48 | 0.007 Log 10 c/mL | Standard Deviation 0.0888 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Baseline Values for HIV-1 RNA at Week 48 | -0.015 Log 10 c/mL | Standard Deviation 0.1673 |
Secondary
Change From Week 8 in Dimension Scores Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire.
The PIN questionnaire explores bother of pain at injection site and injection site reactions (ISR), anxiety before and after injection, willingness to receive an HIV injectable treatment the following visit and satisfaction with mode of treatment administration of individuals receiving injection and perceptions of individuals associated with receiving injections. This measure contains 21 items that measure pain at injection site, local site reactions, impact on functioning and willingness to pursue injectable treatment outside of a clinical trial. Scores range from 1 to 5, and questions are phrased in such a way as to ensure that 1 always equated with the most favourable perception of vaccination, and 5 most unfavourable. Dimension scores include bother from ISR, leg movement, sleep and acceptability. Score of a domain is calculated as mean of all items within the domain. Higher scores represent worse perception of injection. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis.
Time frame: Week 8 and Weeks 24 and 48
Population: ITT-E Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Week 8 in Dimension Scores Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Bother of ISRs, Week 24, n=515, 515 | -0.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.459 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Week 8 in Dimension Scores Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Bother of ISRs, Week 48, n=515, 515 | -0.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.531 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Week 8 in Dimension Scores Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Leg Movement, Week 24, n=515, 514 | -0.11 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.804 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Week 8 in Dimension Scores Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Leg Movement, Week 48, n=515, 514 | -0.12 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.818 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Week 8 in Dimension Scores Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Sleep, Week 24, n=515, 514 | -0.00 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.772 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Week 8 in Dimension Scores Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Sleep, Week 48, n=515, 514 | -0.03 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.814 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Week 8 in Dimension Scores Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Acceptance, Week 24, n=514, 515 | -0.13 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.813 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Week 8 in Dimension Scores Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Acceptance, Week 48, n=514, 515 | -0.18 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.829 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Week 8 in Dimension Scores Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Acceptance, Week 48, n=514, 515 | -0.13 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.88 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Week 8 in Dimension Scores Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Bother of ISRs, Week 24, n=515, 515 | -0.01 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.509 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Week 8 in Dimension Scores Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Sleep, Week 24, n=515, 514 | -0.20 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.793 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Week 8 in Dimension Scores Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Bother of ISRs, Week 48, n=515, 515 | 0.01 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.543 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Week 8 in Dimension Scores Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Acceptance, Week 24, n=514, 515 | -0.13 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.837 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Week 8 in Dimension Scores Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Leg Movement, Week 24, n=515, 514 | -0.23 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.809 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Week 8 in Dimension Scores Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Sleep, Week 48, n=515, 514 | -0.18 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.804 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Week 8 in Dimension Scores Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Leg Movement, Week 48, n=515, 514 | -0.24 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.789 |
Secondary
Change From Week 8 in Individual Item Scores (Anxiety Before, Pain, Satisfaction, Anxiety After and Willingness) Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire.
The PIN questionnaire explores the bother of pain at the injection site and ISRs, anxiety before and after injection, willingness to receive an HIV injectable treatment the following visit and satisfaction with the mode of treatment administration of individuals receiving injection and perceptions of individuals associated with receiving injections. This measure contains 21 items that measure pain at injection site, local site reactions, impact on functioning and willingness to pursue injectable treatment outside of a clinical trial. The items in the scale are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 1(very dissatisfied, extremely, etc.) to 5 (very satisfied, not at all, etc.). Lower scores represent worse perception of injection. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis.
Time frame: Week 8 and Weeks 24 and 48
Population: ITT-E Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Week 8 in Individual Item Scores (Anxiety Before, Pain, Satisfaction, Anxiety After and Willingness) Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Anxiety before, Week 24, n=515, 515 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.83 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Week 8 in Individual Item Scores (Anxiety Before, Pain, Satisfaction, Anxiety After and Willingness) Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Anxiety before, Week 48, n=515, 515 | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.82 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Week 8 in Individual Item Scores (Anxiety Before, Pain, Satisfaction, Anxiety After and Willingness) Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Pain, Week 24, n=515, 515 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.83 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Week 8 in Individual Item Scores (Anxiety Before, Pain, Satisfaction, Anxiety After and Willingness) Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Pain, Week 48, n=515, 515 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.85 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Week 8 in Individual Item Scores (Anxiety Before, Pain, Satisfaction, Anxiety After and Willingness) Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Satisfaction, Week 24, n=514, 515 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.77 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Week 8 in Individual Item Scores (Anxiety Before, Pain, Satisfaction, Anxiety After and Willingness) Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Satisfaction, Week 48, n=514, 515 | -0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.77 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Week 8 in Individual Item Scores (Anxiety Before, Pain, Satisfaction, Anxiety After and Willingness) Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Anxiety after, Week 24, n=514, 515 | -0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.76 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Week 8 in Individual Item Scores (Anxiety Before, Pain, Satisfaction, Anxiety After and Willingness) Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Anxiety after, Week 48, n=514, 515 | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.79 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Week 8 in Individual Item Scores (Anxiety Before, Pain, Satisfaction, Anxiety After and Willingness) Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Willingness, Week 24, n=514, 514 | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Change From Week 8 in Individual Item Scores (Anxiety Before, Pain, Satisfaction, Anxiety After and Willingness) Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Willingness, Week 48, n=514, 514 | -0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.66 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Week 8 in Individual Item Scores (Anxiety Before, Pain, Satisfaction, Anxiety After and Willingness) Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Anxiety after, Week 48, n=514, 515 | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.89 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Week 8 in Individual Item Scores (Anxiety Before, Pain, Satisfaction, Anxiety After and Willingness) Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Anxiety before, Week 24, n=515, 515 | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.85 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Week 8 in Individual Item Scores (Anxiety Before, Pain, Satisfaction, Anxiety After and Willingness) Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Satisfaction, Week 48, n=514, 515 | -0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Week 8 in Individual Item Scores (Anxiety Before, Pain, Satisfaction, Anxiety After and Willingness) Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Anxiety before, Week 48, n=515, 515 | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.85 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Week 8 in Individual Item Scores (Anxiety Before, Pain, Satisfaction, Anxiety After and Willingness) Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Willingness, Week 48, n=514, 514 | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.72 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Week 8 in Individual Item Scores (Anxiety Before, Pain, Satisfaction, Anxiety After and Willingness) Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Pain, Week 24, n=515, 515 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Week 8 in Individual Item Scores (Anxiety Before, Pain, Satisfaction, Anxiety After and Willingness) Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Anxiety after, Week 24, n=514, 515 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.83 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Week 8 in Individual Item Scores (Anxiety Before, Pain, Satisfaction, Anxiety After and Willingness) Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Pain, Week 48, n=515, 515 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.84 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Week 8 in Individual Item Scores (Anxiety Before, Pain, Satisfaction, Anxiety After and Willingness) Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Willingness, Week 24, n=514, 514 | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.65 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Change From Week 8 in Individual Item Scores (Anxiety Before, Pain, Satisfaction, Anxiety After and Willingness) Using Perception of Injection (PIN) Questionnaire. | Satisfaction, Week 24, n=514, 515 | -0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.77 |
Secondary
Cmax in Plasma for RPV LA Evaluable
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to analyze Cmax in plasma for RPV LA. Participants who transitioned from ATLAS (201585 - NCT02951052) into this ATLAS-2M (207966) study had been treated with CAB + RPV for at least one year, were approaching steady state exposures, and were therefore excluded in order to focus the population analysis on those without prior exposure.
Time frame: Predose at Weeks 4, 8, 13, 24, 32, 40, 48; 1 Week post-dose at Week 9 and 41
Population: PK Population. Only those participants with data available at specified time points has been analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Cmax in Plasma for RPV LA Evaluable | 133.062 Nanograms per milliliter |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Cmax in Plasma for RPV LA Evaluable | 124.279 Nanograms per milliliter |
Secondary
Maximum Concentration (Cmax) in Plasma for CAB LA Evaluable
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points to analyze Cmax in plasma for CAB LA. Participants who transitioned from ATLAS (201585 - NCT02951052) into this ATLAS-2M (207966) study had been treated with CAB + RPV for at least one year, were approaching steady state exposures, and were therefore excluded in order to focus the population analysis on those without prior exposure.
Time frame: Predose at Weeks 4, 8, 13, 24, 32, 40, 48; 1 Week post-dose at Week 9 and 41
Population: PK Population. Only those participants with data available at specified time points has been analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Maximum Concentration (Cmax) in Plasma for CAB LA Evaluable | 3.976 Micrograms per milliliter |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Maximum Concentration (Cmax) in Plasma for CAB LA Evaluable | 4.277 Micrograms per milliliter |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase
Genotypic resistance was analyzed in participants who met confirmed virologic withdrawal criteria. Genotypic Resistance data for the following Baseline third agent drugs, INI: BIC, DTG, EVG, RAL; NNRTI: DLV, EFV, ETR, NVP, RPV; NRTI: 3TC, ABC, FTC, TDF, ZDV, d4T, ddI and PI: ATV, ATV/ritonavir (r), DRV/r, FPV/r, IDV/r, LPV/r, NFV, RTV, SQV/r and TPV/r in participants meeting CVF criteria has been presented.
Time frame: Up to Week 48 analysis
Population: CVF Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ZDV, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, ETR, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 6 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ZDV, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, DTG, resistant, n=6, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ZDV, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 8 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, NVP, resistant, n=8, 2 | 4 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, d4T, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, RAL, sensitive, n=6, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, d4T, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, NVP, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, d4T, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 8 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, EVG, resistant, n=6, 2 | 4 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ddI, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, NVP, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ddI, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, DLV, resistant, n=8, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ddI, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 7 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, RPV, resistant, n=8, 2 | 6 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, ATV, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, BIC, sensitive, n=6, 2 | 3 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, ATV, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, RPV, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, ATV, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 8 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, DLV, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, ATV/r, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, RPV, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, ATV/r, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, EVG, resistance possible, n=6, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, ATV/r, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 8 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, 3TC, resistant, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, DRV/r, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, DLV, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 4 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, DRV/r, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, 3TC, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, DRV/r, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 8 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, DTG, resistance possible, n=6, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, FPV/r, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, 3TC, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 7 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, FPV/r, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, EFV, resistant, n=8, 2 | 4 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, FPV/r, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 8 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ABC, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, IDV/r, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, EVG, sensitive, n=6, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, IDV/r, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ABC, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, IDV/r, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 8 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, EFV, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, LPV/r, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ABC, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 8 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, LPV/r, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, BIC, resistance possible, n=6, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, LPV/r, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 8 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, FTC, resistant, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, NFV, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, EFV, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, NFV, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, FTC, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, NFV, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 8 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, RAL, resistant, n=6, 2 | 4 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, RTV, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, FTC, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 7 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, RTV, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, ETR, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, RTV, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 8 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, TDF, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, SQV/r, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, DTG, sensitive, n=6, 2 | 3 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, SQV/r, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, TDF, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, SQV/r, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 8 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, ETR, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, TPV/r, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, TDF, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 8 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, TPV/r, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, RAL, resistance possible, n=6, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, TPV/r, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 8 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, BIC, resistant, n=6, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, TPV/r, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, BIC, resistant, n=6, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, BIC, resistance possible, n=6, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, BIC, sensitive, n=6, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, DTG, resistant, n=6, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, DTG, resistance possible, n=6, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, DTG, sensitive, n=6, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, EVG, resistant, n=6, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, EVG, resistance possible, n=6, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, EVG, sensitive, n=6, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, RAL, resistant, n=6, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, RAL, resistance possible, n=6, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | INI, RAL, sensitive, n=6, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, DLV, resistant, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, DLV, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, DLV, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, EFV, resistant, n=8, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, EFV, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, EFV, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, ETR, resistant, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, ETR, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, ETR, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, NVP, resistant, n=8, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, NVP, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, NVP, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, RPV, resistant, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, RPV, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, RPV, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, 3TC, resistant, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, 3TC, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, 3TC, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ABC, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ABC, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ABC, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, FTC, resistant, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, FTC, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, FTC, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, TDF, resistant, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, TDF, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, TDF, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ZDV, resistant, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ZDV, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ZDV, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, d4T, resistant, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, d4T, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, d4T, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ddI, resistant, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ddI, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ddI, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, ATV, resistant, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, ATV, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, ATV, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, ATV/r, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, ATV/r, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, ATV/r, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, DRV/r, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, DRV/r, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, DRV/r, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, FPV/r, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, FPV/r, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, FPV/r, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, IDV/r, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, IDV/r, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, IDV/r, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, LPV/r, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, LPV/r, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, LPV/r, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, NFV, resistant, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, NFV, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, NFV, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, RTV, resistant, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, RTV, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, RTV, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, SQV/r, resistant, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, SQV/r, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, SQV/r, sensitive, n=8, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, TPV/r, resistant, n=8, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Genotypic Resistance-Maintenance Phase | PI, TPV/r, resistance possible, n=8, 2 | 0 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase
Clinical chemistry toxicities were graded as per the DAIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table)Blood samples were collected for the analysis of following clinical chemistry parameters: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin, alkaline phosphate (ALP), aspartate aminotranferase (AST), bilirubin, carbon dioxide (CO2), cholesterol, creatinine kinase, creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from creatinine adjusted for bovine serum albumin (BSA), glucose, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypernatremia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, low density lipoprotein (LDL) calculation, lipase, phosphate, potassium, sodium and triglycerides. Severity grades were: Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (Potentially life-threatening).
Time frame: Up to Week 48
Population: Safety Population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Glucose, Grade 1 | 84 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Glucose, Grade 2 | 34 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | ALT, Grade 1 | 45 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | ALT, Grade 2 | 10 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | ALT, Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | ALT, Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Albumin, Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Albumin, Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Albumin, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Albumin, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | ALP, Grade 1 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | ALP, Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | ALP, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | ALP, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | AST, Grade 1 | 32 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | AST, Grade 2 | 10 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | AST, Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | AST, Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Bilirubin, Grade 1 | 27 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Glucose, Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Glucose, Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyperglycemia, Grade 1 | 80 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Bilirubin, Grade 2 | 7 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Bilirubin, Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Bilirubin, Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | CO2, Grade 1 | 98 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | CO2, Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | CO2, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | CO2, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyperglycemia, Grade 2 | 32 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyperglycemia, Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyperglycemia, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyperkalemia, Grade 1 | 8 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyperkalemia, Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyperkalemia, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyperkalemia, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypernatremia, Grade 1 | 6 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypernatremia, Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypernatremia, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypernatremia, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypoglycemia, Grade 1 | 11 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypoglycemia, Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypoglycemia, Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypoglycemia, Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypokalemia, Grade 1 | 10 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypokalemia, Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypokalemia, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypokalemia, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyponatremia, Grade 1 | 23 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyponatremia, Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyponatremia, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyponatremia, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | LDL Cholesterol calculation, Grade 1 | 40 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | LDL Cholesterol calculation, Grade 2 | 20 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | LDL Cholesterol calculation, Grade 3 | 9 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Cholesterol, Grade 1 | 50 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Cholesterol, Grade 2 | 31 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | LDL Cholesterol calculation, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Lipase, Grade 1 | 40 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Lipase, Grade 2 | 31 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Lipase, Grade 3 | 13 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Cholesterol, Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Lipase, Grade 4 | 3 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Phosphate, Grade 1 | 75 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Phosphate, Grade 2 | 20 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Phosphate, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Phosphate, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Potassium, Grade 1 | 18 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Potassium, Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Potassium, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Potassium, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Sodium, Grade 1 | 29 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Sodium, Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Sodium, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Sodium, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Triglycerides, Grade 1 | 51 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Triglycerides, Grade 2 | 11 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Triglycerides, Grade 3 | 4 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Triglycerides, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Cholesterol, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Creatinine Kinase, Grade 1 | 41 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Creatinine Kinase, Grade 2 | 22 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Creatinine Kinase, Grade 3 | 7 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Creatinine Kinase, Grade 4 | 9 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Creatinine, Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Creatinine, Grade 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Creatinine, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Creatinine, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | GFR from creatinine adjusted for BSA, Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | GFR from creatinine adjusted for BSA, Grade 2 | 110 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | GFR from creatinine adjusted for BSA, Grade 3 | 15 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | GFR from creatinine adjusted for BSA, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Creatinine Kinase, Grade 2 | 19 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypokalemia, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Potassium, Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | ALT, Grade 1 | 49 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyponatremia, Grade 1 | 26 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | ALT, Grade 2 | 13 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Creatinine, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | ALT, Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyponatremia, Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | ALT, Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Sodium, Grade 1 | 28 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Albumin, Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyponatremia, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Albumin, Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Creatinine Kinase, Grade 3 | 9 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Albumin, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyponatremia, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Albumin, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Sodium, Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | ALP, Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | LDL Cholesterol calculation, Grade 1 | 41 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | ALP, Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | GFR from creatinine adjusted for BSA, Grade 3 | 19 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | ALP, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | LDL Cholesterol calculation, Grade 2 | 26 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | ALP, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Sodium, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | AST, Grade 1 | 44 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | LDL Cholesterol calculation, Grade 3 | 4 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | AST, Grade 2 | 13 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | CO2, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | AST, Grade 3 | 4 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Creatinine Kinase, Grade 4 | 14 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | AST, Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Cholesterol, Grade 1 | 52 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Glucose, Grade 2 | 43 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Sodium, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Glucose, Grade 3 | 5 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Cholesterol, Grade 2 | 30 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Glucose, Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | GFR from creatinine adjusted for BSA, Grade 1 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyperglycemia, Grade 1 | 77 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Bilirubin, Grade 1 | 25 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | LDL Cholesterol calculation, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Bilirubin, Grade 2 | 5 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Triglycerides, Grade 1 | 42 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Bilirubin, Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Lipase, Grade 1 | 44 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Bilirubin, Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Creatinine, Grade 1 | 9 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | CO2, Grade 1 | 111 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Lipase, Grade 2 | 44 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | CO2, Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Triglycerides, Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | CO2, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Glucose, Grade 1 | 87 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Lipase, Grade 3 | 4 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyperglycemia, Grade 2 | 38 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Triglycerides, Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyperglycemia, Grade 3 | 5 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Lipase, Grade 4 | 6 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyperglycemia, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Creatinine, Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyperkalemia, Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Cholesterol, Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyperkalemia, Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Phosphate, Grade 1 | 72 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyperkalemia, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Triglycerides, Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hyperkalemia, Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Phosphate, Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypernatremia, Grade 1 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Creatinine Kinase, Grade 1 | 32 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypernatremia, Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Phosphate, Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypernatremia, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | GFR from creatinine adjusted for BSA, Grade 2 | 134 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypernatremia, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Phosphate, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypoglycemia, Grade 1 | 13 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Cholesterol, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypoglycemia, Grade 2 | 5 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Potassium, Grade 1 | 10 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypoglycemia, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Creatinine, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypoglycemia, Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Potassium, Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypokalemia, Grade 1 | 8 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | GFR from creatinine adjusted for BSA, Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypokalemia, Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Potassium, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Chemistry Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hypokalemia, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase
The hematology toxicities were graded as per the DAIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table). Blood samples were collected for the analysis of following hematology parameters: hemoglobin, leukocytes, neutrophils and platelets. Severity grades were as Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (Potentially life-threatening).
Time frame: Up to Week 48
Population: Safety Population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hemoglobin, Grade 1 | 9 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hemoglobin, Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hemoglobin, Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hemoglobin, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Leukocytes, Grade 1 | 12 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Leukocytes, Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Leukocytes, Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Leukocytes, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Neutrophils, Grade 1 | 7 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Neutrophils, Grade 2 | 8 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Neutrophils, Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Neutrophils, Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Platelets, Grade 1 | 8 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Platelets, Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Platelets, Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Platelets, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Platelets, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hemoglobin, Grade 1 | 4 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Neutrophils, Grade 1 | 6 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hemoglobin, Grade 2 | 3 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Platelets, Grade 1 | 8 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hemoglobin, Grade 3 | 4 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Neutrophils, Grade 2 | 5 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Hemoglobin, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Platelets, Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Leukocytes, Grade 1 | 5 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Neutrophils, Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Leukocytes, Grade 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Platelets, Grade 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Leukocytes, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Neutrophils, Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Hematology Toxicities-Maintenance Phase | Leukocytes, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs >=5% Incidence) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)-Maintenance Phase
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, associated with liver injury and impaired liver function or any other situations as per medical or scientific judgement. Safety Population comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. Participants were assessed according to actual treatment received.
Time frame: Up to Week 48
Population: Safety Population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs >=5% Incidence) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)-Maintenance Phase | Any non-SAE (>=5%) | 429 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs >=5% Incidence) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)-Maintenance Phase | Any SAE | 27 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs >=5% Incidence) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)-Maintenance Phase | Any non-SAE (>=5%) | 427 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs >=5% Incidence) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)-Maintenance Phase | Any SAE | 19 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase
Phenotypic resistance (PR) was analyzed in participants who met CVF criteria. PR for following Baseline third agent drugs: Integrase inhibitors(INI): bictegravir (BIC), CAB, dolutegravir (DTG), elvitegravir (EVG), raltegravir(RAL); non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors(NNRTI): delavirdine(DLV), efavirenz(EFV), etravirine(ETR), nevirapine(NVP), RPV; nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI): lamivudine(3TC), abacavir(ABC), emtricitabine(FTC), tenofovir(TDF), zidovudine(ZDV), stavudine(d4T), didanosine(ddI) and protease inhibitors(PI): atazanavir(ATV), darunavir(DRV), fosamprenavir(FPV), indinavir(IDV), lopinavir(LPV), nelfinavir(NFV), ritonavir(RTV), saquinavir(SQV) and tipranavir (TPV) is presented. Phenotypic susceptibility was defined based on the fold change (FC) value: resistant (FC\>clinical higher cutoff or biological cutoff), partially sensitive (FC\<=clinical higher cutoff and \> clinical lower cutoff), sensitive(FC\<=clinical lower cutoff or biological cutoff)
Time frame: Up to Week 48 analysis
Population: The CVF Population comprised of all participants in ITT-E population who met CVF criteria. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, TDF, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 7 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, ETR, partially sensitive, n=7, 2 | 4 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ZDV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | INI, BIC, sensitive, n=6, 2 | 6 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ZDV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 7 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, ETR, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 3 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, d4T, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | INI, RAL, resistant, n=6, 2 | 4 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, d4T, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 7 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, NVP, resistant, n=7, 2 | 6 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ddI, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | INI, DTG, partially sensitive, n=6, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ddI, partially sensitive, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, NVP, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ddI, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 7 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | INI, RAL, sensitive, n=6, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, ATV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, RPV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 6 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, ATV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 7 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | INI, CAB, sensitive, n=6, 2 | 3 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, DRV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, RPV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, DRV, partially sensitive, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, DLV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 6 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, DRV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 7 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, 3TC, resistant, n=7, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, FPV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | INI, DTG, sensitive, n=6, 2 | 6 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, FPV, partially sensitive, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, 3TC, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 6 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, FPV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 7 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, DLV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, IDV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ABC, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, IDV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 7 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | INI, CAB, resistant, n=6, 2 | 3 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, LPV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ABC, partially sensitive, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, LPV, partially sensitive, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, EFV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 5 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, LPV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 7 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ABC, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 7 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, NFV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | INI, EVG, resistant, n=6, 2 | 4 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, NFV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 7 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, FTC, resistant, n=7, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, RTV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, EFV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, RTV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 7 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, FTC, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 6 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, SQV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | INI, DTG, resistant, n=6, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, SQV, partially sensitive, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, TDF, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, SQV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 7 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, ETR, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, TPV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, TDF, partially sensitive, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, TPV, partially sensitive, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | INI, EVG, sensitive, n=6, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, TPV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 7 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | INI, BIC, resistant, n=6, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, TPV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | INI, BIC, resistant, n=6, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | INI, BIC, sensitive, n=6, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | INI, CAB, resistant, n=6, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | INI, CAB, sensitive, n=6, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | INI, DTG, resistant, n=6, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | INI, DTG, partially sensitive, n=6, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | INI, DTG, sensitive, n=6, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | INI, EVG, resistant, n=6, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | INI, EVG, sensitive, n=6, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | INI, RAL, resistant, n=6, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | INI, RAL, sensitive, n=6, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, DLV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, DLV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, EFV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, EFV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, ETR, resistant, n=7, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, ETR, partially sensitive, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, ETR, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, NVP, resistant, n=7, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, NVP, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, RPV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NNRTI, RPV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, 3TC, resistant, n=7, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, 3TC, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ABC, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ABC, partially sensitive, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ABC, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, FTC, resistant, n=7, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, FTC, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, TDF, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, TDF, partially sensitive, n=7, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, TDF, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ZDV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ZDV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, d4T, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, d4T, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ddI, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ddI, partially sensitive, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | NRTI, ddI, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, ATV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, ATV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, DRV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, DRV, partially sensitive, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, DRV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, FPV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, FPV, partially sensitive, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, FPV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, IDV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, IDV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, LPV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, LPV, partially sensitive, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, LPV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, NFV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, NFV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, RTV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, RTV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, SQV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, SQV, partially sensitive, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, SQV, sensitive, n=7, 2 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, TPV, resistant, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Phenotypic Resistance- Maintenance Phase | PI, TPV, partially sensitive, n=7, 2 | 0 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Severity of Adverse Events-Maintenance Phase
Severity of adverse events were defined as per The Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS adverse events Grading Table). Severity grades for adverse events were as Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe), Grade 4 (Potentially life-threatening) and Grade 5 (all deaths related to an AE).
Time frame: Up to Week 48
Population: Safety Population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Severity of Adverse Events-Maintenance Phase | Grade 2 | 231 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Severity of Adverse Events-Maintenance Phase | Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Severity of Adverse Events-Maintenance Phase | Grade 3 | 38 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Severity of Adverse Events-Maintenance Phase | Grade 5 | 1 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Severity of Adverse Events-Maintenance Phase | Grade 1 | 201 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Severity of Adverse Events-Maintenance Phase | Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Severity of Adverse Events-Maintenance Phase | Grade 1 | 195 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Severity of Adverse Events-Maintenance Phase | Grade 2 | 238 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Severity of Adverse Events-Maintenance Phase | Grade 3 | 43 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Number of Participants With Severity of Adverse Events-Maintenance Phase | Grade 4 | 6 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Their Treatment Preference as Assessed Using Preference Questionnaire at Week 48-CAB 400 mg LA +RPV 600 mg LA Q4W Arm Only
Participants were administered the preference questionnaire which had 3 questions. For treatment preference, participants were required to provide their response to Question 1, which stated Based on your experience which HIV treatment do you prefer. The responses included 1) Injectable LA HIV treatment Q4W, 2) Injectable LA HIV Treatment Q8W (only select this answer if you received the 8-week injectable regimen of CAB LA + RPV LA during study), 3) Oral daily HIV treatment and 4) No preference. Oral daily HIV Treatment refers to the oral medication of CAB + RPV participants received during the oral lead-in period. Number of participants who selected each of the responses based on their treatment preference is presented.
Time frame: Week 48
Population: ITT-E Population. Only those participants with data available at indicated time point is analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Their Treatment Preference as Assessed Using Preference Questionnaire at Week 48-CAB 400 mg LA +RPV 600 mg LA Q4W Arm Only | Injectable LA HIV treatment Q4W | 468 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Their Treatment Preference as Assessed Using Preference Questionnaire at Week 48-CAB 400 mg LA +RPV 600 mg LA Q4W Arm Only | Injectable LA HIV treatment Q8W | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Their Treatment Preference as Assessed Using Preference Questionnaire at Week 48-CAB 400 mg LA +RPV 600 mg LA Q4W Arm Only | Oral daily HIV treatment | 16 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Their Treatment Preference as Assessed Using Preference Questionnaire at Week 48-CAB 400 mg LA +RPV 600 mg LA Q4W Arm Only | No preference | 13 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Their Treatment Preference as Assessed Using Preference Questionnaire at Week 48 With >=1 Weeks of Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV-CAB 600 mg LA +RPV 900 mg LA Q8W Arm Only
Participants were administered the preference questionnaire which had 3 questions. For treatment preference, participants were required to provide their response to Question 1, which stated Based on your experience which HIV treatment do you prefer. The responses included 1) Injectable LA HIV treatment Q4W, 2) Injectable LA HIV Treatment Q8W (only select this answer if you received the 8-week injectable regimen of CAB LA + RPV LA during study), 3) Oral daily HIV treatment and 4) No preference. Oral daily HIV Treatment refers to the oral medication of CAB + RPV subjects received during the oral lead-in period. Number of participants with \>=1 weeks of prior exposure to CAB+RPV who selected each of the responses based on their treatment preference is presented.
Time frame: Week 48
Population: ITT-E Population. Only those participants with data available at indicated time point is analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Their Treatment Preference as Assessed Using Preference Questionnaire at Week 48 With >=1 Weeks of Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV-CAB 600 mg LA +RPV 900 mg LA Q8W Arm Only | Injectable LA HIV treatment Q4W | 6 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Their Treatment Preference as Assessed Using Preference Questionnaire at Week 48 With >=1 Weeks of Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV-CAB 600 mg LA +RPV 900 mg LA Q8W Arm Only | Injectable LA HIV treatment Q8W | 179 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Their Treatment Preference as Assessed Using Preference Questionnaire at Week 48 With >=1 Weeks of Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV-CAB 600 mg LA +RPV 900 mg LA Q8W Arm Only | Oral daily HIV treatment | 4 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Their Treatment Preference as Assessed Using Preference Questionnaire at Week 48 With >=1 Weeks of Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV-CAB 600 mg LA +RPV 900 mg LA Q8W Arm Only | No preference | 2 Participants |
Secondary
Number of Participants With Their Treatment Preference as Assessed Using Preference Questionnaire at Week 48 Without (w/o) Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV-CAB 600 mg LA +RPV 900 mg LA Q8W Arm Only
Participants were administered the preference questionnaire which had 3 questions. For treatment preference, participants were required to provide their response to Question 1, which stated Based on your experience which HIV treatment do you prefer. The responses included 1) Injectable LA HIV treatment Q4W, 2) Injectable LA HIV Treatment Q8W (only select this answer if you received the 8-week injectable regimen of CAB LA + RPV LA during study), 3) Oral daily HIV treatment and 4) No preference. Oral daily HIV Treatment refers to the oral medication of CAB + RPV subjects received during the oral lead-in period. Number of participants without prior exposure to CAB+RPV who selected each of the responses based on their treatment preference is presented.
Time frame: Week 48
Population: ITT-E Population. Only those participants with data available at indicated time point is analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Their Treatment Preference as Assessed Using Preference Questionnaire at Week 48 Without (w/o) Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV-CAB 600 mg LA +RPV 900 mg LA Q8W Arm Only | Injectable LA HIV treatment Q4W | 0 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Their Treatment Preference as Assessed Using Preference Questionnaire at Week 48 Without (w/o) Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV-CAB 600 mg LA +RPV 900 mg LA Q8W Arm Only | Injectable LA HIV treatment Q8W | 300 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Their Treatment Preference as Assessed Using Preference Questionnaire at Week 48 Without (w/o) Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV-CAB 600 mg LA +RPV 900 mg LA Q8W Arm Only | Oral daily HIV treatment | 4 Participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Number of Participants With Their Treatment Preference as Assessed Using Preference Questionnaire at Week 48 Without (w/o) Prior Exposure to CAB+RPV-CAB 600 mg LA +RPV 900 mg LA Q8W Arm Only | No preference | 2 Participants |
Secondary
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Adverse Events-Maintenance Phase
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. Percentage of participants with adverse events leading to withdrawal has been presented.
Time frame: Up to Week 48
Population: Safety Population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Adverse Events-Maintenance Phase | 2 Percentage of participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Adverse Events-Maintenance Phase | 2 Percentage of participants |
Secondary
Percentage of Participants With HIV-RNA >=50 c/mL as Per FDA Snapshot Algorithm at Week 24
Percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA \>=50 c/mL at Week 24 using FDA Snapshot algorithm was assessed to demonstrate antiviral activity of CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W compared to CAB LA+ RPV LA Q4W. The HIV-1 RNA \>=50 c/mL per Snapshot algorithm was determined by the last on-treatment HIV-1 RNA measurement within the analysis visit window. The 95% CIs were derived using normal approximation (Wald CI).
Time frame: Weeks 24
Population: ITT-E Population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Percentage of Participants With HIV-RNA >=50 c/mL as Per FDA Snapshot Algorithm at Week 24 | 2.1 Percentage of participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Percentage of Participants With HIV-RNA >=50 c/mL as Per FDA Snapshot Algorithm at Week 24 | 1.5 Percentage of participants |
Secondary
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL Using FDA Snapshot Algorithm at Week 24
Percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/mL at Week 48 using FDA Snapshot algorithm was assessed to demonstrate antiviral activity of CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W compared to CAB LA+ RPV LA Q4W. The HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/mL per Snapshot algorithm was determined by last on-treatment HIV-1 RNA measurement within the analysis visit window. The 95% CIs were derived using normal approximation (Wald CI)
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT-E Population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL Using FDA Snapshot Algorithm at Week 24 | 95 Percentage of participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL Using FDA Snapshot Algorithm at Week 24 | 95 Percentage of participants |
Secondary
Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL Using FDA Snapshot Algorithm at Week 48
Percentage of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/mL at Week 48 using FDA Snapshot algorithm was assessed to demonstrate antiviral activity of CAB LA+RPV LA Q8W compared to CAB LA+ RPV LA Q4W. The HIV-1 RNA \<50 c/mL per Snapshot algorithm was determined by last on-treatment HIV-1 RNA measurement within the analysis visit window. The 95% CIs were derived using normal approximation (Wald CI)
Time frame: Week 48
Population: ITT-E Population.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL Using FDA Snapshot Algorithm at Week 48 | 94 Percentage of participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Percentage of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 c/mL Using FDA Snapshot Algorithm at Week 48 | 93 Percentage of participants |
95% CI: [-2.1, 3.7]
Secondary
Percentage of Participants With Protocol Defined Confirmed Virologic Failure (CVF) Through Weeks 24 and 48
CVF was defined as rebound as indicated by two consecutive plasma HIV-1-RNA levels \>=200 c/mL after prior suppression to \<200 c/mL. Cumulative percentage of participants with protocol defined CVF up to Weeks 24 and 48 has been presented.
Time frame: Weeks 24 and 48
Population: ITT-E Population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Percentage of Participants With Protocol Defined Confirmed Virologic Failure (CVF) Through Weeks 24 and 48 | Week 24 | 1.3 Percentage of participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Percentage of Participants With Protocol Defined Confirmed Virologic Failure (CVF) Through Weeks 24 and 48 | Week 48 | 1.5 Percentage of participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Percentage of Participants With Protocol Defined Confirmed Virologic Failure (CVF) Through Weeks 24 and 48 | Week 24 | 0.2 Percentage of participants |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Percentage of Participants With Protocol Defined Confirmed Virologic Failure (CVF) Through Weeks 24 and 48 | Week 48 | 0.4 Percentage of participants |
Secondary
Plasma Ctrough for RPV LA Evaluable
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of RPV LA.
Time frame: Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Population: PK Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Plasma Ctrough for RPV LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 16, n=512, 513 | 54.84 Nanograms per milliliters |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Plasma Ctrough for RPV LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 32, n=498, 498 | 62.07 Nanograms per milliliters |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Plasma Ctrough for RPV LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 8, n=515, 512 | 56.35 Nanograms per milliliters |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Plasma Ctrough for RPV LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 40, n=497, 497 | 67.22 Nanograms per milliliters |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Plasma Ctrough for RPV LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 24, n=506, 509 | 57.16 Nanograms per milliliters |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Plasma Ctrough for RPV LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 48, n=495, 488 | 72.29 Nanograms per milliliters |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Plasma Ctrough for RPV LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 4, n=315, 514 | 78.05 Nanograms per milliliters |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Plasma Ctrough for RPV LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 48, n=495, 488 | 97.22 Nanograms per milliliters |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Plasma Ctrough for RPV LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 4, n=315, 514 | 78.60 Nanograms per milliliters |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Plasma Ctrough for RPV LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 8, n=515, 512 | 57.95 Nanograms per milliliters |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Plasma Ctrough for RPV LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 16, n=512, 513 | 68.12 Nanograms per milliliters |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Plasma Ctrough for RPV LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 24, n=506, 509 | 75.76 Nanograms per milliliters |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Plasma Ctrough for RPV LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 32, n=498, 498 | 85.76 Nanograms per milliliters |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Plasma Ctrough for RPV LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 40, n=497, 497 | 89.49 Nanograms per milliliters |
Secondary
Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for CAB LA Evaluable
Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of CAB LA. PK Population comprises of all participants who received CAB and / or RPV and underwent PK sampling during the study and provide at least 1 non-missing CAB and / or RPV plasma concentration value (Non-quantifiable \[NQ\] values will be considered as non-missing values).
Time frame: Pre-dose at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48
Population: PK Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for CAB LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 16, n=512, 514 | 1.5983 Micrograms per milliliter |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for CAB LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 32, n=499, 498 | 1.7414 Micrograms per milliliter |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for CAB LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 8, n=516, 513 | 1.7938 Micrograms per milliliter |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for CAB LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 40, n=496, 497 | 1.7873 Micrograms per milliliter |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for CAB LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 24, n=506, 510 | 1.5955 Micrograms per milliliter |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for CAB LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 48, n=494, 486 | 1.6747 Micrograms per milliliter |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for CAB LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 4, n=314, 513 | 5.1543 Micrograms per milliliter |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for CAB LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 48, n=494, 486 | 2.7449 Micrograms per milliliter |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for CAB LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 4, n=314, 513 | 4.0285 Micrograms per milliliter |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for CAB LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 8, n=516, 513 | 1.9011 Micrograms per milliliter |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for CAB LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 16, n=512, 514 | 2.3358 Micrograms per milliliter |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for CAB LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 24, n=506, 510 | 2.5795 Micrograms per milliliter |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for CAB LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 32, n=499, 498 | 2.8529 Micrograms per milliliter |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Plasma Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for CAB LA Evaluable | Pre-dose, Week 40, n=496, 497 | 2.9739 Micrograms per milliliter |
Secondary
Total Treatment Satisfaction Change Score Using HIV Treatment Satisfaction Change Questionnaire (HIVTSQc) at Week 48
The HIVTSQc is a 1-12 items questionnaire. Each item is scored -3 to 3. Total treatment satisfaction change score is computed using items 1 to 11 and are summed to produce a score with a possible range of -33 to 33. Higher the score, greater the improvement in satisfaction with treatment; the lower the score, the greater the deterioration in satisfaction with treatment. A score of 0 represented no change. LOCF was used as primary method of analysis. Total treatment satisfaction change score for participants who entered the current study from Q4W arm of ATLAS (NCT number: NCT02951052) and from either standard of care (SOC) arms of ATLAS or the new SOC participants) has been presented.
Time frame: Week 48
Population: ITT-E Population. Only those participants with data available at the specified data points were analyzed (represented by n= X in the category titles).
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Total Treatment Satisfaction Change Score Using HIV Treatment Satisfaction Change Questionnaire (HIVTSQc) at Week 48 | Q4W ATLAS, n=124, 125 | 29.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.72 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q8W | Total Treatment Satisfaction Change Score Using HIV Treatment Satisfaction Change Questionnaire (HIVTSQc) at Week 48 | SOC, n=380, 382 | 28.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.68 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Total Treatment Satisfaction Change Score Using HIV Treatment Satisfaction Change Questionnaire (HIVTSQc) at Week 48 | Q4W ATLAS, n=124, 125 | 24.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.33 |
| CAB LA + RPV LA Q4W | Total Treatment Satisfaction Change Score Using HIV Treatment Satisfaction Change Questionnaire (HIVTSQc) at Week 48 | SOC, n=380, 382 | 27.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.5 |
Other Pre-specified
Number of Participants With Different Demographic Parameters for Inter-participant Variability
Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of CAB LA and RPV LA. Demographic parameters including, but not limited to, age, sex, race, body weight, body mass index, and relevant laboratory parameters were planned to be evaluated as potential predictors of inter participant variability for pharmacokinetic parameters.
Time frame: Up to Week 48
Population: PK Population. This was an exploratory Outcome Measure. Data will not be analyzed and reported.
Other Pre-specified
Number of Participants With Different Demographic Parameters for Intra-participant Variability
Blood samples were planned to be collected at indicated time points for PK analysis of CAB LA and RPV LA. Demographic parameters including, but not limited to, age, sex, race, body weight, body mass index, and relevant laboratory parameters were planned to be evaluated as potential predictors of intra participant variability for pharmacokinetic parameters.
Time frame: Up to Week 48
Population: PK Population. This was an exploratory Outcome Measure. Data will not be analyzed and reported.