Skip to content

Study for the Treatment of Ocular Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) With Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED)

A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study for the Treatment of Ocular Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD) With Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03298815
Enrollment
15
Registered
2017-10-02
Start date
2019-12-20
Completion date
2023-02-24
Last updated
2025-04-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ocular Graft Versus Host Disease

Brief summary

A Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study for the Treatment of Ocular Chronic Graft Verses Host Disease with Processed Amniotic Fluid (pAF) Drops.

Detailed description

This is a randomized (to each eye, within patient), double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of Processed Amniotic Fluid (pAF) in patients with hematologic malignancies who have undergone Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) and are diagnosed with Chronic Graft Verses Host Disease of the eye.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALAmniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED)

One drop (0.25 mL) in one eye twice daily for up to 3 months

OTHERSaline Solution

One drop (0.25 mL) in the other eye twice daily for up to 3 months

Sponsors

University of Utah
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed within 5 years after hematopoietic stem cell transplant for any disease, with any graft and any conditioning regimen with at least one of the following symptoms: 1. Dry eye symptoms partially affecting (requiring lubricant drops \> 3 x per day or punctal plugs, or thermally cauterized puncta) or significantly affecting (special eyeware to relieve pain) activities of daily living (ADL) 2. Unable to work because of ocular symptoms 3. Loss of vision due to keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS) * Patients may be using bilateral scleral lenses and/or bilateral punctal plugs at the time of accrual. * Patients who are 18 years of age or older. * Willing and able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who have any other reversible cause for dry eye at the time of accrual. * More than 3 lines of therapy beyond corticosteroids with or without calcineurin inhibitors or sirolimus * Relapsed malignancy at time of accrual after the most recent transplantation * A difference in dryness between both eyes of more than 2 points of the grading provided by the International Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) 2007 report * Patients who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant while participating in the study. * Patients who are not willing to discontinue the use of any eye drops, with the exception of non-medicated lubricant eye drops (artificial tears). All eye drops (excluding non-medicated lubricant eye drops) must be stopped at least seven days before treatment with pAF. * Inability to comply with the investigational plan and visit schedule for any reason, in the judgement of the investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Response Rate30 daysResponse is a composite of the NIH Consensus Conference (CC) for assessment of response in chronic GVHD (eye score) and the International Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) grading scale. Responders would be defined as a one point improvement in the dry eye grading scale (DEWS), without worsening in the eye score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: General (FACT-G) From Baseline to 60 Daysbaseline and 60 daysChange in Quality of Life questionnaire from baseline to 60 days. FACT-G is a combination score of physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. The score ranges from 0 to 108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: General (FACT-G) From Baseline to 100 Daysbaseline and 100 daysChange in Quality of Life questionnaire from baseline to 100 days. FACT-G is a combination score of physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. The score ranges from 0 to 108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Change in National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Criteria (CC) Ocular Score of Chronic GVHD From Baseline to 30 Daysbaseline and 30 daysChange in ocular score using a four-point scale from 0 (no dry eye symptoms) to 3 (severe dry eye symptoms) from baseline to 30 days.
Change in National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Criteria (CC) Ocular Score of Chronic GVHD From Baseline to 60 Daysbaseline and 60 daysChange in ocular score using a four-point scale from 0 (no dry eye symptoms) to 3 (severe dry eye symptoms).
Change in National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Criteria (CC) Ocular Score of Chronic GVHD From Baseline to 100 Daysbaseline and 100 daysChange in ocular score using a four-point scale from 0 (no dry eye symptoms) to 3 (severe dry eye symptoms).
Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: General (FACT-G) From Baseline to 30 Daysbaseline and 30 daysChange in Quality of Life questionnaire from baseline to 30 days. FACT-G is a combination score of physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. The score ranges from 0 to 108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.
Change in Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) 2007 Dry Eye Severity Grading From Baseline and 60 Daysbaseline and 60 daysOphthalmologic assessment to determine changes in dry eye signs/symptoms each graded on a scale of 1 to 4 with 1 being non/mild to 4 being most severe for a total score.
Change in Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) 2007 Dry Eye Severity Grading From Baseline and 100 Daysbaseline and 100 daysOphthalmologic assessment to determine changes in dry eye signs/symptoms each graded on a scale of 1 to 4 with 1 being non/mild to 4 being most severe for a total score.
Change in Pain Assessment From Baseline to 60 Daysbaseline and 60 daysChange in patient reported pain level per treatment eye using 0-10 pain rating scale with zero being no pain to 10 being very severe pain. Each individual pain score was used to estimate a regression slope for each eye with pain as the outcome and day of pAF treatments as the explanatory variable.
Changes in Visual Acuitybaseline, 30 days, 60 days, and 100 daysOphthalmologic assessment to determine changes in visual acuity related to the administration of pAF.
Effects on the Corneal SurfaceUp to 100 daysOphthalmologic assessment to determine the effects of treatment with pAF on the corneal surface of patients with ocular chronic GVHD.
Change in Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) 2007 Dry Eye Severity Grading From Baseline to 30 Daysbaseline and 30 daysOphthalmologic assessment to determine changes in dry eye signs/symptoms each graded on a scale of 1 to 4 with 1 being non/mild to 4 being most severe for a total score.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
Subjects received both Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops and Saline Solution. Each were randomized to one eye. Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED): One drop (0.25 mL) in one eye twice daily for up to 3 months Saline Solution: One drop (0.25 mL) in the other eye twice daily for up to 3 months
15
Total15

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Continuous61 years
Baseline Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) Score88 units on a scale
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants
Subject wears contacts (scleral lenses)6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 151 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Response Rate

Response is a composite of the NIH Consensus Conference (CC) for assessment of response in chronic GVHD (eye score) and the International Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) grading scale. Responders would be defined as a one point improvement in the dry eye grading scale (DEWS), without worsening in the eye score.

Time frame: 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeOverall Response Rate3 eyes
Saline Solution - All Participants, One EyeOverall Response Rate6 eyes
p-value: 0.375McNemar
Secondary

Change in Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) 2007 Dry Eye Severity Grading From Baseline and 100 Days

Ophthalmologic assessment to determine changes in dry eye signs/symptoms each graded on a scale of 1 to 4 with 1 being non/mild to 4 being most severe for a total score.

Time frame: baseline and 100 days

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChange in Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) 2007 Dry Eye Severity Grading From Baseline and 100 DaysBetter results for pAF eye vs Placebo eye1 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChange in Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) 2007 Dry Eye Severity Grading From Baseline and 100 DaysBetter results for Placebo eye vs pAF eye5 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChange in Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) 2007 Dry Eye Severity Grading From Baseline and 100 DaysSame Directional Results for Both Eyes7 Participants
p-value: 0.156Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change in Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) 2007 Dry Eye Severity Grading From Baseline and 60 Days

Ophthalmologic assessment to determine changes in dry eye signs/symptoms each graded on a scale of 1 to 4 with 1 being non/mild to 4 being most severe for a total score.

Time frame: baseline and 60 days

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChange in Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) 2007 Dry Eye Severity Grading From Baseline and 60 DaysBetter results for pAF eye vs Placebo eye0 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChange in Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) 2007 Dry Eye Severity Grading From Baseline and 60 DaysBetter results for Placebo eye vs pAF eye8 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChange in Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) 2007 Dry Eye Severity Grading From Baseline and 60 DaysSame Directional Results for Both eyes6 Participants
p-value: 0.008Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change in Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) 2007 Dry Eye Severity Grading From Baseline to 30 Days

Ophthalmologic assessment to determine changes in dry eye signs/symptoms each graded on a scale of 1 to 4 with 1 being non/mild to 4 being most severe for a total score.

Time frame: baseline and 30 days

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChange in Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) 2007 Dry Eye Severity Grading From Baseline to 30 DaysBetter results for pAF eye vs Placebo eye3 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChange in Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) 2007 Dry Eye Severity Grading From Baseline to 30 DaysBetter results for Placebo eye vs pAF eye5 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChange in Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS) 2007 Dry Eye Severity Grading From Baseline to 30 DaysSame Directional Results for Both Eyes5 Participants
p-value: 0.563Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: General (FACT-G) From Baseline to 100 Days

Change in Quality of Life questionnaire from baseline to 100 days. FACT-G is a combination score of physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. The score ranges from 0 to 108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.

Time frame: baseline and 100 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChange in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: General (FACT-G) From Baseline to 100 Days3.0 score on a scale
p-value: 0.445Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: General (FACT-G) From Baseline to 30 Days

Change in Quality of Life questionnaire from baseline to 30 days. FACT-G is a combination score of physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. The score ranges from 0 to 108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.

Time frame: baseline and 30 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChange in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: General (FACT-G) From Baseline to 30 Days-1 Change in score on a scale
p-value: 0.391Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: General (FACT-G) From Baseline to 60 Days

Change in Quality of Life questionnaire from baseline to 60 days. FACT-G is a combination score of physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being. The score ranges from 0 to 108. The higher the score, the better the quality of life.

Time frame: baseline and 60 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChange in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: General (FACT-G) From Baseline to 60 Days2.8 score on a scale
p-value: 0.267Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change in National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Criteria (CC) Ocular Score of Chronic GVHD From Baseline to 100 Days

Change in ocular score using a four-point scale from 0 (no dry eye symptoms) to 3 (severe dry eye symptoms).

Time frame: baseline and 100 days

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChange in National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Criteria (CC) Ocular Score of Chronic GVHD From Baseline to 100 DaysBetter results for pAF eye vs Placeob eye2 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChange in National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Criteria (CC) Ocular Score of Chronic GVHD From Baseline to 100 DaysBetter results for Placebo eye vs pAF eye0 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChange in National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Criteria (CC) Ocular Score of Chronic GVHD From Baseline to 100 DaysSame Directional Results for Both Eyes13 Participants
p-value: 0.5Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change in National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Criteria (CC) Ocular Score of Chronic GVHD From Baseline to 30 Days

Change in ocular score using a four-point scale from 0 (no dry eye symptoms) to 3 (severe dry eye symptoms) from baseline to 30 days.

Time frame: baseline and 30 days

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChange in National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Criteria (CC) Ocular Score of Chronic GVHD From Baseline to 30 DaysBetter results for pAF eye vs Placebo eye3 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChange in National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Criteria (CC) Ocular Score of Chronic GVHD From Baseline to 30 DaysBetter results for Placebo eye vs pAF eye0 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChange in National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Criteria (CC) Ocular Score of Chronic GVHD From Baseline to 30 DaysSame Directional Results for Both Eyes10 Participants
p-value: 0.25Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change in National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Criteria (CC) Ocular Score of Chronic GVHD From Baseline to 60 Days

Change in ocular score using a four-point scale from 0 (no dry eye symptoms) to 3 (severe dry eye symptoms).

Time frame: baseline and 60 days

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChange in National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Criteria (CC) Ocular Score of Chronic GVHD From Baseline to 60 DaysBetter results for pAF eye vs. Placebo eye1 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChange in National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Criteria (CC) Ocular Score of Chronic GVHD From Baseline to 60 DaysBetter results for Placebo eye vs pAF eye0 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChange in National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Criteria (CC) Ocular Score of Chronic GVHD From Baseline to 60 DaysSame Directional Results for Both Eyes14 Participants
p-value: <1Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Change in Pain Assessment From Baseline to 60 Days

Change in patient reported pain level per treatment eye using 0-10 pain rating scale with zero being no pain to 10 being very severe pain. Each individual pain score was used to estimate a regression slope for each eye with pain as the outcome and day of pAF treatments as the explanatory variable.

Time frame: baseline and 60 days

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChange in Pain Assessment From Baseline to 60 Days-0.004 regression slope
Saline Solution - All Participants, One EyeChange in Pain Assessment From Baseline to 60 Days-0.010 regression slope
p-value: 0.208Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Changes in Visual Acuity

Ophthalmologic assessment to determine changes in visual acuity related to the administration of pAF.

Time frame: baseline, 30 days, 60 days, and 100 days

Population: One participant at the 30 day and 100 day visit did not complete visual acuity assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChanges in Visual AcuityChange from baseline to 30 daysBetter results for pAF eye vs Placebo eye5 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChanges in Visual AcuityChange from baseline to 30 daysBetter results for Placebo eye vs pAF eye2 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChanges in Visual AcuityChange from baseline to 30 daysSame directional results for both eyes6 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChanges in Visual AcuityChange from baseline to 60 daysBetter results for pAF eye vs Placebo eye2 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChanges in Visual AcuityChange from baseline to 60 daysBetter results for Placebo eye vs pAF eye5 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChanges in Visual AcuityChange from baseline to 60 daysSame directional results for both eyes7 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChanges in Visual AcuityChange from baseline to 100 daysBetter results for pAF eye vs Placebo eye3 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChanges in Visual AcuityChange from baseline to 100 daysBetter results for Placebo eye vs pAF eye2 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeChanges in Visual AcuityChange from baseline to 100 daysSame directional results for both eyes8 Participants
p-value: 0.594Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.469Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.75Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Effects on the Corneal Surface

Ophthalmologic assessment to determine the effects of treatment with pAF on the corneal surface of patients with ocular chronic GVHD.

Time frame: Up to 100 days

Population: A participant missed the 30 day visit and another missed the 100 day visit.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeEffects on the Corneal Surface30 day visitBetter results for Placebo eye vs pAF eye7 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeEffects on the Corneal Surface30 day visitSame directional results for both eyes5 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeEffects on the Corneal Surface30 day visitBetter results for pAF eye vs Placebo eye1 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeEffects on the Corneal Surface60 day visitBetter results for pAF eye vs Placebo eye3 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeEffects on the Corneal Surface60 day visitBetter results for Placebo eye vs pAF eye4 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeEffects on the Corneal Surface60 day visitSame directional results for both eyes7 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeEffects on the Corneal Surface100 day visitBetter results for pAF eye vs Placebo eye0 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeEffects on the Corneal Surface100 day visitBetter results for Placebo eye vs pAF eye3 Participants
Amniotic Fluid Eye Drops (AFED) - All Participants, One EyeEffects on the Corneal Surface100 day visitSame directional results for both eyes10 Participants
p-value: 0.063Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: <1Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.25Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026