Skip to content

Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients at Risk for Interstitial Lung Disease

Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients at Risk for Interstitial Lung Disease

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03297775
Acronym
RAPID
Enrollment
750
Registered
2017-09-29
Start date
2017-06-22
Completion date
2027-06-01
Last updated
2026-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Interstitial Lung Disease, Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Rheumatoid Arthritis, RA, Interstitial Lung Disease, ILD, lung disease, connective tissue disease, CTD, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, IPF, airways disease

Brief summary

The overall goal of this study is to define the phenotype of Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD), and identify factors that predict radiologic progression in those with subclinical RA-ILD, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The investigators hypothesize that there are common core elements (e.g. clinical features, genetic variants, and/or biologic markers) between other forms of ILD (e.g. idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, IPF) and subclinical RA-ILD that places individuals at risk for the development of lung disease.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University of Colorado, Denver
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. ≥ 45years old 2. Diagnosis of RA using the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria

Exclusion criteria

1. Inability to give informed consent 2. Pregnant women 3. History of interstitial lung disease 4. Evidence of other causes of diffuse parenchymal lung disease such as infection, drug toxicity, other autoimmune processes, etc. 5. Subjects over the age of 90 years old or less than 45 years old

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Presence of interstitial lung disease on high resolution CT (HRCT) chest imaging3-5 yearsHRCT scans of the chest will be interpreted by two radiologists and the presence or absence of interstitial lung abnormality will be recorded. When present, abnormalities will be categorized as absent, equivocal, non-fibrotic, or fibrotic, and the extent of any reticular abnormalities will be graded on an 11-point scale (0, 1-10%, 11-20%, etc.). Additionally, the presence or absence of airway disease, centrilobular thickening, mosaic attenuation, and air trapping will be recorded.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression of lung disease over time3-5 YearsRadiologic progression of lung disease will be determined through a comparison of baseline HRCT chest findings to follow-up HRCT chest findings at the 3-5 year follow-up benchmark. Similar to baseline, follow-up HRCT scans of the chest will be interpreted by 2 different radiologists. Quantitative radiologic progression will be defined as ≥ 10% increase in fibrotic changes from baseline to follow-up - additionally, the percent reticular change, percent honeycomb change, and percent traction bronchiectasis on the follow-up scan will be quantified and recorded. Radiologic findings of progression will be used in correlation with other clinical features to determine the clinical relevance of the change. The clinical features include - change in cough, change in dyspnea (as measured by UCSD shortness of breath questionnaire), change in FVC percent predicted value, the development of established RA-ILD, or respiratory-related death, over the same time period.
Impact of subclinical RA-ILD on health-related quality of life in RA3-5 YearsThe impact of subclinical RA-ILD on health-related quality of life will be measured using subjective patient questionnaires that will be completed at both baseline and follow-up. These questionnaires include - SF-36, St. George Respiratory Questionnaire, and Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire.
Outcome of airways disease3-5 YearsClinical outcomes will be measured through respiratory assessment (physical exam), changes is dyspnea (based on the University of California San Diego shortness of breath questionnaire), changes in FVC percent predicted values (based on pulmonary function testing), increase in cough (determined using a visual analog scale, where 10 is the worst cough and 0 is no cough), and development of RA-ILD requiring treatment.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTHaylie A Lengel
haylie.lengel@cuanschutz.edu970-376-8303
CONTACTJoyce S Lee, MD
joyce.lee@ucdenver.edu303-724-6109
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJoyce S Lee, MD

University of Colorado, Denver

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 2, 2026