Skip to content

Effects of Positive End-expiratory Pressure on Intracranial Pressure in Patients With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Doctor of Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Zhoupu Hospital Affiliated With Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai 201318, PR China

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03296293
Acronym
PEEP,ICP,CVP
Enrollment
38
Registered
2017-09-28
Start date
2016-08-01
Completion date
2017-08-01
Last updated
2017-10-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mechanical Ventilation Complication, Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

Positive end-expiratory pressure(PEEP), intracranial pressure(ICP), central venous pressure(CVP), intracranial central venous pressure difference(IVPD)

Brief summary

The impact of PEEP on ICP was dependent on the difference between elevated CVP levels and baseline ICP levels. ICP would increase once elevated CVP through PEEP adjustment exceeds the baseline ICP.

Detailed description

all patients were exposed to incremental PEEP levels of 0, 5, 10, and 15cmH2O with 100% of FiO2. The measurements were done bedside on stabilized hemodynamics and intracranial pressure. The measurement was discontinued if the following situation presented and remedies were applied accordingly: (1) CPP \< 60 mmHg (norepinephrine at 0.3\ 1.0μg/kg.min was used); (2) ICP \> 25 mmHg (PEEP was restored to 0); (3) increase of pressure plateau \> 35 cmH2O (tidal volume was decreased and PetCO2 was maintained at 30\ 35mmHg); (4) SpO2 \< 90% (PEEP was restored to 0); and (5) suspicion of pneumothorax (PEEP was restored to 0 and chest radiography was performed). An equilibration period (at least 90 seconds) was entailed to ensure a normalized baseline PetCO2 through modulating tidal volume and respiratory rate. ICP, CVP, Pj, and MAP were measured twice or more at each level of PEEP for consecutively five days after admission. CPP was calculated according to the following equation: CPP=MAP-ICP. The difference between baseline ICP and CVP was categorized into the following three groups according to the previous findings: Group I,IVPD ≤ 3mmHg, Group II, 3 \< IVPD ≤ 6 mmHg, Group III, IVPD \> 6 mmHg. Relationships between PEEP and ICP, CVP and MAP, CVP and Pj were analyzed in each group respectively.

Interventions

OTHERPEEP at 5cmH2O

Effect of PEEP at 5cmH2O on ICP

OTHERPEEP at 10cmH2O

Effect of PEEP at 10cmH2O on ICP

OTHERPEEP at 15cmH2O

Effect of PEEP at 15cmH2O on ICP

Sponsors

Hongpeng Li
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients diagnosed with sTBI (GCS≤8) and applied with MV were initially included.

Exclusion criteria

* Brain death * Younger than 18 or older than 80 years * Pregnancy * Hemodynamic instability:for example heart rate \>120 bpm or CPP \<60 mmHg * Bulbous lung or pneumothorax * Myocardial infarction * Refusal of consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on intracranial pressure in patients with severe traumatic brain injuryup to 12 monthsThe impact of PEEP on ICP was dependent on the difference between elevated CVP levels and baseline ICP levels. ICP would increase once elevated CVP through PEEP adjustment exceeds the baseline ICP.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026