Skip to content

Local Bisphosphonate Effect on Recurrence Rate in Extremity Giant Cell Tumor of Bone

Local Bisphosphonate Effect on Recurrence Rate in Extremity Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03295981
Enrollment
120
Registered
2017-09-28
Start date
2018-05-03
Completion date
2028-01-01
Last updated
2026-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Giant Cell Tumor of Bone

Brief summary

The purpose of the clinical study is to investigate whether the local delivery of bisphosphonate as a surgical adjuvant can decrease the chance of a giant cell tumor of bone coming back to the same location. The hypothesis is that the local administration of bisphosphonate will decrease the rate of the tumor returning compared to traditional aggressive surgical removal of the tumor.

Detailed description

The purpose of the clinical study is to investigate whether the local delivery of bisphosphonate (BP-loaded PMMA bone cement) as a surgical adjuvant can decrease the local recurrence rate of giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone. The investigators will evaluate whether bisphosphonate as a surgical adjuvant improves secondary outcomes, such as pain, function, fever, or wound complications. The hypothesis is that the local administration of bisphosphonate will decrease the recurrence rate of GCT compared to traditional aggressive intralesional curettage.

Interventions

DRUGZoledronic Acid

4 mg of zoledronic acid (Zometa) will be added to each bag of bone cement

Sponsors

St. Louis University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Orthopedic Research and Education Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Allegheny Singer Research Institute (also known as Allegheny Health Network Research Institute)
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Iowa
CollaboratorOTHER
Johns Hopkins University
CollaboratorOTHER
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
CollaboratorOTHER
The Cleveland Clinic
CollaboratorOTHER
Wake Forest University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Kansas
CollaboratorOTHER
Indiana University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Oklahoma
CollaboratorOTHER
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Boston Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
CollaboratorOTHER
Massachusetts General Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Washington
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Primary benign GCT of bone * Lesion located in an extremity * Lesion amenable to reconstruction (intralesional curettage) defined as having at least one intact column of bone after removal * No previous systemic bisphosphonate or denosumab therapy

Exclusion criteria

* Recurrent GCT of bone * Non-extremity location * Lesion too extensive for intralesional treatment, either due to bone loss, joint invasion, or large soft tissue component * Children and pregnancy * Previous systemic bisphosphonate or denosumab therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The endpoint for patient participation will be local recurrenceFollowed for 2 years postoperatively for study end pointsLocal recurrence of giant cell tumor of bone

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MSTS ScoreFollowed for 2 years postoperatively for study end pointsThe Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system is a validated and well-accepted functional scoring system used in orthopaedic oncology research
Surgical site infectionFollow-ups will consist of clinical visits. The clinical visits will be at 2 weeks postoperatively, 6 weeks postoperatively, and then every three months for the first two years after surgery.The surgical site will be assessed for a surgical site infection (SSI) as defined by CDC guidelines after surgery and during scheduled follow-up as outlined in time frame below.
Wound healingFollow-ups will consist of clinical visits. The clinical visits will be at 2 weeks postoperatively, 6 weeks postoperatively, and then every three months for the first two years after surgery.The surgical site will be assessed after surgery and during scheduled follow-up as outlined in time frame below for wound healing issues/concerns.
Potential bisphosphonate complications related to systemic administrationFollowed for 2 years postoperatively for study end pointsPatients will be followed for atypical femur fractures and avascular necrosis (AVN) of jaw

Countries

Canada, India, United States

Contacts

CONTACTAllison Gruender, RN
allison.gruender@health.slu.edu314-617-3406
CONTACTMarsha Steffen, RN
marsha.steffen@slucare.ssmhealth.com314-617-3410

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 23, 2026