Skip to content

Comparison of Two Pulmonary Vein Ablation Techniques for Persistent AF

Investigator Initiated Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Radiofrequency Ablation Strategies in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03295422
Enrollment
100
Registered
2017-09-27
Start date
2017-08-25
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2020-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, Radiofrequency ablation, Catheter ablation

Brief summary

Investigator initiated, randomized controlled trial of two radiofrequency (RF)ablation protocols currently performed in the electrophysiology lab, but have not been studied prospectively to identify which, if either technique, is superior for individuals with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Two-hundred subjects will be consecutively enrolled and randomized to either pulmonary vein isolation only or pulmonary vein isolation plus posterior left atrial wall isolation

Detailed description

Atrial fibrillation, the most common type of cardiac arrhythmia in clinical practice, affects approximately 2.7 million U.S. adults. Percutaneous catheter ablation is an effective treatment option for individuals with persistent AF. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has emerged as the gold standard for paroxysmal AF with excellent success rates, however, individuals with persistent AF procedural efficacy from pulmonary vein isolation is not optimal. Therefore, improved ablation strategies for these individuals are needed. This randomized controlled trial will compare two radiofrequency ablation strategies, PVI alone and pulmonary vein isolation plus left posterior atrial wall (LPAW) isolation in individuals with persistent AF. Both strategies are currently used to treat persistent AF, but no randomized controlled trial ahs been conducted to investigate which strategy is more efficacious. Two-hundred subjects will be randomized into groups of 50 to undergo a radiofrequency ablation procedure for AF. For group 1, a series of radiofrequency applications will be delivered around both sets of pulmonary veins. For group 2, a series of radiofrequency applications will be delivered around both sets of pulmonary veins and along a roof and low posterior line of the left atrial wall. All subjects will be followed at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post ablation. If indicated, antiarrhythmic drugs will be discontinued. For the first month, subjects will receive a continuously recording electrocardiogram heart card to monitor for AF, and then two-week ambulatory monitors at 3 months and one year post ablation.

Interventions

PROCEDURERF ablation PVI alone

A series of RF applications will be delivered around both sets of pulmonary veins with complete entry and exit block obtained around the antrums of all 4 pulmonary veins.

PROCEDURERF ablation PVI plus LPAW

A series of RF applications will be delivered around both sets of pulmonary veins with complete entry and exit block obtained around the antrums of all 4 pulmonary veins. In addition, a roof and posterior line will be placed in the left atrium to achieve entrance and exit block on the posterior wall. Entry block will be confirmed by placing a circular mapping catheter in multiple locations along the posterior wall and confirming lack of presence of any local potentials. Exit block will be confirmed on the posterior wall with pacing at 10 amps from the ablation catheter at multiple locations within the box as well as all lines.

Sponsors

Sequoia Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Have symptomatic persistent AF (i.e., a sustained episode lasting more than 7 days). 2. Refractory to at least one antiarrhythmic agent. 3. Undergoing ablation for the first time.

Exclusion criteria

1. Paroxysmal AF 2. Sustained atrial fibrillation lasting more than 3 years 3. Left atrial diameter of 60 mm or greater

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
1-year freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias1 YearThe primary hypotheses that PVI+PI will lead to a greater percentage of patients free from atrial arrhythmias after single ablation procedures than PVI alone.

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactChristopher E Woods, MD, PhD
WoodC@sutterhealth.org650-652-8600
Backup ContactAnn Campbell, RN, MBA
ann.campbell@dignityhealth.org650-367-5950

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026