Skip to content

Comparing Two Techniques of Haemostasis After Cervical Conization

Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Techniques of Haemostasis After Cervical Conization With High Frequency Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03293628
Enrollment
100
Registered
2017-09-26
Start date
2014-10-01
Completion date
2016-01-30
Last updated
2017-09-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Cervix Neoplasm

Keywords

cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, haemostasis, vaginal pack, Loop electrical excision procedure, randomized clinical trials, uterine cervical neoplasm

Brief summary

The LEEP conization is commonly used for cervical pathologies treatment. The techniques for hemostasis usually used are: cautery, Monsel's solution and vaginal pack. Actually, there is no consensus about the best technique and there is not much information that validates the use of some of that. To compare the use or not of vaginal pack as methods of hemostasis after LEEP conization for management of cervical lesions.

Detailed description

A randomized clinical trial was conducted at Gynecology Oncology Department/Barretos Cancer Hospital for patients with indication of LEEP conization. After local IRB approval, patients were allocated in two arms (50 patients each): without vaginal pack (group 1 - GP1) and with vaginal pack (group 2 - GP2). The Monsel's solution was used in all patients. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes will be evaluated: operative time, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding, hormonal status, age, parity and cone specimens' characteristics as well as short-term outcome were recorded and compared using Chi-square test, Fisher exact test and t-test where appropriate.

Interventions

This study will evaluate the role of vaginal packing after cervical conization as haemostasis technique

Sponsors

Barretos Cancer Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

The allocation of patients to one group or another was only known moments before the surgical procedure was started.

Intervention model description

Patients were allocated in two arms (50 patients each): without vaginal pack (group 1 - GP1) and with vaginal pack (group 2 - GP2).Randomization was generated through a computer program creating a random entry list in the study, separating in group 1 (local application of Monsel's solution without intra-vaginal gauze buffer) and group 2 (application of Monsel's solution with intra-vaginal gauze). In this way, all patients had an equal chance of being included in both groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
19 Years to 68 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Indication of cervical conization.

Exclusion criteria

* We excluded patients who were not treated by our department physicians or if the patient did not return for follow-up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vaginal bleeding until 30 days after surgeryUntil 30 days after surgeryBleeding was assessed by the need for reintervention.

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026