Skip to content

Rehabilitative Trial With tDCS in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Rehabilitative Trial With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03293394
Acronym
tDCS_MND
Enrollment
30
Registered
2017-09-26
Start date
2017-10-02
Completion date
2018-07-01
Last updated
2020-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Keywords

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Motor Neuron Disease, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Brief summary

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a motor neuron disease, which is a group of neurological disorders that selectively affect motor neurons, the cells that control voluntary muscles of the body. The disorder causes muscle weakness and atrophy throughout the body due to the degeneration of the upper and lower motor neurons. Current drugs approved for ALS treatment only modestly slow disease progression. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique, which has been demonstrated to modulate cerebral excitability in several neurodegenerative disorders and modulate intracortical connectivity measures. In this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study, the investigators will evaluate whether a two-weeks' treatment with bilateral motor cortex anodal tDCS and spinal cathodal tDCS can improve symptoms in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and modulate intracortical connectivity, at short and long term.

Detailed description

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a motor neuron disease, which is a group of neurological disorders that selectively affect motor neurons, the cells that control voluntary muscles of the body. The disorder causes muscle weakness and atrophy throughout the body due to the degeneration of the upper and lower motor neurons. Current drugs approved for ALS treatment only modestly slow disease progression. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique, which has been demonstrated to modulate cerebral excitability in several neurodegenerative disorders and modulate intracortical connectivity measures. In this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study, the investigators will evaluate whether a two-weeks' treatment with bilateral motor cortex anodal tDCS and spinal cathodal tDCS can improve symptoms in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and modulate intracortical connectivity, at short and long term. Subjects will be randomized in two groups, one receiving a 10 day (5 days/week for 2 weeks) treatment with anodal bilateral motor cortex tDCS and cathodal spinal tDCS and the other receiving sham stimulation with identical parameters. After the intervention, patients will be reassessed with a clinical and neurophysiological evaluation at 2 weeks, 2 months and 6 months after treatment. Furthermore, blood neurofilaments will be measured at each time point. Clinical evaluation will include the ALSFRS-R, ALSAQ-40, CBI, EQ-5D-5L, muscle strength evaluated with the MRC scale. Neurophysiological evaluation will include measures of intracortical connectivity, evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI-ICF), long interval intracortical inhibition (LICI), short interval intracortical facilitation (SICF).

Interventions

10 sessions of anodal bilateral motor cortex and cathodal spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (5 days/week for 2 weeks)

10 sessions of sham bilateral motor cortex and sham spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (5 days/week for 2 weeks)

Sponsors

Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with a diagnosis of probable, laboratory-supported probable, or definite amyotrophic lateral sclerosis according to the El Escorial revised criteria * Disease duration ≤ 24 months * Disease progression in the past 3 months * Score ≥ 2 at the item swallowing of the ALS Functional Rating Scale Revised * Score ≥ 2 at the item walking of the ALS Functional Rating Scale Revised * Treatment with steady regimen of riluzole for a minimum of 1 month before study entry, and desiring its continuation * Able to give informed consent * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Motor neuron diseases other than ALS * Severe head trauma in the past * History of seizures * History of ischemic stroke or hemorrhage * Pacemaker * Metal implants in the head/neck region * Severe comorbidity * Intake of illegal drugs * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Muscle Strength From BaselineBaseline - 2 weeks - 2 months - 6 monthsA megascore is obtained by summing scores of single muscles (shoulder abductors, elbow flexors and extensors, wrist flexors, thumb opponent, hip flexors, knee flexors and extensors, and ankle dorsiflexors and extensors on both sides) manually evaluated according to the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, which ranges from 0 (no movement) to 5 (normal contraction). The score for each muscle is summed, with scores ranging from 100 (no impairment) to 0 (most severe impairment).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in the ALSFRS-R Score From BaselineBaseline - 2 weeks - 2 months - 6 monthsChange in the ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) score from baseline. The ALSFRS provides a physician-generated estimate of the patient's degree of functional impairment, which can be evaluated serially to objectively assess any response to treatment or progression of disease. The ALSFRS includes ten questions that rate the patients level of functional impairment in performing one of ten common tasks. Each task is rated on a five-point scale from 0 (can't do) to 4 (normal ability). Individual item scores are summed to produce a reported score of between 40 (no impairment) and 0 (severe impairment).
Change of Quality of Life From Baseline: ALSAQ-40 ScaleBaseline - 2 weeks - 2 months - 6 monthsChange of quality of life from baseline evaluated with the ALSAQ-40 scale. The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire (ALSAQ) is a patient self-report health status scale. The ALSAQ is specifically used to measure the subjective well-being of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. There are 40 items/questions with 5 discrete scales: physical mobility (10 items), activities of daily living and independence (10 items), eating and drinking (3 items), communication (7 items), emotional reactions (10 items). Patients are asked to think about the difficulties they may have experienced during the last two weeks (e.g. I have found it difficult to feed myself). Patients are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (Likert scale): never/rarely/sometimes/often/always or cannot do at all. The total ranges from 0 (no impairment) to 160 (severe impairment).
Change of Quality of Life From Baseline: EQ-5D-5L ScaleBaseline - 2 weeks - 2 months - 6 monthsChange of quality of life from baseline evaluated with the EQ-5D-5L scale. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The scale ranges from 5 (no impairment) to 25 (severe impairment).
Change in Short-interval Intracortical Inhibition (SICI) From BaselineBaseline - 2 weeks - 2 months - 6 monthsBy using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), the investigators will evaluate the effects of tDCS on short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) from baseline
Change in Caregiver Burden (CBI)Baseline - 2 weeks - 2 months - 6 monthsChange of quality of life from baseline evaluated with the CBI scale. The CBI scale is 24- item scale designed to assess the experience of caregivers of older people. The multidimensional instrument assesses five domains of burden (time-dependence, developmental, physical, social, and emotional). Items are scored on a 4-point scale, ranging from not at all descriptive to very descriptive. The scale ranges from 0 (no impairment) to 96 (severe impairment).
Change Intracortical Facilitation (ICF) From BaselineBaseline - 2 weeks - 2 month - 6 monthsBy using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), the investigators will evaluate the effects of tDCS on intracortical facilitation (ICF) from baseline
Change of Quality of Life From Baseline: EQ-VAS ScaleBaseline - 2 weeks - 2 months - 6 monthsChange of quality of life from baseline evaluated with the EQ-VAS scale. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflect the patient's own judgement. The scale ranges from 0 (severe impairment) to 100 (no impairment).

Countries

Italy

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Real tDCS
10 days anodal bilateral motor cortex and cathodal spinal tDCS Anodal bilateral motor cortex and cathodal spinal tDCS: 10 sessions of anodal bilateral motor cortex and cathodal spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (5 days/week for 2 weeks)
20
Sham tDCS
10 days sham bilateral motor cortex and sham spinal tDCS Sham bilateral motor cortex and sham spinal tDCS: 10 sessions of sham bilateral motor cortex and sham spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (5 days/week for 2 weeks)
10
Total30

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Follow-up (6 Months)Adverse Event42

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicReal tDCSSham tDCSTotal
Age, Continuous60.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
63.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
61.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
Disease Duration2.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
1.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
2.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
20 Participants10 Participants30 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
20 participants10 participants30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants2 Participants9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants8 Participants21 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 200 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 202 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Muscle Strength From Baseline

A megascore is obtained by summing scores of single muscles (shoulder abductors, elbow flexors and extensors, wrist flexors, thumb opponent, hip flexors, knee flexors and extensors, and ankle dorsiflexors and extensors on both sides) manually evaluated according to the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale, which ranges from 0 (no movement) to 5 (normal contraction). The score for each muscle is summed, with scores ranging from 100 (no impairment) to 0 (most severe impairment).

Time frame: Baseline - 2 weeks - 2 months - 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Real tDCSChange in Muscle Strength From BaselineBaseline74.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Real tDCSChange in Muscle Strength From Baseline2 Weeks76.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Real tDCSChange in Muscle Strength From Baseline2 Months76.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Real tDCSChange in Muscle Strength From Baseline6 Months75.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Sham tDCSChange in Muscle Strength From Baseline6 Months72.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Sham tDCSChange in Muscle Strength From BaselineBaseline74.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Sham tDCSChange in Muscle Strength From Baseline2 Months72.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Sham tDCSChange in Muscle Strength From Baseline2 Weeks74.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
p-value: =0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Caregiver Burden (CBI)

Change of quality of life from baseline evaluated with the CBI scale. The CBI scale is 24- item scale designed to assess the experience of caregivers of older people. The multidimensional instrument assesses five domains of burden (time-dependence, developmental, physical, social, and emotional). Items are scored on a 4-point scale, ranging from not at all descriptive to very descriptive. The scale ranges from 0 (no impairment) to 96 (severe impairment).

Time frame: Baseline - 2 weeks - 2 months - 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Real tDCSChange in Caregiver Burden (CBI)Baseline26.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Real tDCSChange in Caregiver Burden (CBI)2 Weeks21.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Real tDCSChange in Caregiver Burden (CBI)2 Months24.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Real tDCSChange in Caregiver Burden (CBI)6 Months24.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Sham tDCSChange in Caregiver Burden (CBI)6 Months30.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Sham tDCSChange in Caregiver Burden (CBI)Baseline26.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Sham tDCSChange in Caregiver Burden (CBI)2 Months30.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Sham tDCSChange in Caregiver Burden (CBI)2 Weeks30.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.5
p-value: 0.003ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Short-interval Intracortical Inhibition (SICI) From Baseline

By using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), the investigators will evaluate the effects of tDCS on short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) from baseline

Time frame: Baseline - 2 weeks - 2 months - 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Real tDCSChange in Short-interval Intracortical Inhibition (SICI) From Baseline2 Months0.5 millivoltsStandard Deviation 0.1
Real tDCSChange in Short-interval Intracortical Inhibition (SICI) From BaselineBaseline1.0 millivoltsStandard Deviation 0.1
Real tDCSChange in Short-interval Intracortical Inhibition (SICI) From Baseline2 weeks0.4 millivoltsStandard Deviation 0.1
Real tDCSChange in Short-interval Intracortical Inhibition (SICI) From Baseline6 Months0.6 millivoltsStandard Deviation 0.1
Sham tDCSChange in Short-interval Intracortical Inhibition (SICI) From Baseline6 Months1.0 millivoltsStandard Deviation 0.1
Sham tDCSChange in Short-interval Intracortical Inhibition (SICI) From Baseline2 Months0.9 millivoltsStandard Deviation 0.1
Sham tDCSChange in Short-interval Intracortical Inhibition (SICI) From Baseline2 weeks1.0 millivoltsStandard Deviation 0.1
Sham tDCSChange in Short-interval Intracortical Inhibition (SICI) From BaselineBaseline1.0 millivoltsStandard Deviation 0.1
p-value: 0.011ANOVA
Secondary

Change in the ALSFRS-R Score From Baseline

Change in the ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) score from baseline. The ALSFRS provides a physician-generated estimate of the patient's degree of functional impairment, which can be evaluated serially to objectively assess any response to treatment or progression of disease. The ALSFRS includes ten questions that rate the patients level of functional impairment in performing one of ten common tasks. Each task is rated on a five-point scale from 0 (can't do) to 4 (normal ability). Individual item scores are summed to produce a reported score of between 40 (no impairment) and 0 (severe impairment).

Time frame: Baseline - 2 weeks - 2 months - 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Real tDCSChange in the ALSFRS-R Score From BaselineBaselin31.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Real tDCSChange in the ALSFRS-R Score From Baseline2 Weeks32.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Real tDCSChange in the ALSFRS-R Score From Baseline2 Months32.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Real tDCSChange in the ALSFRS-R Score From Baseline6 Months30.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Sham tDCSChange in the ALSFRS-R Score From Baseline6 Months29.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Sham tDCSChange in the ALSFRS-R Score From BaselineBaselin31.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Sham tDCSChange in the ALSFRS-R Score From Baseline2 Months30.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Sham tDCSChange in the ALSFRS-R Score From Baseline2 Weeks31.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
p-value: 0.19ANCOVA
Secondary

Change Intracortical Facilitation (ICF) From Baseline

By using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), the investigators will evaluate the effects of tDCS on intracortical facilitation (ICF) from baseline

Time frame: Baseline - 2 weeks - 2 month - 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Real tDCSChange Intracortical Facilitation (ICF) From BaselineBaselin1.8 millivoltsStandard Deviation 0.1
Real tDCSChange Intracortical Facilitation (ICF) From Baseline2 Weeks1.3 millivoltsStandard Deviation 0
Real tDCSChange Intracortical Facilitation (ICF) From Baseline2 Months1.4 millivoltsStandard Deviation 0.1
Real tDCSChange Intracortical Facilitation (ICF) From Baseline6 Months1.6 millivoltsStandard Deviation 0
Sham tDCSChange Intracortical Facilitation (ICF) From Baseline6 Months1.6 millivoltsStandard Deviation 0.1
Sham tDCSChange Intracortical Facilitation (ICF) From BaselineBaselin1.7 millivoltsStandard Deviation 0.1
Sham tDCSChange Intracortical Facilitation (ICF) From Baseline2 Months1.7 millivoltsStandard Deviation 0.1
Sham tDCSChange Intracortical Facilitation (ICF) From Baseline2 Weeks1.7 millivoltsStandard Deviation 0.1
p-value: 0.001ANOVA
Secondary

Change of Quality of Life From Baseline: ALSAQ-40 Scale

Change of quality of life from baseline evaluated with the ALSAQ-40 scale. The Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Assessment Questionnaire (ALSAQ) is a patient self-report health status scale. The ALSAQ is specifically used to measure the subjective well-being of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. There are 40 items/questions with 5 discrete scales: physical mobility (10 items), activities of daily living and independence (10 items), eating and drinking (3 items), communication (7 items), emotional reactions (10 items). Patients are asked to think about the difficulties they may have experienced during the last two weeks (e.g. I have found it difficult to feed myself). Patients are asked to indicate the frequency of each event by selecting one of 5 options (Likert scale): never/rarely/sometimes/often/always or cannot do at all. The total ranges from 0 (no impairment) to 160 (severe impairment).

Time frame: Baseline - 2 weeks - 2 months - 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Real tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: ALSAQ-40 ScaleBaseline45.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Real tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: ALSAQ-40 Scale2 Months38.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Real tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: ALSAQ-40 Scale2 Weeks40.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Real tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: ALSAQ-40 Scale6 Months41.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Sham tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: ALSAQ-40 Scale2 Weeks38.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Sham tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: ALSAQ-40 ScaleBaseline45.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Sham tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: ALSAQ-40 Scale6 Months42.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
Sham tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: ALSAQ-40 Scale2 Months41.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
p-value: 0.652ANCOVA
Secondary

Change of Quality of Life From Baseline: EQ-5D-5L Scale

Change of quality of life from baseline evaluated with the EQ-5D-5L scale. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The scale ranges from 5 (no impairment) to 25 (severe impairment).

Time frame: Baseline - 2 weeks - 2 months - 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Real tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: EQ-5D-5L ScaleBaseline13.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Real tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: EQ-5D-5L Scale2 Months12.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Real tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: EQ-5D-5L Scale2 Weeks12.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Real tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: EQ-5D-5L Scale6 Months13.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Sham tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: EQ-5D-5L Scale2 Weeks13.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Sham tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: EQ-5D-5L ScaleBaseline13.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Sham tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: EQ-5D-5L Scale6 Months14.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Sham tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: EQ-5D-5L Scale2 Months14.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
p-value: 0.19ANCOVA
Secondary

Change of Quality of Life From Baseline: EQ-VAS Scale

Change of quality of life from baseline evaluated with the EQ-VAS scale. The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflect the patient's own judgement. The scale ranges from 0 (severe impairment) to 100 (no impairment).

Time frame: Baseline - 2 weeks - 2 months - 6 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Real tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: EQ-VAS Scale6 Months54.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Real tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: EQ-VAS Scale2 Months53.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Real tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: EQ-VAS Scale2 Weeks56.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Real tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: EQ-VAS ScaleBaseline51.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Sham tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: EQ-VAS Scale6 Months40.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
Sham tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: EQ-VAS ScaleBaseline51.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Sham tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: EQ-VAS Scale2 Weeks46.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.8
Sham tDCSChange of Quality of Life From Baseline: EQ-VAS Scale2 Months42.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
p-value: 0.011ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026