Skip to content

Using Electroencephalography (EEG) and Transcranial Current Stimulation (tCS) to Study and Modulate Cognition Study

Using Electroencephalography (EEG) and Transcranial Current Stimulation (tCS) to Study and Modulate Cognition Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03293316
Enrollment
72
Registered
2017-09-26
Start date
2015-11-30
Completion date
2016-10-31
Last updated
2017-10-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Inter-individual Variability

Keywords

Transcranial electrical stimulation; random noise;, cognitive interventions; electroencephalography;, inter-individual variability; stochastic resonance;

Brief summary

Inter-individual variability in responsiveness to interventions poses great challenges for translational neuroscience, and health care in general. The investigations sought to examine the potential for high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) to modulate sustained attention in a manner that was informed by individual differences in EEG indices.

Detailed description

Inter-individual variability in responsiveness to interventions poses great challenges for translational neuroscience, and health care in general. Reliable and cost- effective screening procedures that can identify individuals who are more likely to benefit from an intervention could have substantial real-world benefits. Here, the investigators sought to examine the potential for high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) to modulate sustained attention in a manner that was informed by individual differences in a well-studied electrocortical marker, spontaneous theta/beta ratio. The investigators hypothesized that individuals with relatively high theta/beta ratios, putatively reflecting suboptimal cortical arousal, would be more likely to benefit from the gains in cortical excitability afforded by tRNS. Seventy-two young healthy adults were administered 1mA, 2mA and sham tRNS in a double-blind, randomised, cross-over manner, while they performed a continuous monitoring paradigm. Electroencephalography was acquired before and after each stimulation condition. This approach may constitute a feasible means of using individual differences in neurophysiology to inform predictions about outcomes from targeted cognitive interventions.

Interventions

The transcranial random noise stimulation was delivered using a StarStim device (Neuroelectrics®, Barcelona, Spain). The electrodes were encased in a pair of saline-soaked sponges (25 cm2 ), and were secured within a Neurolectrics EEG cap over right DLPFC (F4) and right IPL (P4), according to the 10-20 international EEG system. Other details are stated under the 'intervention arm' descriptions.

Sponsors

University of Oxford
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Randomized Double-Blind

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

\- Aged 18-35 years

Exclusion criteria

* Left-handedness * Visual impairment * History of fainting, * History of neurological or psychiatric illness, * Neurological insult * Drug or alcohol abuse * Reporting current use of anti- psychotic or anti-depressant medications

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Electroencephalography4 minutesVoltage readings from the scalp

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sustained Attention performance20 minutesSustained Attention performance was defined as response time variability on a continuous monitoring paradigm

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026