Skip to content

Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Motor Recovery After Stroke

Safety and Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy to Improve Motor Recovery After Stroke

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03292159
Enrollment
6
Registered
2017-09-25
Start date
2018-05-17
Completion date
2018-11-20
Last updated
2021-09-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis

Keywords

stroke, vagus nerve stimulation, upper extremity paresis

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Respiratory-gated Auricular Vagal Afferent Nerve Stimulation (RAVANS) for improving motor recovery after stroke. Subacute stroke patients will receive RAVANS or sham stimulation concurrent with arm motor training during 10 intervention sessions occurring daily for 30 minutes over 2 weeks. The safety and improvements in arm motor function after the intervention will be compared in patients receiving RAVANS to those receiving sham stimulation.

Detailed description

This study will evaluate the safety, feasibility and effectiveness of Respiratory-gated Auricular Vagal Afferent Nerve Stimulation (RAVANS) for improving motor recovery after stroke. Subacute stroke patients will be randomized to RAVANS or sham stimulation groups. Patients will receive RAVANS or sham stimulation concurrent with arm motor training during 10 sessions occurring daily for 30 minutes over 2 weeks. Safety will be compared in patients receiving RAVANS to those receiving sham stimulation. Feasibility will be evaluated by recruitment into the study and retention of enrolled patients. Changes in arm motor function will be compared between RAVANS and sham stimulation groups from baseline to immediately after the intervention period and to function at 3-months after stroke.

Interventions

DEVICEActive RAVANS concurrent with arm motor training

Patient receives non-painful, sensory-level stimulation to the skin of left outer ear, where nerve endings of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve reside, while participating in arm motor training

DEVICEInactive RAVANS concurrent with arm motor training

Patient does not receive stimulation delivered to the skin of left outer ear while participating in arm motor training

Sponsors

Dana Foundation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Supratentorial ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke incurred 4-30 days prior; * Contralesional UL motor impairment defined by NIHSS item 5 score 1 or 2 (scale 0-4); * Age ≥ 18; * Able to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Implanted electronic device (e.g., pacemaker, neurostimulator); * Pregnancy; * Major psychiatric or medical condition that could interfere with study participation; * Medical condition affecting left ear that could interfere with delivering RAVANS (e.g., wound, infection, malignancy, hypoesthesia); * Significant pre-existing disability of stroke-affected UL in activities of daily living due to prior stroke or other medical cause defined by Stroke Impact Scale item 7 (SIS-hand) mean score \< 4 (scale: 0-5); * History of seizure during year before stroke or \> 1 post-stroke seizure; * Significant cognitive or language impairment that would interfere with informed consent or study participation; * Severe dysphagia; * Bradycardia defined as resting heart rate \< 50 bpm; * Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia; * Cardiac conduction disorder (i.e., bundle branch block, heart block, long Q-T syndrome); * History of asystole; * History of recurrent vaso-vagal syncope; * Hypotension defined as blood pressure \< 90/60 mmHg.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Upper extremity motor impairmentBaseline to just after 10 intervention sessions, and baseline to 3 months post-strokeChange in upper extremity subtest of Fugl Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) score

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Upper extremity motor functionBaseline to just after 10 intervention sessions, and baseline to 3 months post-strokeChange in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) score
Grip force controlBaseline to just after 10 intervention sessions, and baseline to 3 months post-strokeChange in accuracy, variability and temporal structure of performance on a grip force control task
Upper extremity disabilityBaseline to 3 months post-strokeChange in hand subtest of Stroke Impact Scale (SIS-hand) score
Mood state, anxiety and depressionBaseline to 3 months post-strokeChange in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026