Skip to content

Comparison Between OFDI and IVUS in PCI Guidance for Biolimus A9 Eluting Stent Implantation

Comparison Between Optical Frequency Domain Imaging and Intravascular Ultrasound in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guidance for Biolimus A9 Eluting Stent Implantation

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03292081
Acronym
MISTIC-1
Enrollment
96
Registered
2017-09-25
Start date
2014-06-12
Completion date
2017-10-25
Last updated
2017-09-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Intracoronary Imaging, Optical Frequency Domain Imaging, Intravascular Ultrasound, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Drug Eluting Stent

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to assess clinical safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using a newer generation drug-eluting stent (DES) in the context of optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) guidance or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance.

Detailed description

Intracoronary imaging techniques provide clinically useful information in the setting of PCI, such as lesion severity, tissue characterization, vessel sizing, and stent optimization. Current evidences suggest potential advantage of intracoronary imaging guidance in reducing the risk of major adverse cardiac events after stent implantation over conventional PCI under angiographic guidance alone. IVUS has been clinically used in two decades and it is known as one of the most dominant intracoronary imaging technique. OFDI is a new light-based intracoronary imaging technology which provides higher image resolution and higher-speed pullback compared to those of IVUS. Given the different properties between ultrasound-based IVUS and light-based OFDI, treatment and clinical impact of these two imaging techniques would be different.

Interventions

DEVICEOFDI

PCI under OFDI guidance

DEVICEIVUS

PCI under IVUS guidance

Sponsors

Fujita Health University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with stable coronary artery disease who have symptoms or myocardial ischemia proven by non-invasive or invasive stress test.

Exclusion criteria

* Renal insufficiency with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<45 mL/min/1.73m2 * Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<30% or history of congestive heart failure * Acute coronary syndrome within 7 days after onset * Considered as inappropriate for drug-eluting stent (DES) use or dual antiplatelet therapy for one year after the index procedure * Life expectancy within one year * Lesion length estimated by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) \>28mm * Chronic total occlusion * Left main stem lesion * Bifurcation requiring side branch balloon dilatation * Severely calcified lesion * Other conditions by which physicians in charge judged inappropriate to enroll the patients because of safety concern.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Minimum lumen area assessed by OFDI8 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Cardiovascular mortality8 months
Target vessel myocardial infarction8 months
Target lesion revascularization8 months
Tissue coverage of stent struts assessed by OFDI8 months
Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA)8 months
Apposition of stent struts assessed by OFDI8 months

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Integrated Backscatter IVUS (IB-IVUS)0 month (pre-procedure)Plaque components including lipid pool, fibrosis, dense fibrosis or calcification
Detectable external elastic lamina (EEL) arc assessed by OFDI0 month (pre-procedure)

Countries

Japan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026