Skip to content

Wedge Implant Narrow Crests: Multi-center Clinical Study

Wedge Implant for Minimally Invasive Treatment of Narrow Crests: a Prospective Multi-center Clinical Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03290729
Enrollment
44
Registered
2017-09-25
Start date
2017-05-15
Completion date
2020-05-15
Last updated
2020-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alveolar Bone Loss

Keywords

wedge implants; atrophic bone

Brief summary

This study was designed as a multicentric prospective clinical trial to assess the clinical, biological and patient's perceived success of new wedge-shaped dental implants inserted in narrow ridges.

Detailed description

Due to the loss of dental elements, the bone crest undergoes a significant remodeling. Bone resorption begins immediately after dental extraction with a 40-60% reduction in horizontal and vertical direction of the alveolar ridge during the first 2 years. The most significant bone loss after tooth extraction occurs within the first 3 months, although modeling and remodeling of the alveoli have a great variability of time: bone structure and organization may not be complete even 24 weeks after dental extraction. It is now known that crestal remodeling is closely related to the disappearance of the bundle bone, which is more representative of the buccal appearance of the alveolus. Its disappearance, especially in thin periodontal biotopes, can lead to significant recessions of hard and soft tissues. Moreover, with a variable percentage, in many patients, crestal resorption continues over time due to a combination of factors involved: anatomical, metabolic and mechanical. Among these, the use of removable total or partial dentures can play an important role in accelerating the resurfacing process. With these premises, it is common to find patients with atrophic crests when processing plans that provide implant support prosthetic rehabilitation. A crestal bone thickness of at least 6 mm in the buco-lingual sense is considered sufficient to safely place a plant with a diameter of 4 mm. But when the width is lower, a variety of procedures and techniques have been proposed in literature that allow recreate the volumes needed for implant placement. Horizontal lifting techniques with bone blocks (autologous, alloplastic, xeno-graft), guided bone regeneration, crest expansion technique have demonstrated a good long-term predictability of the inserted devices. However, some negatives related to these techniques need to be considered, such as increased morbidity for the patient, demand for advanced surgical skills for the operator, increased treatment costs, and increased therapy times. Because of these observations, a new implant design has been proposed for specific use in narrow ridges. Its wedge shape and press-fit insertion make it possible to position it with a minimally invasive preparation of the implant site, performed with ultrasound technique. Therefore, the use of this implant could allow effective and minimally invasive treatment of narrow edentulous crests up to 4 mm, with significant benefits to the patient in terms of morbidity, treatment costs and time. Twelve clinical centers will treat patients with insertion of wedge-shaped implants in thin crests with a specific surgical protocol and clinical outcomes will be collected and analyzed. The chosen medical device will be the Rex Tissue Level implant System. For each implant inserted, the clinical parameters will be recorded up to 5 years after insertion. In addition, intermediate evaluations will be carried out at 1 year and 3 years after installation.

Interventions

PROCEDUREwedge shape implants insertion

Narrow dental implants inserted in narrow ridges

Sponsors

International Piezosurgery Academy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

multicenter single cohort prospective study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. indications for prosthetic rehabilitation supported by implants in the upper or lower arch, based on accurate diagnosis and treatment planning; 2. the bone crest must be completely healed (at least six months after the tooth loss); 3. residual bone ridge width between 3.5 and 5 mm, at least 3 mm in apical direction; 4. presence of at least 10 mm bone height available for implant placement; 5. age of the patient\> 18 years; 6. The patient must not carry any removable prosthesis on the treated area; 7. the patient must be able to follow the protocol of study; 8. informed written consent

Exclusion criteria

1. acute myocardial infarction over the last 2 months; 2. uncontrolled coagulation disorders; 3. unmanaged diabetes (HBA1c\> 7.5); 4. radiotherapy to the head area in the last 24 months; 5. immunocompromised, HIV positive or chemotherapy patients over the past 5 years; 6. present or past treatment with intravenous bisphosphonates; 7. psychological or psychiatric problems; 8. abuse of alcohol or drugs; 9. uncontrolled periodontal disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
implant survival rate1 year after surgeryhealth of the inserted implants

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
implant stability 1414 days after surgeryresonance frequence analysis of the implant
implant stability 1 month1 month after surgeryresonance frequence analysis of the implant
implant stability 2 months2 months after surgeryresonance frequence analysis of the implant
implant stability 3 months3 months after surgeryresonance frequence analysis of the implant
implant stability 4 months4 months after surgeryresonance frequence analysis of the implant
surgical procedure evaluationduring surgeryhandling assessment of the implant system by the surgeons
implant stability 6 months6 months after surgeryresonance frequence analysis of the implant
implant stability 1 year1 year after surgeryresonance frequence analysis of the implant
implant stability 3 years3 years after surgeryresonance frequence analysis of the implant
implant stability 5 years5 years after surgeryresonance frequence analysis of the implant
implant stability 5 months5 months after surgeryresonance frequence analysis of the implant

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026