Skip to content

NEUROFEEDBACK on Event-Related Potential (ERP)

Clinical Evaluation of a Brain Computer Interfaces (BCI)-Based Training of Attention in Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03289793
Acronym
MyB
Enrollment
52
Registered
2017-09-21
Start date
2017-02-02
Completion date
2019-09-09
Last updated
2019-10-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity

Keywords

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, ADHD, Children, Inattention, Hyperactivity, Neurofeedback, Neuropsychology

Brief summary

This project aims to assess the evolution of symptoms in ADHD children from 8 to 17 years, with various types of attention training. Different groups A, B and C will be evaluated: the first with Neurofeedback training, the second with a similar training but not indexed on brain activity and the third without training. 30 patients will be randomly assigned to groups A and B according to a ratio 2:1. Others patients who meet the same criteria but for logistical reasons cannot comply with the training constraints will be assigned to group C. Children included in groups A and B will participate in training sessions (Neurofeedback and control training, respectively) as well as in four evaluation sessions. Children in group C will only participate in evaluation sessions (baseline control group). Patients of groups A and B will be followed over 6 months: 4 months of training and a follow-up evaluation 2 months after training. Patients of group C will be followed each 2 months for 6 months. This study uses electro-encephalography measures, serious video game, neuropsychological tests and questionnaires. It also uses actigraphy measures to evaluate sleep quality.

Interventions

Children in group A will receive BCI-based training implemented through original P300-based controlled games. They will attend 30 1-hour long training sessions at a pace of 2 sessions per week. Each session includes: installation of the child, the EEG system and an eye-tracking system, a 5-minutes relaxation phase, a short EEG recording at rest, a brief reminder of the instructions, 30 minutes of training by playing video games and finally a time for the child to wash her/his hair. Moreover, 4 neuropsychological sessions will complement the 30 training sessions. During these sessions neuropsychological tests and quality of life questionnaires will be answered.

OTHERActive Sham control

Children in group B will receive a training that is not based on brain activity, but in a blind fashion. They will attend 30 1-hour long training sessions at a pace of 2 sessions per week. Each session includes: installation of the child, setting up the EEG and eye-tracking systems, a 5-minutes relaxation phase, short EEG recording at rest, a brief reminder of the instructions, 30 minutes of video game based training and finally a time for the child to wash her/his hair. Besides, 4 neuropsychological sessions will complement the 30 training sessions. During these sessions neuropsychological tests and quality of life questionnaires will be performed.

OTHERBaseline control group

The children included in this group will not receive any training. They only take part to the 4 neuropsychological sessions. Like others, they will attend 1 neuropsychological session every two months over six months.

Sponsors

Hospices Civils de Lyon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children and teenagers aged from 8 to 17 years' old * Children and teenagers with a deficit attention disorder with or without hyperactivity, in the mixed form or in a pure inattentive form according to Diagnostique et Statistique des troubles Mentaux (DSM)-V. * Children and teenagers having a score in Verbal Comprehension Index (or Index Verbal Reasoning) and Perceptual Reasoning Index (or Index Reasoning fluid) ≥ 80 of WISC IV or V test, not older than two years. * Children and teenagers without psychostimulant treatment * Children and teenagers with psychostimulant treatment agreed to achieve a therapeutic break at each visit day and with a stable dose during all the study. * Children and teenagers whose parents have agreed and signed informed consent form of the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Children aged less than 8 and teenagers are more than 18 years' old. * Children and teenagers having a score in Verbal Comprehension Index (or Index Verbal Reasoning) and Perceptual Reasoning Index (or Index Reasoning fluid) \< 80 of WISC IV or V test, not older than two years. * Children and teenagers with developmental disorder except Dys disorders. * Children and teenagers with pure hyperactivity (without attentional deficit) * Children and teenagers with epilepsy except benign epilepsies (without brain damage), free of crisis for two years and without treatment. * Children and teenagers with ADHD with conduct disorders and aggression * Children and teenagers with ADHD and Tourette's syndrome. * Patients treated by anti / epilepsy or psychotropic treatments (with the exception of psychostimulant treatment). * Patients with psychostimulant treatment and whose parents aren't agreed to achieve a therapeutic break at each visit day. * Patients with visual deficiency uncorrectable with lenses or glasses.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evaluation of the relative effect on symptoms of inattention between the two proposed training techniques, A and B, with the ADHD Rating Scale in children with ADHDevery two months over six months.Questions with odd numbers interested in the dimension inattentive will particularly be studied. The investigator expect an improvement in the type of score: ''ADHD-Inattentive'' children in group A compared to children in Group B. More specifically, he expect to improve responses to questions number 1,3,5,7,9,11,13,15 and 17. By definition, an evolving response would be to move from 2=Often; 3=Very often to 1=Sometimes; 0=Rarely/Never.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neuropsychological assessments of the effects of the lack of training on the symptoms of inattention in ADHD childrenevery months over six months.Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) will be performed ADHD children from groups A, B and C will be compared
Compare the effects of the two types of trainings on the hyperactivity symptoms in ADHD children using neuropsychological assessments.every two months over six monthsADHD Rating Scale (questions with even numbers), Test d'évaluation de l'Attention (TAP) and Continuous Performance Test (CPT) will be performed ADHD children from groups A, B and C will be compared
neuropsychological assessments of the effects of the two types of trainings on the hyperactivity symptoms in ADHD childrenevery two months over six monthsADHD Rating Scale (questions with even numbers) will be performed ADHD children from groups A, B and C will be compared
neuropsychological assessments of the effects of the lack of training on the impulsivity symptoms in ADHD childrenevery two months over six monthsContinuous Performance Test (CPT) will be performed ADHD children from groups A, B and C will be compared
neuropsychological assessments of the effects of the lack of training on the hyperactivity symptoms in ADHD childrenevery two months over six monthsContinuous Performance Test (CPT) will be performed ADHD children from groups A, B and C will be compared
Quantify whether the changes in inattentive symptoms in groups A (Neurofeedback training) correlate with changes in specific EEG parameter, namely the P300 wave.every two months over six monthsADHD Rating Scale (questions with odd numbers) will be evaluated ADHD children of groups A, B and C will be compared
Quantify whether the changes in inattentive symptoms in groups B (Neurofeedback training) correlate with changes in specific EEG parameter, namely the P300 wave.every two months over six monthsADHD Rating Scale (questions with odd numbers)will be evaluated ADHD children of groups A, B and C will be compared
Quantify whether the changes in inattentive symptoms in groups C (Neurofeedback training) correlate with changes in specific EEG parameter, namely the P300 wave.every two months over six monthsADHD Rating Scale (questions with odd numbers) will be evaluated ADHD children of groups A, B and C will be compared
Neuropsychological assessments of effects of training on the symptoms of inattention in ADHD childrenevery months over six months.ADHD Rating Scale (questions with odd numbers) will be performed ADHD children from groups A, B and C will be compared
Assess whether the classical Neurofeedback biomarkers correlate with the evolution of behavioral and primary neurophysiological measures (P300) in all groups.every two months over six monthsADHD Rating Scale (questions with odd numbers) will be evaluated ADHD children of groups A, B and C will be compared
Quantify the evolution of the classical Neurofeedback biomarkers Theta/Beta Ratio (TBR)every two months over six monthsADHD Rating Scale (questions with odd numbers) will be evaluated ADHD children of groups A, B and C will be compared
Assess whether the classical Neurofeedback biomarkers TBR correlate with the evolution of behavioral and primary neurophysiological measures (P300) in all groups.every two months over six monthsADHD Rating Scale (questions with odd numbers) will be evaluated ADHD children of groups A, B and C will be compared
Quantify the evolution of the classical Neurofeedback biomarkers Sensori-Moteur Rythm (SMR)every two months over six monthsADHD Rating Scale (questions with odd numbers) will be evaluated ADHD children of groups A, B and C will be compared
Assess whether the Neurofeedback biomarkers SMR correlate with the evolution of behavioral and primary neurophysiological measures (P300) in all groups.every two months over six monthsADHD Rating Scale (questions with odd numbers)will be evaluated ADHD children of groups A, B and C will be compared
Evaluate the impact of the trainings on the sleep quality in ADHD children.every two months over six months.Sleep questionnaires will be distributed ADHD children in groups A, B and C will be compared.
Evaluating the impact of the trainings on the quality of life in ADHD children.every two months over six monthsThe Child Behavior CheckList (CBCL) questionnaire will be performed Groups A, B and C will be compared.
Quantify the evolution of the classical Neurofeedback biomarkers Slow Cortical Potential (SCP))every two months over six monthsADHD Rating Scale (questions with odd numbers) will be evaluated ADHD children of groups A, B and C will be compared

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026